轴向增强战斗部端部惰性填充物对端部破片飞散特性的影响

李国杰; 王成龙; 郭志威; 李响; 黄广炎

doi:10.11883/bzycj-2021-0281

轴向增强战斗部端部惰性填充物对端部破片飞散特性的影响

doi: 10.11883/bzycj-2021-0281

1.
北京航天长征飞行器研究所，北京 100074
2.
北京理工大学爆炸科学与技术国家重点实验室，北京 100081

基金项目: 航天科技创新基金；航天科技钱学森青年创新基金

详细信息

作者简介:
李国杰（1979－　），男，博士研究生，高级工程师，liguojie7788@126.com

通讯作者:
王成龙（1989－　），男，博士，工程师，350229858@qq.com

中图分类号: O389
计量
- 文章访问数: 409
- HTML全文浏览量: 163
- PDF下载量: 107
- 被引次数: 0
出版历程
- 收稿日期: 2021-07-05
- 修回日期: 2022-02-22
- 网络出版日期: 2022-04-06
- 刊出日期: 2022-09-09

Influence of end non-reactive fillers on the dispersion of the fragments in an axially-enhanced warhead

1.
Beijing Institute of Space Long March Vehicle, Beijing 100074, China
2.
State Key Laboratory of Explosion Science and Technology, Beijing Institute of Technology, Beijing 100081, China

摘要

摘要: 在当前破片战斗部动态毁伤场设计中，中心盲区效应被视为影响战斗部毁伤效率提高的关键因素。轴向增强战斗部作为消除战斗部动态中心盲区的重要手段，越来越受到相关研究人员的重视。本文中基于光滑粒子流体力学计算方法，建立了一系列轴向增强战斗部（端部分别含有惰性聚氨酯填充物、尼龙填充物和爆炸填充物）在爆炸载荷作用下的破碎和碎片散布过程的数值模型，并用于研究战斗部前端填充物特性对壳体动态响应的影响。数值模拟结果表明，填充物对战斗部前部破片的速度影响显著，但对破片飞散角度影响较弱。通过比较特定碎片的速度历史曲线，分析了惰性填料对碎片速度的影响机理。研究结果表明，聚氨酯泡沫填充物可以显著延缓爆炸冲击波对前破片的加速过程，并在一定程度上降低爆炸载荷，尼龙填充物可以在一定程度上降低前向破片和侧向破片的加速度，从而表明爆炸载荷被引导均匀分布在末端位置周围。结合战斗部自身的牵连速度，使用低密度和低质量填料代替头部装药具有相同的动态毁伤效果，可以提高轴向增强战斗部的能量利用效率。
- 轴向增强战斗部 /
- 动态盲区 /
- 惰性填充物 /
- 破片 /
- 飞散角度
Abstract: In the current design of the dynamic damage field of the fragment warheads, the central blind area effect is regarded as an essential factor affecting the warhead damage efficiency improvement. The axially-enhanced warhead has become an important design means to eliminate the dynamic central blind area of the warhead, which attracts more and more attention from relevant researchers. In the present paper, based on the smoothed particle hydrodynamics (SPH) computation method, a series of numerical models for the shell breaking and fragment dispersion processes of axially-reinforced warheads with non-filler, polyurethane filler nylon filler and explosive filler, respectively, at the end under the explosive loadings are established, and used to study the influence of the characteristics of the fillers in the front of the warhead on the dynamic response of the shell. It is found from the numerical simulations that the filler has a significant influence on the velocity of the fragments in the front of the warhead but a minor influence on the dispersion angle of the fragments. The mechanism of the influence of the non-reactive filler on the fragment velocity is analyzed by comparing the velocity history curves of the specific fragments. The results show that the polyurethane foam filling can significantly delay the acceleration process of the explosive shock wave to the forward fragment and reduce the explosive load to a certain extent. The nylon filler can reduce the acceleration of the forward fragment and the acceleration of the lateral fragment to a certain extent. Thus, the explosion loading is guided to be evenly distributed around the circumference of the end position. Considering the synthesis of the involved velocity of the warhead, using low-density and low-mass filler instead of head charge has the same dynamic damage effect of improving the energy utilization efficiency of the axially-enhanced warhead. The numerical models established in this paper and the research finding can provide some reference for the dynamic damage field design of conventional fragment warheads.
- axially-enhanced warhead /
- dynamic blind region /
- non-reactive filler /
- fragment /
- dispersion angle

HTML全文

图 1 不同战斗部的毁伤区域

Figure 1. Damage regions by different warheads

下载: 全尺寸图片幻灯片

图 2 轴向增强战斗部

Figure 2. An axially-enhanced warhead

下载: 全尺寸图片幻灯片

图 3 轴向增强战斗部数值计算模型

Figure 3. The numerical model of an axially-enhanced warhead

下载: 全尺寸图片幻灯片

图 4 端部无填充战斗部壳体的破碎过程

Figure 4. Fragmentation process of the shell of the warhead with a non-filled end

下载: 全尺寸图片幻灯片

图 5 端部填充聚氨酯战斗部壳体破碎过程

Figure 5. Fragmentation process of the warhead with an end filled with polyurethane

下载: 全尺寸图片幻灯片

图 6 端部填充尼龙战斗部壳体破碎过程

Figure 6. Fragmentation process of the warhead with an end filled with nylon

下载: 全尺寸图片幻灯片

图 7 端部填充炸药战斗部壳体破碎过程

Figure 7. Fragmentation process of the warhead with an end filled with explosive

下载: 全尺寸图片幻灯片

图 8 轴向增强战斗部在不同轴向填充材料下的端部破片速度分布

Figure 8. The fragment velocity distributions of the axially-enhanced warheads filled with different materials

下载: 全尺寸图片幻灯片

图 9 不同轴向填充物下战斗部轴向增强部分破片的飞散角度

Figure 9. Projection angles of fragments from the axially-enhanced part of the warhead axially filled with different materials

下载: 全尺寸图片幻灯片

图 10 战斗部典型破片位置示意图

Figure 10. The typical positions of the fragments from the warhead

下载: 全尺寸图片幻灯片

图 11 典型位置破片速度时间曲线

Figure 11. Velocity-time curves of the fragments at typical positions

下载: 全尺寸图片幻灯片

参考文献(18)

[1]	赵耘晨. 前向增强杀爆弹前置破片初速及飞散方向研究 [D]. 南京: 南京理工大学, 2016: 1–9. ZHAO Y C. The study of fragment initial velocity and scattering direction of front fragment on forward enhanced lethal he projectile [D]. Nanjing, Jiangsu, China: Nanjing University of Science and Technology, 2016: 1–9.
[2]	HUANG G Y, LI W, FENG S S. Fragment velocity distribution of cylindrical rings under eccentric point initiation [J]. Propellants, Explosives, Pyrotechnics, 2015, 40(2): 215–220. DOI: 10.1002/prep.201400180.
[3]	NING J G, DUAN Y, XU X Z, et al. Velocity characteristics of fragments from prismatic casing under internal explosive loading [J]. International Journal of Impact Engineering, 2017, 109: 29–38. DOI: 10.1016/j.ijimpeng.2017.05.018.
[4]	DHOTE K D, MURTHY K P S, RAJAN K M, et al. Directional warhead design methodology for a tailored fragment beam [J]. Central European Journal of Energetic Materials, 2015, 12(4): 637–649.
[5]	DING L L, LI Z D, LIANG M Z, et al. The dispersion rule of fragments about the asymmetric shell [J]. Shock and Vibration, 2017, 2017: 9810978. DOI: 10.1155/2017/9810978.
[6]	李超, 李向东, 陈志斌, 等. 前向增强杀伤榴弹对人员目标杀伤威力分析 [J]. 兵工学报, 2014, 35(7): 1119–1123. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1000-1093.2014.07.028. LI C, LI X D, CHEN Z B, et al. Lethality of forward enhanced lethal he projectile against personnel targets [J]. Acta Armamentarii, 2014, 35(7): 1119–1123. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1000-1093.2014.07.028.
[7]	石志彬, 高敏, 米双山, 等. 前向战斗部破片散布均匀性研究 [J]. 弹箭与制导学报, 2014, 34(1): 95-97; 138. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1673-9728.2014.01.024. SHI Z B, GAO M, MI S S, et al. Study on fragment dispersion uniformity of forward-firing warhead [J]. Journal of Projectiles, Rockets, Missiles and Guidance, 2014, 34(1): 95-97; 138. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1673-9728.2014.01.024.
[8]	崔俊杰, 姜建东, 牛新立, 等. 轴向预制破片初速影响因素的研究 [J]. 弹箭与制导学报, 2014, 34(2): 84-86; 97. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1673-9728.2014.02.023. CUI J J, JIANG J D, NIU X L, et al. The research on impacting factors of axial preformed fragment velocity [J]. Journal of Projectiles, Rockets, Missiles and Guidance, 2014, 34(2): 84-86; 97. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1673-9728.2014.02.023.
[9]	郭子云, 赵太勇, 陈智刚. 战斗部端面预制破片威力性能影响的数值仿真 [J]. 计算机仿真, 2015, 32(3): 33–37. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1006-9348.2015.03.008. GUO Z Y, ZHAO T Y, CHEN Z G. Numerical simulation of lethality influence of warhead end premade fragment [J]. Computer Simulation, 2015, 32(3): 33–37. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1006-9348.2015.03.008.
[10]	李明星, 王志军, 黄阳洋, 等. 不同形状轴向预制破片的飞散特性研究 [J]. 兵器装备工程学报, 2017, 38(12): 65–69. DOI: 10.11809/scbgxb2017.12.016. LI M X, WANG Z J, HUANG Y Y, et al. Study on the scattering characteristics of different shape axial prefabricated fragment [J]. Journal of Ordnance Equipment Engineering, 2017, 38(12): 65–69. DOI: 10.11809/scbgxb2017.12.016.
[11]	谭振, 陈鹏万, 周强, 等. 战斗部轴向威力的增强 [J]. 爆炸与冲击, 2018, 38(4): 876–882. DOI: 10.11883/bzycj-2016-0342. TAN Z, CHEN P W, ZHOU Q, et al. Enhancement of axial lethality of warhead [J]. Explosion and Shock Waves, 2018, 38(4): 876–882. DOI: 10.11883/bzycj-2016-0342.
[12]	JOHNSON G R, COOK W H . A constitutive model and data for metals subjected to large strains, high strain rates and high temperatures[C]//Proceedings of the 7th International Symposium on Ballistics. The Hague, Netherlands, 1983: 12–21.
[13]	陈刚, 陈忠富, 陶俊林, 等. 45钢动态塑性本构参量与验证 [J]. 爆炸与冲击, 2005, 25(5): 69–74. DOI: 10.11883/1001-1455(2005)05-0451-06. CHEN G, CHEN Z F, TAO J L, et al. Investigation and validation on plastic constitutive parameters of 45 steel [J]. Explosion and Shock Waves, 2005, 25(5): 69–74. DOI: 10.11883/1001-1455(2005)05-0451-06.
[14]	DOBRATZ B M, CRAWFORD P C. LLNL explosives handbook [M]. Livermore, CA, USA: Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory, 1985.
[15]	DOBRATZ B M. LLNL explosives handbook: properties of chemical explosives and explosives and explosive simulants [R] . Livermore, CA, USA: Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory, 1981.
[16]	恽寿榕, 涂侯杰, 梁德寿, 等. 爆炸力学计算方法[M]. 北京: 北京理工大学出版社, 1995. YUN S R, TU H J, JIANG D S, et al. Explosion mechanics calculation method[M]. Beijing, China: Beijing Institute of Technology Press, 1995.
[17]	ZHOU Y, WANG T, ZHU W, BIAN X, HUANG G. Evaluation of blast mitigation effects of hollow cylindrical barriers based on water and foam [J]. Composite Structures, 2022, 282: 115016. DOI: 10.1016/j.compstruct.2021.115016.
[18]	MATUSKA D A, NEEDHAM C E, DURRETT R E. The AFWL HULL code codes for large problems fluid dynamics[C]//Proceedings of the SIGNUM Meeting on Software for Partial Differential Equations. New York, USA: Association for Computing Machinery, 1975. DOI: 10.1145/800207.806410.