A method for blasting vibration signal denoising based on ensemble empirical mode decomposition-wavelet threshold

FEI Honglu; LIU Meng; QU Guangjian; GAO Ying

doi:10.11883/bzycj-2016-0148

Volume 38 Issue 1

Nov. 2017

Turn off MathJax

Article Contents

Abstract

References

Article Navigation > Explosion And Shock Waves > 2018 > 38(1): 112-118

FEI Honglu, LIU Meng, QU Guangjian, GAO Ying. A method for blasting vibration signal denoising based on ensemble empirical mode decomposition-wavelet threshold[J]. Explosion And Shock Waves, 2018, 38(1): 112-118. doi: 10.11883/bzycj-2016-0148

Citation:

FEI Honglu, LIU Meng, QU Guangjian, GAO Ying. A method for blasting vibration signal denoising based on ensemble empirical mode decomposition-wavelet threshold[J]. Explosion And Shock Waves, 2018, 38(1): 112-118. doi: 10.11883/bzycj-2016-0148

Citation:

PDF( 918 KB)

A method for blasting vibration signal denoising based on ensemble empirical mode decomposition-wavelet threshold

doi: 10.11883/bzycj-2016-0148

1.
Institute of Blasting Technique, Liaoning Technical University, Fuxin 123000, Liaoning, China
2.
Guangzhou China Blast Digital Information Technology Co., Ltd., Guangzhou 510670, Guangdong, China
3.
School of Computer Science & Engineering, South China University of Technology, Guangzhou 510641, Guangdong, China

Received Date: 2016-05-25
Rev Recd Date: 2016-08-26
Publish Date: 2018-01-25

Abstract

Abstract

In this work we proposed a method based on ensemble empirical mode decomposition (EEMD) and wavelet threshold for eliminating the noise contained a in blasting signal. Following this method, the signal is firstly decomposed using the ensemble empirical mode decomposition; then, the intrinsic mode function with noise is processed by the wavelet threshold denoising; and, finally, the processed signal is superimposed on the untreated component of the signal, and the signal thus reconstructed is the denoised signal. This method can not only can effectively remove the noise, but also enable the burst wave form to retain its authenticity and integrity
- blasting signal,
- ensemble empirical mode decomposition,
- wavelet threshold,
- denoising

FullText(HTML)

References(18)

References

[1]	李洪涛, 卢文波, 舒大强.小波分析在爆破振动加速度推求中的应用[J].爆破器材, 2006, 35(5):4-7. http://www.wanfangdata.com.cn/details/detail.do?_type=perio&id=bpqc200605002 LI Hongtao, LU Wenbo, SHU Daqiang. Application of wavelet analysis in calculating blasting vibration acceleration[J]. Explosive Materials, 2006, 35(5):4-7. http://www.wanfangdata.com.cn/details/detail.do?_type=perio&id=bpqc200605002
[2]	中国生, 徐国元, 江文武.基于小波变换的爆破地震信号去噪的应用[J].中南大学学报(自然科学版), 2006, 37(1):155-159. https://www.wenkuxiazai.com/doc/516f598a0242a8956bece4b3.html ZHONG Guosheng, XU Guoyuan, JIANG Wenwu. Application of denoising in blasting seismic signals based on wavelet transform[J]. Journal of Center Sorth University (Science and Technology), 2006, 37(1):155-159. https://www.wenkuxiazai.com/doc/516f598a0242a8956bece4b3.html
[3]	徐学勇, 程康.爆破震动信号模极大值小波消噪方法的改进[J].爆炸与冲击, 2009, 29(2):194-198. doi: 10.11883/1001-1455(2009)02-0194-05 XU Xueyong, CHENG Kang. Improvement of the wavelet transform maximum modulus method for blasting vibration signals[J]. Explosion and Shock Waves, 2009, 29(2):194-198. doi: 10.11883/1001-1455(2009)02-0194-05
[4]	夏晨曦, 杨军, 李顺波, 等.最优小波包基算法在爆破振动信号去噪中的应用[J].爆破, 2011, 28(3):4-7. http://d.wanfangdata.com.cn/Periodical_bp201103002.aspx XIA Chenxi, YANG Jun, LI Shunbo, et al. Application of best wavelet packet basis algorithm in denoising of blasting vibration signal[J]. Blasting, 2011, 28(3):4-7. http://d.wanfangdata.com.cn/Periodical_bp201103002.aspx
[5]	熊正明, 中国生, 徐国元.基于平移不变小波爆破振动信号去噪的应用研究[J].金属矿山, 2006(2):12-14. http://www.wanfangdata.com.cn/details/detail.do?_type=perio&id=jsks200602004 XIONG Zhengming, ZHONG Guosheng, XU Guoyuan. Application of denoising for blasting vibration signals based on translation invariant wavelet[J]. Metal Mine, 2006(2):12-14. http://www.wanfangdata.com.cn/details/detail.do?_type=perio&id=jsks200602004
[6]	李夕兵, 张义平, 左宇军, 等.岩石爆破振动信号的EMD滤波与消噪[J].中南大学学报(自然科学版), 2006, 37(1):150-154. http://www.wanfangdata.com.cn/details/detail.do?_type=perio&id=zngydxxb200601029 LI Xibing, ZHANG Yiping, ZUO Yujun, et al. Filtering and denoising of rock blasting vibration signal with EMD[J]. Journal of Center Sorth University (Science and Technology), 2006, 37(1):150-154. http://www.wanfangdata.com.cn/details/detail.do?_type=perio&id=zngydxxb200601029
[7]	赵明生, 梁开水, 罗元方, 等.EEMD在爆破振动信号去噪中的应用[J].爆破, 2011, 28(2):17-20. http://d.wanfangdata.com.cn/Periodical_bp201102005.aspx ZHAO Mingsheng, LIANG Kaishui, LUO Yuanfang, et al. Application of EEMD in blasting vibration signal denoising[J]. Blasting, 2011, 28(2):17-20. http://d.wanfangdata.com.cn/Periodical_bp201102005.aspx
[8]	饶运章, 王柳, 饶睿, 等.基于EMD与小波阈值的爆破震动信号去噪方法[J].福州大学学报(自然科学版), 2015, 43(2):271-277. doi: 10.7631/issn.1000-2243.2015.02.0271 RAO Yunzhang, WANG Liu, RAO Rui, et al. A method for blasting vibration signal denoising based on empircal mode decomposition and wavelet threshold[J]. Journal of Fuzhou University (Natural Science Edition), 2015, 43(2):271-277. doi: 10.7631/issn.1000-2243.2015.02.0271
[9]	CHIEMENTIN X, KILUNDU B, RASOLOFONDRAIBE L, et al. Performance of wavelet denoising in vibration analysis: Highlighting[J]. Journal of Vibration and Control, 2012, 18(6):850-858. doi: 10.1177/1077546311412992
[10]	HUANG N E, SHEN Z, Long S R, et al. The empirical mode decomposition and the Hibert spectrum for nonlinear and nonstationary time series analysis[J]. Proceedings of Roval Society of London A, 1998, 454(3):903-995.DOI: 10.1098/rspa.1998.0193.
[11]	李夕兵, 张义平, 刘志祥, 等.爆破震动信号的小波分析与HHT变换[J].爆炸与冲击, 2005, 25(6):528-535. doi: 10.11883/1001-1455(2005)06-0528-08 LI Xibing, ZHANG Yiping, LIU Zhixiang, et al. Wavelet analysis and Hilbert-Huang transform of blasting vibration signal[J]. Explosion and Shock Waves, 2005, 25(6):528-535. doi: 10.11883/1001-1455(2005)06-0528-08
[12]	GIAOUR D, FINCH J W. Denoising using wavelets on electric drive applications[J]. Electric Power Systems Research, 2008, 78(4):559-565. doi: 10.1016/j.epsr.2007.05.004
[13]	WU Zhaohua, HUANG N E. Ensemble empirical mode decom position a noise assisted data analysis method[J]. Advances in Adaptive Data Analysis, 2009, 1(1):1-41. DOI: 10.1142/S1793536909000047.
[14]	陈仁祥, 汤宝平, 马靖华.基于EEMD的振动信号自适应降噪方法[J].振动与冲击, 2012, 31(15):82-86. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1000-3835.2012.15.016 CHEN Renxiang, TANG Baoping, MA Jinghua. Adaptived denoising method based on ensemble empirical mode decomposition for vibration signal[J]. Journal of Vibration and Shock, 2012, 31(15):82-86. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1000-3835.2012.15.016
[15]	张雪英, 谢飞, 乔铁柱, 等.基于EEMD与改进小波阈值的磁记忆信号降噪研究[J].太原理工大学学报, 2015(5):592-597. http://www.wanfangdata.com.cn/details/detail.do?_type=perio&id=tylgdxxb201505022 ZHANG Xueying, XIE Fei, QIAO Tiezhu, et al. Denoising algorithm for metal magnetic memory signals based on EEMD and improved semisoft wavelet threshold[J]. Journal of Taiyuan University of Technology, 2015(5):592-597. http://www.wanfangdata.com.cn/details/detail.do?_type=perio&id=tylgdxxb201505022
[16]	刘希灵, 李夕兵, 洪亮, 等.基于离散小波变换的岩石SHPB测试信号去噪[J].爆炸与冲击, 2009, 29(1):67-72. doi: 10.11883/1001-1455(2009)01-0067-06 LIU Xiling, LI Xibing, HONG Liang, et al. Rock SHPB testing signal denoising based on discrete wavelet transform[J]. Explosion and Shock Waves, 2009, 29(1):67-72. doi: 10.11883/1001-1455(2009)01-0067-06
[17]	钱伟新, 刘瑞根, 王婉丽, 等.一种新的闪光照相CCD图像的扩散滤波方法[J].爆炸与冲击, 2006, 26(4):351-355. doi: 10.11883/1001-1455(2006)04-0351-05 QIAN Weixin, LIU Ruigen, WANG Wanli, et al. A new method of diffusion filtering for flash X-ray radiographic CCD image[J]. Explosion and Shock Waves, 2006, 26(4):351-355. doi: 10.11883/1001-1455(2006)04-0351-05
[18]	赵志刚, 管聪慧.基于多尺度边缘检测的自适应阈值小波图像降噪[J].仪器仪表学报, 2007, 28(2):288-292. http://www.doc88.com/p-98930532356.html ZHAO Zhigang, GUAN Conghui. Wavelet image denoising based on multiscale edge detection and adaptive threshold[J]. Chinese Journal of Scientific Instrument, 2007, 28(2):288-292. http://www.doc88.com/p-98930532356.html

Relative Articles

[1]	WANG Hailong, ZHAO Yan, WANG Haijun, PENG Chanyuan, TONG Xiao. De-noising method of tunnel blasting signal based on CEEMDAN decomposition-wavelet packet analysis[J]. Explosion And Shock Waves, 2021, 41(5): 055202. doi: 10.11883/bzycj-2020-0123
[2]	FU Xiaoqiang, YANG Renshu, LIU Jifeng, ZHANG Huizhi, ZHANG Renwei. Baseline drift correction and de-noising method of shaft lining vibration signal in near field of freezing vertical shaft blasting[J]. Explosion And Shock Waves, 2020, 40(9): 095203. doi: 10.11883/bzycj-2019-0367
[3]	YI Wenhua, LIU Liansheng, YAN Lei, DONG Binbin. Vibration signal de-noising based on improved EMD algorithm[J]. Explosion And Shock Waves, 2020, 40(9): 095201. doi: 10.11883/bzycj-2019-0471
[4]	JIA Bei, LING Tianlong, HOU Shijun, LIU Dianshu, WANG Xiao. Application of variable mode decomposition in the removal of blasting signal trend items[J]. Explosion And Shock Waves, 2020, 40(4): 045201. doi: 10.11883/bzycj-2019-0092
[5]	WANG Zhiliang, CHEN Guihao, HUANG Youpeng. Optimal white noise coefficient in EEMD corrected zero drift signal of blasting acceleration[J]. Explosion And Shock Waves, 2019, 39(8): 084201. doi: 10.11883/bzycj-2019-0154
[6]	HAN Liang, LIU Dianshu, XIN Chongwei, LIANG Shufeng, LING Tianlong, WU Yu, LI Chen. Trend removing methods of vibration signals of deep hole bench blasting in near field[J]. Explosion And Shock Waves, 2018, 38(5): 1006-1012. doi: 10.11883/bzycj-2016-0194
[7]	Liu Yuan, Pang Baojun, Chi Runqiang, Cao Wuxiong, Zhang Zhiyuan. Wavelet transformation based damage feature extraction ofhypervelocity impact acoustic emission signalon honeycomb core sandwich[J]. Explosion And Shock Waves, 2017, 37(5): 785-792. doi: 10.11883/1001-1455(2017)05-0785-08
[8]	Zhang Sheng, Ling Tonghua, Cao Feng, Huang Kan. Application of removal trend method of pattern adapted continuous wavelet to blast vibration signal analysis[J]. Explosion And Shock Waves, 2017, 37(2): 255-261. doi: 10.11883/1001-1455(2017)02-0255-07
[9]	Pei Shan-bao, Liu Rong-zhong, Guo Rui. Analysis of characteristics of sequential underwater explosion sound signal based on wavelet transform[J]. Explosion And Shock Waves, 2015, 35(4): 520-526. doi: 10.11883/1001-1455(2015)04-0520-07
[10]	LuLiang, LongYuan, XieQuan-min, . Decompositionandenergydistributionofblastingvibrationsignal basedonsecondgenerationwaveletpacket(SGWP)[J]. Explosion And Shock Waves, 2013, 33(2): 140-147. doi: 10.11883/1001-1455(2013)02-0140-08
[11]	GUAN Xiao-lei, YAN Jing-long. TheHHTtime-frequencypowerspectrumanalysisof theblastingvibrationsigna[J]. Explosion And Shock Waves, 2012, 32(5): 535-541. doi: 10.11883/1001-1455(2012)05-0535-07
[12]	LIU Xi-ling, LI Xi-bing, HONG Liang, GONG Feng-qiang, YE Zhou-yuan. Rock SHPB testing signal denoising based on discrete wavelet transform[J]. Explosion And Shock Waves, 2009, 29(1): 67-72. doi: 10.11883/1001-1455(2009)01-0067-06
[13]	ZHONG Guo-sheng, AO Li-ping, ZHAO Kui, . Influence of explosion parameters on energy distribution of blasting vibration signal based on wavelet packet energy spectrum[J]. Explosion And Shock Waves, 2009, 29(3): 300-305. doi: 10.11883/1001-1455(2009)03-0300-06
[14]	XU Xue-yong, CHENG Kang. Improvement of the wavelet transform maximum modulus method for blasting vibration signals[J]. Explosion And Shock Waves, 2009, 29(2): 194-198. doi: 10.11883/1001-1455(2009)02-0194-05
[15]	YAN Jun-wei, LONG Yuan, FANG Xiang, ZHOU Chun-hua. Analysis on features of energy distribution for blasting seismic wave based on wavelet transform[J]. Explosion And Shock Waves, 2007, 27(5): 405-410. doi: 10.11883/1001-1455(2007)05-0405-06
[16]	ZHONG Guo-sheng, XU Guo-yuan, XIONG Zheng-ming. Application research of the energy analysis method for blasting seismic signals based on wavelet transform[J]. Explosion And Shock Waves, 2006, 26(3): 222-227. doi: 10.11883/1001-1455(2006)03-0222-06
[17]	LI Xi-bing, ZHANG Yi-ping, LIU Zhi-xiang, ZUO Yu-jun, WANG Wei-hua. Wavelet analysis and Hilbert-Huang transform of blasting vibration signal[J]. Explosion And Shock Waves, 2005, 25(6): 528-535. doi: 10.11883/1001-1455(2005)06-0528-08

Supplements(0)

Cited By

Cited by

Periodical cited type(26)

1.	张文涛，汪海波，高朋飞，王梦想，程兵，宗琦. 基于ICEEMDAN-改进小波阈值法的爆破振动信号消噪分析. 工程爆破. 2025(02): 157-168 .
2.	刘梦，王晶晶，蒙萌，史秋波. 爆破振动对临近尾矿坝的影响分析. 爆破器材. 2024(02): 44-49 .
3.	梁阿全，高双玲，郑嘉祺，夏忠. 基于EEMD和小波阈值方法的爆破数据预处理. 地震地磁观测与研究. 2024(03): 55-62 .
4.	周传波，吕国鹏，蒋楠. 爆破振动效应研究若干进展. 工程爆破. 2024(05): 61-74 .
5.	尚雪义，陈勇，陈结，陈林林，蒲源源. 基于Adaboost＿LSTM预测的矿山微震信号降噪方法及应用. 煤炭学报. 2024(11): 4406-4416 .
6.	葛亮，袁雪峰，肖小汀，骆平，王甜. 基于EMD与小波阈值联合去噪的埋地非金属管道声学定位回波信号提取（英文）. Journal of Measurement Science and Instrumentation. 2024(04): 417-431 .
7.	胡阳，李博，胡耀宗，付道一，胡号朋. 基于VMD-HT-ResNet的风电机组塔筒振动状态监测及预警. 太阳能学报. 2024(12): 388-396 .
8.	宋青波，柏皓博，王海龙，赵岩，张奇. 基于CEEMDAN-交叉小波变换的爆破延时识别. 工程爆破. 2023(02): 10-16+24 .
9.	刘柱，丁雪兴，丁俊华，徐理善. 机械密封状态监测与故障诊断技术研究进展. 润滑与密封. 2023(06): 203-212 .
10.	陆俊杰，刘柱，丁雪兴，丁俊华，高德. 局部特征尺度与小波阈值协同下密封摩擦面AE信号降噪研究. 振动与冲击. 2023(12): 205-211+219 .
11.	李火坤，邬鹏贞，黄伟，刘晗玥. 基于CEEMDAN-改进小波阈值的水工结构振动信号联合降噪方法. 南昌大学学报(工科版). 2022(01): 1-8 .
12.	费鸿禄，山杰. CEEMDAN-小波阈值法在爆破振动信号处理中的应用. 爆破. 2022(03): 41-47+164 .
13.	张瑞成，曹志新，梁卫征. 改进VMD-LSTM的轧机振动预测研究. 噪声与振动控制. 2022(06): 119-123 .
14.	纪俊卿，张亚靓，孟祥川，许同乐. 自适应小波阈值滚动轴承故障振动信号降噪方法. 哈尔滨理工大学学报. 2021(02): 124-130 .
15.	王海龙，赵岩，王海军，彭婵媛，仝潇. 基于CEEMDAN-小波包分析的隧道爆破信号去噪方法. 爆炸与冲击. 2021(05): 125-137 . 本站查看
16.	刘建伟，鲁超，何文超. 某金矿深孔爆破振动信号EMD分析及安全评估. 现代矿业. 2021(04): 152-157 .
17.	李启月，王宏伟，王靖博，曾海登，郑静，张建秋. 基于EEMD和小波阈值法的爆破振动信号预处理研究. 矿冶工程. 2021(03): 28-31+36 .
18.	周小龙，徐鑫莉，王尧，刘薇娜，姜振海，马风雷. 基于变分模态分解和最大重叠离散小波包变换的齿轮信号去噪方法. 振动与冲击. 2021(12): 265-274+289 .
19.	彭亚雄，刘广进，苏莹，刘运思，张超. 基于变分模态分解算法的隧道爆破振动信号光滑降噪模型. 振动与冲击. 2021(24): 173-179 .
20.	蔡艳平，范宇，陈万，张金明. 改进时频分析和特征融合在内燃机故障诊断中的应用. 中国机械工程. 2020(16): 1901-1911 .
21.	黄智刚，吕虎波，林一庚，彭亚雄，吴立，陈劲. 基于CEEMDAN-MPE算法的隧道爆破地震波信号降噪方法及应用. 爆破. 2020(04): 138-144 .
22.	赵明生，苟倩倩，张光雄，池恩安，胡娟新，姚颖康. 基于CEEMDAN的塌落触地振动信号最优降噪光滑模型算法. 爆破. 2020(02): 127-135 .
23.	胡伟鹏，邹孝，刘备，赵新民，钱盛友. 基于多迭代变分模态分解与复合多尺度散布熵的生物组织变性识别方法. 传感技术学报. 2019(12): 1856-1863 .
24.	孙苗，吴立，周玉纯，马晨阳，汪煜烽. 水下钻孔爆破地震波信号的最优降噪光滑模型. 华南理工大学学报(自然科学版). 2019(08): 31-37 .
25.	徐朗，蔡德所. CEEMDAN与小波变换混合去噪方法在光纤陀螺监测系统信号去噪中的应用. 水利水电技术. 2018(09): 87-95 .
26.	陈龙，史文库，陈志勇，张贵辉. 基于小波-VMD联合降噪的传动系扭振信号分析. 振动.测试与诊断. 2022(04): 703-709+825 .