A multi-component Duan-Zhang-Kim mesoscopic reaction rate model for shock initiation of multi-component PBX explosives

BAI Zhiling; DUAN Zhuoping; WEN Lijing; ZHANG Zhenyu; OU Zhuocheng; HUANG Fenglei

doi:10.11883/bzycj-2018-0410

Volume 39 Issue 11

Nov. 2019

Turn off MathJax

Article Contents

Abstract

References

Article Navigation > Explosion And Shock Waves > 2019 > 39(11): 112101

BAI Zhiling, DUAN Zhuoping, WEN Lijing, ZHANG Zhenyu, OU Zhuocheng, HUANG Fenglei. A multi-component Duan-Zhang-Kim mesoscopic reaction rate model for shock initiation of multi-component PBX explosives[J]. Explosion And Shock Waves, 2019, 39(11): 112101. doi: 10.11883/bzycj-2018-0410

Citation:

BAI Zhiling, DUAN Zhuoping, WEN Lijing, ZHANG Zhenyu, OU Zhuocheng, HUANG Fenglei. A multi-component Duan-Zhang-Kim mesoscopic reaction rate model for shock initiation of multi-component PBX explosives[J]. Explosion And Shock Waves, 2019, 39(11): 112101. doi: 10.11883/bzycj-2018-0410

Citation:

BAI Zhiling, DUAN Zhuoping, WEN Lijing, ZHANG Zhenyu, OU Zhuocheng, HUANG Fenglei. A multi-component Duan-Zhang-Kim mesoscopic reaction rate model for shock initiation of multi-component PBX explosives[J]. Explosion And Shock Waves, 2019, 39(11): 112101. doi: 10.11883/bzycj-2018-0410

PDF( 2303 KB)

A multi-component Duan-Zhang-Kim mesoscopic reaction rate model for shock initiation of multi-component PBX explosives

doi: 10.11883/bzycj-2018-0410

1.
State Key Laboratory of Explosion Science and Technology, Beijing Institute of Technology, Beijing 100081, China
2.
Nuclear and Radiation Safety Center, Ministry of Environmental Protection, Beijing 100082, China
3.
Institute of Technical Physics, College of Science, National University of Defense Technology, Changsha 410073, Hunan, China

Received Date: 2018-10-26
Rev Recd Date: 2019-01-10

Available Online: 2019-09-25

Publish Date: 2019-11-01

Abstract

Abstract

This paper offers a new method for calculating the reaction rate of the pore collapse hot-spot ignition in multi-component PBX explosives, and proposes a new mesoscopic reaction rate model capable of describing and predicting the shock initiation and detonation behavior of multi-component PBX explosives with any explosive components proportion as well as any explosive particle size. The pressure-time histories in the explosive samples calculated using this mesoscopic reaction rate model are in good agreement with the experimental data. The shock initiation and detonation process of PBX explosives is mainly controlled by both the hot-spot ignition processes and the combustion reaction processes. The PBXC03 explosive with the dominant component of HMX is mainly controlled by the hot-spot ignition and shows the accelerated reaction characteristics. With the dominant component of insensitive TATB, the critical initiation pressure of PBXC10 is high and the shock initiation behavior is controlled by the combustion reaction process, which shows a stable reaction characteristics.
- shock initiation,
- multi-component PBX explosives,
- mesoscopic reaction rate model,
- reaction rate-time histories

FullText(HTML)

References(22)

References

[1]	BOLTON O, SIMKE L R, PAGORIA P F, et al. High power explosive with good sensitivity: a 2:1 cocrystal of CL-20: HMX [J]. Crystal Growth and Design, 2012, 12(9): 4311–4314. DOI: 10.1021/cg3010882.
[2]	TARVER C M, TRAN T D. Thermal decomposition models for HMX-based plastic bonded explosives [J]. Combustion and Flame, 2004, 137(1/2): 50–62. DOI: 10.1016/j.combustflame.2004.01.002.
[3]	URTIEW P A, FORBES J W, GARCIA F, et al. Shock Initiation of UF-TATB at 250 ℃ [C] // FURNISH M D, HORIE Y, THADHANI N N. Shock Compression of Condensed Matter-2001. United States: American Institute of Physics, 2002: 1039−1042. DOI: 10.1063/1.1483716.
[4]	AN Chongwei, LI Hequn, YE Baoyun, et al. Preparation and characterization of ultrafine HMX/TATB explosive co-crystals [J]. Central European Journal of Energetic Materials, 2017, 14(4): 876–887. DOI: 10.22211/cejem/77125.
[5]	WANG Z, GUO X, WU F, et al. Preparation of HMX/TATB composite particles using a mechanochemical approach [J]. Propellants, Explosives, Pyrotechnics, 2016, 41(2): 327–333. DOI: 10.1002/prep.201500136.
[6]	GREBENKIN K F. Comparative analysis of physical mechanisms of detonation initiation in HMX and in a low-sensitive explosive (TATB) [J]. Combustion, Explosion, and Shock Waves, 2009, 45(1): 78–87. DOI: 10.1007/s10573-009-0011-y.
[7]	AUSTIN R, BARTON N, HOWARD W, et al. Modeling pore collapse and chemical reactions in shock-loaded HMX crystals [J]. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 2014, 500(5): 052002–052007. DOI: 10.1088/1742-6596/500/5/052002.
[8]	KAPAHI A. Dynamics of void collapse in shocked energetic materials: physics of void-void interactions [J]. Shock Waves, 2013, 23(6): 537–558. DOI: 10.1007/s00193-013-0439-6.
[9]	OZLEM M, SCHWENDEMAN D W, KAPILA A K, et al. A numerical study of shock-induced cavity collapse [J]. Shock Waves, 2012, 22(2): 89–117. DOI: 10.1007/s00193-011-0352-9.
[10]	TRAN L, UDAYKUMAR H S. Simulation of void collapse in an energetic material: Part 1: inert case [J]. Journal of Propulsion and Power, 2006, 22(5): 947–958. DOI: 10.2514/1.13146.
[11]	ZHOU Tingting, LOU Jianfeng, ZHANG Yangeng, et al. Hot spot formation and chemical reaction initiation in shocked HMX crystals with nanovoids: a large-scale reactive molecular dynamics study [J]. Physical Chemistry Chemical Physics, 2016, 18(26): 17627–17645. DOI: 10.1039/C6CP02015A.
[12]	MASSONI J, SAUREL R, BAUDIN G, et al. A mechanistic model for shock initiation of solid explosives [J]. Physics of Fluids, 1999, 11(3): 710–736. DOI: 10.1063/1.869941.
[13]	SOUERS P C, GARZA R, VITELLO P. Ignition & growth and JWL++ detonation models in coarse zones [J]. Propellants, Explosives, Pyrotechnics, 2002, 27(2): 62–71. DOI: 10.1002/1521-4087(200204)27:23.0.CO;2-5.
[14]	STARKENBERG J. Modeling detonation propagation and failure using explosive initiation models in a conventional hydrocode [C] // SHOR J M, MAIENSCHEIN J L. The 12th Symposium (International) on Detonation. USA: Office of Naval Research, 2002: 1001−1007.
[15]	SHAW M S, MENIKOFF R. A reactive burn model for shock initiation in a PBX: scaling and separability based on the hot spot concept [C] // PEIRIS C B S, ASAY B. The 14th Symposium (International) on Detonation. USA: Office of Naval Research, 2010.
[16]	DUAN Zhuoping, WEN Lijing, LIU Yan, et al. A pore collapse model for hot-spot ignition in shocked multi-component explosives [J]. International Journal of Nonlinear Sciences and Numerical Simulation, 2010, 11(S): 19–24. DOI: 10.1515/IJNSNS.2010.11.S1.19.
[17]	KIM K. Development of a model of reaction rates in shocked multicomponent explosives [C] // LEE E L, SHORT J M. The 9th Symposium (International) on Detonation. USA: Office of the Chief of Naval Researche, 1989: 593−603.
[18]	WEN Lijing, DUAN Zhuoping, ZHANG Liansheng, et al. Effects of HMX particle size on the shock initiation of PBXC03 explosive [J]. International Journal of Nonlinear Sciences and Numerical Simulation, 2012, 13(2): 189–194. DOI: 10.1515/ijnsns.2011.129.
[19]	温丽晶. PBX炸药冲击起爆细观反应速率模型研究[D]. 北京: 北京理工大学, 2011. WEN Lijing. Research on mesoscopic reaction rate model of shock initiation of PBX [D]. Beijing: Beijing Institute of Technology, 2011.
[20]	LIU Y R, DUAN Z P, ZHANG Z Y, et al. A mesoscopic reaction rate model for shock initiation of multi-component PBX explosives [J]. Journal of Hazardous Materials, 2016, 317: 44–51. DOI: 10.1016/j.jhazmat.2016.05.052.
[21]	URTIEW P A, TARVER C M. Shock initiation of energetic materials at different initial temperatures: review [J]. Combustion, Explosion, and Shock Waves, 2005, 41(6): 766–776. DOI: 10.1007/s10573-005-0085-0.
[22]	URTIEW P A, VANDERSALL K S, TARVER C M, et al. Initiation of heated PBX-9501 explosive when exposed to dynamic loading: UCRL-CONF-214667 [R]. United States: Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory, 2005.

Relative Articles

[1]	KANG Haobo, JIANG Jianwei, PENG Jiacheng, LI Mei. Simulation analysis on the initiation mechanism of the explosive charge covered with a thick shell impacted by a rod projectile[J]. Explosion And Shock Waves, 2022, 42(1): 013303. doi: 10.11883/bzycj-2021-0111
[2]	WU Junying, LI Yaojiang, YANG Lijun, LIU Jiaxi, WU Jiaojiao, ZHANG Xiaozhou, CHEN Lang. Shock initiation characteristics of four-component HTPB solid propellant containing RDX[J]. Explosion And Shock Waves, 2021, 41(8): 082301. doi: 10.11883/bzycj-2020-0350
[3]	PANG Songlin, CHEN Xiong, XU Jinsheng, WANG Yongping. Impact initiation of a solid-rocket engine by a shaped-charge jet[J]. Explosion And Shock Waves, 2020, 40(8): 082101. doi: 10.11883/bzycj-2019-0469
[4]	GUO Chun, GUO Shangsheng, QIAN Jianping, GU Wenbin. Numerical simulation on shock critical initiation velocity of cylindrical covered charge by multiple fragment impacts[J]. Explosion And Shock Waves, 2020, 40(6): 062301. doi: 10.11883/bzycj-2019-0391
[5]	WANG Xin, JIANG Jianwei, WANG Shuyou, MEN Jianbing. Critical detonation velocity calculation model of cylindrical covered charge impacted by fragment[J]. Explosion And Shock Waves, 2019, 39(1): 012302. doi: 10.11883/bzycj-2017-0271
[6]	LIU Haiqing, DUAN Zhuoping, BAI Zhiling, WEN Lijing, OU Zhuocheng, HUANG Fenglei. Experimental research on effects of porosity on shock initiation of PBX explosive[J]. Explosion And Shock Waves, 2019, 39(7): 072302. doi: 10.11883/bzycj-2018-0226
[7]	ZHANG Tao, LIU Yusheng, GAO Zhipeng, YANG Jia, LIU Yi, GU Yan. Numerical simulation of the interlayer effects for fragments impacting steel-covered charge[J]. Explosion And Shock Waves, 2018, 38(6): 1241-1246. doi: 10.11883/bzycj-2017-0154
[8]	Pi Zhengdi, Chen Lang, Liu Danyang, Wu Junying. Shock initiation of CL-20 based explosives[J]. Explosion And Shock Waves, 2017, 37(6): 915-923. doi: 10.11883/1001-1455(2017)06-0915-09
[9]	Zhang Menghua, Wang Pengxin, Yu Yonggang, Ruan Wenjun, Wang Jian, Ning Huijun. Numerical simulation of the delay time of impact initiated projectile[J]. Explosion And Shock Waves, 2016, 36(5): 728-733. doi: 10.11883/1001-1455(2016)05-0728-06
[10]	Chen Shao-jie, Wu Li-zhi, Shen Rui-qi, Ye Ying-hua, Hu Yan. Initiation of HNS-Ⅳ using a laser-driven multi-layer flyer[J]. Explosion And Shock Waves, 2015, 35(2): 285-288. doi: 10.11883/1001-1455-(2015)02-0285-04
[11]	Jiang Xi-bo, Rao Guo-ning, Xu Sen, Yao Miao, Ma An-peng, Peng Jin-hua. Shock initiation characteristics of expired single-base propellants[J]. Explosion And Shock Waves, 2014, 34(1): 99-105. doi: 10.11883/1001-1455(2014)01-0099-07
[12]	Chen Lang, Liu Qun, Wy Jun-ying. On shock initiation of heated explosives[J]. Explosion And Shock Waves, 2013, 33(1): 21-28. doi: 10.11883/1001-1455(2013)01-0021-08
[13]	TAO Wei-jun, HUAN Shi, HUANG Feng-lei, JIANG Guo-ping. Lateralrarefactionwaveeffectsonshockinitiation ofheterogeneouscondensedexplosives[J]. Explosion And Shock Waves, 2011, 31(4): 397-401. doi: 10.11883/1001-1455(2011)04-0397-05
[14]	ZHANG Zhong, CHEN Wei-dong, YANG Wen-miao. Thematerialpointmethodforshock-to-detonationtransitionof heterogeneoussolidexplosive[J]. Explosion And Shock Waves, 2011, 31(1): 25-30. doi: 10.11883/1001-1455(2011)01-0025-06
[15]	LIANG Zeng-you, HUANG Feng-lei, ZHANG Zhen-yu. Study on new reaction rate function model of PBX-9404 for damaged explosive initiation behaviour[J]. Explosion And Shock Waves, 2008, 28(1): 38-41. doi: 1.011883/1001-1455(2008)01-0038-06
[16]	WANG Gui-ji, ZHAO Tong-hu, MO Jian-jun, WU Gang, HAN Mei, TAN Fu-li. Short-duration pulse shock initiation characteristics of a TATB/HMX-based polymer bonded explosive[J]. Explosion And Shock Waves, 2007, 27(3): 230-235. doi: 10.11883/1001-1455(2007)03-0230-06
[17]	LI Zhi-peng, LONG Xin-ping, HUANG Yi-min, HE Bi, WANG Rong, HE Song-wei. Electromagnetic gauge measurements of shock initiating JOB-9003 explosive[J]. Explosion And Shock Waves, 2006, 26(3): 269-272. doi: 10.11883/1001-1455(2006)03-0269-04
[18]	PAN Hao, HU Xiao-mian. Numerical simulation for overdriven and shocking-to-detonation transition of insensitive high explosives[J]. Explosion And Shock Waves, 2006, 26(2): 174-178. doi: 10.11883/1001-1455(2006)02-0174-05