LI Tong, CHEN Ming, YE Zhiwei, LU Wenbo, WEI Dong. Study on the energy transfer efficiency of explosive blasting with different coupling medium[J]. Explosion And Shock Waves, 2021, 41(6): 062201. doi: 10.11883/bzycj-2020-0381
Citation: LI Tong, CHEN Ming, YE Zhiwei, LU Wenbo, WEI Dong. Study on the energy transfer efficiency of explosive blasting with different coupling medium[J]. Explosion And Shock Waves, 2021, 41(6): 062201. doi: 10.11883/bzycj-2020-0381

Study on the energy transfer efficiency of explosive blasting with different coupling medium

doi: 10.11883/bzycj-2020-0381
  • Received Date: 2020-10-12
  • Rev Recd Date: 2021-01-06
  • Available Online: 2021-04-14
  • Publish Date: 2021-06-05
  • Decoupled charge blasting can effectively reduce the peak pressure of hole wall and improve the blasting effect. Aiming at the issues associated with the explosive energy transferred into rock mass with different coupling medium, the deformation and failure characteristics of rock mass under explosion were analyzed theoretically with the consideration of strain rate effect of the rock mass, and the theoretical energy transfer efficiency of blasting with different coupling medium was obtained. Combined with the numerical simulations, the effects of rock mass properties, explosive categories and decoupled charge coefficient on the energy transfer efficiency of blasting with different coupling medium were studied. The results show that the energy transferred into rock mass from explosive of decoupling charge blasting is related to the coupling medium, the energy transfer efficiency of water coupling blasting is higher than that of air coupling blasting for the same charge structure and same blasting medium. When the charge structure and blasting rock mass are the same but the coupling medium is different, the energy transferred into the rock mass from explosive will be different, depending on blasting rock mass, explosive categories and decoupling charge coefficient. When blasting with the same decoupling charge coefficient but different coupling medium, the higher the rock mass strength, the greater the difference of energy transfer efficiency between different coupling medium. For blasting with the same rock mass properties and same charge structure, the difference of energy transfer efficiency between air coupling blasting and water coupling blasting increases with the increase of decoupling charge coefficient. For emulsion explosive exploding in siltstone, when the decoupling charge coefficient increases from 1.28 to 3.44, the energy transferred from water coupling blasting to surrounding rock mass increases from 1.45 to 6.52 times of air coupling blasting. The research results are of great reference significance for optimizing blasting design, improving explosion energy distribution and increasing the explosion energy utilization rate.
  • [1]
    中国爆破行业协会. 中国爆破行业中长期科学与技术发展规划(2016~2025年) [M]. 北京: 中国爆破行业协会, 2015: 2−5.
    [2]
    王志亮, 李永池. 工程爆破中径向水不耦合系数效应数值仿真 [J]. 岩土力学, 2005, 26(12): 1926–1930. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1000-7598.2005.12.012.

    WANG Z L, LI Y C. Numerical simulation on effects of radial water-decoupling coefficient in engineering blast [J]. Rock and Soil Mechanics, 2005, 26(12): 1926–1930. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1000-7598.2005.12.012.
    [3]
    王伟, 李小春. 不耦合装药下爆炸应力波传播规律的试验研究 [J]. 岩土力学, 2010, 31(6): 1723–1728. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1000-7598.2010.06.008.

    WANG W, LI X C. Experimental study of propagation law of explosive stress wave under condition of decouple charge [J]. Rock and Soil Mechanics, 2010, 31(6): 1723–1728. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1000-7598.2010.06.008.
    [4]
    王文龙. 钻眼爆破[M]. 北京: 煤炭工业出版社, 1984: 196−209.
    [5]
    BRINKMANN J R. Separating shock wave and gas expansion breakage mechanisms [C] // Proceedings of the Second International Symposium on Rock Fragmentation by Blasting. Keystone, Colorado, International Organising Committee of Rock Fragmentation by Blasting, 1989: 6−15.
    [6]
    LIVINGSTON C W. Fundamental concepts of rock failure [J]. Quarterly of the Colorado school of mines, 1956, 51(3): 1–11.
    [7]
    SANCHIDRIÁN J A, SEGARRA P, LÓPEZ L M. Energy components in rock blasting [J]. International Journal of Rock Mechanics and Mining Sciences, 2007, 44(1): 130–147. DOI: 10.1016/j.ijrmms.2006.05.002.
    [8]
    HONG L, ZHOU Z L, YIN T B, et al. Energy consumption in rock fragmentation at intermediate strain rate [J]. Journal of Central South University of Technology, 2009, 16(4): 677–682. DOI: 10.1007/s11771-009-0112-5.
    [9]
    杨善元. 岩石爆破动力学基础[M]. 北京: 煤炭工业出版社, 1993: 143−144.
    [10]
    郭子庭, 吴从师. 炸药与岩石的全过程匹配 [J]. 矿冶工程, 1993, 13(3): 11–15.

    GUO Z T, WU C S. The exeplosive-rock matching throughout the blasting process [J]. Mining and Metallurgical Engineering, 1993, 13(3): 11–15.
    [11]
    赖应得. 论炸药和岩石的能量匹配 [J]. 工程爆破, 1995, 1(2): 22–26.

    LAI Y D. On energy match between explosive and rock [J]. Engineering Blasting, 1995, 1(2): 22–26.
    [12]
    陈士海, 崔新壮. 水偶合装药与全偶合装药爆破效能讨论 [J]. 爆破, 1998, 15(2): 10–13.

    CHEN S H, CUI X Z. Study on blasting efficacy of water coupling and explosive coupling charges [J]. Blasting, 1998, 15(2): 10–13.
    [13]
    宗琦, 田立, 汪海波. 水介质不耦合装药爆破岩石破坏范围的研究和应用 [J]. 爆破, 1998, 29(2): 42–46. DOI: 10.3963/j.issn.1001-487X.2012.02.011.

    ZONG Q, TIAN L, WANG H B. Study and application on rock damage range by blasting with water-decoupled charge [J]. Blasting, 1998, 29(2): 42–46. DOI: 10.3963/j.issn.1001-487X.2012.02.011.
    [14]
    JANG H, HANDEL D, KO Y, et al. Effects of water deck on rock blasting performance [J]. International Journal of Rock Mechanics and Mining Sciences, 2018, 112: 77–83. DOI: 10.1016/j.ijrmms.2018.09.006.
    [15]
    顾文彬, 王振雄, 陈江海, 等. 装药结构对爆破震动能量传递及爆破效果影响研究 [J]. 振动与冲击, 2016, 35(2): 207–211. DOI: 10.13465/j.cnki.jvs.2016.02.035.

    GU W B, WANG Z X, CHEN J H, et al. Influence of charge structure on the energy transfer of blasting vibration and explosive effect [J]. Journal of Vibration and Shock, 2016, 35(2): 207–211. DOI: 10.13465/j.cnki.jvs.2016.02.035.
    [16]
    XIA W J, LU W B, LI R Z, et al. Effect of water-decked blasting on rock fragmentation energy [J]. Shock and Vibration, 2020, 2020: 8194801. DOI: 10.1155/2020/8194801.
    [17]
    王礼立. 应力波基础M]. 2版. 北京: 国防工业出版社, 2005: 25−29.
    [18]
    王伟, 李小春, 石露, 等. 深层岩体松动爆破中不耦合装药效应的探讨 [J]. 岩土力学, 2008, 29(10): 2837–2842. DOI: 10.16285/j.rsm.2008.10.009.

    WANG W, LI X C, SHI L, et al. Discussion on decoupled charge loosening blasting in deep rock mass [J]. Rock and Soil Mechanics, 2008, 29(10): 2837–2842. DOI: 10.16285/j.rsm.2008.10.009.
    [19]
    冷振东. 岩石爆破中爆炸能量的释放与传输机制[D]. 武汉: 武汉大学, 2017: 53−60.
    [20]
    戴俊. 柱状装药爆破的岩石压碎圈与裂隙圈计算 [J]. 辽宁工程技术大学学报(自然科学版), 2001, 20(2): 144–147. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1008-0562.2001.02.005.

    DAI J. Calculation of radii of the broken and cracked areas in rock by a long charge explosion [J]. Journal of Liaoning Technical University (Natural Science), 2001, 20(2): 144–147. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1008-0562.2001.02.005.
    [21]
    布洛克. 工程断裂力学基础[M]. 王克仁, 何明元, 高桦, 译. 北京: 科学出版社, 1980: 6−22.
    [22]
    宗琦, 杨吕俊. 岩石中爆炸冲击波能量分布规律初探 [J]. 爆破, 1999, 16(2): 1–6.

    ZONG Q, YANG L J. Shock energy distribution of column charge in rock [J]. Blasting, 1999, 16(2): 1–6.
    [23]
    卢文波, 陶振宁. 爆生气体驱动的裂纹扩展速度研究 [J]. 爆炸与冲击, 1994, 14(3): 264–268.

    LU W B, TAO Z Y. A study of fracture propagation velocity driven by gases of explosion products [J]. Explosion and Shock Waves, 1994, 14(3): 264–268.
    [24]
    徐颖, 孟益平, 宗琦, 等. 断层带爆炸裂隙区范围及裂纹扩展长度的研究 [J]. 岩土力学, 2002, 23(1): 81–84. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1000-7598.2002.01.018.

    XU Y, MENG Y P, ZONG Q, et al. Study on range of cranny and length of fissure expansion in fault zone [J]. Rock and Soil Mechanics, 2002, 23(1): 81–84. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1000-7598.2002.01.018.
    [25]
    水利水电科学研究院. 岩石力学参数手册[M]. 北京: 水利电力出版社, 1991: 429−434.
    [26]
    夏祥, 李海波, 李俊如, 等. 岭澳核电站二期工程基岩爆破安全阈值分析 [J]. 岩土力学, 2008, 29(11): 2945–2951, 2956. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1000-7598.2008.11.010.

    XIA X, LI H B, LI J R, et al. Research on vibration safety threshold for rock under blasting excavation [J]. Rock and Soil Mechanics, 2008, 29(11): 2945–2951, 2956. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1000-7598.2008.11.010.
    [27]
    刘军. 岩体在冲击载荷作用下的各向异性损伤模型及其应用 [J]. 岩石力学与工程学报, 2004, 23(4): 635–640. DOI: 10.3321/j.issn:1000-6915.2004.04.020.

    LIU J. Anisotropic damage model and its application to rock materials under impact load [J]. Chinese Journal of Rock Mechanics and Engineering, 2004, 23(4): 635–640. DOI: 10.3321/j.issn:1000-6915.2004.04.020.
  • Relative Articles

    [1]MA Sizhou, JIANG Haiming, ZHOU Chaolan, WANG Mingyang, LIU Kewei. Investigation on cracking behavior and influencing factors of jointed rock masses under the coupling effect of confining pressure and blasting[J]. Explosion And Shock Waves, 2025, 45(6): 061001. doi: 10.11883/bzycj-2024-0424
    [2]LU Jianhua, YUAN Liangzhu, XIE Yushan, CHEN Meiduo, WANG Pengfei, XU Songlin. Coupled wave propagation in meso-scale heterogeneous medium[J]. Explosion And Shock Waves, 2024, 44(9): 091423. doi: 10.11883/bzycj-2023-0438
    [3]MA Sizhou, LIU Kewei, YANG Jiacai, LI Xudong. Size distribution characteristics of blast-induced rock fragmentation under decoupled charge structures[J]. Explosion And Shock Waves, 2024, 44(4): 045201. doi: 10.11883/bzycj-2023-0358
    [4]HU Jianhua, ZHANG Tao, DING Xiaotian, WEN Guanping, WEN Zengsheng, GUO Mengmeng. Dynamic response mechanism of a rock-filling interfacial coupling body to blasting in it[J]. Explosion And Shock Waves, 2021, 41(8): 085201. doi: 10.11883/bzycj-2020-0433
    [5]YE Zhiwei, CHEN Ming, WEI Dong, LU Wenbo, LIU Tao, WU Liang. Experimental study on the peak pressure of borehole wall in decoupling charge blasting[J]. Explosion And Shock Waves, 2021, 41(5): 055201. doi: 10.11883/bzycj-2020-0004
    [6]YE Zhiwei, CHEN Ming, LI Tong, LU Wenbo, YAN Peng. A calculation method of the peak pressure on borehole wall for low decoupling coefficient charge blasting[J]. Explosion And Shock Waves, 2021, 41(6): 064901. doi: 10.11883/bzcyj-2020-0185
    [7]XU Gancheng, YUAN Weize, GU Jincai, ZHANG Xiangyang. Anti-detonation property of reinforcement rock[J]. Explosion And Shock Waves, 2019, 39(5): 052203. doi: 10.11883/bzycj-2018-0203
    [8]CHEN Yang, WU Liang, CHEN Ming, XIANG Xiaorui, YANG Deming. Characteristics of strain rate and strain energy during blasting unloading of high stress rock mass[J]. Explosion And Shock Waves, 2019, 39(10): 103202. doi: 10.11883/bzycj-2018-0225
    [9]LIU Hongyan, LI Junfeng, PEI Xiaolong. A dynamic damage constitutive model for rockmass with intermittent joints under uniaxial compression[J]. Explosion And Shock Waves, 2018, 38(2): 316-323. doi: 10.11883/bzycj-2016-0261
    [10]Yang Guoliang, Cheng Shuaijie, Wang Ping, Li Xuehai, Yan Yugang. Experiment on slotted tube blasting of axial decoupling coefficient charging[J]. Explosion And Shock Waves, 2017, 37(1): 134-139. doi: 10.11883/1001-1455(2017)01-0134-06
    [11]Hu Ying-guo, Lu Wen-bo, Chen Ming, Yan Peng. Determination of critical damage PPV near the blast hole of rock-mass[J]. Explosion And Shock Waves, 2015, 35(4): 547-554. doi: 10.11883/1001-1455(2015)04-0547-08
    [12]Zhu Liang, Chen Ming, Lu Wen-bo, Yan Peng. Numerical simulation on the cracking process of columnar jointed rock masses in contour blasting[J]. Explosion And Shock Waves, 2015, 35(4): 555-560. doi: 10.11883/1001-1455(2015)04-0555-06
    [13]XIAO Wei-guo, WANG Xiao-jun, ZHU Hao-feng, JIN Ping. Experimentalstudyonseismiccouplingeffectsofundergroundexplosions indifferentmaterial[J]. Explosion And Shock Waves, 2012, 32(3): 267-272. doi: 10.11883/1001-1455(2012)03-0267-06
    [14]ZHONG Ming-shou, LONG Yuan, XIE Quan-min, JI Chong, LIU Hao-quan. Effectsofnon-couplingchargecoefficientsonexplosionseismic waveenergyincarbonaterocks[J]. Explosion And Shock Waves, 2011, 31(6): 612-618. doi: 10.11883/1001-1455(2011)06-0612-07
    [15]CHEN Ming, LU Wen-bo, ZHOU Chuang-bing. Influence of in-situ stress redistribution on proportional radii of blasting-induced cracking zones in tunnel excavation[J]. Explosion And Shock Waves, 2009, 29(3): 328-332. doi: 10.11883/1001-1455(2009)03-0328-05
    [16]SUO Yong-lu, WANG Xiao-lin. Experimental research on the expansion of blast cavity of de-coupling charge in coal[J]. Explosion And Shock Waves, 2005, 25(1): 54-58. doi: 10.11883/1001-1455(2005)01-0054-05
  • Cited by

    Periodical cited type(20)

    1. 马衍坤,张正锐,张纪辉. 水耦合作用下高压空气冲击煤岩破裂规律与声发射响应试验研究. 振动与冲击. 2025(02): 1-10+29 .
    2. 谭铭. 炸药性能对爆破地震波传播与能量衰减规律影响研究. 中国矿业. 2024(01): 193-199 .
    3. 马泗洲,刘科伟,杨家彩,李旭东. 不耦合装药下岩石爆破块体尺寸的分布特征. 爆炸与冲击. 2024(04): 122-140 . 本站查看
    4. 杨建华,彭超,叶志伟,冷振东,魏彬. 深部岩体爆破冲击波能量分布特征. 兵工学报. 2024(06): 1735-1746 .
    5. 李昊明,李祥龙,王建国,胡启文,武永博. 不同耦合介质下岩石损伤特性数值模拟. 有色金属工程. 2024(07): 121-129 .
    6. 叶志伟,陈明,杨建华,姚池,张小波,周创兵. 隧道爆破炮孔堵塞结构运动规律与长度优化研究. 中国公路学报. 2024(08): 204-215 .
    7. 余诚. 环保严控区高陡灰岩路堑抑尘控爆施工技术研究. 工程与建设. 2024(05): 1138-1140+1149 .
    8. 杨凯. 双向荷载下不耦合装药对石灰岩预裂爆破的影响研究. 煤. 2023(02): 104-108 .
    9. 周贤舜,张学民,武朝光,胡涛,陈鑫磊,段亚. 基于低碳减排的隧道水封爆破优化效果研究. 铁道科学与工程学报. 2023(03): 996-1007 .
    10. 付晓强,麻岩,俞缙,戴良玉,黄凌君. 隧道爆破振动信号时频谱增强优化分析. 矿业科学学报. 2023(03): 348-356 .
    11. 冷振东,高启栋,卢文波,陈明,周桂松,范勇. 岩石钻孔爆破能量调控理论与应用技术研究进展. 金属矿山. 2023(05): 64-76 .
    12. 张学富,李宁杰,周杰,韩风雷,张建. 异形孔水包爆破围岩粉碎范围研究. 振动与冲击. 2023(11): 131-138 .
    13. 张宪堂,董国庆,余辉,张经双,周红敏,朱宝合,殷振. 围压下空孔直径对直眼掏槽爆破振动的影响. 山东科技大学学报(自然科学版). 2023(03): 44-52 .
    14. 滕树强,吴亮,代颖,刘汉龙. 岷江龙溪口水下岩体钻爆的爆破能量特征研究. 水运工程. 2023(10): 104-109 .
    15. 刘万通,徐振洋,张久洋,王雪松,刘鑫. 孔底间隔介质对岩体损伤规律研究. 有色金属工程. 2023(10): 82-94 .
    16. 孙得志,郭俊庆,杨永康,赵国飞,谢二伟,宋选民,刘亚龙. 水介质预裂爆破顶板裂纹的扩展. 工程爆破. 2023(06): 100-109 .
    17. 李康贵,夏鹏,米元桃,陈明,李桐. 水耦合强抛掷台阶爆破技术研究. 爆破. 2022(02): 23-29 .
    18. 周桂松,钟冬望. 绿色爆破的爆炸能量转化机制. 金属矿山. 2022(07): 35-41 .
    19. 谢先启,黄小武,姚颖康,何理,伍岳. 露天深孔台阶精细爆破技术研究进展. 金属矿山. 2022(07): 7-18 .
    20. 杨赛群,李洪伟,吴立辉,刘伟. 影响光面爆破效果和空孔处能量分布的试验研究. 工程爆破. 2022(06): 58-65 .

    Other cited types(20)

  • 加载中

Catalog

    通讯作者: 陈斌, bchen63@163.com
    • 1. 

      沈阳化工大学材料科学与工程学院 沈阳 110142

    1. 本站搜索
    2. 百度学术搜索
    3. 万方数据库搜索
    4. CNKI搜索

    Figures(3)  / Tables(4)

    Article Metrics

    Article views (900) PDF downloads(197) Cited by(40)
    Proportional views
    Related

    /

    DownLoad:  Full-Size Img  PowerPoint
    Return
    Return