航空油料在舱室内燃爆危害的数值分析

杨满江 董张强 胡洋洋 武红梅 刘丽娟

杨满江, 董张强, 胡洋洋, 武红梅, 刘丽娟. 航空油料在舱室内燃爆危害的数值分析[J]. 爆炸与冲击, 2023, 43(4): 045402. doi: 10.11883/bzycj-2022-0240
引用本文: 杨满江, 董张强, 胡洋洋, 武红梅, 刘丽娟. 航空油料在舱室内燃爆危害的数值分析[J]. 爆炸与冲击, 2023, 43(4): 045402. doi: 10.11883/bzycj-2022-0240
YANG Manjiang, DONG Zhangqiang, HU Yangyang, WU Hongmei, LIU Lijuan. Simulation analysis of combustion and explosion hazards of aviation fuel in cabin[J]. Explosion And Shock Waves, 2023, 43(4): 045402. doi: 10.11883/bzycj-2022-0240
Citation: YANG Manjiang, DONG Zhangqiang, HU Yangyang, WU Hongmei, LIU Lijuan. Simulation analysis of combustion and explosion hazards of aviation fuel in cabin[J]. Explosion And Shock Waves, 2023, 43(4): 045402. doi: 10.11883/bzycj-2022-0240

航空油料在舱室内燃爆危害的数值分析

doi: 10.11883/bzycj-2022-0240
基金项目: 国家重点研发计划(2021YFB4000904);中央高校基本科研业务费专项资金(WUT:2022IVA086);湖北省安全生产专项资金科技项目(SJZX20211003)
详细信息
    作者简介:

    杨满江(1982- ),男,博士,高级工程师,20895928@qq.com

    通讯作者:

    刘丽娟(1992- ),女,博士,副教授,lijuan.liu@whut.edu.cn

  • 中图分类号: O383

Simulation analysis of combustion and explosion hazards of aviation fuel in cabin

  • 摘要: 不同舱室结构内航空油料的燃爆参数存在差异,为了解和掌握不同结构舱室内航空油料的燃爆危害性,运用计算流体动力学(computational fluid dynamics,CFD)方法对不同结构航空油料舱室内的航空油料蒸汽燃爆问题进行了数值模拟。结果表明:密闭航空油料舱中的航空油料蒸汽预混燃爆时,油舱各处压力分布较均匀,无隔板密闭舱室和含不完全分割隔板密闭舱室内航空油料的最大燃爆压力分别为0.76、0.74 MPa,即舱室内的不完全分割隔板对航空油料燃爆时所产生的最大压力无显著影响;隔板等特殊结构的存在使舱室内部产生了气流漩涡,增大了燃料消耗的速率,导致火焰面传播速度及压力上升速率增大,舱室内各处燃料的质量分数由火焰面决定。
  • 图  1  航空油料舱的几何模型及数据监测点的布置示意图

    Figure  1.  Geometric model of aviation fuel cabins and layout of data monitoring points

    图  2  燃爆过程中各监测点的压力变化曲线

    Figure  2.  Pressure change curves of each monitoring points during deflagration

    图  3  燃爆过程中各监测点的温度变化曲线

    Figure  3.  Temperature change curve of each monitoring points during deflagration

    图  4  燃爆过程中各监测点的航空油料质量分数变化曲线

    Figure  4.  Change curve of fuel mass fraction at each monitoring points during deflagration

    图  5  无隔板舱室燃爆过程中温度分布的变化过程

    Figure  5.  Temperature distribution change process during the combustion and explosion of the cabin without partition

    图  6  含隔板舱室燃爆过程中温度分布变化过程

    Figure  6.  Temperature distribution change process during the combustion and explosion of the cabin with incomplete partition

  • [1] 贾文林. 煤基喷气燃料和RP-3航空煤油及其混合燃料点火特性研究 [D]. 太原: 中北大学, 2022. DOI: 10.27470/d.cnki.ghbgc.2022.000890.

    JIA W L. Study on ignition characteristics of coal-based jet fuel and RP-3 jet fuel and their blends [D]. Taiyuan: North University of China, 2022. DOI: 10.27470/d.cnki.ghbgc.2022.000890.
    [2] 沈晓波, 鲁长波, 李斌, 等. 液体燃料云雾爆轰参数实验 [J]. 爆炸与冲击, 2012, 32(1): 108–112. DOI: 10.11883/1001-1455(2012)01-0108-05.

    SHEN X B, LU C B, LI B, et al. An experimental study of detonation parameters of liquid fuel drops cloud [J]. Explosion and Shock Waves, 2012, 32(1): 108–112. DOI: 10.11883/1001-1455(2012)01-0108-05.
    [3] NIU Y H, SHI B M, JIANG B Y. Experimental study of overpressure evolution laws and flame propagation characteristics after methane explosion in transversal pipe networks [J]. Applied Thermal Engineering, 2019, 154: 18–23. DOI: 10.1016/j.applthermaleng.2019.03.059.
    [4] SU B, LUO Z M, WANG T, et al. Experimental and numerical evaluations on characteristics of vented methane explosion [J]. Journal of Central South University, 2020, 27(8): 2382–2393. DOI: 10.1007/s11771-020-4456-1.
    [5] LI D, ZHANG Q, MA Q J, et al. Comparison of explosion characteristics between hydrogen/air and methane/air at the stoichiometric concentrations [J]. International Journal of Hydrogen Energy, 2015, 40(28): 8761–8768. DOI: 10.1016/j.ijhydene.2015.05.038.
    [6] LI G Q, ZHENG K, WANG S M, et al. Comparative study on explosion characteristics of hydrogen and gasoline vapor in a semi-confined pipe based on large eddy simulation [J]. Fuel, 2022, 328: 125334. DOI: 10.1016/j.fuel.2022.125334.
    [7] HUANG D, LI W. Heat transfer deterioration of aviation kerosene flowing in mini tubes at supercritical pressures [J]. International Journal of Heat and Mass Transfer, 2017, 111: 266–278. DOI: 10.1016/j.ijheatmasstransfer.2017.03.117.
    [8] 高旭锋, 代萌, 郭士刚, 等. 喷气燃料热氧化安定性测定方法及其影响因素的研究进展 [J]. 石油化工, 2022, 51(7): 857–862. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1000-8144.2022.07.019.

    GAO X F, DAI M, GUO S G, et al. Research progress on determination methods of thermal oxidation stability of jet fuel and its influencing factors [J]. Petrochemical Technology, 2022, 51(7): 857–862. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1000-8144.2022.07.019.
    [9] 李俊, 鲁长波, 安高军, 等. 高闪点喷气燃料最小点火能试验研究 [J]. 消防科学与技术, 2016, 35(11): 1521–1524. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1009-0029.2016.11.006.

    LI J, LU C B, AN G J, et al. Experimental study on the minimum ignition energy of high flashpoint jet fuel [J]. Fire Science and Technology, 2016, 35(11): 1521–1524. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1009-0029.2016.11.006.
    [10] ZHAO Z F, CUI H S. Numerical investigation on combustion processes of an aircraft piston engine fueled with aviation kerosene and gasoline [J]. Energy, 2022, 239: 122264. DOI: 10.1016/j.energy.2021.122264.
    [11] LI M H, ZHOU L, SHU Z Z, et al. Gas-liquid hydrodynamics and vortex motion of flame spread over jet fuel in longitudinal air stream [J]. Experimental Thermal and Fluid Science, 2022, 134: 110601. DOI: 10.1016/j.expthermflusci.2022.110601.
    [12] LEI Z, LU C B, AN G J, et al. Comparative study on combustion and explosion characteristics of high flash point jet fuel [J]. Procedia Engineering, 2014, 84: 377–383. DOI: 10.1016/j.proeng.2014.10.447.
    [13] 李俊, 鲁长波, 安高军, 等. 抑爆高闪点喷气燃料的抑爆特性 [J]. 高压物理学报, 2017, 31(3): 328–334. DOI: 10.11858/gywlxb.2017.03.016.

    LI J, LU C B, AN G J, et al. Explosion suppression characteristics of explosion-suppressive high flash-point jet fuel [J]. Chinese Journal of High Pressure Physics, 2017, 31(3): 328–334. DOI: 10.11858/gywlxb.2017.03.016.
    [14] YANG Z Y, ZENG P, WANG B Y, et al. Ignition characteristics of an alternative kerosene from direct coal liquefaction and its blends with conventional RP-3 jet fuel [J]. Fuel, 2021, 291: 120258. DOI: 10.1016/j.fuel.2021.120258.
    [15] RAZA M, MAO Y B, YU L, et al. Insights into the effects of mechanism reduction on the performance of n-decane and its ability to act as a single-component surrogate for jet fuels [J]. Energy & Fuels, 2019, 33(8): 7778–7790. DOI: 10.1021/acs.energyfuels.9b00971.
    [16] ZHAO L, YANG T, KAISER R I, et al. Combined experimental and computational study on the unimolecular decomposition of JP-8 jet fuel surrogates. Ⅱ: n-dodecane (n-C12H26) [J]. The Journal of Physical Chemistry A, 2017, 121(6): 1281–1297. DOI: 10.1021/acs.jpca.6b11817.
    [17] 霍伟业, 林宇震, 张弛, 等. 正癸烷作为航空煤油雾化过程代理燃料的研究 [J]. 航空动力学报, 2016, 31(1): 188–195. DOI: 10.13224/j.cnki.jasp.2016.01.024.

    HUO W Y, LIN Y Z, ZHANG C, et al. Research on n-decane as surrogate fuel of aviation kerosene in atomization process [J]. Journal of Aerospace Power, 2016, 31(1): 188–195. DOI: 10.13224/j.cnki.jasp.2016.01.024.
    [18] LI Y, WANG Y W, FAN W P, et al. Experiment and simulation of JP-5 vapor/air mixture deflagration in enclosed space [J]. Process Safety and Environmental Protection, 2021, 156: 545–558. DOI: 10.1016/j.psep.2021.10.048.
    [19] FAKANDU B M, MBAM C J, ANDREWS G E, et al. Gas explosion venting: external explosion turbulent flame speeds that control the overpressure [J]. Chemical Engineering Transactions, 2016, 53: 1–6. DOI: 10.3303/CET1653001.
    [20] KINDRACKI J, KOBIERA A, RARATA G, et al. Influence of ignition position and obstacles on explosion development in methane-air mixture in closed vessels [J]. Journal of Loss Prevention in the Process Industries, 2007, 20(4/5/6): 551–561. DOI: 10.1016/j.jlp.2007.05.010.
  • 加载中
图(6)
计量
  • 文章访问数:  388
  • HTML全文浏览量:  72
  • PDF下载量:  153
  • 被引次数: 0
出版历程
  • 收稿日期:  2022-06-02
  • 修回日期:  2022-11-09
  • 网络出版日期:  2022-11-14
  • 刊出日期:  2023-04-05

目录

    /

    返回文章
    返回