Liquid high pulse pressure calibration by laser interferometry

YANG Jun; SHI Bo; FAN Shangchun; LI Cheng; LI Bo; HUANG Riheng

doi:10.11883/bzycj-2016-0280

Volume 38 Issue 3

Feb. 2018

Turn off MathJax

Article Contents

Abstract

References

Article Navigation > Explosion And Shock Waves > 2018 > 38(3): 572-578

YANG Jun, SHI Bo, FAN Shangchun, LI Cheng, LI Bo, HUANG Riheng. Liquid high pulse pressure calibration by laser interferometry[J]. Explosion And Shock Waves, 2018, 38(3): 572-578. doi: 10.11883/bzycj-2016-0280

Citation:

YANG Jun, SHI Bo, FAN Shangchun, LI Cheng, LI Bo, HUANG Riheng. Liquid high pulse pressure calibration by laser interferometry[J]. Explosion And Shock Waves, 2018, 38(3): 572-578. doi: 10.11883/bzycj-2016-0280

Citation:

PDF( 1836 KB)

Liquid high pulse pressure calibration by laser interferometry

doi: 10.11883/bzycj-2016-0280

1.
School of Instrumentation Science and Opto-electronics Engineering, Beihang University, Beijing 100083, China
2.
Changcheng Institute of Metrology & Measurement, Beijing 100095, China

Received Date: 2016-09-13
Rev Recd Date: 2017-02-25
Publish Date: 2018-05-25

Abstract

Abstract

In order to achieve traceable dynamic pressure measurement in the liquid pulse pressure calibration, a dynamic pressure measurement method by laser interferometry based on Newton's second law is used. The pulse pressure is generated by a drop mass' impact on the piston in the liquid cavity to calibrate the amplitude sensitivity of the piezoelectric sensor. The amplitude of the pulse pressure is calculated from the mass and the mass' acceleration measured by the laser interferometer. Theoretical and experimental analysis of the pressure distribution in the pressure cavity, the acceleration distribution in the mass and the frictions are done, and then the measurement uncertainty of the piezoelectric pressure sensor's amplitude sensitivity calibration is analyzed. The measurement range of the calibration device is (10-500) MPa and the extend uncertainty is less than 1.8%.
- pulse pressure,
- high pressure,
- laser interferometer,
- error analysis

FullText(HTML)

References(11)

References

[1]	The Instrumentation, Systems, and Automation Society. A guide for the dynamic calibration of pressure transducers: ISA-37. 16. 01-2002[R]. 2002.
[2]	HJELMGREN J. Dynamic measurement of pressure: A literature survey[R]. 2002: 34.
[3]	JIM L, DAN C. Dynamic pressure calibration[R]. PCB Piezotronics Technical Note TN-15-0205, 2005.
[4]	孔德仁, 孙海波, 朱明武, 等.压力动态绝对校准方法研究[J].南京理工大学学报, 2000, 24(3):261-264. http://www.wanfangdata.com.cn/details/detail.do?_type=perio&id=njlgdxxb200003017 KONG Deren, SUN Haibo, ZHU Mingwu, et al. Dynamic pressure absolute calibration method[J]. Journal of Nanjing University of Science and Technology, 2000, 24(3):261-264. http://www.wanfangdata.com.cn/details/detail.do?_type=perio&id=njlgdxxb200003017
[5]	BARTOLI C, BEUG M F, BRUNS T, et al. Traceable dynamic measurement of mechanical quantities:Objectives and first results of this European project[J]. International Journal of Metrology and Quality Engineering, 2013, 3(3):127-135. https://dalspace.library.dal.ca/bitstream/handle/10222/45110/Bartoli_Traceable.pdf?sequence=1&isAllowed=y
[6]	LAKKA A, SAXHOLM S. Drop-weight system for dynamic pressure calibration[C]//8th Workshop on Analysis of Dynamic Measurements. Turin, 2014.
[7]	DURGUT Y, AKSAHIN E, BAGCI E, et al. Preliminary dynamic pressure measurement system at ume[C]//XXI IMEKO World Congress. Prague, 2015.
[8]	MALENGO A, PENNECCHI F. Drop-weight system for dynamic pressure calibration: Calibration models and methods[C]//8th Workshop on Analysis of Dynamic Measurements. Turin, 2014.
[9]	BRUNS T, FRANKE E, KOBUSCH M. Linking dynamic pressure to static pressure by laser interferometry[J]. Metrologia, 2013, 50:580-585. doi: 10.1088/0026-1394/50/6/580
[10]	KOBUSCH M, BRUNS T. European research project for the dynamic measurement of mechanical quantities[J]. PTB Mitteilungen:Amts-und Mitteilungsblatt der Physikalisch-Technischen Bundesanstalt, 2015, 125(2):4-11. DOI: 10.7795/310.20150202.
[11]	朱明武.压力准静态校准技术[J].宇航计测技术, 2004, 24(2):19-21. http://www.wanfangdata.com.cn/details/detail.do?_type=perio&id=yhjcjs200402006 ZHU Mingwu. Pressure quasi-static calibration technology[J]. Journal of Astronautic Metrology and Measurement, 2004, 24(2):19-21. http://www.wanfangdata.com.cn/details/detail.do?_type=perio&id=yhjcjs200402006

Relative Articles

[1]	WU Chuandong, CAO Dong, QI Chang, YAN Xingqing, YU Jianliang. The upper explosion limits of CH₄/C₂H₆ and C₂H₆/H₂O mixtures at elevated temperatures and pressures in oxygen[J]. Explosion And Shock Waves. doi: 10.11883/bzycj-2024-0277
[2]	NI Hui. Plasma pressure over time-space evolution law for femtosecond pulses laser shock peening[J]. Explosion And Shock Waves, 2024, 44(2): 023202. doi: 10.11883/bzycj-2023-0262
[3]	CHEN Sheng, NING Ye, HE Meng, QI Chang, WANG Yalei, YAN Xingqing, YU Jianliang. The upper explosion limit of C₃H₈/C₂H₄ mixtures in air at high temperatures and pressures[J]. Explosion And Shock Waves, 2023, 43(6): 065401. doi: 10.11883/bzycj-2022-0475
[4]	YAO Kuiguang, ZHAO Xuefeng, FAN Xing, XUE Pengyi, DAI Xiaogan. Burn rate-pressure characteristic for PBX-1 explosive at high pressures[J]. Explosion And Shock Waves, 2020, 40(1): 011404. doi: 10.11883/bzycj-2019-0347
[5]	ZHANG Zhen, WANG Yonggang. Measurement system for split Hopkinson pressure bar apparatus based on laser interferometry technique[J]. Explosion And Shock Waves, 2018, 38(5): 1165-1171. doi: 10.11883/bzycj-2017-0116
[6]	WU Feipeng, XU Ersi, LIU Jing, WEI Xuemei, PU Chunsheng, REN Yang. Coupled loading simulation for combined pulse fracturing and the sensitivity analysis of different propellant ratios[J]. Explosion And Shock Waves, 2018, 38(3): 683-687. doi: 10.11883/bzycj-2016-0302
[7]	Mu Chao-min, Han Jing. Mechanical characteristics of high-pressure water jets impinging on coal[J]. Explosion And Shock Waves, 2015, 35(3): 442-448. doi: 10.11883/1001-1455(2015)03-0442-07
[8]	LongRen-rong, FuYue-sheng, ZhangQing-ming. Alocationmethodforunderwaterexplosionsourceanderroranalysis[J]. Explosion And Shock Waves, 2013, 33(2): 181-185. doi: 10.11883/1001-1455(2013)02-0181-05
[9]	LIU Qiao, LI Ze-ren. DispersionmeasurementofsignalopticalfibersinVISAR[J]. Explosion And Shock Waves, 2012, 32(2): 179-184. doi: 10.11883/1001-1455(2012)02-0179-06
[10]	LI Ze-ren. The influence of the modal dispersion of signal fiber on velocity measurement in VISAR applications[J]. Explosion And Shock Waves, 2005, 25(5): 457-460. doi: 10.11883/1001-1455(2005)05-0457-04

Supplements(0)

Cited By

Cited by

Periodical cited type(8)

1.	杨军，张力，李新良. 动态计量技术发展中的几个关键问题. 计测技术. 2021(02): 8-21 .
2.	史博，杨军，蔡菁，王辰辰，李程. 脉冲式动态压力溯源方法研究. 计测技术. 2021(03): 46-50 .
3.	李博，杨军，谢兴娟，段小艳. 温度对激光干涉法测量气体动态压力的影响. 光学技术. 2021(05): 565-569+581 .
4.	张博涵，杨军，谢兴娟，张大治，姜延欢. 基于激光干涉法的CO_2气体压力测量. 计测技术. 2021(06): 55-58 .
5.	李博，杨军，黄楠，黄日恒，尹肖，石玉松. 基于激光干涉测量的高频液体正弦压力校准. 工程科学与技术. 2020(05): 216-222 .
6.	李博，杨军，黄楠，石玉松. 基于激光干涉法测水介质正弦压力的动态校准技术. 红外与激光工程. 2019(08): 26-32 .
7.	张炳毅，付强，郑爱建，徐佳. 空气声高声压校准技术现状和趋势. 计测技术. 2019(06): 8-12 .
8.	商飞，顾廷炜，孔德仁. 基于力传感器的压力电测系统准静态校准方法研究. 宇航计测技术. 2018(05): 60-65 .