钙质砂介质中爆炸波传播规律的试验研究

潘亚豪 宗周红 钱海敏 黄杰 单玉麟

潘亚豪, 宗周红, 钱海敏, 黄杰, 单玉麟. 钙质砂介质中爆炸波传播规律的试验研究[J]. 爆炸与冲击, 2023, 43(5): 053201. doi: 10.11883/bzycj-2022-0117
引用本文: 潘亚豪, 宗周红, 钱海敏, 黄杰, 单玉麟. 钙质砂介质中爆炸波传播规律的试验研究[J]. 爆炸与冲击, 2023, 43(5): 053201. doi: 10.11883/bzycj-2022-0117
PAN Yahao, ZONG Zhouhong, QIAN Haimin, HUANG Jie, SHAN Yulin. Experimental study on blast wave propagation in calcareous sand[J]. Explosion And Shock Waves, 2023, 43(5): 053201. doi: 10.11883/bzycj-2022-0117
Citation: PAN Yahao, ZONG Zhouhong, QIAN Haimin, HUANG Jie, SHAN Yulin. Experimental study on blast wave propagation in calcareous sand[J]. Explosion And Shock Waves, 2023, 43(5): 053201. doi: 10.11883/bzycj-2022-0117

钙质砂介质中爆炸波传播规律的试验研究

doi: 10.11883/bzycj-2022-0117
基金项目: 国家重点研发计划(2021YFC3100700)
详细信息
    作者简介:

    潘亚豪(1995- ),女,博士研究生,panyahao@seu.edu.cn

    通讯作者:

    宗周红(1966- ),男,教授,zongzh@seu.edu.cn

  • 中图分类号: 0382

Experimental study on blast wave propagation in calcareous sand

  • 摘要: 开展了一系列钙质砂和石英砂的地面爆炸试验,主要对比分析了两种砂土介质中爆炸波的传播规律,包括峰值压力、弹塑性波速及升压时间、爆坑尺寸等。试验结果表明,爆炸波在钙质砂中的传播与在石英砂中存在较大差异:地面爆炸作用下钙质砂爆坑较石英砂爆坑的直径和深度更小,且成坑形状为两阶同心圆;钙质砂中弹性波速为236~300 m/s,石英砂中弹性波速为218~337 m/s,弹性波速和塑性波速均随炸药质量增加而增大;爆炸波在钙质砂中的升压时间随比例距离的增加而增加,而在石英砂中升压时间随比例距离变化不明显,且较钙质砂中升压更迅速;在地面爆炸作用下,低含水率钙质砂的衰减系数为2.86,石英砂为2.79。
  • 图  1  砂土试样

    Figure  1.  Sand specimen

    图  2  试验用砂土级配曲线

    Figure  2.  Particle size distribution

    图  3  试验现场

    Figure  3.  Test site

    图  4  土压力传感器布置

    Figure  4.  Locations of pressure sensors

    图  5  相同爆炸药量同测点压力和冲量时程曲线对比图

    Figure  5.  Comparison of pressure time-history and impulse time-history curves at the same location

    图  6  爆炸试验前后钙质砂颗粒级配曲线

    Figure  6.  Particle size distribution before and after the explosion

    图  7  爆炸后钙质砂和石英砂表面形成的爆坑

    Figure  7.  Craters on the surface of calcareous sand and silica sand after the explosions

    图  8  爆坑尺寸定义

    Figure  8.  Definition of crater sizes

    图  9  爆心正下方不同深度的压力时程曲线

    Figure  9.  Pressure time-history curves at different depths directly below the explosion center

    图  10  冲量试验结果及其拟合曲线

    Figure  10.  Experimental results and fitting curves of the scaled impulse

    图  11  爆心距与波阵面到达时刻线性拟合曲线

    Figure  11.  Linear fitting curves of explosion center distance and arrival time of wave front

    图  12  爆心距与压力峰值到达时刻线性拟合曲线

    Figure  12.  Linear fitting curves of explosion center distance and arrival time of pressure peak

    图  13  爆炸波升压时间与比例距离关系

    Figure  13.  The relationship between rise time and scaled distance

    图  14  峰值压力实测值和拟合曲线

    Figure  14.  Experimental results and fitting curves of peak pressure

    图  15  峰值压力试验值与计算值对比

    Figure  15.  Comparison of peak pressures measured value and calculated value

    表  1  爆炸试验参数设计表

    Table  1.   Measured parameters of explosion test

    试验编号土体类型装药质量/kg比例距离/(m·kg−1/3)
    H = 0.35 mH = 0.50 mH = 0.65 m
    CS-1钙质砂0.20.640.901.15
    CS-20.40.520.720.93
    CS-30.80.450.610.78
    CS-41.60.330.460.59
    SS-1石英砂0.20.620.881.13
    SS-20.40.510.710.92
    SS-30.80.400.570.73
    SS-41.60.340.470.60
    SS-53.20.270.370.48
    下载: 导出CSV

    表  2  相同爆炸药量同测点峰值压力对比

    Table  2.   Comparison of peak pressure at the same location

    W/kg试验H = 0.35 mH = 0.50 mH = 0.65 m
    峰值压力/MPa相对差值/%峰值压力/MPa相对差值/%峰值压力/MPa相对差值/%
    0.210.8631.070.4622.930.3419.49
    21.130.570.40
    0.813.991.871.653.591.072.49
    24.061.711.10
    注:相对差值 = (第2次峰值压力-第1次峰值压力)/第1次峰值压力×100 %。
    下载: 导出CSV

    表  3  钙质砂和石英砂爆坑尺寸

    Table  3.   Crater sizes of calcareous sand and silica sand

    W/kg材料d/mmD/mmh/mmh/mm
    0.2钙质砂1645606818
    石英砂19559011190
    0.4钙质砂2366739129
    石英砂19567012590
    0.8钙质砂28870010530
    石英砂850150
    下载: 导出CSV

    表  4  波速拟合结果

    Table  4.   Fitting results of blast wave velocity

    试验弹性波速/(m∙s−1)拟合优度塑性波速/(m∙s−1)拟合优度
    CS-12360.9961880.998
    CS-22530.9872360.999
    CS-32940.982361*1.000
    CS-43000.9762941.000
    SS-12180.9952341.000
    SS-22470.9982341.000
    SS-32900.9992851.000
    SS-42790.9992851.000
    SS-53370.999
    注:*为异常值。
    下载: 导出CSV

    表  5  计算参数

    Table  5.   Parameters of calculation

    材料ρ/(kg∙m−3)c/(m∙s−1)nf
    钙质砂1 3202712.8590.14
    石英砂1 3902722.7860.14
    下载: 导出CSV
  • [1] 单华刚, 汪稔. 钙质砂中的桩基工程研究进展述评 [J]. 岩土力学, 2000, 21(3): 299–304, 308. DOI: 10.16285/j.rsm.2000.03.027.

    SHAN H G, WANG R. Development of study on pile in calcareous sand [J]. Rock and Soil Mechanics, 2000, 21(3): 299–304, 308. DOI: 10.16285/j.rsm.2000.03.027.
    [2] 刘崇权, 汪稔. 钙质砂物理力学性质初探 [J]. 岩土力学, 1998, 19(1): 32–37, 44. DOI: 10.16285/j.rsm.1998.01.006.

    LIU C Q, WANG R. Preliminary research on physical and mechanical properties of calcareous sand [J]. Rock and Soil Mechanics, 1998, 19(1): 32–37, 44. DOI: 10.16285/j.rsm.1998.01.006.
    [3] US, Department of the Army. Fundamentals of protective design for conventional weapons: TM5-855-1 [S]. Washington: US Department of the Army, 1986.
    [4] 穆朝民, 任辉启, 李永池, 等. 爆炸波在高饱和度饱和土中传播规律的研究 [J]. 岩土力学, 2010, 31(3): 875–880. DOI: 10.16285/j.rsm.2010.03.051.

    MU C M, REN H Q, LI Y C, et al. Propagation laws of blast wave in saturated soils with high saturation degree [J]. Rock and Soil Mechanics, 2010, 31(3): 875–880. DOI: 10.16285/j.rsm.2010.03.051.
    [5] 屈俊童, 周健, 吴晓峰. 爆炸法密实砂土地基(Ⅰ)——研究现状 [J]. 工程爆破, 2006, 12(3): 14–18. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1006-7051.2006.03.003.

    QU J T, ZHOU J, WU X F. Explosive compaction of sand ground foundation (Ⅰ)-review [J]. Engineering Blasting, 2006, 12(3): 14–18. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1006-7051.2006.03.003.
    [6] 屈俊童, 周健, 吴晓峰. 爆炸法密实砂土地基(Ⅳ)——设计方法 [J]. 工程爆破, 2007, 13(2): 1–6. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1006-7051.2007.02.001.

    QU J T, ZHOU J, WU X F. Explosive compaction of sand foundation (Ⅳ)-design method [J]. Engineering Blasting, 2007, 13(2): 1–6. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1006-7051.2007.02.001.
    [7] 屈俊童, 周健, 吴晓峰. 爆炸法密实砂土地基(Ⅱ)——现场试验 [J]. 工程爆破, 2006, 12(4): 4–8. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1006-7051.2006.04.002.

    QU J T, ZHOU J, WU X F. Explosive compaction of sand foundation (Ⅱ)-in situ trails [J]. Engineering Blasting, 2006, 12(4): 4–8. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1006-7051.2006.04.002.
    [8] KAGGWA W S, BOOKER J R, CARTER J P. Residual strains in calcareous sand due to irregular cyclic loading [J]. Journal of Geotechnical Engineering, 1991, 117(2): 201–218. DOI: 10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9410(1991)117:2(201.
    [9] 曹梦, 叶剑红. 中国南海钙质砂蠕变-应力-时间四参数数学模型 [J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(5): 1771–1777. DOI: 10.16285/j.rsm.2018.1267.

    CAO M, YE J H. Creep-stress-time four parameters mathematical model of calcareous sand in South China Sea [J]. Rock and Soil Mechanics, 2019, 40(5): 1771–1777. DOI: 10.16285/j.rsm.2018.1267.
    [10] LADE P V, LIGGIO JR C D, NAM J. Strain rate, creep, and stress drop-creep experiments on crushed coral sand [J]. Journal of Geotechnical and Geoenvironmental Engineering, 2009, 135(7): 941–953. DOI: 10.1061/(ASCE)GT.1943-5606.0000067.
    [11] XIAO Y, LIU H, XIAO P, et al. Fractal crushing of carbonate sands under impact loading [J]. Géotechnique Letters, 2016, 6(3): 199–204. DOI: 10.1680/jgele.16.00056.
    [12] LV Y R, LI X, WANG Y. Particle breakage of calcareous sand at high strain rates [J]. Powder Technology, 2020, 366: 776–787. DOI: 10.1016/j.powtec.2020.02.062.
    [13] 朱晓亮. 冲击荷载及大荷载作用下钙质砂颗粒破碎特性研究 [D]. 长春: 吉林大学, 2015: 1–6.

    ZHU X L. Study on the crushing characteristics of calcareous sand particles under impact load and large load [D]. Changchun: Jilin University, 2015: 1–6.
    [14] 魏久淇, 吕亚茹, 刘国权, 等. 钙质砂一维冲击响应及吸能特性试验 [J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(1): 191–198, 206. DOI: 10.16285/j.rsm.2017.1235.

    WEI J Q, LV Y R, LIU G Q, et al. One-dimensional impact responses and energy absorption of calcareous sand [J]. Rock and Soil Mechanics, 2019, 40(1): 191–198, 206. DOI: 10.16285/j.rsm.2017.1235.
    [15] LV Y R, LI F, LIU Y W, et al. Comparative study of coral sand and silica sand in creep under general stress states [J]. Canadian Geotechnical Journal, 2017, 54(11): 1601–1611. DOI: 10.1139/cgj-2016-0295.
    [16] 吕亚茹, 王明洋, 魏久淇, 等. 钙质砂的SHPB实验技术及其动态力学性能 [J]. 爆炸与冲击, 2018, 38(6): 1262–1270. DOI: 10.11883/bzycj-2017-0179.

    LV Y R, WANG M Y, WEI J Q, et al. Experimental techniques of SHPB for calcareous sand and its dynamic behaviors [J]. Explosion and Shock Waves, 2018, 38(6): 1262–1270. DOI: 10.11883/bzycj-2017-0179.
    [17] 于潇, 陈力, 方秦. 珊瑚砂中应力波衰减规律的实验研究 [J]. 岩石力学与工程学报, 2018, 37(6): 1520–1529. DOI: 10.13722/j.cnki.jrme.2018.0147.

    YU X, CHEN L, FANG Q. Experimental study on the attenuation of stress wave in coral sand [J]. Chinese Journal of Rock Mechanicals and Engineering, 2018, 37(6): 1520–1529. DOI: 10.13722/j.cnki.jrme.2018.0147.
    [18] 徐学勇. 饱和钙质砂爆炸响应动力特性研究 [D]. 武汉: 中国科学院研究生院(武汉岩土力学研究所), 2009: 1−13.
    [19] 赵章泳, 王明洋, 邱艳宇, 等. 爆炸波在非饱和钙质砂中的传播规律 [J]. 爆炸与冲击, 2020, 40(8): 083201. DOI: 10.11883/bzycj-2019-0389.

    ZHAO Z Y, WANG M Y, QIU Y Y, et al. The propagation laws of blast wave in unsaturated calcareous sand [J]. Explosion and Shock Waves, 2020, 40(8): 083201. DOI: 10.11883/bzycj-2019-0389.
    [20] 赵章泳, 邱艳宇, 王明洋, 等. 非饱和钙质砂中平面爆炸波传播试验研究 [J]. 防护工程, 2017, 39(3): 22–28.

    ZHAO Z Y, QIU Y Y, WANG M Y, et al. Experimental study on plane explosive wave propagation in unsaturated calcareous sand [J]. Protective Engineering, 2017, 39(3): 22–28.
    [21] 石晗. 钙质砂地基爆炸响应动力特性试验研究 [D]. 武汉: 武汉科技大学, 2020: 1–6. DOI: 10.27380/d.cnki.gwkju.2020.000474.

    SHI H. Experimental study on dynamic characteristics of explosion response of calcareous sand foundation [D]. Wuhan: Wuhan University of Science and Technology, 2020: 1–6. DOI: 10.27380/d.cnki.gwkju.2020.000474.
    [22] 张家铭. 钙质砂基本力学性质及颗粒破碎影响研究 [D]. 武汉: 中国科学院研究生院(武汉岩土力学研究所), 2004: 1–9.

    ZHANG J M. Study on the fundamental mechanical characteristics of calcareous sand and the influence of particle breakage [D]. Wuhan: Chinese Academy of Sciences (Institute of Rock & Soil Mechanics), 2004: 1–9.
    [23] AMBROSINI R D, LUCCIONI B M, DANESI R F, et al. Size of craters produced by explosive charges on or above the ground surface [J]. Shock Waves, 2002, 12(1): 69–78. DOI: 10.1007/s00193-002-0136-3.
    [24] AMBROSINI R D, LUCCIONI B M. Craters produced by explosions on the soil surface [J]. Journal of Applied Mechanics, 2006, 73(6): 890–900. DOI: 10.1115/1.2173283.
  • 加载中
图(15) / 表(5)
计量
  • 文章访问数:  310
  • HTML全文浏览量:  77
  • PDF下载量:  130
  • 被引次数: 0
出版历程
  • 收稿日期:  2022-03-25
  • 修回日期:  2022-12-26
  • 网络出版日期:  2023-02-07
  • 刊出日期:  2023-05-05

目录

    /

    返回文章
    返回