Simulation analysis on impact resistance of aluminum foam sandwich structures using peridynamics

CHEN Yang; TANG Jie; YI Guo; WU Liang; JIANG Gang

doi:10.11883/bzycj-2022-0110

Volume 43 Issue 3

Mar. 2023

Turn off MathJax

Article Contents

Abstract

References

Article Navigation > Explosion And Shock Waves > 2023 > 43(3): 034202

CHEN Yang, TANG Jie, YI Guo, WU Liang, JIANG Gang. Simulation analysis on impact resistance of aluminum foam sandwich structures using peridynamics[J]. Explosion And Shock Waves, 2023, 43(3): 034202. doi: 10.11883/bzycj-2022-0110

Citation:

CHEN Yang, TANG Jie, YI Guo, WU Liang, JIANG Gang. Simulation analysis on impact resistance of aluminum foam sandwich structures using peridynamics[J]. Explosion And Shock Waves, 2023, 43(3): 034202. doi: 10.11883/bzycj-2022-0110

Citation:

PDF( 3557 KB)

Simulation analysis on impact resistance of aluminum foam sandwich structures using peridynamics

doi: 10.11883/bzycj-2022-0110

1.
Shanghai Spaceflight Precision Machinery Institute, Shanghai 201600, China
2.
Department of Engineering Mechanics, School of Science, Wuhan University of Science and Technology, Wuhan 430065, Hubei, China

Received Date: 2022-03-22
Rev Recd Date: 2022-05-08

Available Online: 2022-06-07

Publish Date: 2023-03-05

Abstract

Abstract

Under impact, aluminum foam undergoes significant plastic deformation, and the kinetic energy of the impactor is dissipated in the process, thereby protecting the structure from damage. The failure modes of aluminum foam sandwich structures under impact are complex, involving plastic deformation, panel failure, and cracking of the bonding interface. Traditional numerical simulation methods are difficult to solve these discontinuous problems. Peridynamics is a non-local numerical method that describes the mechanical behavior of materials by solving spatial integral equations. It has unique advantages in solving crack propagation, material failure, progressive damage of composite materials, and multi-scale problems. Although the basic bond-based peridynamic theory cannot describe plasticity, the ordinary state-based peridynamic method decouples distortion and dilation and can easily simulate the plastic deformation of materials. Therefore, based on ordinary state-based peridynamics, the Mises yield criterion and the linear isotropic hardening model were introduced to study the factors affecting the impact resistance of aluminum foam sandwich structures. Two-dimensional mesoscopic models of aluminum foam sandwich structure were established by the Monte-Carlo method and impact was simulated using the peridynamic method. The influence of the porosity of aluminum foam on the impact resistance and damage mode of the sandwich structure was analyzed. The results show that the good plastic deformation ability of aluminum foam sandwich structure is the main factor for its buffering and protection, and within a certain range, the higher the porosity of aluminum foam core, the better impact resistance of the sandwich structure. When the porosity of aluminum foam increases from 0.4 to 0.7, the kinetic energy absorption rate of aluminum foam to the impactor increases from 90% to 99%. The simulation results are in good agreement with the experimental results, which verifies the accuracy of the simulation results and the effectiveness of the analysis conclusions. The numerical simulation predicts the crack propagation morphology of the plexiglass backplate, and the results show that improving the porosity of aluminum foam can obtain a better protection effect.
- peridynamics,
- aluminum foam sandwich structure,
- plastic deformation,
- impact damage,
- impact resistance

FullText(HTML)

References(18)

References

[1]	ZHANG J X, QIN Q H, WANG T J. Compressive strengths and dynamic response of corrugated metal sandwich plates with unfilled and foam-filled sinusoidal plate cores [J]. Acta Mechanica, 2013, 224(4): 759–775. DOI: 10.1007/s00707-012-0770-5.
[2]	ZHANG J X, ZHOU R F, WANG M S, et al. Dynamic response of double-layer rectangular sandwich plates with metal foam cores subjected to blast loading [J]. International Journal of Impact Engineering, 2018, 122: 265–275. DOI: 10.1016/j.ijimpeng.2018.08.016.
[3]	ZHANG J X, YE Y, QIN Q H. On dynamic response of rectangular sandwich plates with fibre-metal laminate face-sheets under blast loading [J]. Thin-Walled Structures, 2019, 144: 106288. DOI: 10.1016/j.tws.2019.106288.
[4]	郭亚周, 刘小川, 何思渊, 等. 不同弹形撞击下泡沫铝夹芯结构动力学性能研究 [J]. 兵工学报, 2019, 40(10): 2032–2041. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1000-1093.2019.10.008. GUO Y Z, LIU X C, HE S Y, et al. Research on dynamic properties of aluminum foam sandwich structure impacted by projectiles with different shapes [J]. Acta Armamentarii, 2019, 40(10): 2032–2041. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1000-1093.2019.10.008.
[5]	张博一, 赵威, 王理, 等. 泡沫铝子弹高速撞击下铝基复合泡沫夹层板的动态响应 [J]. 爆炸与冲击, 2017, 37(4): 600–610. DOI: 10.11883/1001-1455(2017)04-0600-11. ZHANG B Y, ZHAO W, WANG L, et al. Dynamic response of aluminum matrix syntactic foams sandwich panel subjected to foamed aluminum projectile impact loading [J]. Explosion and Shock Waves, 2017, 37(4): 600–610. DOI: 10.11883/1001-1455(2017)04-0600-11.
[6]	邓旭辉, 李亚斌. 双层泡沫铝夹芯板抗冲击性能数值研究 [J]. 铁道科学与工程学报, 2019, 16(10): 2603–2611. DOI: 10.19713/j.cnki.43-1423/u.2019.10.029. DENG X H, LI Y B. Numerical study on impact resistance of double-layer foam aluminum sandwich panels [J]. Journal of Railway Science and Engineering, 2019, 16(10): 2603–2611. DOI: 10.19713/j.cnki.43-1423/u.2019.10.029.
[7]	张永康, 李玉龙, 汤忠斌, 等. 冰雹撞击下泡沫铝夹芯板的动态响应 [J]. 爆炸与冲击, 2018, 38(2): 373–380. DOI: 10.11883/bzycj-2016-0232. ZHANG Y K, LI Y L, TANG Z B, et al. Dynamic response of aluminum-foam-based sandwich panels under hailstone impact [J]. Explosion and Shock Waves, 2018, 38(2): 373–380. DOI: 10.11883/bzycj-2016-0232.
[8]	夏志成, 张建亮, 周竞洋, 等. 泡沫铝夹芯板抗冲击性能分析 [J]. 工程力学, 2017, 34(10): 207–216. DOI: 10.6052/j.issn.1000-4750.2016.06.0494. XIA Z C, ZHANG J L, ZHOU J Y, et al. Analysis on impact resistance of aluminum foam sandwich panels [J]. Engineering Mechanics, 2017, 34(10): 207–216. DOI: 10.6052/j.issn.1000-4750.2016.06.0494.
[9]	CUI T N, ZHANG J H, LI K K, et al. Ballistic limit of sandwich plates with a metal foam core [J]. Journal of Applied Mechanics, 2022, 89(2): 021006. DOI: 10.1115/1.4052835.
[10]	苏兴亚, 敬霖, 赵隆茂. 爆炸载荷下分层梯度泡沫铝夹芯板的失效模式与抗冲击性能 [J]. 爆炸与冲击, 2019, 39(6): 063103. DOI: 10.11883/bzycj-2018-0198. SU X Y, JING L, ZHAO L M. Failure modes and shock resistance of sandwich panels with layered-gradient aluminum foam cores under air-blast loading [J]. Explosion and Shock Waves, 2019, 39(6): 063103. DOI: 10.11883/bzycj-2018-0198.
[11]	王涛, 余文力, 秦庆华, 等. 爆炸载荷下泡沫铝夹芯板变形与破坏模式的实验研究 [J]. 兵工学报, 2016, 37(8): 1456–1463. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1000-1093.2016.08.017. WANG T, YU W L, QIN Q H, et al. Experimental investigation into deformation and damage patterns of sandwich plates with aluminum foam core subjected to blast loading [J]. Acta Armamentarii, 2016, 37(8): 1456–1463. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1000-1093.2016.08.017.
[12]	SILLING S A. Reformulation of elasticity theory for discontinuities and long-range forces [J]. Journal of the Mechanics and Physics of Solids, 2000, 48(1): 175–209. DOI: 10.1016/S0022-5096(99)00029-0.
[13]	SILLING S A, ASKARI E. A meshfree method based on the peridynamic model of solid mechanics [J]. Computers & Structures, 2005, 83(17/18): 1526–1535. DOI: 10.1016/j.compstruc.2004.11.026.
[14]	SILLING S A, EPTON M, WECKNER O, et al. Peridynamic states and constitutive modeling [J]. Journal of Elasticity, 2007, 88(2): 151–184. DOI: 10.1007/s10659-007-9125-1.
[15]	杨娜娜, 赵天佑, 陈志鹏, 等. 破片冲击作用下舰船复合材料结构损伤的近场动力学模拟 [J]. 爆炸与冲击, 2020, 40(2): 023302. DOI: 10.11883/bzycj-2019-0019. YANG N N, ZHAO T Y, CHEN Z P, et al. Peridynamic simulation of damage of ship composite structure under fragments impact [J]. Explosion and Shock Waves, 2020, 40(2): 023302. DOI: 10.11883/bzycj-2019-0019.
[16]	刘宁, 胡梦凡, 周飞. 基于键基近场动力学理论的单裂纹圆孔板冲击破坏研究 [J]. 工程力学, 2020, 37(12): 9–17. DOI: 10.6052/j.issn.1000-4750.2020.02.0076. LIU N, HU M F, ZHOU F. The impacted damage study of a single cleavage drilled compression specimen based on bond-based peridynamics [J]. Engineering Mechanics, 2020, 37(12): 9–17. DOI: 10.6052/j.issn.1000-4750.2020.02.0076.
[17]	熊伟鹏, 王超, 傅江妍, 等. 冰球冲击试验的近场动力学方法数值模拟 [J]. 振动与冲击, 2020, 39(7): 148–155. DOI: 10.13465/j.cnki.jvs.2020.07.021. XIONG W P, WANG C, FU J Y, et al. Numerical simulation of ice sphere impact test by peridynamics method [J]. Journal of Vibration and Shock, 2020, 39(7): 148–155. DOI: 10.13465/j.cnki.jvs.2020.07.021.
[18]	MADENCI E, OTERKUS S. Ordinary state-based peridynamics for plastic deformation according to von Mises yield criteria with isotropic hardening [J]. Journal of the Mechanics and Physics of Solids, 2016, 86: 192–219. DOI: 10.1016/j.jmps.2015.09.016.

Relative Articles

[1]	YU Zhijie, WANG Xiangying, SUN Qixing, SUN Wei, GUO Yupei. Cross-scale approach for impact damage and fatigue based on the strain gradient theory[J]. Explosion And Shock Waves. doi: 10.11883/bzycj-2024-0454
[2]	YANG Yaotang, WANG Rui, ZHAO Hui, HOU Chuanchuan. Impact resistence mechanism and deflection prediction of steel-concrete composite wall under fire exposure[J]. Explosion And Shock Waves, 2024, 44(1): 012101. doi: 10.11883/bzycj-2023-0052
[3]	HE Yuanpeng, WANG Lingfeng, YANG Qiusong, LI Zhejian, HAO Hong, CHEN Wensu. Impact response of TPS folded sandwich structure[J]. Explosion And Shock Waves, 2024, 44(4): 043103. doi: 10.11883/bzycj-2023-0315
[4]	CHEN Yang, WANG Zhaoxi, ZHAI Shihui, SHENG Peng, WANG Zhelan, ZHU Mingliang. Peridynamic simulation of impact damage to 3D printedlattice sandwich structure[J]. Explosion And Shock Waves, 2024, 44(3): 033101. doi: 10.11883/bzycj-2023-0124
[5]	ZHAO Yijia, WANG Rui, ZHAO Hui, MAO Min, SHEN Linghua. Impact resistances of FRP-concrete-steel double skin tubular columns and their mechanism analyses[J]. Explosion And Shock Waves, 2023, 43(10): 103101. doi: 10.11883/bzycj-2022-0335
[6]	WEI Jianhui, LI Xu, HUANG Wei, XU Hongjian, FANG Bopeng. Dynamic response and failure of sandwich beams with graded metal foam core under high-velocity impact[J]. Explosion And Shock Waves, 2023, 43(5): 053301. doi: 10.11883/bzycj-2022-0156
[7]	CHEN Zhipeng, MA Fulin, YANG Nana, YAO Xiongliang, JU Jinlong. Peridynamic damage simulation of composite structures subjected to fragment clusters[J]. Explosion And Shock Waves, 2022, 42(3): 033303. doi: 10.11883/bzycj-2021-0081
[8]	MA Fulin, YANG Nana, ZHAO Tianyou, CHEN Zhipeng, YAO Xiongliang. Peridynamic damage simulation of ship composite structures subjected to combined action of shock wave and fragments[J]. Explosion And Shock Waves, 2022, 42(3): 033304. doi: 10.11883/bzycj-2021-0080
[9]	CHENG Shuai, LIU Wenxiang, TONG Nianxue, YIN Wenjun, SHI Yingju, ZHANG Dezhi. Damage mechanism of typical stiffened aircraft structures under explosive loading[J]. Explosion And Shock Waves, 2021, 41(1): 013302. doi: 10.11883/bzycj-2020-0077
[10]	WANG Lili, DONG Xinlong. Talk about dynamic plasticity and viscoplasticity[J]. Explosion And Shock Waves, 2020, 40(3): 031101. doi: 10.11883/bzycj-2020-0024
[11]	LI Pu, YUE Jingxia, LI Xiaobin, PENG Shuai. Impact resistance of thickness-graded arrow-shaped honeycomb pedestals with negative Poisson’s ratio[J]. Explosion And Shock Waves, 2020, 40(7): 071403. doi: 10.11883/bzycj-2019-0414
[12]	YANG Nana, ZHAO Tianyou, CHEN Zhipeng, WU Guoxun, YAO Xiongliang. Peridynamic simulation of damage of ship composite structure under fragments impact[J]. Explosion And Shock Waves, 2020, 40(2): 023302. doi: 10.11883/bzycj-2019-0019
[13]	SU Xingya, JING Lin, ZHAO Longmao. Failure modes and shock resistance of sandwich panels with layered-gradient aluminum foam cores under air-blast loading[J]. Explosion And Shock Waves, 2019, 39(6): 063103. doi: 10.11883/bzycj-2018-0198
[14]	CHEN Pengcheng, CHENG Xin, GONG Lei, LU Guoyun. Impact resistance of H shaped beam with various width-to-thickness ratios[J]. Explosion And Shock Waves, 2018, 38(6): 1378-1385. doi: 10.11883/bzycj-2017-0125
[15]	Liu Wenxiang, Zhang Qingming, Zhong Fangping, Cheng Shuai, Zhang Dezhi. Strain growth of spherical shell subjected to internal blast loading during plastic response[J]. Explosion And Shock Waves, 2017, 37(5): 893-898. doi: 10.11883/1001-1455(2017)05-0893-06
[16]	Ren Peng, Zhang Wei, Liu Jianhua. Experimental research on shock resistant properties of aluminum alloylattice core sandwich panels under underwater shock loading[J]. Explosion And Shock Waves, 2016, 36(1): 101-106. doi: 10.11883/1001-1455(2016)01-0101-06
[17]	Zhu Xiuyun, Lin Gao, Pan Rong, Lu Yu. Sensitivity analysis for impact resistance of steel plate concrete walls based on force vs. time-history analysis[J]. Explosion And Shock Waves, 2016, 36(5): 670-679. doi: 10.11883/1001-1455(2016)05-0670-10
[18]	Zhang Zhen-hua, Qian Hai-feng, Wang Yuan-xin, Mou Jin-lei, Mei Zhi-yuan, Niu Chuang. Experiment of dynamic response of multilayered pyramidal lattices during ball hammer collision loading[J]. Explosion And Shock Waves, 2015, 35(6): 888-894. doi: 10.11883/1001-1455(2015)06-0888-07
[19]	GONG Bai-lin, LU Fang-yun, LI Xiang-yu. Atheoreticalmodelforforecastingdeformationshapes ofdeformablewarheads[J]. Explosion And Shock Waves, 2010, 30(1): 65-69. doi: 10.11883/1001-1455(2010)01-0065-05
[20]	LI Yan-zhao, WANG Xiao-jun, GUO Xiao-hui, CAO Hai, ZHAO Kai. Experimental study on anti-impact properties of a partially prestressed concrete beam[J]. Explosion And Shock Waves, 2006, 26(3): 256-261. doi: 10.11883/1001-1455(2006)03-0256-06