列车碰撞被动安全性与司乘人员冲击生物损伤研究进展

敬霖; 刘凯; 王成全

doi:10.11883/bzycj-2021-0330

列车碰撞被动安全性与司乘人员冲击生物损伤研究进展

doi: 10.11883/bzycj-2021-0330

西南交通大学牵引动力国家重点实验室，四川成都 610031

基金项目: 国家自然科学基金（12122211）

详细信息

通讯作者:
敬　霖（1984－　），男，博士，研究员，博士生导师，jinglin@swjtu.edu.cn

中图分类号: O389；U270.1
计量
- 文章访问数: 621
- HTML全文浏览量: 585
- PDF下载量: 164
- 被引次数: 0
出版历程
- 收稿日期: 2021-07-31
- 修回日期: 2021-10-20
- 网络出版日期: 2021-11-10
- 刊出日期: 2021-12-05

Recentadvances in the collision passive safety of trains andimpact biological damage of drivers and passengers

State Key Laboratory of Traction Power, Southwest Jiaotong University, Chengdu 610031, Sichuan, China

摘要

摘要: 尽管铁路客运列车具有系列的主动安全保障措施，但列车服役中的意外碰撞事故仍不能完全避免，并且一旦发生，将造成严重的人员伤亡和巨大的经济损失。随着列车运行速度的不断提高，列车碰撞安全与冲击防护问题愈发受到关注和重视，并已开展了大量的探索和研究。本文中综述了列车碰撞被动安全性与司乘人员冲击生物损伤的若干研究进展。首先，统计和梳理了近些年的列车碰撞事故，分析了典型列车碰撞事故中存活人员的生物损伤分布情况；其次，介绍了列车碰撞被动安全性的研究方法，总结了列车碰撞后的响应姿态与脱轨机理；然后，从车辆耐撞性设计与评价标准、基于多级能量耗散的吸能结构设计、基于碰撞能量管理的列车结构耐撞性设计三个方面，详细阐述了列车碰撞被动安全性的研究进展；最后，关注了司乘人员在列车碰撞过程中的冲击生物损伤，总结了相关减轻司机和乘客生物损伤的防护措施。
- 列车碰撞 /
- 被动安全 /
- 碰撞能量管理 /
- 耐撞性设计 /
- 冲击生物损伤
Abstract: Despite a series of active safety precautions have been adopted by railway passenger trains, train collision accident cannot be completely eliminated in service, resulting in serious casualties and huge economic losses once it happened. With the continuous increase of train speed, the train collision safety and relevant impact protections have been paid more attention, and numerous related explorations have been carried out by domestic and foreign scholars. This paper reviews recent advances in the passive safety of train collisions and impact biological damage of drivers and passengers. First, the train collision accidents at home and abroad in recent years are summarized, and the biological damage distributions of survivals in a certain train collision accident are analyzed. Secondly, the main research approaches of collision passive safety of trains are illustrated, including numerical simulation, experimental investigation, and theoretical analysis, while the response attitudes and derailment mechanisms during the train collision process are outlined. Thirdly, the research progress of the collision passive safety of trains are elaborated, in terms of the design and evaluation standards of vehicle crashworthiness, energy-absorbing structural design based on multistage energy dissipation, train structural crashworthiness design based on collision energy management. Finally, the impact biological damage of drivers and passengers in train collisions are emphasized, and the related protective measures of reducing the biological damage of drivers and passengers are presented. Through the above overview, some suggestions are put forward for further studies: (1) the applicability of the existing crashworthiness standards for trains needs to be further explored under the increased train speed; (2) the theoretical study on train collision is still scarce, and the collision theory of high-speed train should be further developed; (3) how to effectively learn from and refer to the mature experience of the automobile collision still needs systematic and in-depth investigation; and (4) the design and evaluation method of train passive safety based on the impact biological damage of drivers and passengers should be explored.
- train collision /
- passive safety /
- collision energy management /
- crashworthiness design /
- impact biological damage

HTML全文

图 1 铁路列车碰撞事故（图片来自网络）^[27-32]

Figure 1. Collision accidents of railway vehicles (figures from the website)^[27-32]

下载: 全尺寸图片幻灯片

图 2 1900～2019年间各洲铁路事故伤亡人数^[33]

Figure 2. Statistics of injuries and deaths in global railwayaccidents from 1900 to 2019^[33]

下载: 全尺寸图片幻灯片

图 3 1950～2020年间我国铁路事故伤亡人数^[34]

Figure 3. Statistics of injuries and deaths in railway accidents in China from 1950 to 2020^[34]

下载: 全尺寸图片幻灯片

图 4 列车碰撞数值仿真模型

Figure 4. Numerical simulation models of train collision

下载: 全尺寸图片幻灯片

图 5 国外列车碰撞试验线

Figure 5. Test lines of vehicle collision abroad

下载: 全尺寸图片幻灯片

图 6 我国的列车碰撞试验台

Figure 6. Test beds of railway vehicle collision in China

下载: 全尺寸图片幻灯片

图 7 列车碰撞1∶8缩比模型^[51]

Figure 7. Scaled-model of vehicle collision^[51]

下载: 全尺寸图片幻灯片

图 8 列车碰撞变形过程和应力波传播的简化理论模型^[56]

Figure 8. A simplified theoretical model for train collision deformation process and stress wave propagation^[56]

下载: 全尺寸图片幻灯片

图 9 列车碰撞响应姿态示意图^[57]

Figure 9. Schematic diagram of response posture during train collision^[57]

下载: 全尺寸图片幻灯片

图 10 列车碰撞脱轨边界线^[74]

Figure 10. The boundary line of derailment under train collision^[74]

下载: 全尺寸图片幻灯片

图 11 列车碰撞能量分级吸收系统^[57,93]

Figure 11. The graded energy absorption system of train collision^[57,93]

下载: 全尺寸图片幻灯片

图 12 列车碰撞过程中理想的力-位移曲线^[93]

Figure 12. The ideal force-displacement curves during train collision process^[93]

下载: 全尺寸图片幻灯片

图 13 带螺栓剪切的车钩缓冲装置力-位移曲线^[111]

Figure 13. Force-displacement curve of coupler buffering device with bolt shear^[111]

下载: 全尺寸图片幻灯片

图 14 防爬器对两列车碰撞行为的影响^[14]

Figure 14. Influence of anti-climbing device on the train collision behavior^[14]

下载: 全尺寸图片幻灯片

图 15 不同类型防爬器示意图^[123]

Figure 15. Schematic diagram of different types of anti-climbing devices^[123]

下载: 全尺寸图片幻灯片

图 16 蜂窝吸能装置的布置^[129]

Figure 16. The arrangements of honeycomb energy-absorbing device^[129]

下载: 全尺寸图片幻灯片

图 17 碰撞试验后的车体变形情况^[142]

Figure 17. Deformation of car body after crash test^[142]

下载: 全尺寸图片幻灯片

图 18 优化后的列车碰撞界面压缩量和冲击能量分布情况^[36]

Figure 18. The distribution of compression and impact energy in train collision interface after optimization^[36]

下载: 全尺寸图片幻灯片

图 19 身体各部位的损伤比例^[147]

Figure 19. The proportion of injuries in different parts of body^[147]

下载: 全尺寸图片幻灯片

图 20 座椅与乘员间的撞击过程^[153]

Figure 20. The collision process between the seat and the occupant^[153]

下载: 全尺寸图片幻灯片

图 21 管式和板式座椅隔离装置及其对乘客胸部损伤的影响^[157]

Figure 21. The tubular and plate dividers of seat and its influence on chest injury^[157]

下载: 全尺寸图片幻灯片

图 22 乘员和车辆在碰撞过程中的速度变化曲线^[148]

Figure 22. The velocity curves of occupants and vehicles in a collision^[148]

下载: 全尺寸图片幻灯片

图 23 安全带在保护乘员中发挥的作用^[162]

Figure 23. The role of seat belts in protecting occupants^[162]

下载: 全尺寸图片幻灯片

图 24 改进后的小桌板结构示意图^[163]

Figure 24. The structural diagram of the improved workstation table^[163]

下载: 全尺寸图片幻灯片

图 25 改进后的司机室保护装置及耐撞性测试^[170]

Figure 25. The improved protection device cab and the corresponding crashworthiness test^[170]

下载: 全尺寸图片幻灯片

表 1 近些年典型的列车碰撞事故（数据源自网络）

Table 1. Typical train collision accidents in recent years at home and abroad (data from the website)

年份	国家	事发地点	碰撞类型	事故后果
1988	法国	巴黎里昂车站	客车撞击静止列车	56人死亡、57人受伤
1997	中国	京广线湖南境内	客车追尾碰撞	126 人死亡、230 人受伤，直接经济损失超过415.53万元
1999	印度	盖萨尔火车站	客车正面碰撞	超过500 人死亡、近1000 人受伤
2005	巴基斯坦	信德省格特基地区	追尾脱轨后与第3列客车碰撞	150人死亡、约1000人受伤
2005	日本	JR福知山线	客车脱轨后撞击大楼	107人死亡、562人受伤
2007	法国	邻近瑞士边境	客车撞击货车	1人死亡、35人受伤
2008	法国	阿尔卑斯山阿兰日镇	客车撞击校车	7人死亡、25人受伤
2008	美国	洛杉矶	客车撞击货车	25人死亡、135人受伤
2009	中国	京广铁路郴州站	客车侧面碰撞	3人死亡、63人受伤
2011	中国	甬温线浙江境内	客车追尾碰撞	40人死亡、200多人受伤，直接经济损失超过1.93亿元
2012	德国	法兰克福东部郊区	客车撞击工程车	3人死亡、13人受伤
2013	瑞士	沃州格朗日地区	客车正面碰撞	1人死亡、35人受伤
2013	西班牙	圣地亚哥附近	客车脱轨后撞击护栏	至少77人死亡、143人受伤
2015	瑞士	苏黎世州拉夫兹站	客车追尾碰撞	至少50人受伤
2016	德国	慕尼黑巴特艾布灵镇	客车正面碰撞	11人死亡、80余人受伤
2017	西班牙	马德里附近	客车撞击障碍物	45人受伤
2017	德国	北威州	客车撞击货车	约50人受伤
2018	美国	南卡罗来纳州	客车正面撞击货车	至少2 人死亡、百余人受伤
2019	日本	神奈川县	客车撞击卡车	1人死亡、约32人受伤
2021	中国	台湾花莲大清水隧道	客车侧面撞击工程车	49人死亡、近200人受伤
2021	巴基斯坦	信德省戈特基地区	脱轨后撞击客车	至少36人死亡、超过70人受伤

下载: 导出CSV

表 2 “7·23”甬温线动车碰撞事故中存活伤员受伤部位分布情况^[35]

Table 2. Distribution of injured parts of the survivors in EMU collision accident on Ningbo-Wenzhou railway line^[35]

受伤部位	颅脑	颌面	颈	胸	腹	脊椎	骨盆	四肢	体表
人数	16	15	5	41	13	26	7	35	135
占比/%	5.46	5.12	1.71	13.99	4.44	8.87	2.39	11.95	46.07

下载: 导出CSV

表 3 各国车辆耐撞性设计标准对比

Table 3. The comparison of design standard for vehicle crashworthiness in different countries

标准	车钩纵向力	防爬能力	加/减速度	适用范围
英国GM/RT 2100	压缩载荷2 000 kN；拉伸载荷1500 kN	垂向载荷100 kN；横向载荷100 kN；压缩载荷1000 kN	无明确规定	200 km/h以上列车
欧盟EN 15227	压缩载荷2 000 kN；拉伸载荷1000 kN	垂向载荷150 kN，至少保证一个车轮与钢轨接触	加速度≤5g；减速度≤7.5g	各类型客车
美国FRA法规	压缩载荷3560 kN	中部垂向载荷445 kN；端部垂向载荷890 kN	≤8g	128～240 km/h客车
欧盟TSI	压缩载荷1500 kN	端部应安装防爬装置	≤5g	各类车辆（190 km/h以上）
中国TB/T 3500-2018	无明确规定	每个转向架至少有一个轮对在轨道上方的垂直位移不大于轮缘名义高度的75%	加速度≤5g；减速度≤7.5g	200 km/h以上动车组及部件

下载: 导出CSV

表 4 列车碰撞中司机冲击损伤试验结果^[159]

Table 4. The test results of impact damage for driver during train collision process^[159]

损伤指标	试验结果	最大耐受水平
C_hi,₁₅	18.6	500
头部加速度	23.5g	80g
胸部压缩量/m	0.081	0.05
颈部损伤N_ij	0.19	1
股骨力-左/N	167.68	7560
股骨力-右/N	170.45	7560
胫骨指数-左	1.3	1.3
胫骨指数-右	0.3	1.3
胫骨压缩力-左/N	4.17	8000
胫骨压缩力-右/N	6.17	8000

下载: 导出CSV

表 5 试验测得的司机各关键部位生物损伤指标^[169]

Table 5. The biological damage indexes of key parts for drivers measured from tests^[169]

损伤指标	胸部压缩量/mm	胸部加速度	颈部伸长力矩/mN	头部加速度	C_hi	股骨载荷/kN
无任何约束	84	94.3g	37.2	37.3g	200	10.0
配备安全带	79	41.5g	45.0	40.6g	297	4.5
安装气囊	27	31.0g	7.9	31.0g		14.0
标准限值	50		57.0	80.0g	1000	9.07（0＜t＜10 ms） 7.58（t＞10 ms）

下载: 导出CSV

参考文献(173)

[1]	余也艺. 高速运输系统安全 [M]. 北京: 中国铁道出版社, 1996.
[2]	雷成, 肖守讷, 罗世辉, 等. 轨道车辆耐碰撞性研究进展 [J]. 铁道学报, 2013, 35(1): 31–40. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1001-8360.2013.01.005. LEI C, XIAO S N, LUO S H, et al. State-of-the-art research development of rail vehicles crashworthiness [J]. Journal of the China Railway Society, 2013, 35(1): 31–40. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1001-8360.2013.01.005.
[3]	ZHU T, XIAO S N, LEI C, et al. Rail vehicle crashworthiness based on collision energy management: an overview [J]. International Journal of Rail Transportation, 2021, 9(2): 101–131. DOI: 10.1080/23248378.2020.1777908.
[4]	GAO G J, ZHUO T Y, GUAN W Y. Recent research development of energy-absorption structure and application for railway vehicles [J]. Journal of Central South University, 2020, 27(4): 1012–1038. DOI: 10.1007/s11771-020-4349-3.
[5]	GUAN WY, GAO G J, YU Y, et al. Crashworthiness analysis and multi-objective optimization of expanding circular tube energy absorbers with cylindrical anti-clamber under eccentric loading for subway vehicles [J]. Structural and Multidisciplinary Optimization, 2020, 61(4): 1711–1729. DOI: 10.1007/s00158-019-02427-z.
[6]	LI Z X, MA W, YAO S G, et al. Crashworthiness performance of corrugation-reinforced multicell tubular structures [J]. International Journal of Mechanical Sciences, 2021, 190: 106038. DOI: 10.1016/j.ijmecsci.2020.106038.
[7]	Railway Group Standard. Requirements for rail vehicle structures: GM/RT 2100 [S]. London: Rail Safety and Standards Board Limited, 2012.
[8]	张振淼, 逄增祯. 轨道车辆碰撞能量吸收装置原理及结构设计(待续) [J]. 国外铁道车辆, 2001, 38(3): 13–19. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1002-7610.2001.03.004. ZHAGN Z M, PANG Z Z. Principles and structure design of collision energy absorption equipment for rail cars (to be continued) [J]. Foreign Rolling Stock, 2001, 38(3): 13–19. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1002-7610.2001.03.004.
[9]	BSI Standards. Railway applications—Crashworthiness requirements for railway vehicle bodies: BSEN 15227: 2008+A1: 2010 [S]. Brussels: The British Standards Institution, 2011.
[10]	TYRELL D, SEVERSON K, PERLMAN B. An overview of passenger equipment full scale impact tests: results to date [C] //Proceedings of the World Congress on Railway Research. Cologne, Germany: World Congress on Railway Research, 2001.
[11]	TYRELL D, SEVERSON K, PERLMAN A B. Single passenger rail car impact test. Volume Ⅰ: overview and selected results: DOT/FRA/ORD-00/02.1 [R]. Washington: U. S. Department of TransportationFederal RailroadAdministration, 2000.
[12]	VANINGEN-DUNN C. Single passenger rail car impact test. Volume Ⅱ: summary of occupant protection program: DOT/FRA/ORD-00/02.2 [R]. Washington: U. S. Department of TransportationFederal RailroadAdministration, 2000.
[13]	TYRELL D, SEVERSON K, ZOLOCK J, et al. Passenger rail two-car impact test. Volume Ⅰ: overview and selected results: DOT/FRA/ORD-01/22.1 [R]. Washington: U. S. Department of TransportationFederal RailroadAdministration, 2002.
[14]	TYRELL D, JACOBSEN K, MARTINEZ E, et al. Train-to-train impact test of crash energy management passenger rail equipment: structural results [C] // Proceedings of the ASME 2006 International Mechanical Engineering Congress and Exposition. Chicago: ASME, 2006. DOI: 10.1115/IMECE2006-13597.
[15]	畑弘敏, 刘克鲜, 王凤洲. 运用碰撞仿真技术进行提高铁道车辆安全性的研究 [J]. 国外铁道车辆, 2004, 41(6): 22–27,31. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1002-7610.2004.06.007. TIAN H M, LIU K X, WANG F Z. Research on improvement of rolling stock safety with the collision simulation technology [J]. Foreign Rolling Stock, 2004, 41(6): 22–27,31. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1002-7610.2004.06.007.
[16]	谢素超, 田红旗, 姚松. 车辆吸能部件的碰撞试验与数值仿真 [J]. 交通运输工程学报, 2008, 8(3): 1–5. DOI: 10.3321/j.issn:1671-1637.2008.03.001. XIE S C, TIAN H Q, YAO S. Impacting experiment and numerical simulation of energy-absorbing component of vehicles [J]. Journal of Traffic and Transportation Engineering, 2008, 8(3): 1–5. DOI: 10.3321/j.issn:1671-1637.2008.03.001.
[17]	刘金朝, 房加志, 王成国, 等. 铁道客车大变形碰撞仿真研究 [J]. 中国铁道科学, 2004, 25(6): 1–8. DOI: 10.3321/j.issn:1001-4632.2004.06.001. LIU J Z, FANG J Z, WANG C G, et al. Simulation research on finite deformation crashworthiness of railway passenger car [J]. China Railway Science, 2004, 25(6): 1–8. DOI: 10.3321/j.issn:1001-4632.2004.06.001.
[18]	李兰. 城轨车辆耐碰撞结构设计及其乘员安全数字仿真研究 [D]. 北京: 铁道科学研究院, 2007.
[19]	张乐乐, 张啸雨, 崔进, 等. 地铁头车车体耐撞性仿真分析 [J]. 铁道学报, 2012, 34(3): 22–27. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1001-8360.2012.03.004. ZHANG L L, ZHANG X Y, CUI J, et al. Numerical analysis on crashworthiness of subway head-car body [J]. Journal of the China Railway Society, 2012, 34(3): 22–27. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1001-8360.2012.03.004.
[20]	卫亮, 张乐乐, 崔进, 等. 地铁碰撞事故中站姿假人的响应仿真与损伤预测 [J]. 铁道学报, 2015, 37(1): 16–23. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1001-8360.2015.01.003. WEI L, ZHANG L L, CUI J, et al. Response simulation and injury prediction of standing dummy in a subway collision [J]. Journal of the China Railway Society, 2015, 37(1): 16–23. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1001-8360.2015.01.003.
[21]	王存义, 张乐乐, 卫亮, 等. 基于坐姿假人的地铁乘员二次碰撞损伤影响分析 [J]. 铁道学报, 2015, 37(3): 14–22. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1001-8360.2015.03.003. WANG C Y, ZHANG L L, WEI L, et al. Analysis of secondary impact on passenger injuries in a subway vehicle based on sitting dummy [J]. Journal of the China Railway Society, 2015, 37(3): 14–22. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1001-8360.2015.03.003.
[22]	WANG W B, REN L H, ZHOU H C, et al. Energy absorption configuration of crashworthy metro train [J]. Advanced Materials Research, 2012, 466/467: 724–728. DOI: 10.4028/www.scientific.net/AMR.466-467.724.
[23]	WALDECK H, 肖守讷. ICE动力车碰撞仿真 [J]. 控制与信息技术, 1996(4): 26–32. DOI: 10.13889/j.issn.2095-3631.1996.04.006. WALDECK H, XIAO S N. ICE powered car crash simulation [J]. Control and Information Technology, 1996(4): 26–32. DOI: 10.13889/j.issn.2095-3631.1996.04.006.
[24]	张志新, 肖守讷, 阳光武, 等. 高速列车乘员碰撞安全性研究 [J]. 铁道学报, 2013, 35(10): 24–32. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1001-8360.2013.10.004. ZHAGN Z X, XIAO S N, YANG G W, et al. Research on collision safety of high-speed train crews & passengers [J]. Journal of the China Railway Society, 2013, 35(10): 24–32. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1001-8360.2013.10.004.
[25]	雷成, 肖守讷, 罗世辉. 基于显式有限元的高速列车吸能装置吸能原理研究 [J]. 铁道机车车辆, 2012, 32(2): 1–4. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1008-7842.2012.02.001. LEI C, XIAO S N, LUO S H. Research on the energy-absorbing theory of high speed train energy-absorbing component based on the explicit finite element [J]. Railway Locomotive & Car, 2012, 32(2): 1–4. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1008-7842.2012.02.001.
[26]	丁兆洋, 郑志军, 虞吉林. 列车分布式吸能系统的波传播特性和参数分析 [J]. 爆炸与冲击, 2019, 39(3): 035101. DOI: 10.11883/bzycj-2018-0053. DING Z Y, ZHENG Z J, YU J L. Wave propagation characteristics and parameter analysis of the distributed energy absorption system of trains [J]. Explosion and Shock Waves, 2019, 39(3): 035101. DOI: 10.11883/bzycj-2018-0053.
[27]	腾讯网. 日本40年来最严重铁路事故—福知山线脱轨事故 [EB/OL]. (2021-04-26) [2021-12-8]. https://new.qq.com/rain/a/20210426V0CB5C00.
[28]	央视网. 追问7·23动车追尾事故 [EB/OL]. (2011-07-27) [2021-12-8]. https://tv.cctv.com/2011/07/27/VIDE1336928346085433.shtml.
[29]	央视网. 瑞士: 发生火车相撞事故, 多人受伤 [EB/OL]. (2015-02-21) [2021-12-8]. http://tv.cctv.com/2015/02/21/VIDE1424453038742862.shtml.
[30]	凤凰网. 德国两辆火车迎面相撞, 死伤者多达上百人 [EB/OL]. (2016-02-09) [2021-12-8]. https://news.ifeng.com/a/20160209/47400747_0.shtml.
[31]	央视网. 美国南卡罗来纳州发生列车相撞事故, 2人死亡 [EB/OL]. (2018-02-05) [2021-12-8]. http://tv.cctv.com/2018/02/05/VIDEqbGvWMYAeF5O1r18sDzs180205.shtml.
[32]	腾讯网. 台湾列车脱轨事故[EB/OL]. (2021-04-19) [2021-12-8]. https://new.qq.com/rain/a/20210419a0ek7y00.
[33]	FORSBERG R, BJÖRNSTIG U. One hundred years of railway disasters and recent trends [J]. Prehospital and Disaster Medicine, 2011, 26(5): 367–373. DOI: 10.1017/S1049023X1100639X.
[34]	维基百科. 中华人民共和国铁路事故列表 [EB/OL]. (2021-06-04)[2021-07-27].https://zh.wikipedia.org/wiki/%E4%B8%AD%E5%8D%8E%E4%BA%BA%E6%B0%91%E5%85%B1%E5%92%8C%E5%9B%BD%E9%93%81%E8%B7%AF%E4%BA%8B%E6%95%85%E5%88%97%E8%A1%A8.
[35]	闻浩, 林露阳, 陈大庆, 等. “7·23”温州动车事故存活伤员损伤特点及救治分析 [J]. 中华急诊医学杂志, 2011, 20(12): 1248–1250. DOI: 10.3760/cma.j.issn.1671-0282.2011.12.005. WEN H, LIN L Y, CHEN D Q, et al. Features of survived casualties and treatment after “July23” EMU railway accident at Wenzhou station [J]. Chinese Journal of Emergency Medicine, 2011, 20(12): 1248–1250. DOI: 10.3760/cma.j.issn.1671-0282.2011.12.005.
[36]	ZHANG H H, PENG Y, HOU L, et al. Multistage impact energy distribution for whole vehicles in high-speed train collisions: modeling and solution methodology [J]. IEEE Transactions on Industrial Informatics, 2020, 16(4): 2486–2499. DOI: 10.1109/TII.2019.2936048.
[37]	DIAS J P, PEREIRA M S. Optimization methods for crashworthiness design using multibody models [J]. Computers & Structures, 2004, 82(17/18/19): 1371–1380. DOI: 10.1016/j.compstruc.2004.03.032.
[38]	ZHU T, XIAO S N, HU G Z, et al. Crashworthiness analysis of the structure of metro vehicles constructed from typical materials and the lumped parameter model of frontal impact [J]. Transport, 2019, 34(1): 75–88. DOI: 10.3846/transport.2019.7552.
[39]	李松晏, 郑志军, 虞吉林. 高速列车吸能结构设计和耐撞性分析 [J]. 爆炸与冲击, 2015, 35(2): 164–170. DOI: 10.11883/1001-1455(2015)02-0164-07. LI S Y, ZHENG Z J, YU J L. Energy-absorbing structure design and crashworthiness analysis of high-speed trains [J]. Explosion and Shock Waves, 2015, 35(2): 164–170. DOI: 10.11883/1001-1455(2015)02-0164-07.
[40]	KOO J S, YOUN Y H. Crashworthy design and evaluation on the front-end structure of Korean high speed train [J]. International Journal of Automotive Technology, 2004, 5(3): 173–180. DOI: 10.1109/TVT.2004.832409.
[41]	XUE X, SCHMID F, SMITH R A. Analysis of the structural characteristics of an intermediate rail vehicle and their effect on vehicle crash performance [J]. Proceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers, Part F:Journal of Rail and Rapid Transit, 2007, 221(3): 339–352. DOI: 10.1243/09544097jrrt77.
[42]	XUE X, SCHMID F, SMITH R A. A study of modelling approaches for rail vehicle collision behaviour [J]. International Journal of Crashworthiness, 2004, 9(5): 515–525. DOI: 10.1533/ijcr.2004.0307.
[43]	周和超, 徐世洲, 詹军, 等. 基于有限元和多刚体动力学联合仿真技术的列车碰撞爬车现象研究 [J]. 机械工程学报, 2017, 53(12): 166–171. DOI: 10.3901/JME.2017.12.166. ZHOU H C, XU S Z, ZHAN J, et al. Research on the overriding phenomenon during train collision based on FEM and MBS joint simulation [J]. Journal of Mechanical Engineering, 2017, 53(12): 166–171. DOI: 10.3901/JME.2017.12.166.
[44]	HECHT M. 有轨电车和轻轨车辆的防碰撞性 [J]. 国外铁道车辆, 2005, 42(5): 39–41. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1002-7610.2005.05.008. HECHT M. The crashworthiness of tramcar and LRV [J]. Foreign Rolling Stock, 2005, 42(5): 39–41. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1002-7610.2005.05.008.
[45]	王万静, 梁建英, 崔洪举, 等. 铁道车辆车体撞击试验台建设必要性分析及建议 [J]. 国外铁道车辆, 2013, 50(6): 1–6. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1002-7610.2013.06.001. WANG W J, LIANG J Y, CUI H J, et al. The necessity analysis of construction of the impact test bench for rolling stock carbodies [J]. Foreign Rolling Stock, 2013, 50(6): 1–6. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1002-7610.2013.06.001.
[46]	中南大学高性能复杂制造国家重点实验室. “列车碰撞试验系统构建与安全评估理论”研究进展 [EB/OL]. (2018-04-19)[2021-07-27]. https://hpcm.csu.edu.cn/info/1016/1014.htm.
[47]	XU P, YANG C X, PENG Y, et al. Crash performance and multi-objective optimization of a gradual energy-absorbing structure for subway vehicles [J]. International Journal of Mechanical Sciences, 2016, 107: 1–12. DOI: 10.1016/j.ijmecsci.2016.01.001.
[48]	刘志祥, 王万静, 张志强, 等. 基于电机牵引方式的轨道车辆碰撞试验台研制 [J]. 中国基础科学, 2018, 20(6): 11–14,24. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1009-2412.2018.06.003. LIU Z X, WANG W J, ZHANG Z Q, et al. Research and development of the crash test bench for railway vehicles based on motor traction [J]. China Basic Science, 2018, 20(6): 11–14,24. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1009-2412.2018.06.003.
[49]	中国中车. 76km/h ! 中车完成高速列车最高速实车对撞试验[EB/OL]. (2019-09-27)[2021-11-03]. https://mp.weixin.qq.com/s/UwbHZvtvtdhqHAg_8M7www.
[50]	高广军, 于尧, 关维元. 用于碰撞实验的列车缩比等效模型构建方法及其系统: CN107798171A [P]. 2018-03-13.
[51]	LU S S, XU P, YAN K B, et al. A force/stiffness equivalence method for the scaled modelling of a high-speed train head car [J]. Thin-Walled Structures, 2019, 137: 129–142. DOI: 10.1016/j.tws.2019.01.016.
[52]	YU Y, GAO G J, GUAN W Y, et al. Scale similitude rules with acceleration consistency for trains collision [J]. Proceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers, Part F: Journal of Rail and Rapid Transit, 2018, 232(10): 2466–2480. DOI: 10.1177/0954409718773562.
[53]	JONES N. Structural impact [M]. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2010. DOI: 10.1017/CBO9780511624285.
[54]	田红旗, 卢执中. 列车撞击动力学建模研究 [J]. 铁道车辆, 1997, 35(4): 8–11. TIAN H Q, LU Z Z. High speed trains modelling study on train impact dynamics [J]. Rolling Stock, 1997, 35(4): 8–11.
[55]	卢毓江, 肖守讷, 朱涛, 等. 列车纵向-垂向碰撞动力学耦合模型建模与研究 [J]. 铁道学报, 2014, 36(12): 6–13. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1001-8360.2014.12.002. LU Y J, XIAO S N, ZHU T, et al. Construction of dynamic coupling model of longitudinal-vertical train crash [J]. Journal of the China Railway Society, 2014, 36(12): 6–13. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1001-8360.2014.12.002.
[56]	DING Z Y, ZHENG Z J, YU J L. A wave propagation model of distributed energy absorption system for trains [J]. International Journal of Crashworthiness, 2019, 24(5): 508–522. DOI: 10.1080/13588265.2018.1479482.
[57]	王文斌. 轨道车辆耐碰撞结构及乘员安全防护技术研究[D]. 上海: 同济大学, 2006.
[58]	SCHOLES A, LEWIS J H. Development of crashworthiness for railway vehicle structures [J]. Proceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers, Part F: Journal of Rail and Rapid Transit, 1993, 207(1): 1–16. DOI: 10.1243/PIME_PROC_1993_207_222_02.
[59]	SCHOLES A. Railway passenger vehicle design loads and structural crashworthiness [J]. Proceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers, Part D: Transport Engineering, 1987, 201(3): 201–207. DOI: 10.1243/PIME_PROC_1987_201_177_02.
[60]	HAN H S, KOO J S. Simulation of train crashes in three dimensions [J]. Vehicle System Dynamics, 2003, 40(6): 435–450. DOI: 10.1076/vesd.40.6.435.17906.
[61]	MAYVILLE R, RANCATORE R, TEGELER L. Investigation and simulation of lateral buckling in trains [C] // Proceedings of the 1999 ASME/IEEE Joint Railroad Conference. Dallas: IEEE, 1999. DOI: 10.1109/RRCON.1999.762407.
[62]	KIRKPATRICK S W, SCHROEDER M, SIMONS J W. Evaluation of passenger rail vehicle crashworthiness [J]. International Journal of Crashworthiness, 2001, 6(1): 95–106. DOI: 10.1533/cras.2001.0165.
[63]	BAYKASOGLU C, MUGAN A, SUNBULOGLU E, et al. Rollover crashworthiness analysis of a railroad passenger car [J]. International Journal of Crashworthiness, 2013, 18(5): 492–501. DOI: 10.1080/13588265.2013.809645.
[64]	CUARTERO J, LIZARANZU M, CASTEJÓN L, et al. Evaluation of passenger railroad car roll over crashworthiness [J]. International Journal of Crashworthiness, 2006, 11(5): 419–424. DOI: 10.1533/ijcr.2005.0120.
[65]	KOO J S, CHOI S Y. Theoretical development of a simplified wheelset model to evaluate collision-induced derailments of rolling stock [J]. Journal of Sound and Vibration, 2012, 331(13): 3172–3198. DOI: 10.1016/j.jsv.2012.02.014.
[66]	WU X W, CHI M R, GAO H. The study of post-derailment dynamic behavior of railway vehicle based on running tests [J]. Engineering Failure Analysis, 2014, 44: 382–399. DOI: 10.1016/j.engfailanal.2014.05.021.
[67]	WANG W, LI G X. Development of high-speed railway vehicle derailment simulation-Part Ⅱ: exploring the derailment mechanism [J]. Engineering Failure Analysis, 2012, 24: 93–111. DOI: 10.1016/j.engfailanal.2012.02.001.
[68]	LING L, DHANASEKAR M, WANG K Y, et al. Collision derailments on bridges containing ballastless slab tracks [J]. Engineering Failure Analysis, 2019, 105: 869–882. DOI: 10.1016/j.engfailanal.2019.07.042.
[69]	XU J M, WANG J, WANG P, et al. Study on the derailment behaviour of a railway wheelset with solid axles in a railway turnout [J]. Vehicle System Dynamics, 2020, 58(1): 123–143. DOI: 10.1080/00423114.2019.1566558.
[70]	ZHOU H C, WANG W B, HECHT M. Three-dimensional derailment analysis of a crashed city tram [J]. Vehicle System Dynamics, 2013, 51(8): 1200–1215. DOI: 10.1080/00423114.2013.790553.
[71]	KOO J S, CHO H J. A method to predict the derailment of rolling stock due to collision using a theoretical wheelset derailment model [J]. Multibody System Dynamics, 2012, 27(4): 403–422. DOI: 10.1007/s11044-011-9270-y.
[72]	CHO H J, KOO J S. A numerical study of the derailment caused by collision of a rail vehicle using a virtual testing model [J]. Vehicle System Dynamics, 2012, 50(1): 79–108. DOI: 10.1080/00423114.2011.563860.
[73]	YAO S G, ZHU H F, YAN K B, et al. The derailment behaviour and mechanism of a subway train under frontal oblique collisions [J]. International Journal of Crashworthiness, 2021, 26(2): 133–146. DOI: 10.1080/13588265.2019.1692506.
[74]	LING L, DHANASEKAR M, THAMBIRATNAM D P. Frontal collision of trains onto obliquely stuck road trucks at level crossings: derailment mechanisms and simulation [J]. International Journal of Impact Engineering, 2017, 100: 154–165. DOI: 10.1016/j.ijimpeng.2016.11.002.
[75]	LING L, DHANASEKAR M, THAMBIRATNAM D P, et al. Lateral impact derailment mechanisms, simulation and analysis [J]. International Journal of Impact Engineering, 2016, 94: 36–49. DOI: 10.1016/j.ijimpeng.2016.04.001.
[76]	LING L, DHANASEKAR M, THAMBIRATNAM D P. A passive road-rail crossing design to minimise wheel-rail contact failure risk under frontal collision of trains onto stuck trucks [J]. Engineering Failure Analysis, 2017, 80: 403–415. DOI: 10.1016/j.engfailanal.2017.07.003.
[77]	LING L, GUAN Q H, DHANASEKAR M, et al. Dynamic simulation of train-truck collision at level crossings [J]. Vehicle System Dynamics, 2017, 55(1): 1–22. DOI: 10.1080/00423114.2016.1240811.
[78]	BAE H U, YUN K M, LIM N H. Containment capacity and estimation of crashworthiness of derailment containment walls against high-speed trains [J]. Proceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers, Part F: Journal of Rail and Rapid Transit, 2018, 232(3): 680–696. DOI: 10.1177/0954409716684663.
[79]	BAE H U, YUN K M, MOON J, et al. Impact force evaluation of the derailment containment wall for high-speed train through a collision simulation [J]. Advances in Civil Engineering, 2018, 2018: 2626905. DOI: 10.1155/2018/2626905.
[80]	SONG I H, KIM J W, KOO J S, et al. Modeling and simulation of collision-causing derailment to design the derailment containment provision using a simplified vehicle model [J]. Applied Sciences, 2019, 10(1): 118. DOI: 10.3390/app10010118.
[81]	International Union of Railways. Loadings of coach bodies and their components: UIC-566 [S]. Paris: International Union of Railways, 1990.
[82]	BSI Standards. 2014 Railway applications—structural requirements of railway vehicle bodies–part 1: locomotives and passenger rolling stock (and alternative method for freight wagons): BS EN 12663-1: 2010+A1 [S]. Brussels: The British Standards Institution, 2015.
[83]	BSI Standards. 2010 Railway applications-structural requirements of railway vehicle bodies–part 2: freight wagons: BS EN 12663-2 [S]. Brussels: The British Standards Institution, 2010.
[84]	European Union. Technical specification for interoperability (TSI) [S]. Brussels: Official Journal of the European Union, 2008.
[85]	ATOC Vehicle Standard. AV/ST9001 Vehicle interior crashworthiness [S]. London: Association of Train Operating Companies, 2002.
[86]	Federal Railroad Administration. 49 CFR Part 229Railroad locomotive safety standards [S]. Florida: U. S. Department of Transportation Federal Railroad Administration, 2006.
[87]	Federal Railroad Administration. 49 CFR Part 238Passenger equipment safety standards [S]. Florida: U. S. Department of Transportation Federal Railroad Administration, 2003.
[88]	Association of American Railroads. Standard S-580: mechanical section-manual of standards and recommended practices, locomotive crashworthiness requirements [S]. Washington: Association of American Railroads, 1994.
[89]	American Public Transportation Association. Manual of standards and recommended practices for passenger rail equipment [R]. Washington: American Public Transportation Association, 1999.
[90]	Passenger Rail Equipment Safety Standards (PRESS) Construction and Structural Working Group. Standard for the design and construction of passenger railroad rolling stock: APTA SS-C& S-034-99 [S]. Washington: American Public Transportation Association, 2000.
[91]	国家铁路局. 动车组车体耐撞性要求与验证规范:TB/T 3500-2018[S]. 北京: 中国铁道出版社, 2018.
[92]	国家铁路局. 机车车辆碰撞试验测试方法:TB/T 3501-2018[S]. 北京: 中国铁道出版社, 2018.
[93]	SHAO H, XU P, YAO S G, et al. Improved multibody dynamics for investigating energy dissipation in train collisions based on scaling laws [J]. Shock and Vibration, 2016, 2016: 3084052. DOI: 10.1155/2016/3084052.
[94]	CHEN D. Derailment risk due to coupler jack-knifing under longitudinal buff force [J]. Proceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers, Part F: Journal of Rail and Rapid Transit, 2010, 224(5): 483–490. DOI: 10.1243/09544097JRRT363.
[95]	EL-SIBAIE M. Recent advancements in buff and draft testing techniques [C] // Proceedings of the 1993 IEEE/ASME Joint Railroad Conference. Pittsburgh: IEEE, 1993: 115-119. DOI: 10.1109/rrcon.1993.292955.
[96]	LEWIS J H, RASAIAH W G, SCHOLES A. Validation of measures to improve rail vehicle crashworthiness [J]. Proceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers, Part F: Journal of Rail and Rapid Transit, 1996, 210(2): 73–85. DOI: 10.1243/PIME_PROC_1996_210_330_02.
[97]	JAHROMI A G, HATAMI H. Energy absorption performance on multilayer expanded metal tubes under axial impact [J]. Thin-Walled Structures, 2017, 116: 1–11. DOI: 10.1016/j.tws.2017.03.005.
[98]	HATAMI H, RAD M S, JAHROMI A G. A theoretical analysis of the energy absorption response of expanded metal tubes under impact loads [J]. International Journal of Impact Engineering, 2017, 109: 224–239. DOI: 10.1016/j.ijimpeng.2017.06.009.
[99]	NOURI M D, HATAMI H, JAHROMI A G. Experimental and numerical investigation of expanded metaltube absorber under axial impact loading [J]. Structural Engineering and Mechanics, 2015, 54(6): 1245–1266. DOI: 10.12989/sem.2015.54.6.1245.
[100]	HATAMI H, NOURI M D. Experimental and numerical investigation of lattice-walled cylindrical shell under low axial impact velocities [J]. Latin American Journal of Solids and Structures, 2015, 12(10): 1950–1971. DOI: 10.1590/1679-78251919.
[101]	YANG J L, LUO M, HUA Y L, et al. Energy absorption of expansion tubes using a conical–cylindrical die: experiments and numerical simulation [J]. International Journal of Mechanical Sciences, 2010, 52(5): 716–725. DOI: 10.1016/j.ijmecsci.2009.11.015.
[102]	QI C, YANG S, DONG F L. Crushing analysis and multiobjective crashworthiness optimization of tapered square tubes under oblique impact loading [J]. Thin-Walled Structures, 2012, 59: 103–119. DOI: 10.1016/j.tws.2012.05.008.
[103]	GUILLOW S R, LU G, GRZEBIETA R H. Quasi-static axial compression of thin-walled circular aluminum tubes [J]. International Journal of Mechanical Sciences, 2001, 43(9): 2103–2123. DOI: 10.1016/S0020-7403(01)00031-5.
[104]	REDDY T Y. Guist and marble revisited—on the natural knuckle radius in tube inversion [J]. International Journal of Mechanical Sciences, 1992, 34(10): 761–768. DOI: 10.1016/0020-7403(92)90040-N.
[105]	REID S R, HARRIGAN J J. Transient effects in the quasi-static and dynamic internal inversion and nosing of metal tubes [J]. International Journal of Mechanical Sciences, 1998, 40(2/3): 263–280. DOI: 10.1016/S0020-7403(97)00054-4.
[106]	SHAKERI M, SALEHGHAFFARI S, MIRZAEIFAR R. Expansion of circular tubes by rigid tubes as impact energy absorbers: experimental and theoretical investigation [J]. International Journal of Crashworthiness, 2007, 12(5): 493–501. DOI: 10.1080/13588260701483540.
[107]	AL-ABRI O S, PERVEZ T. Structural behavior of solid expandable tubular undergoes radial expansion process–Analytical, numerical, and experimental approaches [J]. International Journal of Solids and Structures, 2013, 50(19): 2980–2994. DOI: 10.1016/j.ijsolstr.2013.05.013.
[108]	SEIBI A C, BARSOUM I, MOLKI A. Experimental and numerical study of expanded aluminum and steel tubes [J]. Procedia Engineering, 2011, 10: 3049–3055. DOI: 10.1016/j.proeng.2011.04.505.
[109]	LI J, GAO G J, DONG H P, et al. Study on the energy absorption of the expanding–splitting circular tube by experimental investigations and numerical simulations [J]. Thin-Walled Structures, 2016, 103: 105–114. DOI: 10.1016/j.tws.2016.01.031.
[110]	YAN J L, YAO S G, XU P, et al. Theoretical prediction and numerical studies of expanding circular tubes as energy absorbers [J]. International Journal of Mechanical Sciences, 2016, 105: 206–214. DOI: 10.1016/j.ijmecsci.2015.11.022.
[111]	KIM J S, HUH H, KWON T S. Crashworthiness design of the shear bolts for light collision safety devices [J]. International Journal of Modern Physics B, 2008, 22(31–32): 5603–5608. DOI: 10.1142/S0217979208050887.
[112]	ZHU T, YANG B Z, YANG C, et al. The mechanism for the coupler and draft gear and its influence on safety during a train collision [J]. Vehicle System Dynamics, 2018, 56(9): 1375–1393. DOI: 10.1080/00423114.2017.1413198.
[113]	DUNCAN I B, WEBB P A. The longitudinal behaviour of heavy haul trains using remote locomotives [C] // Proceedings of theFourth International Heavy Haul Railway Conference. Brisbane: Institution of Engineers, 1989: 587-590.
[114]	LU G. Collision behaviour of crashworthy vehicles in rakes [J]. Proceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers, Part F: Journal of Rail and Rapid Transit, 1999, 213(3): 143–160. DOI: 10.1243/0954409991531100.
[115]	MILHO J F, AMBRÓSIO J A C, PEREIRA M F O S. Validated multibody model for train crash analysis [J]. International Journal of Crashworthiness, 2003, 8(4): 339–352. DOI: 10.1533/ijcr.2003.0242.
[116]	庞艳凤, 陈凯. 国内城轨车辆车钩缓冲装置应用情况和统型设想 [J]. 铁道车辆, 2011, 49(1): 22–25. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1002-7602.2011.01.007. PANG Y F, CHEN K. Application of coupler draft gears on domestic urban rail vehicles and the idea of unifying models [J]. Rolling Stock, 2011, 49(1): 22–25. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1002-7602.2011.01.007.
[117]	ZHOU H C, MEI M S, ZHANG J M, et al. Investigations on the vertical buckling of railway vehicle's anti-climber [J]. International Journal of Crashworthiness, 2021, 26(2): 171–181. DOI: 10.1080/13588265.2019.1701354.
[118]	YANG C, LI Q, XIAO S N, et al. On the overriding issue of train front end collision in rail vehicle dynamics [J]. Vehicle System Dynamics, 2018, 56(4): 506–528. DOI: 10.1080/00423114.2017.1394472.
[119]	YAO S G, XIAO X L, XU P, et al. The impact performance of honeycomb-filled structures under eccentric loading for subway vehicles [J]. Thin-Walled Structures, 2018, 123: 360–370. DOI: 10.1016/j.tws.2017.10.031.
[120]	ZHOU H C, WANG W B, HECHT M. Three-dimensional override analysis of crashed railway multiple units [J]. Vehicle System Dynamics, 2012, 50(4): 663–674. DOI: 10.1080/00423114.2011.631552.
[121]	GAO G J, GUAN W Y, LI J, et al. Experimental investigation of an active–passive integration energy absorber for railway vehicles [J]. Thin-Walled Structures, 2017, 117: 89–97. DOI: 10.1016/j.tws.2017.03.029.
[122]	GUAN W Y, GAO G J, LI J, et al. Crushing analysis and multi-objective optimization of a cutting aluminum tube absorber for railway vehicles under quasi-static loading [J]. Thin-Walled Structures, 2018, 123: 395–408. DOI: 10.1016/j.tws.2017.11.031.
[123]	岳伟玲. 轨道车辆拉削式防爬器吸能特性的研究[D]. 广州: 华南理工大学, 2014.
[124]	张云峰, 杭志洲, 方炅任. 刨削式与整体型蜂窝式车辆防爬器对撞性能分析 [J]. 城市轨道交通研究, 2020, 23(2): 26–30. DOI: 10.16037/j.1007-869x.2020.02.007. ZHANG Y F, HANG Z Z, FANG J R. Collision performance analysis of planing and integral honeycombing anti-climbs for vehicles [J]. Urban Mass Transit, 2020, 23(2): 26–30. DOI: 10.16037/j.1007-869x.2020.02.007.
[125]	BAYKASOĞLU C, SÜNBÜLOĞLU E, BOZDAĞ S E, et al. Railroad passenger car collision analysis and modifications for improved crashworthiness [J]. International Journal of Crashworthiness, 2011, 16(3): 319–329. DOI: 10.1080/13588265.2011.566475.
[126]	XUE X, SMITH R A, SCHMID F. Analysis of crush behaviours of a rail cab car and structural modifications for improved crashworthiness [J]. International Journal of Crashworthiness, 2005, 10(2): 125–136. DOI: 10.1533/ijcr.2005.0332.
[127]	XIE S C, LIANG X F, ZHOU H, et al. Crashworthiness optimisation of the front-end structure of the lead car of a high-speed train [J]. Structural and Multidisciplinary Optimization, 2016, 53(2): 339–347. DOI: 10.1007/s00158-015-1332-y.
[128]	XIE S C, LIANG X F, ZHOU H. Design and analysis of a composite energy-absorbing structure for use on railway vehicles [J]. Proceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers, Part F: Journal of Rail and Rapid Transit, 2016, 230(3): 825–839. DOI: 10.1177/0954409714566058.
[129]	LI B H, LU Z J, YAN K B, et al. Experimental study of a honeycomb energy-absorbing device for high-speed trains [J]. Proceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers, Part F: Journal of Rail and Rapid Transit, 2020, 234(10): 1170–1183. DOI: 10.1177/0954409719882564.
[130]	PENG Y, DENG W Y, XU P, et al. Study on the collision performance of a composite energy-absorbing structure for subway vehicles [J]. Thin-Walled Structures, 2015, 94: 663–672. DOI: 10.1016/j.tws.2015.05.016.
[131]	SHARIFI S, SHAKERI M, FAKHARI H E, et al. Experimental investigation of bitubal circular energy absorbers under quasi-static axial load [J]. Thin-Walled Structures, 2015, 89: 42–53. DOI: 10.1016/j.tws.2014.12.008.
[132]	RAHI A. Controlling energy absorption capacity of combined bitubular tubes under axial loading [J]. Thin-Walled Structures, 2018, 123: 222–231. DOI: 10.1016/j.tws.2017.11.032.
[133]	VINAYAGAR K, KUMAR A S. Crashworthiness analysis of double section bi-tubular thin-walled structures [J]. Thin-Walled Structures, 2017, 112: 184–193. DOI: 10.1016/j.tws.2016.12.008.
[134]	AZIMI M B, ASGARI M. A new bi-tubular conical-circular structure for improving crushing behavior under axial and oblique impacts [J]. International Journal of Mechanical Sciences, 2016, 105: 253–265. DOI: 10.1016/j.ijmecsci.2015.11.012.
[135]	FANG J G, GAO Y K, SUN G Y, et al. Crashworthiness design of foam-filled bitubal structures with uncertainty [J]. International Journal of Non-Linear Mechanics, 2014, 67: 120–132. DOI: 10.1016/j.ijnonlinmec.2014.08.005.
[136]	TYRELL D, PERLMAN A B. Evaluation of rail passenger equipment crashworthiness strategies [J]. Transportation Research Record:Journal of the Transportation Research Board, 2003, 1825(1): 8–14. DOI: 10.3141/1825-02.
[137]	SEVERSON K J, TYRELL D C, PERLMAN A B. Collision safety comparison of conventional and crash energy management passenger rail car designs [C] // Proceedings of the IEEE/ASME 2003 Joint Rail Conference. Chicago: ASME, 2003: 83-90. DOI: 10.1115/rtd2003-1657.
[138]	田红旗. 客运列车耐冲击吸能车体设计方法 [J]. 交通运输工程学报, 2001, 1(1): 110–114. DOI: 10.3321/j.issn:1671-1637.2001.01.028. TIAN H Q. Crashworthy energy absorbing car-body design method for pass enger train [J]. Journal of Triffic and Transportation Engineering, 2001, 1(1): 110–114. DOI: 10.3321/j.issn:1671-1637.2001.01.028.
[139]	JACOBSEN K, TYRELL D, PERLMAN B. Impact test of a crash-energy management passenger rail car [C] // Proceedings of the ASME/IEEE 2004 Joint Rail Conference. Baltimore: ASME, 2004. DOI: 10.1115/rtd2004-66045.
[140]	SEVERSON K J, PARENT D P. Train-to-train impact test of crash energy management passenger rail equipment: occupant experiments [C] // Proceedings of the ASME 2006 International Mechanical Engineering Congress and Exposition. Chicago: ASME, 2006. DOI: 10.1115/imece2006-14420.
[141]	TYRELL D, GORDON J. Crash energy management: an overview of federal railroad administration research [J]. TR News, 2013(286): 4–10.
[142]	JACOBSEN K M. Collision dynamics modeling of crash energy management passenger rail equipment [D]. Medford-Somerville: Tufts University, 2008.
[143]	MERAN A P, BAYKASOGLU C, MUGAN A, et al. Development of a design for a crash energy management system for use in a railway passenger car [J]. Proceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers, Part F: Journal of Rail and Rapid Transit, 2014, 230(1): 206–219. DOI: 10.1177/0954409714533321.
[144]	FANG Z W, WANG J R, LIU H T, et al. Design and analysis for a 4-stage crash energy management system for railway vehicles [C] // ICRVS 2018: International Conference on Railway Vehicles and Systems. Barcelona, Spain: International Journal of Transport and Vehicle Engineering, 2018.
[145]	LU G. Energy absorption requirement for crashworthy vehicles [J]. Proceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers, Part F: Journal of Rail and Rapid Transit, 2002, 216(1): 31–39. DOI: 10.1243/0954409021531665.
[146]	杨宝柱, 肖守讷, 杨超. 能量吸收方案对列车碰撞响应的影响 [J]. 城市轨道交通研究, 2018, 21(3): 48–51. DOI: 10.16037/j.1007-869x.2018.03.013. YANG B Z, XIAO S N, YANG C. Effect of energy absorbing schemes on train crash re-sponse [J]. Urban Mass Transit, 2018, 21(3): 48–51. DOI: 10.16037/j.1007-869x.2018.03.013.
[147]	XIE S C, ZHOU H. Forecasting impact injuries of unrestrained occupants in railway vehicle passenger compartments [J]. Traffic Injury Prevention, 2014, 15(7): 740–747. DOI: 10.1080/15389588.2013.862590.
[148]	XIE S C, TIAN H Q. Dynamic simulation of railway vehicle occupants under secondary impact [J]. Vehicle System Dynamics, 2013, 51(12): 1803–1817. DOI: 10.1080/00423114.2013.834368.
[149]	VANINGEN-DUNN C. Commuter rail seat testing and analysis of facing seats: DOT/FRA/ORD-03/06 [R]. Washington: U. S. Department of Transportation Federal Railroad Administration, Office of Research and Development, 2003.
[150]	TYRELL D, ZOLOCK J, VANINGEN-DUNN C. Train-to-train impact test: occupant protection experiments [C] //Proceedings of the ASME 2002 International Mechanical Engineering Congress and Exposition. New Orleans, USA: ASME, 2002. DOI: 10.1115/IMECE2002-39611.
[151]	TYRELL D C, SEVERSON K J, MARQUIS B P. Analysis of occupant protection strategies in train collisions [C] //Proceedings of the ASME International Mechanical Engineering Congress and Exposition. San Francisco, USA: ASME, 1995.
[152]	CARVALHO M, AMBROSIO J, MILHO J. Implications of the inline seating layout on the protection of occupants of railway coach interiors [J]. International Journal of Crashworthiness, 2011, 16(5): 557–568. DOI: 10.1080/13588265.2011.611399.
[153]	CARVALHO M, MARTINS A, MILHO J. Validation of a railway inline seating model for occupants injury biomechanics [J]. International journal of crashworthiness, 2018, 23(3): 328–335. DOI: 10.1080/13588265.2017.1328651.
[154]	CARVALHO M, MILHOJ, AMBROSIO J, et al. Railway occupant passive safety improvement by optimal design [J]. International Journal of Crashworthiness, 2017, 22(6): 624–634. DOI: 10.1080/13588265.2016.1221332.
[155]	施青松, 刘艳文, 杨超, 等. 轨道卧铺客车乘员二次碰撞安全性研究 [J]. 机车车辆工艺, 2013(6): 6–8,10. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1007-6034.2013.06.003. SHI Q S, LIU Y W, YANG C, et al. Research of secondary crashworthiness for passengers in railway sleeping cars [J]. Locomotive & Rolling Stock Technology, 2013(6): 6–8,10. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1007-6034.2013.06.003.
[156]	佟鑫, 张乐乐, 刘文, 等. 新型纵向卧铺结构被动安全性仿真分析与评估 [J]. 吉林大学学报(工学版), 2020, 50(1): 147–155. DOI: 10.13229/j.cnki.jdxbgxb20180942. TONG X, ZHANG L L, LIU W, et al. Simulation analysis and evaluation on passive safety of the longitudinal berth [J]. Journal of Jilin University (Engineering and Technology Edition), 2020, 50(1): 147–155. DOI: 10.13229/j.cnki.jdxbgxb20180942.
[157]	OMINO K, SHIROTO H, SAITOH A, et al. Behavior analysis of passengers on bench seats in a train collision [J]. Quarterly Report of RTRI, 2008, 49(1): 47–52. DOI: 10.2219/rtriqr.49.47.
[158]	ROBERT T, BEILLAS P, MAUPAS A, et al. Conditions of possible head impacts for standing passengers in public transportation: an experimental study [J]. International Journal of Crashworthiness, 2007, 12(3): 319–327. DOI: 10.1080/13588260701433552.
[159]	HAULT-DUBRULLE A, ROBACHE F, DRAZETIC P, et al. Analysis of train driver protection in rail collisions: part I. evaluation of injury outcome for train driver in desk impact [J]. International Journal of Crashworthiness, 2013, 18(2): 183–193. DOI: 10.1080/13588265.2013.769484.
[160]	ZHOU H C, ZHAN J, WANG W B, et al. Dynamic simulation of train driver under secondary impact [J]. Advances in Mechanical Engineering, 2017, 9(12): 1–10. DOI: 10.1177/1687814017743111.
[161]	CAPUTO F, LAMANNA G, SOPRANO A. On the evaluation of the overloads coming from the use of seat-belts on a passenger railway seat [J]. International Journal of Mechanics and Materials in Design, 2012, 8(4): 335–348. DOI: 10.1007/s10999-012-9199-1.
[162]	CAPUTO F, FIDANZA F, LAMANNA G. Multibody investigation on the passive safety performances of seats in railway vehicles [C] // Proceedings of the ASME 2010 10th Biennial Conference on Engineering Systems Design and Analysis. Istanbul, Turkey: ASME, 2010. DOI: 10.1115/ESDA2010-24766.
[163]	PARENT D P, TYRELL D C, RANCATORE R, et al. Design of a workstation table with improved crashworthiness performance [C]//Proceedings of theASME 2005 International Mechanical Engineering Congress and Exposition. Orlando: ASME, 2005. DOI: 10.1115/IMECE2005-82779.
[164]	SEVERSON K J, TYRELL D C, RANCATORE R. Crashworthiness requirements for commuter rail passenger seats [C]//Proceedings of theASME 2005 International Mechanical Engineering Congress and Exposition. Orlando, USA: ASME, 2005. DOI: 10.1115/IMECE2005-82643.
[165]	XIE S C, TIAN H Q. Influencing factors and sensitivity analysis of occupant impact injury in passenger compartment [J]. Traffic Injury Prevention, 2013, 14(8): 816–822. DOI: 10.1080/15389588.2013.768341.
[166]	WEI L, ZHANG L L. Evaluation and improvement of crashworthiness for high-speed train seats [J]. International Journal of Crashworthiness, 2018, 23(5): 561–568. DOI: 10.1080/13588265.2017.1367354.
[167]	PROCHOWSKI L, ŻUCHOWSKI A. Analysis of the influence of passenger position in a car on a risk of injuries during a car accident [J]. Eksploatacja i Niezawodnosc - Maintenance and Reliability, 2014, 16(3): 360–366.
[168]	YANG W L, XIE S C, LI H H, et al. Design and injury analysis of the seated occupant protection posture in train collision [J]. Safety Science, 2019, 117: 263–275. DOI: 10.1016/j.ssci.2019.04.028.
[169]	CHEVALIER M C, MAUPAS A, LEVEQUE D, et al. Air-bag protection of the train driver during a collision [C] //Proceedings of the 2005 International IRCOBI Conference on the Biomechanics of Impact. Prague, Czechoslovakia: IRCOBI Conference, 2015.
[170]	HAULT-DUBRULLE A, ROBACHE F, DRAZETIC P, et al. Analysis of train driver protection in rail collisions: part II. design of a desk with improved crashworthiness performance [J]. International Journal of Crashworthiness, 2013, 18(2): 194–205. DOI: 10.1080/13588265.2013.769485.
[171]	ANGHILERI M, CASTELLETTI L M L, PIROLA M, et al. CIV class tram crashworthiness assessment [J]. International Journal of Crashworthiness, 2008, 13(4): 425–435. DOI: 10.1080/13588260802049372.
[172]	PENG Y, HOU L, YANG M Z, et al. Investigation of the train driver injuries and the optimization design of driver workspace during a collision [J]. Proceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers, Part F: Journal of Rail and Rapid Transit, 2017, 231(8): 902–915. DOI: 10.1177/0954409716647418.
[173]	ZOLOCK J D, TYRELL D C. Locomotive cab occupant protection [C] // Proceedings of the ASME 2003 International Mechanical Engineering Congress and Exposition. Washington, USA: ASME, 2003. DOI: 10.1115/IMECE2003-55121.