高饱和黏土中爆炸波作用下直埋聚乙烯管的动力响应

钟冬望; 龚相超; 涂圣武; 黄雄

doi:10.11883/bzycj-2017-0334

高饱和黏土中爆炸波作用下直埋聚乙烯管的动力响应

doi: 10.11883/bzycj-2017-0334

武汉科技大学理学院力学系，湖北武汉 430065

基金项目: 国家自然科学基金(51574184)

详细信息

作者简介:
钟冬望（1963－　），男，博士，教授，zhongdw123@wust.edu.cn

通讯作者:
龚相超（1974－　），男，博士研究生，副教授，gxc741@163.com

中图分类号: O382; TD235.1
计量
- 文章访问数: 5046
- HTML全文浏览量: 1922
- PDF下载量: 67
- 被引次数: 0
出版历程
- 收稿日期: 2017-09-11
- 修回日期: 2018-01-10
- 网络出版日期: 2019-03-25
- 刊出日期: 2019-03-01

Dynamic responses of PE pipes directly buried in high saturated clay to blast wave

Department of Engineering Mechanics, School of Science, Wuhan University of Science and Technology, Wuhan 430065, Hubei, China

摘要

摘要: 为了解决爆破作业对近距离埋地管道的安全评估问题，对高饱和粘土中爆炸波作用下聚乙烯(polyethylene, PE)管道进行了一系列管道动态响应的原型实验，得到了不同药量下管道动应变、动压力的实验数据和管体及地面的振速数据。实验结果表明：PE管动应变峰值同比例距离具有良好的幂函数衰减关系，在6～11 m/kg^1/3比例距离范围内，PE管的环向峰值应变衰减指数（绝对值）比轴向峰值应变衰减指数大；管道动态响应的主振频率略高于土体的主振频率，两者在同一量级，管道合成速度衰减指数大体和管道轴向应变衰减指数相当；压电陶瓷片所测得的电压信号和同测点的应变变化率信号具有较强的相关性。高饱和黏性土由于含水量较高，近距离柔性PE管因受到局部冲击会产生较大的环向应变，管道安全计算时应充分考虑这一因素；随着比例距离的增大，环向应变水平降低，轴向应变水平相对增强；压电陶瓷片因为具有良好可靠的动态性能，作为埋地管道现场监测的技术手段值得采用和推广。
- 爆炸波 /
- PE管 /
- 饱和土 /
- 埋地管道 /
- 动应变
Abstract: In order to solve the safety assessment of a buried pipeline nearby blasting operation location, a series of dynamic responses of the polyethylene (PE) pipe in high saturated clay under the action of the explosive wave were carried out. The experimental data of the dynamic strain and dynamic pressure were gotten, and the velocity data of the pipe and the ground were measured at the same time. The experimental results show that the peak strain of the PE pipe has a good power function attenuation relationship with scaled distance. In the scaled distance range of 6−11 m/kg^1/3, the attenuation index of hoop strain (absolute value) is larger than the attenuation index of axial strain. The main vibration frequency of the dynamic response of the pipeline is slightly higher than the main vibration frequency of the soil, both in the same order. The pipeline synthesis velocity attenuation index is roughly the same as the axial strain attenuation index of the pipe. There is a strong correlation between the dynamic pressure signal measured by PZT and the strain rate signal of the same point. Due to the high water content in the high saturated soil, the PE pipe will be locally impacted and the greater circumferential strain will be produced, so this factor should be taken full account of the pipeline safety assessment. The hoop strain level is reduced, and the axial strain level relatively enhances when the scaled distance increases. Because of good and reliable dynamic performance of the PZT, the PZT is worthy of use and promotion as a mean for field detection of pipelines.
- blast wave /
- PE pipe /
- saturated soil /
- dynamic strain /
- buried pipeline

HTML全文

图 1 拉力和绝对伸长的关系曲线

Figure 1. Relation between tensile force and absolute extension

下载: 全尺寸图片幻灯片

图 2 实验现场示意图

Figure 2. Diagram of experimental site

下载: 全尺寸图片幻灯片

图 3 管道贴片示意图

Figure 3. Location of strain gauges and PZT pieces on the pipe

下载: 全尺寸图片幻灯片

图 4 爆源和PE管位置示意图

Figure 4. Location of PE pipe and explosion source

下载: 全尺寸图片幻灯片

图 5 两种应变仪采集的典型信号

Figure 5. Typical signals detected by DH5937 and UT3408

下载: 全尺寸图片幻灯片

图 6 位置3-1和3-3的环向和轴向最大压应变衰减曲线

Figure 6. The maximum hoop and axial strains at positions 3-1 and 3-3 varying with scaled distance

下载: 全尺寸图片幻灯片

图 7 位置3-2和3-4的环向和轴向最大应变衰减曲线

Figure 7. The maximum hoop and axial strains at positions 3-2 and 3-4 varying with scaled distance

下载: 全尺寸图片幻灯片

图 8 位置2-3和3-3的环向最大压应变

Figure 8. The maximum hoop compressive strains at positions 2-3 and 3-3

下载: 全尺寸图片幻灯片

图 9 位置2-3和3-3的轴向最大拉应变

Figure 9. The maximum axial tensile strains at positions 2-3 and 3-3

下载: 全尺寸图片幻灯片

图 10 位置2-1环向最大拉和压应变

Figure 10. The maximum hoop tensile and compressive strains at position 2-1

下载: 全尺寸图片幻灯片

图 11 位置3-1环向和轴向最大应变

Figure 11. The maximum hoop and axial strains at position 3-1

下载: 全尺寸图片幻灯片

图 12 PE管和地表振动速度信号(Q=100 g)

Figure 12. The vibration velocity signals of the PE pipe and ground (Q=100 g)

下载: 全尺寸图片幻灯片

图 13 地表主振频率随药量的衰减

Figure 13. Main frequency attenuation of ground vibration with explosive charge

下载: 全尺寸图片幻灯片

图 14 地表和管端合成速度随比例距离的衰减

Figure 14. Resultant velocity attenuation of the pipe and ground with scaled distance

下载: 全尺寸图片幻灯片

图 15 典型的压电陶瓷片信号

Figure 15. The typical signal of PZT voltage

下载: 全尺寸图片幻灯片

图 16 位置3-1轴向应变时程曲线

Figure 16. The time history curve of axial strain at position 3-1

下载: 全尺寸图片幻灯片

图 17 位置3-1轴向应变率和电压时程曲线

Figure 17. The time history curves of PZT voltage and axial strain rate at position 3-1

下载: 全尺寸图片幻灯片

表 1 不同深度土体纵波波速

Table 1. Longitudinal wave velocities of soil at different depths

实验编号	探头类型	埋深/cm	探头距离/m	纵波声速/(m·s⁻¹)
1	声发射探头	20	0.5	853
2	水介质耦合探头	60	0.5	891
3	水介质耦合探头	100	0.5	954

下载: 导出CSV

表 2 不同药量下各测点最大拉应变

Table 2. The maximum tensile strain at each measuring point under different explosive charges

位置	/10⁻⁶
位置	Q=50 g	Q=75 g	Q=100 g	Q=125 g	Q=150 g	Q=175 g	Q=200 g
2-1环向	20.7	23.4	25.4	39.1	50.9	50.9	67.6
2-1轴向	19.9	28.3	31.6	47.6	56.9	50.0	59.6
2-3环向	19.6	23.0	22.8	35.0	47.3	42.2	51.3
2-3轴向	21.5	28.0	33.9	61.5	96.3	107.2	130.0
3-1环向	20.3	23.7	25.9	41.2	51.7	49.2	65.6
3-1轴向	13.1	21.4	26.9	46.6	67.6	62.5	82.2
3-1（45°）	5.4	6.3	5.8	14.7	26.7	30.2	37.6
3-2环向	15.9	25.5	29.5	69.4	134.2	194.1	194.7
3-2轴向	18.2	24.3	24.4	41.6	65.5	76.0	87.9
3-3环向	28.8	33.7	28.2	43.6	70.7	98.7	115.3
3-3轴向	19.0	29.1	33.8	61.4	97.0	122.4	135.8
3-4环向	17.7	22.2	23.6	42.6	99.0	155.2	164.8
3-4轴向	18.9	25.6	29.7	51.3	82.1	88.1	102.7

下载: 导出CSV

表 3 不同药量下各测点最大压应变

Table 3. The maximum compressive strain at each measuring point under different explosive charges

位置	/10⁻⁶
位置	Q=50 g	Q=75 g	Q=100 g	Q=125 g	Q=150 g	Q=175 g	Q=200 g
2-1环向	−20.6	−24.4	−26.7	−67.3	−127.8	−140.6	−181.3
2-1轴向	−19.0	−24.2	−26.8	−49.7	−61.1	−47.0	−57.9
2-3环向	−18.4	−29.5	−40.5	−87.5	−149.7	−174.3	−213.5
2-3轴向	−29.1	−38.4	−42.6	−68.4	−92.3	−78.0	−103.5
3-1环向	−19.9	−25.6	−28.2	−53.1	−102.3	−119.9	−147.0
3-1轴向	−23.0	−30.8	−35.0	−67.3	−95.2	−84.5	−110.1
3-1（45°）	−7.3	−6.0	−6.6	−13.8	−25.0	−34.7	−37.0
3-2环向	−10.5	−16.3	−19.2	−41.3	−88.3	−110.4	−134.6
3-2轴向	−23.9	−36.9	−41.1	−75.6	−104.2	−122.3	−121.7
3-3环向	−22.6	−31.5	−37.3	−95.6	−199.1	−289.0	−309.1
3-3轴向	−27.5	−40.6	−44.0	−79.6	−107.6	−105.8	−115.7
3-4环向	−18.4	−27.5	−31.6	−50.6	−69.5	−54.8	−65.2
3-4轴向	−30.1	−41.0	−43.0	−84.0	−121.0	−114.3	−138.6

下载: 导出CSV

表 4 不同药量下PE管的PPV和主频

Table 4. The PPVs and main frequencies of the PE pipe under different explosive charges

Q/g	X方向		Y方向		Z方向		合成PPV/(cm·s⁻¹)
Q/g	PPV/(cm·s⁻¹)	主频/Hz	PPV/(cm·s⁻¹)	主频/Hz	PPV/(cm·s⁻¹)	主频/Hz	合成PPV/(cm·s⁻¹)
50	1.14	26.31	0.43	25.84	1.32	27.46	1.39
75	1.20	22.86	0.55	24.69	1.29	25.48	1.68
100	1.05	25.16	1.19	21.62	1.56	24.1	1.91
125	1.68	11.9	1.68	17.24	2.56	20.9	3.00
150	2.92	9.22	2.17	24.60	3.91	18.2	4.41
175	3.53	9.24	2.18	21.98	4.04	17.02	4.63
200	4.43	9.59	2.80	21.98	4.92	16.80	5.49

下载: 导出CSV

表 5 不同药量下地表的PPV和主频

Table 5. The PPVs and main frequencies of the ground under different explosive charges

Q/g	X方向		Y方向		Z方向		合成PPV/(cm·s⁻¹)
Q/g	PPV/(cm·s⁻¹)	主频/Hz	PPV/(cm·s⁻¹)	主频/Hz	PPV/(cm·s⁻¹)	主频/Hz	合成PPV/(cm·s⁻¹)
50	2.17	12.3	0.89	30.47	3.30	25.76	3.57
75	2.38	10.93	1.03	31.75	3.62	24.80	3.81
100	3.02	10.44	1.18	25.64	3.87	23.26	3.97
125	5.62	8.45	1.34	15.23	6.98	19.24	7.20
150	9.29	7.83	1.30	8.30	9.44	16.26	9.72
175	9.30	6.63	2.19	9.11	9.35	14.55	10.70
200	9.98	6.73	2.62	8.91	11.73	14.44	11.78

下载: 导出CSV

表 6 已有公式计算值和实测数据

Table 6. Deteced data and calculated values by existing formulas

药量/ g	比例距离/ (m·kg^−1/3)	实测值		式(2)	式(3)	式(1)
药量/ g	比例距离/ (m·kg^−1/3)	ε_cir/10⁻⁶	ε_long/10⁻⁶	ε_cir/10⁻⁶	ε_long/10⁻⁶	ε_long/10⁻⁶
50	10.18	28.8	27.5	29.2	24.5	32.5
100	8.08	37.3	44.0	56.9	45.2	36.1
150	7.06	199.1	107.6	83.8	64.0	88.3
200	6.41	309.1	115.7	110.2	81.3	107.1

下载: 导出CSV

参考文献(11)

[1]	DOWDING C H. Blast vibration monitoring and control[M]. New Jersey: Prentice-Hall, 1985: 167−171.
[2]	ESPARZA E D, WESTINE P S, WENZEL A B. Pipeline response to buried explosive detonations: Vol. 2: technical report[R]. Arlington, USA: American Gas Association, 1981.
[3]	SISKIND D E, STAGG M S, WIEGAND J E, et al. Surface mine blasting near pressurized transmission pipelines: RI 9523 [R]. Minneapolis, MN: US Department of the Interior Bureau of Mines, 1994.
[4]	KOURETZIS G P, BOUCKOVALAS G D, GANTES C J. Analytical calculation of blast-induced strains to buried pipelines [J]. International Journal of Impact Engineering, 2007, 34(10): 1683–1704. doi: 10.1016/j.ijimpeng.2006.08.008
[5]	热塑性塑料管材拉伸性能测定: GB/T 8804-2003 [S].
[6]	王峥辉. 下蜀黄土超声波波速与物理力学性质试验研究[D]. 南京: 河海大学, 2007: 57-58. doi: 10.7666/d.y1128172.
[7]	温婷, 徐丽丽, 王青, 等. 混凝土表面应变片防水性能的试验研究 [J]. 中国科技信息, 2014(8): 107–110 doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1001-8972.2014.08.035 WEN Ting, XU Lili, WANG Qing, et al. Experimental study on waterproof performance of concrete surface stain-gages [J]. China Science and Technology Information, 2014(8): 107–110 doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1001-8972.2014.08.035
[8]	李晓娟, 李全禄, 谢妙霞, 等. 国内外压电陶瓷的新进展及新应用 [J]. 硅酸盐通报, 2006, 25(4): 101–107 doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1001-1625.2006.04.024 LI Xiaojuan, LI Quanlu, XIE Miaoxia, et al. New headways and new applications of piezoelectric at home and abroad [J]. Bulletin of the Chinese Ceramic Society, 2006, 25(4): 101–107 doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1001-1625.2006.04.024
[9]	穆朝民, 任辉启, 李永池, 等. 变埋深条件下饱和土爆炸能量耦合系数的试验研究 [J]. 岩土力学, 2010, 31(5): 1574–1578 doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1000-7598.2010.05.039 MU Chaomin, REN Qihui, LI Yongchi, et al. Experiment study of explosion energy coupling coefficient with different burial depths in saturated soils [J]. Rock and Soil Mechanics, 2010, 31(5): 1574–1578 doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1000-7598.2010.05.039
[10]	库特乌佐夫. 爆破工程师手册[M]. 刘清泉, 译. 北京: 煤炭工业出版社, 1992: 137−138.
[11]	DATTA T K. Seismic response of buried pipelines: a state-of-the-art review [J]. Nuclear Engineering and Design, 1999, 192(2/3): 271–284. doi: 10.1016/S0029-5493(99)00113-2