Effect of blocking ratio on aluminum powder explosion’s characteristicsin vertical duct

ZHU Xiaochao; ZHENG Ligang; YU Shuijun; WANG Yalei; LI Gang; DU Depeng; DOU Zengguo

doi:10.11883/bzycj-2019-0006

Volume 39 Issue 10

Oct. 2019

Turn off MathJax

Article Contents

Abstract

References

Article Navigation > Explosion And Shock Waves > 2019 > 39(10): 105402

ZHU Xiaochao, ZHENG Ligang, YU Shuijun, WANG Yalei, LI Gang, DU Depeng, DOU Zengguo. Effect of blocking ratio on aluminum powder explosion’s characteristicsin vertical duct[J]. Explosion And Shock Waves, 2019, 39(10): 105402. doi: 10.11883/bzycj-2019-0006

Citation:

ZHU Xiaochao, ZHENG Ligang, YU Shuijun, WANG Yalei, LI Gang, DU Depeng, DOU Zengguo. Effect of blocking ratio on aluminum powder explosion’s characteristicsin vertical duct[J]. Explosion And Shock Waves, 2019, 39(10): 105402. doi: 10.11883/bzycj-2019-0006

Citation:

ZHU Xiaochao, ZHENG Ligang, YU Shuijun, WANG Yalei, LI Gang, DU Depeng, DOU Zengguo. Effect of blocking ratio on aluminum powder explosion’s characteristicsin vertical duct[J]. Explosion And Shock Waves, 2019, 39(10): 105402. doi: 10.11883/bzycj-2019-0006

PDF( 2628 KB)

Effect of blocking ratio on aluminum powder explosion’s characteristicsin vertical duct

doi: 10.11883/bzycj-2019-0006

ZHU Xiaochao^1
,,
ZHENG Ligang^{1, 2
,
,},
YU Shuijun^{1, 2},
WANG Yalei¹,
LI Gang¹,
DU Depeng¹,
DOU Zengguo¹

1.
State Key Laboratory Cultivation Base for Gas Geology and Gas Control, Henan Polytechnic University, Jiaozuo 454003, Henan, China
2.
The Collaborative Innovation Center of Coal Safety, Production of Henan Province, Henan Polytechnic University, Jiaozuo 454003, Henan, China

Received Date: 2019-01-08
Rev Recd Date: 2019-01-24

Available Online: 2019-09-25

Publish Date: 2019-10-01

Abstract

Abstract

In this work, experimenting on a self-built vertically transparent duct, we investigated the influence of the blocking ratio (φ) for duct-end venting on the explosive characteristics of aluminum dust explosion through analysis of its such characteristics as the flame front evolution and pressure history. The results show that the blocking ratio had a great influence on the flame front structure of aluminum powder of a small particle size. The overpressure in the pipeline exhibited a bimodal waveform and there was an inflection point of the blocking ratio φ=0.4 where the dominance of two overpressure peaks reversed. The first overpressure peak as a function of the blocking ratio was different from that of the second beyond the inflection point. The first overpressure peak increased as did the blocking ratio, and the increase rate rose greatly with φ=0.4 as the turning point. The second overpressure peak first rose and then fell with the increase of the blocking ratio, and reached the maximum at φ=0.4. Both peak values as a function of the blocking ratio for the large particle size were similar to that for the small particle size. However, the inflection point shifted to φ=0.6. The maximum (dominant) overpressure peak increased with the increase of the blocking ratio. A smaller particle size dust is prone to generating a more hazardous overpressure.
- blocking ratio,
- aluminum,
- explosion,
- duct,
- flame propagation,
- overpressure

FullText(HTML)

References(31)

References

[1]	LI G, YANG H X, YUAN C M, et al. A catastrophic aluminium-alloy dust explosion in China [J]. Journal of Loss Prevention in the Process Industries, 2015, 39: 121–130.
[2]	安全监管总局. 安全监管总局通报2016年工贸行业粉尘防爆专项整治工作情况 [J]. 中国应急管理, 2017(3): 43–45.
[3]	李庆钊, 王可, 梅晓凝, 等. 微米级铝粉的爆炸特性及其反应机理研究 [J]. 工程热物理学报, 2017, 38(1): 219–225. LI Qingzhao, WANG Ke, MEI Xiaoning, et al. Investigation on explosion characteristics and reaction mechanism of micro-aluminum powder [J]. Journal of Engineering Theermophysics, 2017, 38(1): 219–225.
[4]	LI Q, WANG K, ZHENG Y, et al. Explosion severity of micro-sized aluminum dust and its flame propagation properties in 20 L spherical vessel [J]. Powder Technology, 2016, 301: 1299–1308. DOI: 10.1016/j.powtec.2016.08.012.
[5]	沈世磊, 张奇, 马秋菊, 等. 湍流对铝粉爆炸特性的影响 [J]. 兵工学报, 2016, 37(3): 455–461. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1000-1093.2016.03.010. SHEN Shilei, ZHANG Qi, MA Qiujun, et al. Effect of turbulence on explosion characteristics of aluminium dust/air [J]. Acta Armamentarii, 2016, 37(3): 455–461. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1000-1093.2016.03.010.
[6]	LIU X, ZHANG Q. Influence of turbulent flow on the explosion parameters of micro- and nano-aluminum powder-air mixtures [J]. Journal of Hazardous Materials, 2015, 299: 603–617. DOI: 10.1016/j.jhazmat.2015.07.068.
[7]	谭汝媚, 张奇, 张博. 点火延迟时间对铝粉爆炸特性参数的影响 [J]. 爆炸与冲击, 2014, 34(1): 17–22. DOI: 10.11883/1001-1455(2014)01-0017-06. TAN Rumei, ZHANG Qi, ZHANG Bo. Effect of ignition delay time on characteristic parameters of aluminum dust explosion [J]. Explosion and Shock Waves, 2014, 34(1): 17–22. DOI: 10.11883/1001-1455(2014)01-0017-06.
[8]	谭汝媚, 张奇. 环境湿度对铝粉爆炸特性参数影响的实验研究 [J]. 兵工学报, 2013, 34(8): 965–969. TAN Rumei, ZHANG Qi. Experimental research of the effect of ambient humidity on the explosion characteristic parameters of aluminum powder [J]. Acta Armamentarii, 2013, 34(8): 965–969.
[9]	张博, 张奇, 谭汝媚. 喷粉压力及点火延迟时间对粉尘爆炸参数的影响 [J]. 高压物理学报, 2014, 28(2): 183–190. DOI: 10.11858/gywlxb.2014.02.008. ZHANG Bo, ZHANG Qi, TAN Rumei. Influence of dispersion pressure and ignition delay time on the dust explosion parameters [J]. Chinese Journal of High Pressure Physics, 2014, 28(2): 183–190. DOI: 10.11858/gywlxb.2014.02.008.
[10]	SUN J, DOBASHI R, HIRANO T. Structure of flames propagating through aluminum particles cloud and combustion process of particles [J]. journal of loss prevention in the Process Industries, 2006, 19: 769–773. DOI: 10.1016/j.jlp.2006.01.002.
[11]	胡东涛, 陈先锋, 陈曦. 不同粒径铝粉火焰传播特性试验研究 [J]. 中国安全科学学报, 2016, 26(8): 41–45. HU Dongtao, CHEN Xianfeng, CHEN Xi. Experimental study on aluminum dust flame propagation characteristics [J]. China Safety Science Journal, 2016, 26(8): 41–45.
[12]	任瑞娥, 谭迎新. 浓度对铝粉爆炸特性的影响研究 [J]. 消防科学与技术, 2014(4): 375–377. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1009-0029.2014.04.005. REN Ruie, TAN Yingxin. Study on the effect of concentration on the characteristcs of aluminum dust explosion [J]. Fire Science and Technology, 2014(4): 375–377. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1009-0029.2014.04.005.
[13]	尉存娟, 谭迎新, 路旭, 等. 点火延迟时间对铝粉爆炸压力的影响研究 [J]. 中北大学学报(自然科学版), 2009, 30(3): 257–260. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1673-3193.2009.03.013. YU Cunjuan, TAN Yingxin, LU Xu, et al. Effect of the ignition delay time on the explosion pressure of aluminum dust [J]. Journal of North University of China (Natural Science Edition), 2009, 30(3): 257–260. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1673-3193.2009.03.013.
[14]	谭迎新, 霍晓东, 尉存娟. 不同粒度铝粉在水平管道内的爆炸压力测定 [J]. 中国安全科学学报, 2008, 18(12): 80–83. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1003-3033.2008.12.013. TAN Yingxin, HUO Xiaodong, YU Cunjian. Explosion pressure test of different-sized aluminum powder in horizontal pipeline equipment [J]. China Safety Science Journal, 2008, 18(12): 80–83. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1003-3033.2008.12.013.
[15]	YAN X, LI D, YU J. Secondary explosions in relief duct during aluminum dust explosion venting [J]. Procedia Engineering, 2012, 45: 431–434. DOI: 10.1016/j.proeng.2012.08.181.
[16]	喻健良, 杨少丽, 吕明宇. 金属粉尘燃爆泄放特性研究 [J]. 石油化工设备, 2007(4): 6–10. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1000-7466.2007.04.002. YU Jianliang, YANG Shaoli, LV Mingyu. Study on the explosion venting characters of metal dusts [J]. Petro-Chenical Equipment, 2007(4): 6–10. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1000-7466.2007.04.002.
[17]	ZHENG L G, LI G, WANG Y L, et al. Effect of blockage ratios on the characteristics of methane/air explosion suppressed by BC powder [J]. Journal of Hazardous Materials, 2018, 355: 25–33. DOI: 10.1016/j.jhazmat.2018.04.070.
[18]	XIAO H H, WANG Q S, SHEN X B, et al. An experimental study of premixed hydrogen/air flame propagation in a partially open duct [J]. International Journal of Hydrogen Energy, 2014, 39(11): 6233–6241. DOI: 10.1016/j.ijhydene.2013.05.003.
[19]	AIRASH M J, ZANGANEH J, MOGHTADERI B. Flame deflagration in side-on vented detonation tubes: a large scale study [J]. Journal of Hazardous Materials, 2018, 345: 38–47. DOI: 10.1016/j.jhazmat.2017.11.014.
[20]	陈曦, 陈先锋, 张洪铭, 等. 惰化剂粒径对铝粉火焰传播特性影响的实验研究 [J]. 爆炸与冲击, 2017, 37(4): 759–765. DOI: 10.11883/1001-1455(2017)04-0759-07. CHEN Xi, CHEN Xianfeng, ZHANG Hongming, et al. Effect of inerting agent with different particle sizes on the flame propagation of aluminum dust [J]. Explosion and Shock Waves, 2017, 37(4): 759–765. DOI: 10.11883/1001-1455(2017)04-0759-07.
[21]	VOROZHTSOV A B, LERNER M, RODKEVICH N, et al. Oxidation of nano-sized aluminum powders [J]. Thermochimica Acta, 2016(636): 48–56.
[22]	郑立刚, 苏洋, 李刚, 等. 点火位置对氢气/甲烷/空气预混气体爆燃特性的影响 [J]. 化工学报, 2017, 68(12): 4874–4881. ZHENG Ligang, SU Yang, LI Gang, et al. Effect of ignition position on deflagration characteristics of premixed hydrogen/methane/air [J]. Journal of Chemical Industry and Engineering, 2017, 68(12): 4874–4881.
[23]	ZHENG L G, ZHU X C, WANG Y L, et al. Combined effect of ignition position and equivalence ratio on the characteristics of premixed hydrogen/air deflagrations [J]. International Journal of Hydrogen Energy, 2018, 43(33): 16430–16441. DOI: 10.1016/j.ijhydene.2018.06.189.
[24]	HUANG Y, RISHA G A, YANG V, et al. Effect of particle size on combustion of aluminum particle dust in air [J]. Combustion and Flame, 2008(156): 5–13.
[25]	CORCORAN A L, HOFFMANN V K, DREIZIN E L. Aluminum particle combustion in turbulent flames [J]. Combustion and Flame, 2013, 160(3): 718–724. DOI: 10.1016/j.combustflame.2012.11.008.
[26]	李亚男. 磷酸二氢铵对金属粉尘的爆炸抑制研究[D]. 太原: 中北大学, 2015: 14.
[27]	HUANG Y, RISHA G A, YANG V, et al. Combustion of bimodal nano/micron-sized aluminum particle dust in air [J]. Proceedings of the Combustion Institute, 2007, 31(2): 2001–2009. DOI: 10.1016/j.proci.2006.08.103.
[28]	范宝春, 谢波, 张小和, 等. 惰性粉尘抑爆过程的实验研究 [J]. 流体力学实验与测量, 2001, 15(4): 20–25. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1672-9897.2001.04.005. FAN Baochun, XIE Bo, ZHANG Xiaohe, et al. Experimental research on explosion suppression by inert particles [J]. Experiments and Measurements in Fluid Mechanics, 2001, 15(4): 20–25. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1672-9897.2001.04.005.
[29]	JIANG H P, BI M S, LI B, et al. Inhibition evaluation of ABC powder in aluminum dust explosion [J]. Journal of Hazardous Materials, 2018, 361: 273–282.
[30]	CASTELLANOS D, CARRETO-VAZQUEZ V H, MASHUGA C V, et al. The effect of particle size polydispersity on the explosibility characteristics of aluminum dust [J]. Powder Technology, 2014, 254: 331–337. DOI: 10.1016/j.powtec.2013.11.028.
[31]	DUFAUD O, TRAORE M, PERRIN L, et al. Experimental investigation and modelling of aluminum dusts explosions in the 20 L sphere [J]. Journal of Loss Prevention in the Process Industries, 2009, 23(2).

Relative Articles

[1]	HUANG Yuxiong, GUO Rui, QIN Jiang, NIU Yanjie, XU Chang, ZHANG Xinyan. Study on the mechanism of explosion flame propagation of aluminum powder coated with stearic acid[J]. Explosion And Shock Waves. doi: 10.11883/bzycj-2024-0268
[2]	YANG Ke, LI Xuerui, JI Hong, ZHENG Kai, XING Zhixiang, JIANG Juncheng. Experiment on suppression of methane/air explosion in pipeline by modified coal gangue-sodium alginate powder[J]. Explosion And Shock Waves, 2024, 44(7): 075401. doi: 10.11883/bzycj-2023-0399
[3]	ZHENG Kai, REN Jiale, SONG Chen, JIA Qianhang, XING Zhixiang. Experimental study on influences of copper foam on explosive characteristics of syngas in a closed pipe[J]. Explosion And Shock Waves, 2024, 44(1): 012102. doi: 10.11883/bzycj-2023-0036
[4]	MAO Wenzhe, ZHANG Guotao, YANG Shuaishuai, XU Zihui, WANG Yan, JI Wentao. Characteristics of hydrogenated magnesium dust explosion flame propagating in a semi-enclosed space[J]. Explosion And Shock Waves, 2024, 44(6): 065401. doi: 10.11883/bzycj-2023-0363
[5]	LIU Jiajia, ZHANG Yang, ZHANG Xiang, NIE Zishuo. Simulation study on propagation characteristics of gas explosion in Y-shaped ventilated coal face[J]. Explosion And Shock Waves, 2023, 43(8): 085401. doi: 10.11883/bzycj-2023-0018
[6]	ZHANG Yansong, LI Nan, GUO Rui, ZHANG Xinyan, ZHANG Gongyan, HUANG Xingwang. Relationship between pyrolysis kinetics and flame propagation characteristics of lauric acid and stearic acid dust explosion[J]. Explosion And Shock Waves, 2022, 42(7): 075402. doi: 10.11883/bzycj-2021-0470
[7]	XIE Jibiao, ZHANG Jiaqi, DING Ce, WANG Xiaoli. Coupling relationship between flame velocity and overpressure of butane explosion inhibited by synergistic effect of nanohydrophobic SiO₂[J]. Explosion And Shock Waves, 2021, 41(9): 095402. doi: 10.11883/bzycj-2021-0016
[8]	BAO Lei, WANG Peng,, DANG Qian, LI Houda, KUANG Chen, YU Anfeng. Experimental study on detonation propagation in industrial scale pipelines used in petrochemical plants[J]. Explosion And Shock Waves, 2021, 41(9): 095401. doi: 10.11883/bzycj-2020-0295
[9]	JIA Hailin, XIANG Haijun, LI Dihui, ZHAI Rupeng. Suppression of explosion in pipelines with different blocking ratios by ultrafine water mist containing sodium chloride[J]. Explosion And Shock Waves, 2020, 40(4): 042201. doi: 10.11883/bzycj-2019-0268
[10]	WANG Yalei, ZHENG Ligang, YU Shuijun, ZHU Xiaochao, LI Gang, DU Depeng, DOU Zengguo. Effect of vented end faces on characteristics of methane explosion in duct[J]. Explosion And Shock Waves, 2019, 39(9): 095401. doi: 10.11883/bzycj-2018-0249
[11]	JIANG Nan, Bi Yixing, LÜ Dong, WANG Lu, MU Yangyang. Explosion overpressure of hydrogen cloud in catalytic reforming process[J]. Explosion And Shock Waves, 2019, 39(2): 025403. doi: 10.11883/bzycj-2017-0371
[12]	REN Shaoyun. The leakage, low temperature diffusion and explosion of liquefied natural gas in open space[J]. Explosion And Shock Waves, 2018, 38(4): 891-897. doi: 10.11883/bzycj-2016-0323
[13]	LI Mei, JIANG Jianwei, WANG Xin. Shock wave propagation characteristics of double layer charge explosion in the air[J]. Explosion And Shock Waves, 2018, 38(2): 367-372. doi: 10.11883/bzycj-2016-0209
[14]	DU Yang, WANG Shimao, YUAN Guangqiang, QI Sheng, WANG Bo, LI Guoqing, LI Yangchao. Experimental study of fuel-air mixture explosion characteristics in the short pipe containing weakly confined face at the end[J]. Explosion And Shock Waves, 2018, 38(2): 465-472. doi: 10.11883/bzycj-2015-0242
[15]	HUANG Chuyuan, CHEN Xianfeng, ZHANG Hongming, TANG Wenwen, CHEN Xi, ZHANG Wenbo, LIU Xuanya. Experimental investigation on suppression of starch flame by ultrafine silicon dioxide powders[J]. Explosion And Shock Waves, 2018, 38(2): 324-330. doi: 10.11883/bzycj-2016-0235
[16]	FAN Baolong, BAI Chunhua, WANG Bo, GAO Kanghua, LI Bin. Explosion overpressure field of natural gas in a large-scaled confined vessel[J]. Explosion And Shock Waves, 2018, 38(2): 404-408. doi: 10.11883/bzycj-2016-0191
[17]	Chen Xi, Chen Xianfeng, Zhang Hongming, Liu Xuanya, Zhang Ying, Niu Yi, Hu Dongtao. Effects of inerting agent with different particle sizes onthe flame propagation of aluminum dust[J]. Explosion And Shock Waves, 2017, 37(4): 759-765. doi: 10.11883/1001-1455(2017)04-0759-07
[18]	Fan Jin, Xu Da-li, Ren Xin-jian. Propagation of shock waves in protective structures with holes under contact explosive loads[J]. Explosion And Shock Waves, 2014, 34(6): 658-666. doi: 10.11883/1001-1455(2014)06-0658-09
[19]	Cao Wei-guo, Xu Sen, Liang Ji-yuan, Gao Wei, Pan Feng, Rao Guo-ning. Characteristics of flame propagation during coal dust cloud explosion[J]. Explosion And Shock Waves, 2014, 34(5): 586-593. doi: 10.11883/1001-1455(2014)05-0586-08
[20]	PAN Qiang, ZHANG Ji-chun, GUO Xue-bin. Theprincipleofsoilcompactionbyexplosion anditsexperimentalinvestigation[J]. Explosion And Shock Waves, 2011, 31(2): 165-172. doi: 10.11883/1001-1455(2011)02-0165-08

Supplements(0)

Cited By

Cited by

Periodical cited type(5)

1.	颜轲，孟祥豹，潘智超，王政，张延松. KH_2PO_4/SiO_2复合粉体抑制铝粉爆燃效果及机理分析. 爆炸与冲击. 2022(06): 3-13 . 本站查看
2.	王玥，肖泽，任常兴，吕东. 局部阻塞空间LPG槽罐车泄漏爆炸模拟分析研究. 消防科学与技术. 2022(12): 1688-1691+1697 .
3.	孟祥豹，王俊峰，张延松，李志勇. 惰性粉体对油页岩粉尘爆炸火焰的抑制性能和作用机理研究. 爆炸与冲击. 2021(10): 166-177 . 本站查看
4.	靳红旺，郑立刚，朱小超，于水军，潘荣锟，杜德朋，窦增果. 竖直管道中氧化铝抑制铝粉爆炸特性研究. 化工学报. 2020(04): 1929-1939 .
5.	赵星宇，白春华，姚箭，孙彬峰. 燃料空气炸药爆轰产物JWL状态方程参数计算. 兵工学报. 2020(10): 1921-1929 .