加载速率对40Cr钢Ⅱ型动态断裂特性的影响

范昌增; 许泽建; 何晓东; 黄风雷

doi:10.11883/bzycj-2021-0029

加载速率对40Cr钢Ⅱ型动态断裂特性的影响

doi: 10.11883/bzycj-2021-0029

北京理工大学爆炸科学与技术国家重点实验室，北京 100081

基金项目: 国家自然科学基金（11772062，12072040）

详细信息

作者简介:
范昌增（1996－　），男，硕士研究生，fanfancy0928@163.com

通讯作者:
许泽建（1979－　），男，博士，副教授，xuzejian@bit.edu.cn

中图分类号: O346.1
计量
- 文章访问数: 544
- HTML全文浏览量: 303
- PDF下载量: 81
- 被引次数: 0
出版历程
- 收稿日期: 2021-01-21
- 修回日期: 2021-04-21
- 网络出版日期: 2021-07-20
- 刊出日期: 2021-08-05

Effect of loading rate on the modeⅡ dynamic fracture characteristics of 40Cr steel

State Key Laboratory of Explosion Science and Technology, Beijing Institute of Technology, Beijing 100081， China

摘要

摘要: 采用新型Ⅱ型动态断裂测试技术，对高强钢40Cr在高加载速率下的Ⅱ型动态断裂特性进行了测试研究。基于新设计的Ⅱ型动态断裂试样和分离式霍普金森压杆（split Hopkinson pressure bar， SHPB）技术，通过实验-数值方法确定了裂尖在加载过程中的应力强度因子曲线。采用应变片法确定了试样的起裂时间，最终得到40Cr的Ⅱ型动态断裂韧性值，并对其加载速率相关性和材料的失效机理进行了研究。结果表明，在1.08～5.53 TPa·m^1/2/s的加载速率范围内，40Cr的Ⅱ型动态断裂韧性基本表现为与加载速率成正相关的变化趋势。通过对试样断口形貌的分析，确定了材料的失效模式及机理，发现随着加载速率的增加，存在拉伸型失效向绝热剪切型失效模式转变的现象。
- 高强钢 /
- 加载速率 /
- Ⅱ型动态断裂韧性 /
- 失效模式转变
Abstract: 40Cr high strength steel is often used in aerospace and national defense fields due to its excellent mechanical properties. Therefore, the research on the mode Ⅱ dynamic fracture characteristics and failure mechanism of 40Cr high strength steel under high-speed impact has important scientific significance and engineering value. Experiments and numerical simulations were carried out to study the mode Ⅱ dynamic fracture properties of 40Cr material under high loading rates. Based on the newly designed specimen and the novel test technique for mode Ⅱ dynamic fracture, the experimental-numerical method was used to determine the dynamic stress intensity factor curve of the crack tip during the loading process. The crack initiation time of the specimen was obtained by the strain gauge pasted on the specimen, and the mode Ⅱ dynamic fracture toughness of 40Cr was finally determined. The effect of loading rate and the failure mechanism of the material were also studied. The results show that within the present loading rate range of this work (1.08−5.53 TPa·m^1/2/s), the mode Ⅱ dynamic fracture toughness of 40Cr presents a positive correlation with the loading rate. Through the analysis of the fracture morphology of the recovered specimen, it is found that there exists a transition from tensile failure mode to adiabatic shear failure mode with the increase of loading rate, and the critical loading rate is about 2.92 TPa·m^1/2/s. When K_Ⅱd≤1.70 TPa·m^1/2/s, the 40Cr steel mainly exhibits brittle fracture; when K_Ⅱd is in the range of 2.12−2.92 TPa·m^1/2/s, the fracture mainly presents the morphological characteristics of ductile fracture; when K_Ⅱd ≥ 3.19 TPa·m^1/2/s, the material failure is mainly caused by adiabatic shear bands. Brittle fracture is dominated by strain rate hardening mechanism, ductile fracture is dominated by strain/strain rate hardening and thermal softening mechanisms, and adiabatic shear fracture is dominated by thermal softening mechanism.
- high strength steel /
- loading rate /
- mode Ⅱ dynamic fracture toughness /
- failure mode transition

HTML全文

图 1 Ⅱ型断裂试样几何尺寸(单位：mm)

Figure 1. Geometric dimensions of the mode Ⅱ fracture specimen (unit: mm)

下载: 全尺寸图片幻灯片

图 2 典型实验信号（4.86 TPa·m^1/2/s）

Figure 2. Typical experimental signals (4.86 TPa·m^1/2/s)

下载: 全尺寸图片幻灯片

图 3 试样拉伸起裂的典型信号（1.25 TPa·m^1/2/s）

Figure 3. Typical signals of tensile fracture initiation of a specimen (1.25 TPa·m^1/2/s)

下载: 全尺寸图片幻灯片

图 4 试样绝热剪切起裂的典型信号（4.86 TPa·m^1/2/s）

Figure 4. Typical signals of ASB initiation of a specimen (4.86 TPa·m^1/2/s)

下载: 全尺寸图片幻灯片

图 5 拉伸型起裂（1.25 TPa·m^1/2/s）与ASB型起裂（4.86 TPa·m^1/2/s）的高速摄影图

Figure 5. High-speed photographic images of tensile fracture initiation (1.25 TPa·m^1/2/s) and ASB initiation (4.86 TPa·m^1/2/s)

下载: 全尺寸图片幻灯片

图 6 试样裂尖网格细化

Figure 6. Mesh refinement of the specimen crack tips

下载: 全尺寸图片幻灯片

图 7 试样的实测应变与模拟应变

Figure 7. The measured strain and simulated strain of the specimen

下载: 全尺寸图片幻灯片

图 8 子弹速度与起裂时间的关系

Figure 8. Relationship between bullet velocity and crack initiation time

下载: 全尺寸图片幻灯片

图 9 不同加载速率下的DSIF曲线

Figure 9. DSIF curves at different loading rates

下载: 全尺寸图片幻灯片

图 10 不同加载方式下的DFT与加载速率关系图

Figure 10. Relationship between DFT and loading rate under different loading methods

下载: 全尺寸图片幻灯片

图 11 不同断口形貌特征的DFT与加载速率关系图

Figure 11. Relationship between DFT and loading rate of different fracture morphology characteristics

下载: 全尺寸图片幻灯片

图 12 40Cr试样沿晶断裂及A区放大图（1.25 TPa·m^1/2/s）

Figure 12. Intergranular fracture of 40Cr specimen and magnification of location A (1.25 TPa·m^1/2/s)

下载: 全尺寸图片幻灯片

图 13 40Cr试样韧性断裂特征（2.92 TPa·m^1/2/s）

Figure 13. Ductile fracture characteristics of 40Cr specimen (2.92 TPa·m^1/2/s)

下载: 全尺寸图片幻灯片

图 14 40Cr试样绝热剪切型断裂特征（3.87 TPa·m^1/2/s）

Figure 14. Adiabatic shear fracture characteristics of 40Cr specimen (3.87 TPa·m^1/2/s)

下载: 全尺寸图片幻灯片

表 1 高强钢40Cr的元素成分及质量分数

Table 1. Composition and mass fraction of high-strength steel 40Cr

w(C)/%	w(Mn)/%	w(Si)/%	w(Cr)/%	w(Ni)/%
0.37～0.45	0.50～0.80	0.20～0.40	0.80～1.10	−

下载: 导出CSV

表 2 高强钢40Cr的力学性能参数

Table 2. Mechanical properties of high strength steel 40Cr

材料	ρ/(kg·m⁻³)	E/GPa	$\ \mu $	$ {\sigma }_{\mathrm{b}} $/MPa
40Cr	7820	199	0.3	1987

下载: 导出CSV

表 3 入射杆、透射杆的力学性能参数

Table 3. Mechanical properties of the incident and transmission bars

材料	ρ/（kg·m⁻³）	E/GPa	$\ \mu $
18Ni	8000	190	0.3

下载: 导出CSV

表 4 高强钢40Cr的动态断裂韧性值

Table 4. Dynamic fracture toughness values of high strength steel 40Cr

L/m	p/MPa	t_f/µs	K_Ⅱd/（MPa·m^1/2）	${\dot{K} }_{\text{Ⅱ}\mathrm{d} }$/（TPa·m^1/2/s）
0.380	0.18	27	29.2	1.08
0.380	0.19	26	32.6	1.25
0.380	0.22	22	37.5	1.70
0.203	0.18	19	40.2	2.12
0.203	0.20	17	49.4	2.92
0.203	0.22	16	51.0	3.19
0.100	0.14	13	50.3	3.87
0.100	0.16	11	53.5	4.86
0.100	0.18	10	55.3	5.53
注: L为子弹长度，p为气压，t_f为起裂时间，K_Ⅱd为Ⅱ型断裂韧性，$ {\dot{K}}_{\text{Ⅱ}\mathrm{d}} $为加载速率

下载: 导出CSV

表 5 不同断口形貌下DFT与加载速率的线性拟合参数

Table 5. Linear fitting parameters of DFT and the loading rates under different fracture morphology

材料	断口类型	A	b
40Cr	脆性	12.88	15.80
	韧性	9.98	19.94
	绝热剪切型	2.09	43.39

下载: 导出CSV

参考文献(27)

[1]	黄浩. 40Cr表面激光熔覆硬质涂层及其应用研究[D]. 河北秦皇岛: 燕山大学, 2016.
[2]	KALTHOFF J F. Shadow optical analysis of dynamic shear fracture [J]. Optical Engineering, 1988, 27(10): 271035. DOI: 10.1117/12.7976772.
[3]	KALTHOFF J F. Transition in the failure behavior of dynamically shear loaded cracks [J]. Applied Mechanics Reviews, 1990, 43(S5): 47–50. DOI: 10.1115/1.3120818.
[4]	KALTHOFF J F. Modes of dynamic shear failure in solids [J]. International Journal of Fracture, 2000, 101(1): 1–31. DOI: 10.1023/A: 1007647800529.
[5]	KALTHOFF J F, BÜRGEL A. Influence of loading rate on shear fracture toughness for failure mode transition [J]. International Journal of Impact Engineering, 2004, 30(8): 957–971. DOI: 10.1016/j.ijimpeng.2004.05.004.
[6]	ZHOU M, ROSAKIS A J, RAVICHANDRAN G. Dynamically propagating shear bands in impact-loaded prenotched plates—Ⅰ. experimental investigations of temperature signatures and propagation speed [J]. Journal of the Mechanics and Physics of Solids, 1996, 44(6): 981–1006. DOI: 10.1016/0022-5096(96)00003-8.
[7]	ZHOU M, RAVICHANDRAN G, ROSAKIS A J. Dynamically propagating shear bands in impact-loaded prenotched plates—Ⅱ. numerical simulations [J]. Journal of the Mechanics and Physics of Solids, 1996, 44(6): 1007–1021, 1023-1032. DOI: 10.1016/0022-5096(96)00004-X.
[8]	ZHOU M, ROSAKIS A J, RAVICHANDRAN G. On the growth of shear bands and failure-mode transition in prenotched plates: a comparison of singly and doubly notched specimens [J]. International Journal of Plasticity, 1998, 14(4): 435–451. DOI: 10.1016/S0749-6419(98)00003-5.
[9]	RAVI-CHANDAR K. On the failure mode transitions in polycarbonate under dynamic mixed-mode loading [J]. International Journal of Solids and Structures, 1995, 32(6): 925–938. DOI: 10.1016/0020-7683(94)00169-W.
[10]	RAVI-CHANDAR K, LU J, YANG B, et al. Failure mode transitions in polymers under high strain rate loading [J]. International Journal of Fracture, 2000, 101(1): 33–72. DOI: 10.1023/A: 1007581101315.
[11]	MASON J J, ROSAKIS A J, RAVICHANDRAN G. On the strain and strain rate dependence of the fraction of plastic work converted to heat: an experimental study using high speed infrared detectors and the Kolsky bar [J]. Mechanics of Materials, 1994, 17(2): 135–145. DOI: 10.1016/0167-6636(94)90054-X.
[12]	CHU D Y, LI X, LIU Z L, et al. A unified phase field damage model for modeling the brittle-ductile dynamic failure mode transition in metals [J]. Engineering Fracture Mechanics, 2019, 212: 197–209. DOI: 10.1016/j.engfracmech.2019.03.031.
[13]	CHIANG F. Moiré and speckle methods applied to elastic-plastic fracture studies[C]//Experimental Techniques in Fracture Mechanics. New York: VCH, 1993: 291-325.
[14]	SANFORD R J. Determining fracture parameters with full-field optical methods [J]. Experimental Mechanics, 1989, 29(3): 241–247. DOI: 10.1007/BF02321401.
[15]	PATTERSON E A, OLDEN E J. Optical analysis of crack tip stress fields: a comparative study [J]. Fatigue & Fracture of Engineering Materials & Structures, 2004, 27(7): 623–635. DOI: 10.1111/j.1460-2695.2004.00774.X.
[16]	MA L, KOBAYASHI A S, ATLURI S N, et al. Crack linkup: an experimental analysis [J]. Experimental Mechanics, 2002, 42(2): 147–152. DOI: 10.1007/BF02410876.
[17]	GOECKE K E, MOSHIER M A. A technique to measure fatigue crack growth threshold [J]. Experimental Mechanics, 2002, 42(2): 182–185. DOI: 10.1007/BF02410881.
[18]	王洪山. 几种实用的断裂试验方法 [J]. 理化检验-物理分册, 2001, 37(7): 292–294. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1001-4012.2001.07.005. WANG H S. Some kinds of practical fracture test methods [J]. Physical Testing and Chemical Analysis Part A: Physical Testing, 2001, 37(7): 292–294. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1001-4012.2001.07.005.
[19]	姜风春, 刘瑞堂. 动态断裂韧性测试方法的有效性分析 [J]. 哈尔滨工程大学学报, 1999, 20(3): 97–101. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1006-7043.1999.03.017. JIANG F C, LIU R T. Analysis of validity of dynamic fracture toughness measurement [J]. Journal of Harbin Engineering University, 1999, 20(3): 97–101. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1006-7043.1999.03.017.
[20]	郑坚, 王泽平, 段祝平. 动态断裂的加载和测试技术 [J]. 力学进展, 1994, 24(4): 459–475. DOI: 10.6052/1000-0992-1994-4-j1994-042. ZHENG J, WANG Z P, DUAN Z P. Loading and measuring techniques indynamic fracture testing [J]. Advances in Mechanics, 1994, 24(4): 459–475. DOI: 10.6052/1000-0992-1994-4-j1994-042.
[21]	许泽建, 李玉龙, 刘元镛, 等. 两种高强钢在高加载速率下的Ⅱ型动态断裂韧性 [J]. 金属学报, 2006, 42(6): 635–640. DOI: 10.3321/j.issn: 0412-1961.2006.06.013. XU Z J, LI Y L, LIU Y Y, et al. Mode Ⅱ dynamic fracture toughness of two high strength steels under high loading rate [J]. Acta Metallurgica Sinica, 2006, 42(6): 635–640. DOI: 10.3321/j.issn: 0412-1961.2006.06.013.
[22]	许泽建, 黄风雷, 何晓东. 一种用于纯Ⅱ型动态断裂的试验件: CN201820669843.4 [P]. 2018-12-11.
[23]	XU Z J, HE X D, HAN Y, et al. A different viewpoint on mechanism of fracture to shear-banding failure mode transition [J]. Journal of the Mechanics and Physics of Solids, 2020, 145: 104165. DOI: 10.1016/j.jmps.2020.104165.
[24]	XU Z J, HAN Y, FAN C Z, et al. Dynamic shear fracture toughness and failure characteristics of Ti-6Al-4V alloy under high loading rates [J]. Mechanics of Materials, 2021, 154: 103718. DOI: 10.1016/j.mechmat.2020.103718.
[25]	JIANG F C, VECCHIO K S. Hopkinson bar loaded fracture experimental technique: a critical review of dynamic fracture toughness tests [J]. Applied Mechanics Reviews, 2009, 62(6): 060802. DOI: 10.1115/1.3124647.
[26]	BAI Y L, DODD B. Adiabatic shear localization: occurrence, theories, and applications [M]. Oxford: Pergamon Press, 1992: 73−75.
[27]	NEMAT-NASSER S, ISAACS J B, STARRETT J E. Hopkinson techniques for dynamic recovery experiments [J]. Proceedings of the Royal Society A: Mathematical, Physical and Engineering Sciences, 1991, 435(1894): 371–379. DOI: 10.1098/rspa.1991.0150.