Validity analysis of materials' dynamic tensile SHTB experimental technique at ultrahigh temperature
-
摘要: 针对高温拉伸分离式Hopkinson杆实验技术，通过数值模拟、实验验证以及几种典型材料的高温动态拉伸性能测试相结合的方法，对此实验技术中存在的几个关键问题进行了深入研究。结果表明：对于平板状钩挂式拉伸试样，通过标距段尺寸优化后，应力分布均匀，流动应力曲线与螺纹拉伸试样一致，且应力上升段后没有剧烈跳动；通过精确气动控制，在加载脉冲到来同时，可实现有效的试样快速同步组装和加载；当试样温度为1 200 ℃时，在冷加载杆与高温试样接触以及应力波加载试样的整个过程中，试样平均温度下降约1.3%，而加载杆端温升低于180 ℃。为了验证此实验技术，对3D打印TC4、镍基单晶高温合金DD6进行了最高温度约1 200 ℃时的高温动态拉伸力学性能实验测试。
-
关键词:
- Hopkinson拉杆 /
- 高温 /
- 拉伸试样 /
- 同步组装 /
- 高应变率
Abstract: In this work we investigated several key issues in view of the dynamic tensile experimental technique used in the split Hopkinson tension bar at ultra high temperature by performing numerical simulation, experimental verification and tests of several typical materials' dynamic tensile property at high temperature. The results show that the stress distribution was uniform for the flat tensile specimen with a hook joint after its gauge section size was optimized. The flow stress curve of the hook joint flat tensile specimen coincided well with that of the thread specimen, and no evident shake was observed in the strain rising stage. Through accurate pneumatic control, effective rapid synchronous assembly and loading of the specimen could be achieved at the same time when the loading wave arrived. When the temperature of the specimen reached 1 200 ℃, the average temperature of the specimen only dropped about 1.3% and the temperature rise of the loading bars kept below 180 ℃ during the whole cold contact between the high temperature specimen with the cold loading bars as well as in the process of the stress wave loading the specimen. To validate this experimental technique, tests were conducted at the temperature as high as about 1 200 ℃ for the dynamic tensile mechanical properties of a few materials such as 3D printed TC4 and single crystal nickel-base superalloy DD6.-
Key words:
- Hopkinson tension bar /
- high temperature /
- tensile specimen /
- synchronous assembly /
- high strain rate
-
图 2 高温SHTB实验过程示意图
Figure 2. Schematic diagram of SHTB experimental process at high temperature
图 3 高温SHTB实验装置示意图
Figure 3. Illustration of setup for high temperature SHTB experiment
图 4 数值模拟流动应力曲线与输入曲线对比
Figure 4. Comparison of simulated flow stress curve with input curves
图 7 钩挂式板状试样不同长宽比下应力和应变分布
Figure 7. Flat hook-joint specimen's stress and strain distribution at different ratios of length to width
图 8 钩挂连接与螺纹连接数值模拟和实验结果对比
Figure 8. Comparison of numerical simulation and experimental results between hook joint and thread connection
图 9 钛合金TC4弹性模量随温度变化
Figure 9. Elastic modulus of titanium alloy TC4 versus temperature
图 12 热辐射和热对流过程沿宽度和厚度方向温度分布
Figure 12. Temperature distribution along width and thickness
图 13 冷接触过程试样中线温度分布
Figure 13. Temperature distribution along center line of specimen during cold contact
图 14 热辐射、热对流和热传导对标距段平均温度的影响
Figure 14. Effect of heat radiation, heat convection and heat conduction on average temperature
图 15 标距段温度下降随试样初始温度变化
Figure 15. Average temperature of gage section drop versus specimen initial temperature
图 16 不同加热温度引起的加载杆端温升
Figure 16. Temperature rise of loading bars caused by different heating temperatures
-
[1] GILAT A, WU X. Elevated temperature testing with the torsional split Hopkinson bar[J]. Experimental Mechanics, 1994, 34(2):166-170. doi: 10.1007/BF02325713 [2] 佟景伟, 高丛峰, 李鸿琦, 等.温度梯度对拉伸SHB试验误差的数值分析[J].爆炸与冲击, 2001, 21(4):277-281. http://www.bzycj.cn/CN/abstract/abstract10235.shtmlTONG Jingwei, GAO Congfeng, LI Hongqi, et al. Numerical analysis on the error in the split Hopkinson tension bar test at temperature gradient[J]. Explosion and Shock Waves, 2001, 21(4):277-281. http://www.bzycj.cn/CN/abstract/abstract10235.shtml [3] 夏开文, 刘文彦, 唐志平.30CrMnSiA钢高温动态力学性质的实验研究[J].爆炸与冲击, 1998, 18(4):310-316. http://www.bzycj.cn/CN/abstract/abstract10422.shtmlXIA Kaiwen, LIU Wenyan, TANG Zhiping. Experimental study of dynamic properties of 30CrMnSiA steel at high temperature[J]. Explosion and Shock Waves, 1998, 18(4):310-316. http://www.bzycj.cn/CN/abstract/abstract10422.shtml [4] ROSENBERG Z, DAWICKE D, STEADER E, et al. A new technique for heating specimens in split-Hopkinson-bar experiments using induction-coil heaters[J]. Experimental Mechanics, 1986, 26(3):275-278. doi: 10.1007/BF02320053 [5] FRANTZ C E, FOLLANSBEE P S, WRIGHT W J. New experimental techniques with the split Hopkinson pressure bar[C]//8th International Conference on High Energy Rate Fabrication. 1984. [6] GUO W G, NEMAT-NASSER S. Flow stress of nitronic-50 stainless steel over a wide range of strain rates and temperatures[J]. Mechanics of Materials, 2006, 38(11):1090-1103. doi: 10.1016/j.mechmat.2006.01.004 [7] 郭伟国.高导无氧铜在大变形、不同温度和不同应变率下的流动应力和本构模型[J].爆炸与冲击, 2005, 25(3):244-250. http://www.bzycj.cn/CN/abstract/abstract9341.shtmlGUO Weiguo. Flow stress and constitutive model of OFHC Cu for large deformation, different temperatures and different strain rates[J]. Explosion and Shock Waves, 2005, 25(3):244-250. http://www.bzycj.cn/CN/abstract/abstract9341.shtml [8] 郭伟国, 朱泽, 曾志银, 等. 高温高应变率拉伸同步实验装置: ZL 2012 2 0438121. 0[P]. 2013-04-17. [9] LI Yulong, ZHANG Yongkang, XUE Pu. Study of similarity law for bird impact on structure[J]. Chinese Journal of Aeronautics, 2008, 21(6):512-517. doi: 10.1016/S1000-9361(08)60168-5 [10] 陈滔, 李庆斌, 管俊峰, 等.霍普金森拉杆装置螺纹过渡段变形测量修正[J].工程力学, 2013, 30(7):276-281. http://kns.cnki.net/KCMS/detail/detail.aspx?filename=gclx201307043&dbname=CJFD&dbcode=CJFQCHEN Tao, LI Qingbin, GUAN Junfeng, et al. Deformation measurement correction for the threaded connection and transition part utilizing SHTB[J]. Engineering Mechanics, 2013, 30(7):276-281. http://kns.cnki.net/KCMS/detail/detail.aspx?filename=gclx201307043&dbname=CJFD&dbcode=CJFQ [11] KLEPACZKO J R, RUSINEK A, RODRÍGUEZ-MARTÍNEZ J A, et al. Modelling of thermo-viscoplastic behaviour of DH-36 and Weldox 460-E structural steels at wide ranges of strain rates and temperatures, comparison of constitutive relations for impact problems[J]. Mechanics of Materials, 2009, 41(5):599-621. doi: 10.1016/j.mechmat.2008.11.004 [12] 张树华.TC4、16Mn合金及Al2O3陶瓷的高温弹性模量[J].高压物理学报, 1995, 9(2):133-138. http://kns.cnki.net/KCMS/detail/detail.aspx?filename=gywl502.007&dbname=CJFD&dbcode=CJFQZHANG Shuhua. High temperature elastic moduli of TC4, 16Mn and Al2O3 ceramics[J]. Chinese Journal of High Pressure Physics, 1995, 9(2):133-138. http://kns.cnki.net/KCMS/detail/detail.aspx?filename=gywl502.007&dbname=CJFD&dbcode=CJFQ [13] JASTRZEBSKI Z D, KOMANDURI R. The nature and properties of engineering materials[M]. Wiley, 1975. [14] LI P H, GUO W G, HUANG W D, et al. Thermomechanical response of 3D laser-deposited Ti-6Al-4V alloy over a wide range of strain rates and temperatures[J]. Materials Science and Engineering: A, 2015, 647:34-42. doi: 10.1016/j.msea.2015.08.043 [15] WANG J, GUO W G, LI P, et al. Dynamic tensile properties of a single crystal nickel-base superalloy at high temperatures measured with an improved SHTB technique[J]. Materials Science and Engineering: A, 2016, 670:1-8. doi: 10.1016/j.msea.2016.06.002 期刊类型引用(9)
1. 李营，杜志鹏，陈赶超，王诗平，侯海量，李晓彬，张攀，张伦平，孔祥韶，李海涛，郭君，姚术健，王志凯，殷彩玉. 舰艇爆炸毁伤与防护若干关键问题研究进展. 中国舰船研究. 2024(03): 3-60 . 
百度学术2. 刘均伟，张先锋，赵瑶瑶，魏海洋，刘闯，李鹏程. 在椭圆横截面弹体正侵彻下有限厚铝靶的破坏模式及响应特性. 爆炸与冲击. 2022(12): 81-94 . 
本站查看3. 巨圆圆，杜志鹏，张磊. 截卵形弹丸斜穿甲均质薄靶剩余速度的理论分析. 装备制造技术. 2022(11): 27-30 . 百度学术4. 姚熊亮，王治，叶墡君，吴子奇，王志凯. 球头弹体侵彻舰船板架加强筋时的攻角变化简化理论模型. 爆炸与冲击. 2021(03): 130-141 . 本站查看5. 李尚青，李芝绒，张玉磊，翟红波. 炸药在预制条形孔圆筒装置内爆炸威力的评价方法. 火炸药学报. 2020(03): 341-344+350 . 百度学术6. 王浩，潘鑫，武海军，皮爱国，李金柱，黄风雷. 椭圆截面截卵形刚性弹体正贯穿加筋板能量耗散分析. 爆炸与冲击. 2019(10): 71-82 . 本站查看7. 惠旭龙，刘小川，王计真，白春玉. TC4钛合金平板高速撞击损伤及弹道极限特性. 科学技术与工程. 2017(11): 1-8 . 百度学术8. 巨圆圆，张庆明. 尖卵形弹丸侵彻加筋薄靶剩余速度的理论分析. 兵工学报. 2015(S1): 126-130 . 百度学术9. 熊飞，石全，朱艮春，张成，刘锋. 半穿甲战斗部侵彻运动加筋板数值模拟. 火力与指挥控制. 2015(08): 74-77 . 百度学术其他类型引用(5)
-
下载:
百度学术
计量
- 文章访问数: 6270
- HTML全文浏览量: 1951
- PDF下载量: 295
- 被引次数: 14