Quasi-static model for predicting explosion cavity with spherical charges

Yu Chenglong; Wang Zhongqi

doi:10.11883/1001-1455(2017)02-0249-06

Volume 37 Issue 2

Mar. 2017

Turn off MathJax

Article Contents

Abstract

References

Article Navigation > Explosion And Shock Waves > 2017 > 37(2): 249-254

Yu Chenglong, Wang Zhongqi. Quasi-static model for predicting explosion cavity with spherical charges[J]. Explosion And Shock Waves, 2017, 37(2): 249-254. doi: 10.11883/1001-1455(2017)02-0249-06

Citation:

Yu Chenglong, Wang Zhongqi. Quasi-static model for predicting explosion cavity with spherical charges[J]. Explosion And Shock Waves, 2017, 37(2): 249-254. doi: 10.11883/1001-1455(2017)02-0249-06

Yu Chenglong, Wang Zhongqi. Quasi-static model for predicting explosion cavity with spherical charges[J]. Explosion And Shock Waves, 2017, 37(2): 249-254. doi: 10.11883/1001-1455(2017)02-0249-06

Citation:

Yu Chenglong, Wang Zhongqi. Quasi-static model for predicting explosion cavity with spherical charges[J]. Explosion And Shock Waves, 2017, 37(2): 249-254. doi: 10.11883/1001-1455(2017)02-0249-06

PDF( 406 KB)

Quasi-static model for predicting explosion cavity with spherical charges

doi: 10.11883/1001-1455(2017)02-0249-06

State Key Laboratory of Explosion Science and Technology, Beijing Institute of Technology, Beijing 100081, China

Received Date: 2015-07-21
Rev Recd Date: 2016-01-15
Publish Date: 2017-03-25

Abstract

Abstract

The characteristic dimension of the explosion-generated cavity in the soil is the most important influence factor for the feature of the far field seismic wave. In this paper we established a quasi-static model to predict the characteristic dimension of the cavity. When a spherical charge was detonated in the homogeneous, incompressible, infinite and elastic mediums, the analytical expressions of the fine crushing zone and the radial fissures zone were shown in this model. In addition, we also used this model to calculate the dimension of the divisions in different conditions. Finally, we conducted a comparison among the quasi-static model, the dynamic model and the experiments. The errors range of the quasi static model was 5.4%-16.0%. The results show that our model can be used to predict exactly the dimension of the cavity.
- spherical cavity,
- theory of quasi-static,
- fine crushing zone,
- radial fissures zone

FullText(HTML)

References(11)

References

[1]	Favreau R F. Generation of strain waves in rock by an explosion in a spherical cavity[J]. Journal of Geophysical Research, 1969, 74(17):4267-4280. doi: 10.1029/JB074i017p04267
[2]	亨利奇J. 爆炸动力学及其应用[M]. 熊建国, 译. 北京: 科学出版社, 1987: 239-252.
[3]	Holmberg R, Persson P A. The Swedish approach to contour blasting[C]// Proceedings of the 4th Conference on Explosives and Blasting Technique. New Orleans, LA: ISEE, 1978: 113-127.
[4]	Ouchterlony F. Prediction of crack lengths in rock after cautious blasting with zero inter-hole delay[J]. Fragblast, 1997, 1(4):417-444. doi: 10.1080/13855149709408407
[5]	Ouchterlony F, Olsson M, Bergqvist I. Towards new Swedish recommendations for cautious perimeter blasting[J]. Fragblast, 2002, 6(2):235-261. doi: 10.1076/frag.6.2.235.8666
[6]	Kanchibolta S S, Valery W, Morrell S. Modeling fines in blast fragmentation and its impact on crushing and grinding[C]// The Australasian Institute of Mining and Metallurgy Proceeding of Explosion 99-A Conference on Rock Breaking. Australia: Brisbane, 1999: 137-144.
[7]	Chernikov A, Sher E. A quasistatic model of a confined explosion of a concentrated charge in a bed and in a block[J]. Journal of Mining Science, 1990, 26(4):355-362. doi: 10.1007/BF02506516
[8]	Forrestal M J, Tzou D Y. A Spherical cavity-expansion penetration model for concrete targets[J]. International Journal of Solids and Structures, 1997, 34(31):4127-4146. http://www.wanfangdata.com.cn/details/detail.do?_type=perio&id=15bb10f7d851f075588b20216506d45c
[9]	Voitenko Y I. Fracture of solids by weak blasts[J]. Combustion, Explosion, and Shock Waves, 1995, 31(4):492-496. doi: 10.1007/BF00789374
[10]	Drukovanyi M F, Kravtov V S, Chernyavskii Y E, et al. Calculation of fracture zones created by exploding cylindrical charges in ledge rock[J]. Soviet Mining Science, 1976, 12(3):292-295. doi: 10.1007/BF02594873
[11]	Ding H, Zheng Z M. Source model of blasting vibration[J]. Science in China, Series E, 2002, 45(4):395-407. http://www.wanfangdata.com.cn/details/detail.do?_type=perio&id=zgkx-ee200204007

Relative Articles

[1]	ZHU Jianlei, HAN Lei, FANG Zhanxiang, XU Yuxin. Calculation method for quasi-static pressure of annular composite implosion of active materials and explosives[J]. Explosion And Shock Waves, 2025, 45(4): 041404. doi: 10.11883/bzycj-2024-0218
[2]	SHU Junxiang, PEI Hongbo, HUANG Wenbin, ZHANG Xu, ZHENG Xianxu. Accurate measurements of detonation pressure and detonation reaction zones of several commonly-used explosives[J]. Explosion And Shock Waves, 2022, 42(5): 052301. doi: 10.11883/bzycj-2021-0305
[3]	ZHANG Ya, LI Xiaobin, PENG Shuai, SHI Rui. Influences of adiabatic index γ on the parameters of different complex wave zones in a planar detonation[J]. Explosion And Shock Waves, 2021, 41(10): 102102. doi: 10.11883/bzycj-2020-0458
[4]	YI Haibao, ZHANG Xiliang, YANG Haitao, LI Ming, GAO Qiqi, JIN Ke. Goaf collapse vibration analysis and disposal based on a experiment of heavy ball touchdown[J]. Explosion And Shock Waves, 2019, 39(7): 074101. doi: 10.11883/bzycj-2018-0160
[5]	GAN Bo, GAO Wei, ZHANG Xinyan, JIANG Haipeng, BI Mingshu. Effect of methane concentration on minimum concentration and thickness of preheating zone in PMMA/methane hybrid explosion[J]. Explosion And Shock Waves, 2019, 39(2): 025404. doi: 10.11883/bzycj-2017-0252
[6]	QIN Jincheng, PEI Hongbo, HUANG Wenbin, ZHANG Xu, ZHENG Xianxu, ZHAO Feng. Measuring the detonation reaction zone structure ofJOB-9003 explosive using PDV[J]. Explosion And Shock Waves, 2019, 39(4): 041404. doi: 10.11883/bzycj-2018-0101
[7]	PEI Hongbo, HUANG Wenbin, QIN Jincheng, ZHANG Xu, ZHAO Feng, ZHENG Xianxu. Reaction zone structure of JB-9014 explosive measured by PDV[J]. Explosion And Shock Waves, 2018, 38(3): 485-490. doi: 10.11883/bzycj-2017-0379
[8]	ZHANG Yulei, SU Jianjun, LI Zhirong, JIANG Haiyan, ZHONG Kai, WANG Shengqiang. Quasi-static pressure characteristic of TNT's internal explosion[J]. Explosion And Shock Waves, 2018, 38(6): 1429-1434. doi: 10.11883/bzycj-2017-0170
[9]	LIU Wenxiang, ZHANG Dezhi, ZHONG Fangping, CHENG Shuai, ZHANG Qingming. Quasi-static gas pressure generated by explosive charge blasting in a spherical explosion containment vessel[J]. Explosion And Shock Waves, 2018, 38(5): 1045-1050. doi: 10.11883/bzycj-2017-0056
[10]	Zhang Tao, Gu Yan, Zhao Jibo, Liu Yusheng, Wu Xing. Chemical reaction zone length of JBO-9021[J]. Explosion And Shock Waves, 2017, 37(3): 415-421. doi: 10.11883/1001-1455(2017)03-0415-07
[11]	Leng Zhen-dong, Lu Wen-bo, Chen Ming, Yan Peng, Hu Ying-guo. Improved calculation model for the size of crushed zone around blasthole[J]. Explosion And Shock Waves, 2015, 35(1): 101-107. doi: 10.11883/1001-1455(2015)01-0101-07
[12]	Zhang Zai-chen, Lin Cong-mou, Huang Zhi-bo, Ge Bing-yang, Xu Liang. Prediction of blasting vibration of area near tunnel blasting source[J]. Explosion And Shock Waves, 2014, 34(3): 367-372. doi: 10.11883/1001-1455(2014)03-0367-06
[13]	CHEN Ming, LU Wen-bo, ZHOU Chuang-bing. Influence of in-situ stress redistribution on proportional radii of blasting-induced cracking zones in tunnel excavation[J]. Explosion And Shock Waves, 2009, 29(3): 328-332. doi: 10.11883/1001-1455(2009)03-0328-05
[14]	WANG Xin-liang, YE Dan, GU Fan. The double fluid model of the non-equilibrium ionization zone in the detonation plasma[J]. Explosion And Shock Waves, 2008, 28(2): 131-137. doi: 10.11883/1001-1455(2008)02-0131-07
[15]	ZHANG Chong-yu, GU Yan, LI Qing-zhong, HUA Jin-song, SUN Xue-lin, PENG Qi-xian, ZHANG Zhen-tao. Study on deformation characteristics of collision region of copper tube with guard ring driven by two head-on colliding detonation waves[J]. Explosion And Shock Waves, 2007, 27(2): 97-102. doi: 10.11883/1001-1455(2007)02-0097-06

Supplements(0)

Cited By

Cited by

Periodical cited type(5)

1.	康普林，雷涛，李立峰. 考虑药包爆破动-静时序作用的漏斗形成机理. 爆炸与冲击. 2025(05): 142-158 . 本站查看
2.	徐谦，王仲琦. 轴向分布式药包激发地震波场模型. 爆炸与冲击. 2021(07): 50-59 . 本站查看
3.	李洪伟，雷战，刘伟，江向阳，王贵. 起爆方式对岩石柱状装药爆破作用的影响. 工程爆破. 2019(05): 28-34 .
4.	李鹏毅，王仲琦，徐谦，梁形形. 有限长柱形药包土中爆腔特征尺寸的计算方法. 爆炸与冲击. 2019(12): 100-108 . 本站查看
5.	刘先斌，蒋志刚，詹昊雯. 球形装药内爆岩体破坏效应的准静态模型. 弹道学报. 2018(02): 54-59 .