Bar diameter effect of minimum loading strain rate in granite impacting tests by SHPB
-
摘要: 基于Steverding-Lehnigk脆性断裂准则，分析了半正弦应力波加载条件下SHPB杆径尺寸与导致花岗岩试样单次冲击破坏对应的最低应变率之间的关系。采用杆径分别为22、36、50和75 mm的SHPB实验系统对相应尺寸规格的花岗岩试样进行了应变率从高到低的冲击实验，讨论了花岗岩试样在单次冲击破坏情形下对应的最低应变率与实验杆径的相关性。理论和实验结果表明：岩石试样的最低加载应变率随着SHPB杆径的增大而以乘方关系减小，但当应变率低到100 s-1量级时，Hopkinson杆径已超过100 mm，增大Hopkinson杆径降低加载应变率的效果不再明显。Abstract: The relationship between elastic bar diameter of split Hopkinson pressure bar(SHPB) systems and the minimum strain rate causing rock failure under once impact with half-sine stress wave loads, is analyzed based on the Steverding-Lehnigk fracture criterion of brittle materials.The tests were carried out at different strain rates from high to low on the SHPB systems with different elastic bar diameters of 22, 36, 50 and 75 mm.Granite was used in these tests, and its size varies with the elastic bar diameter.The variation law of the lowest strain rate with the elastic bar diameter was discussed.The theoretical and experimental results show that the lowest strain rate of rock decreases with the increase of the elastic bar diameter in power relation.However, the bar diameter has already exceeded 100 mm when the strain rate decreases to the order of 10 0 s-1, and the effect of decreasing strain rate by increasing bar diameter turns to be less evident.
-
Key words:
- solid mechanics /
- bar diameter effect /
- SHPB test /
- strain rate
-
图 2 实验中测得不同杆径系列SHPB装置产生的典型入射应变与对应的透射应变值
Figure 2. Typical test results of incident-stain and corresponding transmission-strain curves created by different diameters
图 3 75 mm杆径SHPB实验中不同应变率对应的花岗岩试样典型破裂状态
Figure 3. Typical breakage of granite under different strain rate on 75 mm diameter bar system
图 4 SHPB杆径与导致岩石破裂的最低加载平均应变率关系
Figure 4. Relationship between bar diameter and strain rate lower limit in rock break
表 1 不同杆径条件下能导致岩石试样单次冲击破裂的加载应变率下限
Table 1. Strain rate lower limit in sample break under once impact corresponding to different-diameter bars
D0/mm 试样编号 ρ/(g·cm-3) k ε· /s-1 试样破损状态 22 22-1 2.65 0.59 159 贯通裂纹 22-2 2.65 0.68 121 贯通裂纹 22-3 2.65 0.58 169 贯通裂纹 22-4 2.65 0.57 159 贯通裂纹 36 36-1 2.64 0.56 90 贯通裂纹 36-2 2.63 0.52 85 贯通裂纹 36-3 2.64 0.47 76 碎裂成3块 50 50-1 2.65 0.52 45 碎裂成2块 50-2 2.65 0.51 53 贯通裂纹 50-3 2.65 0.53 63 贯通裂纹 50-4 2.65 0.53 47 贯通裂纹 75 75-1 2.66 0.50 41 碎裂成4块 75-2 2.65 0.49 48 贯通裂纹 
下载: 导出CSV
-
[1] Field J E, Walley S M, Proud W G, et al. Review of experimental techniques for high rate deformation and shock studies[J]. International Journal of Impact Engineering, 2004, 30(7): 725-775. doi: 10.1016/j.ijimpeng.2004.03.005 [2] 李夕兵, 古德生.岩石冲击动力学[M].长沙: 中南工业大学出版社, 1994: 11. [3] Meng H, Li Q M. Correlation between the accuracy of a SHPB test and the stress uniformity based on numerical experiments[J]. International Journal of Impact Engineering, 2003, 28(5): 537-555. doi: 10.1016/S0734-743X(02)00073-8 [4] Frew D J, Forrestal M J, Chen W. A split Hopkinson pressure bar technique to determine compressive stress-strain data for rock materials[J]. Experimental Mechanics, 2001, 41(1): 40-46. doi: 10.1007/BF02323102 [5] Zhu J, Hu S S, Wang L L. An analysis of stress uniformity for concrete-like specimens during SHPB tests[J]. International Journal of Impact Engineering, 2009, 36(1): 61-72. doi: 10.1016/j.ijimpeng.2008.04.007 [6] Li X B, Lok T S, Zhao J. Dynamic characteristics of granite subjected to intermediate loading rate[J]. Rock Mechanics and Rock Engineering, 2005, 38(1): 21-39. doi: 10.1007/s00603-004-0030-7 [7] Perkin R D, Green S J, Friedman M. Uniaxial stress behavior of porphritic to nalite at strain rates to 103 s-1[J]. International Journal of Rock Mechanics and Mining Sciences, 1970, 7(5): 527-535. doi: 10.1016/0148-9062(70)90005-7 [8] Blabton T L. Effect of strain rates from 10-2-10 s-1 in triaxial compression tests on three rocks[J]. International Journal of Rock Mechanics and Mining Sciences, 1981, 18(1): 47-62. doi: 10.1016/0148-9062(81)90265-5 [9] 张学峰, 夏源明.中应变率材料试验机的研制[J].实验力学, 2001, 16(1): 13-18.Zhang Xue-feng, Xia Yuan-ming. Development of material testing apparatus for intermediate strain rate test[J]. Journal of Experimental Mechanics, 2001, 16(1): 13-18. [10] Davies E D H, Hunter S C. The dynamic compression testing of solids by the method of the split Hopkinson bar[J]. Journal of the Mechanics and Physics of Solids, 1963, 11(3): 155-179. doi: 10.1016/0022-5096(63)90050-4 [11] Lok T S, Li X B, Zhao P J, et al. Uniaxial compression tests on granite and its complete stress-strain relationship at high strain rate[C]//Wang S J, Fu B J, Li Z K. Frontiers of Rock Mechanics and Sustainable Development in the 21st Century. Netherlands: Balkema A A, 2001: 85-87. [12] Steverding B, Lehnigk S H. Response of cracks to impact[J]. Journal of Applied Physics, 1970, 41(5): 2096-2099. doi: 10.1063/1.1659170 [13] Steverding B, Lehnigk S H. Collision of stress pulses with obstacles and dynamic of fracture[J]. Journal of Applied Physics, 1971, 42(8): 3231-3238. doi: 10.1063/1.1660713 [14] Steverding B, Lehnigk S H. The fracture penetration depth of stress pulses[J]. International Journal of Rock Mechanics and Mining Sciences, 1976, 13(3): 75-80. doi: 10.1016/0148-9062(76)90423-X [15] 沈明荣, 陈建峰.岩体力学[M].上海: 同济大学出版社, 2006: 55. [16] Hong L, Li X B, Liu X L, et al. Stress uniformity process of specimens in SHPB test under different loading conditions of rectangular and half-sine input waves[J]. Transactions of Tianjin University, 2008, 14(6): 450-456. doi: 10.1007/s12209-008-0077-8 -
点击查看大图
图(4) / 表(1)
计量
- 文章访问数: 2795
- HTML全文浏览量: 362
- PDF下载量: 421
- 被引次数: 0