动、静裂纹作用偏置效应的动焦散冲击实验

赵勇 肖成龙 杨立云 丁晨曦 郑昌达

赵勇, 肖成龙, 杨立云, 丁晨曦, 郑昌达. 动、静裂纹作用偏置效应的动焦散冲击实验[J]. 爆炸与冲击, 2020, 40(7): 073201. doi: 10.11883/bzycj-2019-0401
引用本文: 赵勇, 肖成龙, 杨立云, 丁晨曦, 郑昌达. 动、静裂纹作用偏置效应的动焦散冲击实验[J]. 爆炸与冲击, 2020, 40(7): 073201. doi: 10.11883/bzycj-2019-0401
ZHAO Yong, XIAO Chenglong, YANG Liyun, DING Chenxi, ZHENG Changda. Dynamic caustics experiments on offset effects between dynamic and static cracks[J]. Explosion And Shock Waves, 2020, 40(7): 073201. doi: 10.11883/bzycj-2019-0401
Citation: ZHAO Yong, XIAO Chenglong, YANG Liyun, DING Chenxi, ZHENG Changda. Dynamic caustics experiments on offset effects between dynamic and static cracks[J]. Explosion And Shock Waves, 2020, 40(7): 073201. doi: 10.11883/bzycj-2019-0401

动、静裂纹作用偏置效应的动焦散冲击实验

doi: 10.11883/bzycj-2019-0401
基金项目: 国家重点研发计划(2016YFC0600903);国家自然科学基金(51774287);四川省科技计划(2018JZ0036)
详细信息
    作者简介:

    赵 勇(1993- ),男,博士研究生,zhaoyong931216@126.com

    通讯作者:

    丁晨曦(1991- ),男,博士,dingcx91@sina.com

  • 中图分类号: O382

Dynamic caustics experiments on offset effects between dynamic and static cracks

  • 摘要: 为了研究冲击荷载作用下脆性材料中运动裂纹与静止裂纹的相互作用,选取动态载荷下断裂行为与岩石材料类似且本身光学特性较好的有机玻璃(PMMA)作为实验材料,试件尺寸为220 mm×50 mm×5 mm,采用激光切割制作长度5 mm的预制裂纹和长度10 mm的静止裂纹,预制裂纹位于试件的底部边缘中心,静止裂纹的中心位于试件水平轴线。将静止裂纹偏置距离作为单一变量,采用数字激光动态焦散实验系统对含不同缺陷的PMMA进行三点弯曲实验,并结合几何分形理论研究不同偏置距离下运动裂纹的分形规律。实验结果表明:存在预制裂纹与静止裂纹的临界偏置距离(6 mm),该条件下裂纹轨迹对应的分形维数值最大,裂纹轨迹的规则程度最低,裂纹破坏形态最复杂。当预制裂纹与静止裂纹的偏置距离在0~6 mm时,裂纹Ⅰ起裂后垂直向上扩展一段距离,与静止裂纹交汇,并停滞一段时间后发生二次起裂,直至贯穿试件,偏置距离和交汇点竖向坐标值呈近似线性函数关系。偏置距离的存在不会影响裂纹Ⅰ的起裂时间和应力强度因子,但会显著减小裂纹Ⅱ的动态应力强度因子,且停滞时长随偏置距离的增大而逐渐缩短。当偏置距离大于临界偏置距离时,运动裂纹不再与静止裂纹交汇而是呈拱状向试件上边缘扩展直至贯穿,裂纹的起偏时间、起偏位置也会出现明显的滞后现象。
  • 图  1  焦散线方法原理图

    Figure  1.  The principle of the caustic method

    图  2  Ⅰ型裂纹尖端载荷及焦散曲线

    Figure  2.  Load at the mode-I crack tip and the corresponding caustics curve

    图  3  数字激光动态焦散线实验系统

    Figure  3.  Digital laser dynamic caustics test system

    图  4  数字激光动态焦散实验试件示意图

    Figure  4.  Schematic representation of the specimens used in digital laser dynamic caustics test

    图  5  冲击加载装置

    Figure  5.  The impact loading device

    图  6  试件断裂形态

    Figure  6.  Fractural forms of specimens

    图  7  裂纹尖端交汇点位置随偏置距离的变化

    Figure  7.  Change of crack tip vertical coordinate intersection point with offset distance

    图  8  裂纹扩展的焦散斑图片

    Figure  8.  Caustic photos of cracks during propagation

    图  9  裂纹应力强度因子随时间的变化

    Figure  9.  Change of crack stress intensity factor with time

    图  10  裂纹尖端沿水平方向的运动速度随时间的变化

    Figure  10.  Change of crack tip velocity along horizontal direction with time

    图  11  裂纹尖端在扩展过程中偏离竖直方向的角度随其位移的变化

    Figure  11.  Angle change of crack tip deviating from the vertical direction during propagation with its displacement

    图  12  裂纹轨迹二值图

    Figure  12.  Binary diagrams of crack trajectories

    图  13  裂纹轨迹的计盒维数拟合曲线

    Figure  13.  Box-counting dimension fitting curves of crack trajectories

  • [1] RICHARD H A, SANDER M. Damages caused by crack growth [M]//RICHARD H A, SANDER M. Fatigue Crack Growth. Cham: Springer, 2016. DOI: 10.1007/978-3-319-32534-7_2
    [2] RICHARD H A, FULLAND M, SANDER M. Theoretical crack path prediction [J]. Fatigue and Fracture of Engineering Materials and Structures, 2005, 28(1−2): 3–12. DOI: 10.1111/j.1460-2695.2004.00855.x.
    [3] 杨仁树, 王雁冰, 侯丽冬, 等. 冲击荷载下缺陷介质裂纹扩展的DLDC试验 [J]. 岩石力学与工程学报, 2014, 33(10): 1971–1976. DOI: 10.13722/j.cnki.jrme.2014.10.004.

    YANG R S, WANG Y B, HOU L D, et al. DLDC experiment on crack propagation in defective medium under impact loading [J]. Chinese Journal of Rock Mechanics and Engineering, 2014, 33(10): 1971–1976. DOI: 10.13722/j.cnki.jrme.2014.10.004.
    [4] 杨仁树, 苏洪, 龚悦, 等. 冲击作用下静止裂纹与运动裂纹相互作用的试验研究 [J]. 振动与冲击, 2018, 37(8): 107–112. DOI: 10.13465/j.cnki.jvs.2018.08.017.

    YANG R S, SU H, GONG Y, et al. Experimental study of interaction between stationary crack and moving crack under impact [J]. Journal of Vibration and Shock, 2018, 37(8): 107–112. DOI: 10.13465/j.cnki.jvs.2018.08.017.
    [5] 姚学锋, 熊春阳, 方竞. 含偏置裂纹三点弯曲梁的动态断裂行为研究 [J]. 力学学报, 1996, 28(6): 661–669. DOI: 10.3321/j.issn:0459-1879.1996.06.003.

    YAO X F, XIONG C Y, FANG J. Study of dynamic fracture behaviour on three-point-bend beam with off-center edge-crack [J]. Acta Mechanica Sinica, 1996, 28(6): 661–669. DOI: 10.3321/j.issn:0459-1879.1996.06.003.
    [6] YAO X F, XU W, XU M Q, et al. Experimental study of dynamic fracture behavior of PMMA with overlapping offset-parallel cracks [J]. Polymer Testing, 2003, 22(6): 663–670. DOI: 10.1016/S0142-9418(02)00173-3.
    [7] 岳中文, 宋耀, 邱鹏, 等. 冲击载荷下双预置裂纹三点弯曲梁动态断裂实验 [J]. 振动与冲击, 2017, 36(4): 151–156, 177. DOI: 10.13465/j.cnki.jvs.2017.04.024.

    YUE Z W, SONG Y, QIU P, et al. A dynamic fracture experiment of a three-point-bend beam containing double pre-existing cracks under impact load [J]. Journal of Vibration and Shock, 2017, 36(4): 151–156, 177. DOI: 10.13465/j.cnki.jvs.2017.04.024.
    [8] GONG K Z, LI Z, QIN W Z. Influence of loading rate on dynamic fracture behavior of fiber-reinforced composites [J]. Acta Mechanica Solida Sinica, 2008, 21(5): 457–460. DOI: 10.1007/s10338-008-0855-9.
    [9] 杨立云, 张勇进, 孙金超, 等. 偏置裂纹对含双裂纹PMMA试件动态断裂影响效应研究 [J]. 矿业科学学报, 2017, 2(4): 330–335. DOI: 10.19606/j.cnki.jmst.2017.04.003.

    YANG L Y, ZHANG Y J, SUN J C, et al. The effect of offset distance on dynamic fracture behavior of PMMA with double cracks [J]. Journal of Mining Science and Technology, 2017, 2(4): 330–335. DOI: 10.19606/j.cnki.jmst.2017.04.003.
    [10] 李清, 薛耀东, 于强, 等. 含预制裂纹L形梁柱试件动态断裂过程 [J]. 爆炸与冲击, 2018, 38(3): 491–500. DOI: 10.11883/bzycj-2017-0255.

    LI Q, XUE Y D, YU Q, et al. Dynamic fracture processes of L-shaped beam-column specimens with prefabricated cracks [J]. Explosion and Shock Waves, 2018, 38(3): 491–500. DOI: 10.11883/bzycj-2017-0255.
    [11] 李清, 薛耀东, 于强, 等. 含预制裂纹的悬臂梁-柱试件冲击断裂实验 [J]. 矿业科学学报, 2018, 3(2): 139–147. DOI: 10.19606/j.cnki.jmst.2018.02.005.

    LI Q, XUE Y D, YU Q, et al. Experimental study on impact fracture of cantilever beam-column specimen with prefabricated crack [J]. Journal of Mining Science and Technology, 2018, 3(2): 139–147. DOI: 10.19606/j.cnki.jmst.2018.02.005.
    [12] GUO D M, ZHOU B W, LIU K, et al. Dynamic caustics test of blast load impact on neighboring different cross-section roadways [J]. International Journal of Mining Science and Technology, 2016, 26(5): 803–808. DOI: 10.1016/j.ijmst.2016.05.045.
    [13] 沈世伟, 廖文旺, 徐燕, 等. 不同节理间距条件下岩体双孔爆破动焦散试验研究 [J]. 煤炭学报, 2018, 43(8): 2180–2186. DOI: 10.13225/j.cnki.jccs.2017.1223.

    SHEN S W, LIAO W W, XU Y, et al. Dynamic caustics test of rock mass under different joint spacing conditions with two-hole blasting [J]. Journal of China Coal Society, 2018, 43(8): 2180–2186. DOI: 10.13225/j.cnki.jccs.2017.1223.
    [14] 杨立云, 杨仁树, 许鹏. 新型数字激光动态焦散线实验系统及其应用 [J]. 中国矿业大学学报, 2013, 42(2): 188–194. DOI: 10.13247/j.cnki.jcumt.2013.02.005.

    YANG L Y, YANG R S, XU P. Caustics method combined with laser & digital high-speed camera and its applications [J]. Journal of China University of Mining and Technology, 2013, 42(2): 188–194. DOI: 10.13247/j.cnki.jcumt.2013.02.005.
    [15] 杨仁树, 陈程, 赵勇, 等. 空孔-裂纹偏置方式对PMMA冲击断裂动态行为的影响 [J]. 振动与冲击, 2018, 37(20): 122–128. DOI: 10.13465/j.cnki.jvs.2018.20.019.

    YANG R S, CHEN C, ZHAO Y, et al. Influence of the void-crack offset method on the dynamic behavior of PMMA during impact fracture [J]. Journal of Vibration and Shock, 2018, 37(20): 122–128. DOI: 10.13465/j.cnki.jvs.2018.20.019.
    [16] YANG R S, DING C X, LI Y L, et al. Crack propagation behavior in slit charge blasting under high static stress conditions [J]. International Journal of Rock Mechanics and Mining Sciences, 2019, 119: 117–123. DOI: 10.1016/j.ijrmms.2019.05.002.
    [17] YANG L Y, DING C X. Fracture mechanism due to blast-imposed loading under high static stress conditions [J]. International Journal of Rock Mechanics and Mining Sciences, 2018, 107: 150–158. DOI: 10.1016/j.ijrmms.2018.04.039.
    [18] 杨仁树, 许鹏, 岳中文, 等. 圆孔缺陷与I型运动裂纹相互作用的试验研究 [J]. 岩土力学, 2016, 37(6): 1597–1602. DOI: 10.16285/j.rsm.2016.06.009.

    YANG R S, XU P, YUE Z W, et al. Laboratory study of interaction between a circular hole defect and mode-I moving crack [J]. Rock and Soil Mechanics, 2016, 37(6): 1597–1602. DOI: 10.16285/j.rsm.2016.06.009.
    [19] 杨立云. 岩石类材料的动态断裂与围压下爆生裂纹的实验研究[D]. 北京: 中国矿业大学(北京), 2011.

    YANG L Y. The experimental study on rock-type materials dynamic fracure and blasting crack propagation under confining pressure [D]. Beijing: China University of Mining and Technology-Beijing, 2011.
    [20] DAEHNKE A, ROSSMANITH H P, NAPIER J A L. Gas pressurisation of blast-induced conical cracks [J]. International Journal of Rock Mechanics and Mining Sciences, 1997, 34(3/4): 263.e1–263.e17. DOI: 10.1016/S1365-1609(97)00282-7.
    [21] 杨鑫. 爆炸作用下裂隙岩体裂纹扩展模拟试验研究[D]. 四川绵阳: 西南科技大学, 2015.

    YANG X. Simulation test study of fissured rock mass on crack progation under explosion [D]. Mianyang, Sichuan: Southwest University of Science and Technology, 2015.
    [22] 谢和平. 分形几何及其在岩土力学中的应用 [J]. 岩土工程学报, 1992, 14(1): 14–24. DOI: 10.3321/j.issn:1000-4548.1992.01.002.

    XIE H P. Fractal geometry and its application to rock and soil materials [J]. Chinese Journal of Geotechnical Engineering, 1992, 14(1): 14–24. DOI: 10.3321/j.issn:1000-4548.1992.01.002.
    [23] 杨仁树, 肖成龙, 丁晨曦, 等. 空孔与运动裂纹相互作用的动焦散线实验研究 [J]. 爆炸与冲击, 2020, 40(5): 052202. DOI: 10.11883/bzycj-2019-0091.

    YANG R S, XIAO C L, DING C X, et al. Experimental study on dynamic caustics of interaction between void and running crack [J]. Explosion and Shock Waves, 2020, 40(5): 052202. DOI: 10.11883/bzycj-2019-0091.
    [24] 李成杰, 徐颖, 张宇婷, 等. 冲击荷载下裂隙类煤岩组合体能量演化与分形特征研究 [J]. 岩石力学与工程学报, 2019, 38(11): 2231–2241. DOI: 10.13722/j.cnki.jrme.2019.0446.

    LI C J, XU Y, ZHANG Y T, et al. Study on energy evolution and fractal characteristics of cracked coal-rock-like combined body under impact loading [J]. Chinese Journal of Rock Mechanics and Engineering, 2019, 38(11): 2231–2241. DOI: 10.13722/j.cnki.jrme.2019.0446.
    [25] 李柯萱, 李铁. 不同加载速率下砂岩弯曲破坏的细观机理 [J]. 爆炸与冲击, 2019, 39(4): 043101. DOI: 10.11883/bzycj-2018-0178.

    LI K X, LI T. Micro-mechanism of bending failure of sandstone under different loading rates [J]. Explosion and Shock Waves, 2019, 39(4): 043101. DOI: 10.11883/bzycj-2018-0178.
  • 加载中
图(13)
计量
  • 文章访问数:  4459
  • HTML全文浏览量:  1786
  • PDF下载量:  56
  • 被引次数: 0
出版历程
  • 收稿日期:  2019-10-21
  • 修回日期:  2020-05-20
  • 网络出版日期:  2020-06-25
  • 刊出日期:  2020-07-01

目录

    /

    返回文章
    返回