花岗岩破坏过程能量演化机制与能量屈服准则

王云飞 郑晓娟 焦华喆 陈峰宾 赵洪波

王云飞, 郑晓娟, 焦华喆, 陈峰宾, 赵洪波. 花岗岩破坏过程能量演化机制与能量屈服准则[J]. 爆炸与冲击, 2016, 36(6): 876-882. doi: 10.11883/1001-1455(2016)06-0876-07
引用本文: 王云飞, 郑晓娟, 焦华喆, 陈峰宾, 赵洪波. 花岗岩破坏过程能量演化机制与能量屈服准则[J]. 爆炸与冲击, 2016, 36(6): 876-882. doi: 10.11883/1001-1455(2016)06-0876-07
Wang Yunfei, Zheng Xiaojuan, Jiao Huazhe, Cheng Fengbin, Zhao Hongbo. Energy evolution mechanism and energy yield criterion in granite's failure process[J]. Explosion And Shock Waves, 2016, 36(6): 876-882. doi: 10.11883/1001-1455(2016)06-0876-07
Citation: Wang Yunfei, Zheng Xiaojuan, Jiao Huazhe, Cheng Fengbin, Zhao Hongbo. Energy evolution mechanism and energy yield criterion in granite's failure process[J]. Explosion And Shock Waves, 2016, 36(6): 876-882. doi: 10.11883/1001-1455(2016)06-0876-07

花岗岩破坏过程能量演化机制与能量屈服准则

doi: 10.11883/1001-1455(2016)06-0876-07
基金项目: 

国家自然科学基金项目 51104057

煤炭工业协会科学技术研究计划项目 MTKJ2013-338

河南省教育厅重点项目 13A440323

河南省高校科技创新团队支持计划项目 15IRTSTHN029

详细信息
    作者简介:

    王云飞(1978—),男,博士, wyf_ustb@126.com

  • 中图分类号: O346.4;TU452

Energy evolution mechanism and energy yield criterion in granite's failure process

  • 摘要: 为了明确岩石破坏的能量演化特性,结合单轴实验和颗粒流程序获得花岗岩的细观力学参数,进行不同应力状态的花岗岩实验,研究不同围压下花岗岩破坏过程的能量演化机理并推导能量屈服准则。获得以下主要结论:花岗岩破坏过程中低围压下内部损伤出现较早而高围压较晚,表明低围压花岗岩内部损伤是渐进发展过程,而高围压下内部损伤一旦出现便快速发展破坏;高围压花岗岩峰值前一定应变范围弹性应变能基本保持不变,吸收的能量全部转化为耗散能,表明高围压破坏时花岗岩内部损伤程度严重;弹性应变能经历不断积累并达到弹性储能极限而后减小的变化过程,而弹性储能极限与围压之间存在线性变化规律,因此高围压下岩体开挖卸荷时极易诱发大量弹性应变能的急剧释放,引起围岩失稳甚至发生岩爆;花岗岩峰值破坏时的能量比与围压无关,为一定值;基于能量原理导出了能量屈服准则,该准则包含岩性参数和所有主应力,能够综合反映岩石破坏影响因素。
  • 图  1  平行黏结模型

    Figure  1.  Parallel bond model

    图  2  耗散能与可释放应变能的关系

    Figure  2.  Relationship between dissipation strain energy and releasable strain energy

    图  3  花岗岩破坏过程能量转化机制

    Figure  3.  Energy conversion mechanism of granite in failure process

    图  4  花岗岩弹性储能极限与围压的关系

    Figure  4.  Relationship between granite's maximum elastic strain energy and confining pressures

    图  5  花岗岩峰值能量比与围压关系

    Figure  5.  Relationship between granite's peak energy ratio and confining pressures

    图  6  花岗岩能量屈服准则

    Figure  6.  Energy yield criterion of granite

  • [1] 谢和平, 鞠杨, 黎立云.基于能量耗散与释放原理的岩石强度与整体破坏准则[J].岩石力学与工程学报, 2005, 24(17):3003-3010. doi: 10.3321/j.issn:1000-6915.2005.17.001

    Xie Heping, Ju Yang, Li Liyun. Criteria for strength and structural failure of rocks based on energy dissipation and energy release principles[J]. Chinese Journal of Rock Mechanics and Engineering, 2005, 24(17):3003-3010. doi: 10.3321/j.issn:1000-6915.2005.17.001
    [2] 谢和平, 彭瑞东, 鞠杨.岩石变形破坏过程中的能量耗散分析[J].岩石力学与工程学报, 2004, 23(21):3565-3570. doi: 10.3321/j.issn:1000-6915.2004.21.001

    Xie Heping, Peng Ruidong, Ju Yang. Energy dissipation of rock deformation and fracture[J]. Chinese Journal of Rock Mechanics and Engineering, 2004, 23(21):3565-3570. doi: 10.3321/j.issn:1000-6915.2004.21.001
    [3] 黄达, 黄润秋, 张永兴.粗晶大理岩单轴压缩力学特性的静态加载速率效应及能量机制试验研究[J].岩石力学与工程学报, 2012, 31(2):245-255. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1000-6915.2012.02.003

    Huang Da, Huang Runqiu, Zhang Yongxing. Experimental investigations on static loading rate effects on mechanical properties and energy mechanism of coarse crystal grain marble under uniaxial compression[J]. Chinese Journal of Rock Mechanics and Engineering, 2012, 31(2):245-255. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1000-6915.2012.02.003
    [4] 陈卫忠, 吕森鹏, 郭小红, 等.基于能量原理的卸围压试验与岩爆判据研究[J].岩石力学与工程学报, 2009, 28(8):1530-1540. doi: 10.3321/j.issn:1000-6915.2009.08.003

    Chen Weizhong, Lu Senpeng, Guo Xiaohong, et al. Research on unloading confining pressure tests and rockburst criterion based on energy theory[J]. Chinese Journal of Rock Mechanics and Engineering, 2009, 28(8):1530-1540. doi: 10.3321/j.issn:1000-6915.2009.08.003
    [5] Sanchidrian J A, Segarra P, López L M. Energy components in rock blasting[J]. Rock Mechanics and Mining Sciences, 2007, 44(1):130-147. doi: 10.1016/j.ijrmms.2006.05.002
    [6] 黎立云, 谢和平, 鞠杨, 等.岩石可释放应变能及耗散能的实验研究[J].工程力学, 2011, 28(3):35-40. http://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-GCLX201103007.htm

    Li Liyun, Xie Heping, Ju Yang, et al. Experimental investigations of releasable energy and dissipative energy within rock[J]. Engineering Mechanics, 2011, 28(3):35-40. http://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-GCLX201103007.htm
    [7] 尤明庆, 华安增.岩石试样破坏过程的能量分析[J].岩石力学与工程学报, 2002, 21(6):778-781. doi: 10.3321/j.issn:1000-6915.2002.06.004

    You Mingqing, Hua Anzeng. Energy analysis on failure process of rock specimens[J]. Chinese Journal of Rock Mechanics and Engineering, 2002, 21(6):778-781. doi: 10.3321/j.issn:1000-6915.2002.06.004
    [8] Zhou Yu, Wu Shunchuan, Gao Yongtao, et al. Macro and meso analysis of jointed rock mass triaxial compression test by using equivalent rock mass (ERM) technique[J]. Journal of Central South University, 2014, 21(3):1125-1135. doi: 10.1007/s11771-014-2045-x
    [9] 罗勇, 龚晓南, 连峰.三维离散颗粒单元模拟无黏性土的工程力学性质[J].岩土工程学报, 2008, 30(2):292-297. doi: 10.3321/j.issn:1000-4548.2008.02.024

    Luo Yong, Gong Xiaonan, Lian Feng. Simulation of mechanical behaviors of granular materials by three-dimensional discrete element method based on particle flow code[J]. Chinese Journal of Geotechnical Engineering, 2008, 30(2):292-297. doi: 10.3321/j.issn:1000-4548.2008.02.024
    [10] 周小平, 钱七虎, 杨海清.深部岩体强度准则[J].岩石力学与工程学报, 2008, 27(1):117-123. doi: 10.3321/j.issn:1000-6915.2008.01.018

    Zhou Xiaoping, Qian Qihu, Yang Haiqing. Strength criteria of deep rock mass[J]. Chinese Journal of Rock Mechanics and Engineering, 2008, 27(1):117-123. doi: 10.3321/j.issn:1000-6915.2008.01.018
    [11] 俞茂宏, 昝月稳, 范文, 等.20世纪岩石强度理论的发展:纪念Mohr-Coulomb强度理论100周年[J].岩石力学与工程学报, 2000, 19(5):545-550. doi: 10.3321/j.issn:1000-6915.2000.05.001

    Yu Maohong, Zan Yuewen, Fan Wen, et al. Advances in strength theory of rock in 20 century: 100 years inmemory of the Mohr-Coulomb strength theory[J]. Chinese Journal of Rock Mechanics and Engineering, 2000, 19(5):545-550. doi: 10.3321/j.issn:1000-6915.2000.05.001
    [12] 高红, 郑颖人, 冯夏庭.岩土材料能量屈服准则研究[J].岩石力学与工程学报, 2007, 26(12):2437-2443. doi: 10.3321/j.issn:1000-6915.2007.12.008

    Gao Hong, Zheng Yingren, Feng Xiating. Study on energy yield criterion of geomaterials[J]. Chinese Journal of Rock Mechanics and Engineering, 2007, 26(12):2437-2443. doi: 10.3321/j.issn:1000-6915.2007.12.008
    [13] 周辉, 李震, 杨艳霜, 等.岩石统一能量屈服准则[J].岩石力学与工程学报, 2013, 32(11):2170-2185. http://d.old.wanfangdata.com.cn/Periodical/yslxygcxb201311002

    Zhou Hui, Li Zhen, Yang Yanshuang, et al. Unified energy yield criterion of rock[J]. Chinese Journal of Rock Mechanics and Engineering, 2013, 32(11):2170-2185. http://d.old.wanfangdata.com.cn/Periodical/yslxygcxb201311002
    [14] Cundall P A, Strack O D. A discrete numerical model for granula assemblies[J]. Géotechnique, 1979, 29(1):47-65. doi: 10.1680/geot.1979.29.1.47
    [15] Itasca Consulting Group. PFC3D: Particle flow code in 3 dimensions[R]. Minneapolis, USA: Itasca Consulting Group, 2008.
    [16] Solecki R, Conant R J. Advanced mechanics of materials[M]. London: Oxford University Press, 2003.
    [17] 尤明庆, 苏承东.大理岩试样循环加载强化作用的试验研究[J].固体力学学报, 2009, 29(1):66-72. http://d.old.wanfangdata.com.cn/Periodical/gtlxxb200801010

    You Mingqing, Su Chengdong. Experimental study on strengthening of marble specimen in cyclic loading of uniaxial or pseudo-triaxial compression[J]. Chinese Journal of Solid Mechanics, 2009, 29(1):66-72. http://d.old.wanfangdata.com.cn/Periodical/gtlxxb200801010
    [18] 余贤斌, 谢强, 李心一, 等.岩石直接拉伸与压缩变形的循环加载实验与双模量本构模型[J].岩土工程学报, 2005, 27(9):988-993. doi: 10.3321/j.issn:1000-4548.2005.09.003

    Yu Xianbin, Xie Qiang, Li Xinyi, et al. Cycle loading tests of rock samples under direct tension and compression and bi-modular constitutive model[J]. Chinese Journal of Geotechnical Engineering, 2005, 27(9):988-993. doi: 10.3321/j.issn:1000-4548.2005.09.003
  • 加载中
图(6)
计量
  • 文章访问数:  4284
  • HTML全文浏览量:  1222
  • PDF下载量:  413
  • 被引次数: 0
出版历程
  • 收稿日期:  2015-03-04
  • 修回日期:  2015-05-20
  • 刊出日期:  2016-11-25

目录

    /

    返回文章
    返回