阻塞比对竖直管道中铝粉爆炸特性的影响研究

朱小超; 郑立刚; 于水军; 王亚磊; 李刚; 杜德朋; 窦增果

doi:10.11883/bzycj-2019-0006

阻塞比对竖直管道中铝粉爆炸特性的影响研究

doi: 10.11883/bzycj-2019-0006

朱小超^1,,
郑立刚^{1, 2, ,},
于水军^{1, 2},
王亚磊¹,
李刚¹,
杜德朋¹,
窦增果¹

1.
河南理工大学瓦斯地质与瓦斯治理国家重点实验室培育基地，河南焦作 454003
2.
河南理工大学煤炭安全生产河南省协同创新中心，河南焦作 454003

基金项目: 国家自然科学基金（51674104，51874120）；中国博士后科学基金（2013M540570）；河南理工大学创新型科研团队（T2018-2）

详细信息

作者简介:
朱小超（1992－　），男，硕士研究生，1039137325@qq.com

通讯作者:
郑立刚（1979－　），男，博士，教授，zhengligang97@163.com

中图分类号: O389; X945
计量
- 文章访问数: 5195
- HTML全文浏览量: 1637
- PDF下载量: 55
- 被引次数: 0
出版历程
- 收稿日期: 2019-01-08
- 修回日期: 2019-01-24
- 网络出版日期: 2019-09-25
- 刊出日期: 2019-10-01

Effect of blocking ratio on aluminum powder explosion’s characteristicsin vertical duct

ZHU Xiaochao^1
,,
ZHENG Ligang^{1, 2
, ,},
YU Shuijun^{1, 2},
WANG Yalei¹,
LI Gang¹,
DU Depeng¹,
DOU Zengguo¹

1.
State Key Laboratory Cultivation Base for Gas Geology and Gas Control, Henan Polytechnic University, Jiaozuo 454003, Henan, China
2.
The Collaborative Innovation Center of Coal Safety, Production of Henan Province, Henan Polytechnic University, Jiaozuo 454003, Henan, China

摘要

摘要: 在自行搭建的竖直透明管道喷粉平台中开展了铝粉尘爆炸实验研究，通过对铝粉爆炸火焰锋面演化及压力变化等特征进行分析，探究泄爆口阻塞比对铝粉爆炸特性的影响规律。结果表明：阻塞比对较小粒径铝粉爆炸火焰锋面结构影响较大。管道中爆炸超压呈双峰形式；对于较小粒径铝粉，超压双峰主导地位在拐点φ=0.4（φ为阻塞比）处发生反转，且第一波峰值与第二波峰值通过转折点时变化趋势不同，第一波峰值随阻塞比增加而升高，并以φ=0.4为拐点，斜率大大提升，而第二波峰值随阻塞比的增加先升后降，且在φ=0.4时达到最大；铝粉粒径较大时，波峰值变化趋势与小粒径类似，拐点后移至φ=0.6。最大(主导)超压峰值随阻塞比增加而增加；小粒径粉尘更容易产生危险性爆炸超压。
- 阻塞比 /
- 铝粉 /
- 爆炸 /
- 管道 /
- 火焰传播 /
- 超压
Abstract: In this work, experimenting on a self-built vertically transparent duct, we investigated the influence of the blocking ratio (φ) for duct-end venting on the explosive characteristics of aluminum dust explosion through analysis of its such characteristics as the flame front evolution and pressure history. The results show that the blocking ratio had a great influence on the flame front structure of aluminum powder of a small particle size. The overpressure in the pipeline exhibited a bimodal waveform and there was an inflection point of the blocking ratio φ=0.4 where the dominance of two overpressure peaks reversed. The first overpressure peak as a function of the blocking ratio was different from that of the second beyond the inflection point. The first overpressure peak increased as did the blocking ratio, and the increase rate rose greatly with φ=0.4 as the turning point. The second overpressure peak first rose and then fell with the increase of the blocking ratio, and reached the maximum at φ=0.4. Both peak values as a function of the blocking ratio for the large particle size were similar to that for the small particle size. However, the inflection point shifted to φ=0.6. The maximum (dominant) overpressure peak increased with the increase of the blocking ratio. A smaller particle size dust is prone to generating a more hazardous overpressure.
- blocking ratio /
- aluminum /
- explosion /
- duct /
- flame propagation /
- overpressure

HTML全文

图 1 实验系统图

Figure 1. Illustration of experimental setup

下载: 全尺寸图片幻灯片

图 2 实验铝粉表征测试结果

Figure 2. Test results of aluminum powder surface characteristics

下载: 全尺寸图片幻灯片

图 3 D₅₀=17 μm铝粉在不同阻塞比条件下火焰前锋结构

Figure 3. Flame front structure of D₅₀=17 μm aluminum powder at different blocking ratios

下载: 全尺寸图片幻灯片

图 4 D₅₀=48 μm铝粉在不同阻塞比条件下火焰前锋结构

Figure 4. Flame front structure of D₅₀=48 μm aluminum powder at different blocking ratios

下载: 全尺寸图片幻灯片

图 5 在不同阻塞比条件下火焰锋面发展对比图

Figure 5. Comparison of the development of flame fronts at different blocking ratios

下载: 全尺寸图片幻灯片

图 6 锋面位置与压力波形对照分析图

Figure 6. Contrast analysis of frontal position and pressure waveform

下载: 全尺寸图片幻灯片

图 7 铝颗粒燃烧顺序机制图

Figure 7. Combustion sequence of aluminum particles

下载: 全尺寸图片幻灯片

图 8 各阻塞比条件下超压波形图

Figure 8. Overpressure waveform at different blocking ratios

下载: 全尺寸图片幻灯片

图 9 D₅₀=17.1 μm和D₅₀=48.3 μm铝粉在各阻塞比条件下波峰值比较

Figure 9. Comparison of peak values of D₅₀=17.1 μm and D₅₀=48.3 μm aluminum powder at different blocking ratios

下载: 全尺寸图片幻灯片

图 10 阻塞比对反应进行影响机制图

Figure 10. Illustration of block ratio effect’s mechanism

下载: 全尺寸图片幻灯片

图 11 最大超压柱形分布图和最大超压上升率趋势图

Figure 11. Maximum overpressure and rate of maximum overpressure rise

下载: 全尺寸图片幻灯片

参考文献(31)

[1]	LI G, YANG H X, YUAN C M, et al. A catastrophic aluminium-alloy dust explosion in China [J]. Journal of Loss Prevention in the Process Industries, 2015, 39: 121–130.
[2]	安全监管总局. 安全监管总局通报2016年工贸行业粉尘防爆专项整治工作情况 [J]. 中国应急管理, 2017(3): 43–45.
[3]	李庆钊, 王可, 梅晓凝, 等. 微米级铝粉的爆炸特性及其反应机理研究 [J]. 工程热物理学报, 2017, 38(1): 219–225. LI Qingzhao, WANG Ke, MEI Xiaoning, et al. Investigation on explosion characteristics and reaction mechanism of micro-aluminum powder [J]. Journal of Engineering Theermophysics, 2017, 38(1): 219–225.
[4]	LI Q, WANG K, ZHENG Y, et al. Explosion severity of micro-sized aluminum dust and its flame propagation properties in 20 L spherical vessel [J]. Powder Technology, 2016, 301: 1299–1308. DOI: 10.1016/j.powtec.2016.08.012.
[5]	沈世磊, 张奇, 马秋菊, 等. 湍流对铝粉爆炸特性的影响 [J]. 兵工学报, 2016, 37(3): 455–461. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1000-1093.2016.03.010. SHEN Shilei, ZHANG Qi, MA Qiujun, et al. Effect of turbulence on explosion characteristics of aluminium dust/air [J]. Acta Armamentarii, 2016, 37(3): 455–461. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1000-1093.2016.03.010.
[6]	LIU X, ZHANG Q. Influence of turbulent flow on the explosion parameters of micro- and nano-aluminum powder-air mixtures [J]. Journal of Hazardous Materials, 2015, 299: 603–617. DOI: 10.1016/j.jhazmat.2015.07.068.
[7]	谭汝媚, 张奇, 张博. 点火延迟时间对铝粉爆炸特性参数的影响 [J]. 爆炸与冲击, 2014, 34(1): 17–22. DOI: 10.11883/1001-1455(2014)01-0017-06. TAN Rumei, ZHANG Qi, ZHANG Bo. Effect of ignition delay time on characteristic parameters of aluminum dust explosion [J]. Explosion and Shock Waves, 2014, 34(1): 17–22. DOI: 10.11883/1001-1455(2014)01-0017-06.
[8]	谭汝媚, 张奇. 环境湿度对铝粉爆炸特性参数影响的实验研究 [J]. 兵工学报, 2013, 34(8): 965–969. TAN Rumei, ZHANG Qi. Experimental research of the effect of ambient humidity on the explosion characteristic parameters of aluminum powder [J]. Acta Armamentarii, 2013, 34(8): 965–969.
[9]	张博, 张奇, 谭汝媚. 喷粉压力及点火延迟时间对粉尘爆炸参数的影响 [J]. 高压物理学报, 2014, 28(2): 183–190. DOI: 10.11858/gywlxb.2014.02.008. ZHANG Bo, ZHANG Qi, TAN Rumei. Influence of dispersion pressure and ignition delay time on the dust explosion parameters [J]. Chinese Journal of High Pressure Physics, 2014, 28(2): 183–190. DOI: 10.11858/gywlxb.2014.02.008.
[10]	SUN J, DOBASHI R, HIRANO T. Structure of flames propagating through aluminum particles cloud and combustion process of particles [J]. journal of loss prevention in the Process Industries, 2006, 19: 769–773. DOI: 10.1016/j.jlp.2006.01.002.
[11]	胡东涛, 陈先锋, 陈曦. 不同粒径铝粉火焰传播特性试验研究 [J]. 中国安全科学学报, 2016, 26(8): 41–45. HU Dongtao, CHEN Xianfeng, CHEN Xi. Experimental study on aluminum dust flame propagation characteristics [J]. China Safety Science Journal, 2016, 26(8): 41–45.
[12]	任瑞娥, 谭迎新. 浓度对铝粉爆炸特性的影响研究 [J]. 消防科学与技术, 2014(4): 375–377. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1009-0029.2014.04.005. REN Ruie, TAN Yingxin. Study on the effect of concentration on the characteristcs of aluminum dust explosion [J]. Fire Science and Technology, 2014(4): 375–377. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1009-0029.2014.04.005.
[13]	尉存娟, 谭迎新, 路旭, 等. 点火延迟时间对铝粉爆炸压力的影响研究 [J]. 中北大学学报(自然科学版), 2009, 30(3): 257–260. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1673-3193.2009.03.013. YU Cunjuan, TAN Yingxin, LU Xu, et al. Effect of the ignition delay time on the explosion pressure of aluminum dust [J]. Journal of North University of China (Natural Science Edition), 2009, 30(3): 257–260. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1673-3193.2009.03.013.
[14]	谭迎新, 霍晓东, 尉存娟. 不同粒度铝粉在水平管道内的爆炸压力测定 [J]. 中国安全科学学报, 2008, 18(12): 80–83. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1003-3033.2008.12.013. TAN Yingxin, HUO Xiaodong, YU Cunjian. Explosion pressure test of different-sized aluminum powder in horizontal pipeline equipment [J]. China Safety Science Journal, 2008, 18(12): 80–83. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1003-3033.2008.12.013.
[15]	YAN X, LI D, YU J. Secondary explosions in relief duct during aluminum dust explosion venting [J]. Procedia Engineering, 2012, 45: 431–434. DOI: 10.1016/j.proeng.2012.08.181.
[16]	喻健良, 杨少丽, 吕明宇. 金属粉尘燃爆泄放特性研究 [J]. 石油化工设备, 2007(4): 6–10. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1000-7466.2007.04.002. YU Jianliang, YANG Shaoli, LV Mingyu. Study on the explosion venting characters of metal dusts [J]. Petro-Chenical Equipment, 2007(4): 6–10. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1000-7466.2007.04.002.
[17]	ZHENG L G, LI G, WANG Y L, et al. Effect of blockage ratios on the characteristics of methane/air explosion suppressed by BC powder [J]. Journal of Hazardous Materials, 2018, 355: 25–33. DOI: 10.1016/j.jhazmat.2018.04.070.
[18]	XIAO H H, WANG Q S, SHEN X B, et al. An experimental study of premixed hydrogen/air flame propagation in a partially open duct [J]. International Journal of Hydrogen Energy, 2014, 39(11): 6233–6241. DOI: 10.1016/j.ijhydene.2013.05.003.
[19]	AIRASH M J, ZANGANEH J, MOGHTADERI B. Flame deflagration in side-on vented detonation tubes: a large scale study [J]. Journal of Hazardous Materials, 2018, 345: 38–47. DOI: 10.1016/j.jhazmat.2017.11.014.
[20]	陈曦, 陈先锋, 张洪铭, 等. 惰化剂粒径对铝粉火焰传播特性影响的实验研究 [J]. 爆炸与冲击, 2017, 37(4): 759–765. DOI: 10.11883/1001-1455(2017)04-0759-07. CHEN Xi, CHEN Xianfeng, ZHANG Hongming, et al. Effect of inerting agent with different particle sizes on the flame propagation of aluminum dust [J]. Explosion and Shock Waves, 2017, 37(4): 759–765. DOI: 10.11883/1001-1455(2017)04-0759-07.
[21]	VOROZHTSOV A B, LERNER M, RODKEVICH N, et al. Oxidation of nano-sized aluminum powders [J]. Thermochimica Acta, 2016(636): 48–56.
[22]	郑立刚, 苏洋, 李刚, 等. 点火位置对氢气/甲烷/空气预混气体爆燃特性的影响 [J]. 化工学报, 2017, 68(12): 4874–4881. ZHENG Ligang, SU Yang, LI Gang, et al. Effect of ignition position on deflagration characteristics of premixed hydrogen/methane/air [J]. Journal of Chemical Industry and Engineering, 2017, 68(12): 4874–4881.
[23]	ZHENG L G, ZHU X C, WANG Y L, et al. Combined effect of ignition position and equivalence ratio on the characteristics of premixed hydrogen/air deflagrations [J]. International Journal of Hydrogen Energy, 2018, 43(33): 16430–16441. DOI: 10.1016/j.ijhydene.2018.06.189.
[24]	HUANG Y, RISHA G A, YANG V, et al. Effect of particle size on combustion of aluminum particle dust in air [J]. Combustion and Flame, 2008(156): 5–13.
[25]	CORCORAN A L, HOFFMANN V K, DREIZIN E L. Aluminum particle combustion in turbulent flames [J]. Combustion and Flame, 2013, 160(3): 718–724. DOI: 10.1016/j.combustflame.2012.11.008.
[26]	李亚男. 磷酸二氢铵对金属粉尘的爆炸抑制研究[D]. 太原: 中北大学, 2015: 14.
[27]	HUANG Y, RISHA G A, YANG V, et al. Combustion of bimodal nano/micron-sized aluminum particle dust in air [J]. Proceedings of the Combustion Institute, 2007, 31(2): 2001–2009. DOI: 10.1016/j.proci.2006.08.103.
[28]	范宝春, 谢波, 张小和, 等. 惰性粉尘抑爆过程的实验研究 [J]. 流体力学实验与测量, 2001, 15(4): 20–25. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1672-9897.2001.04.005. FAN Baochun, XIE Bo, ZHANG Xiaohe, et al. Experimental research on explosion suppression by inert particles [J]. Experiments and Measurements in Fluid Mechanics, 2001, 15(4): 20–25. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1672-9897.2001.04.005.
[29]	JIANG H P, BI M S, LI B, et al. Inhibition evaluation of ABC powder in aluminum dust explosion [J]. Journal of Hazardous Materials, 2018, 361: 273–282.
[30]	CASTELLANOS D, CARRETO-VAZQUEZ V H, MASHUGA C V, et al. The effect of particle size polydispersity on the explosibility characteristics of aluminum dust [J]. Powder Technology, 2014, 254: 331–337. DOI: 10.1016/j.powtec.2013.11.028.
[31]	DUFAUD O, TRAORE M, PERRIN L, et al. Experimental investigation and modelling of aluminum dusts explosions in the 20 L sphere [J]. Journal of Loss Prevention in the Process Industries, 2009, 23(2).