Experimental study on effects of nozzles on gas bubble shapes and pressure characteristics of underwater detonation

LI Cheng; HUANG Xiaolong; LI Ning; LIU Wei; WENG Chunsheng

doi:10.11883/bzycj-2022-0268

Volume 43 Issue 3

Mar. 2023

Turn off MathJax

Article Contents

Abstract

References

Article Navigation > Explosion And Shock Waves > 2023 > 43(3): 032202

PENG Pei, LI Zhan, ZHANG Yadong, CHEN Li, FANG Qin. Performance of retrofitted autoclaved aerated concrete masonry walls subjected to gas explosions[J]. Explosion And Shock Waves, 2020, 40(3): 035101. doi: 10.11883/bzycj-2018-0252

Citation:

LI Cheng, HUANG Xiaolong, LI Ning, LIU Wei, WENG Chunsheng. Experimental study on effects of nozzles on gas bubble shapes and pressure characteristics of underwater detonation[J]. Explosion And Shock Waves, 2023, 43(3): 032202. doi: 10.11883/bzycj-2022-0268

Citation:

PDF( 2818 KB)

Experimental study on effects of nozzles on gas bubble shapes and pressure characteristics of underwater detonation

doi: 10.11883/bzycj-2022-0268

National Key Laboratory of Transient Physics, Nanjing University of Science and Technology, Nanjing 210094, Jiangsu, China

Received Date: 2022-06-23
Rev Recd Date: 2022-08-22

Available Online: 2022-08-31

Publish Date: 2023-03-05

Abstract

Abstract

A detonation experimental system was established to explore the characteristics of underwater detonation gas jets from the detonation tubes with different types of nozzles. The effects of different types of nozzles on underwater bubble shapes and pressure characteristics during detonation were experimentally studied. The digital particle image velocimetry was used to visualize the bubble pulsation pictures captured by a high-speed camera, and the bubble velocity fields in the different nozzle cases were obtained. Two dynamic pressure sensors were installed at the end of the detonation tube to confirm whether the stable detonation wave was formed, and to observe the transmission and reflection characteristics of the detonation wave on the gas-liquid two-phase interface, respectively. An underwater explosion sensor was installed at a certain distance from the nozzle to measure the underwater pressure wave. The results show that the bubble pulsation process in the divergent nozzle case is basically the same as that in the case of the straight nozzle, but the divergent nozzle improves the gas jet velocity and increases the bubble volume of the first bubble pulsation. The combined effect of the convergent nozzle and its reflected shock wave reduces the injection speed of the detonation gas. Because of the continuity of the gas jet, the bubble pulsation process in the convergent nozzle case is obviously different. The maximum bubble volume in the convergent nozzle case is smaller, but the attenuation of the second bubble pulsation duration is smaller than that of the first pulsation duration. The divergent nozzle increases the gas velocity and kinetic energy, which enhances the bubble pulsation intensity, the bubble pulsation pressure and transmitted shock wave pressure in the divergent nozzle case are much higher than those in the straight nozzle case. The bubble pulsation pressure and the transmitted shock wave pressure in the convergent nozzle case are both low, but the continuity of the convergent nozzle gas jet retards the attenuation speed of the bubble pulsation pressure. Compared with the straight nozzle, the bubble pulsation time in the divergent nozzle case is longer, the bubble pulsation pressure and transmitted shock wave pressure are higher. The duration of the bubble pulsation in the convergent nozzle case is shorter, and the convergent nozzle can obviously inhibit the transmitted shock wave pressure and the bubble pulsation pressure.
- nozzle,
- underwater detonation,
- bubble pulsation,
- bubble shape,
- underwater pressure

FullText(HTML)

References(26)

References

[1]	ROSATO D A, THORNTON M, SOSA J, et al. Stabilized detonation for hypersonic propulsion [J]. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 2021, 118(20): e2102244118. DOI: 10.1073/pnas.2102244118.
[2]	潘振华, 范宝春, 归明月, 等. 流动系统中爆轰波传播特性的数值模拟 [J]. 爆炸与冲击, 2010, 30(6): 593–597. DOI: 10.11883/1001-1455(2010)06-0593-05. PAN Z H, FAN B C, GUI M Y, et al. Numerical simulation of detonation wave propagation in a flow system [J]. Explosion and Shock Waves, 2010, 30(6): 593–597. DOI: 10.11883/1001-1455(2010)06-0593-05.
[3]	王兵, 谢峤峰, 闻浩诚, 等. 爆震发动机研究进展 [J]. 推进技术, 2021, 42(4): 721–737. DOI: 10.13675/j.cnki.tjjs.210109. WANG B, XIE Q F, WEN H C, et al. Research progress of detonation engines [J]. Journal of Propulsion Technology, 2021, 42(4): 721–737. DOI: 10.13675/j.cnki.tjjs.210109.
[4]	张春, 郁伟, 王宝寿. 水下超声速燃气射流的初期流场特性研究 [J]. 兵工学报, 2018, 39(5): 961–968. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1000-1093.2018.05.016. ZHANG C, YU W, WANG B S. Research on the initial flow field characteristics of underwater supersonic gas jets [J]. Acta Armamentarii, 2018, 39(5): 961–968. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1000-1093.2018.05.016.
[5]	王乐勤, 郝宗睿, 吴大转. 水下气体射流初期流场的数值研究 [J]. 工程热物理学报, 2009, 30(7): 1132–1135. DOI: 10.3321/j.issn:0253-231X.2009.07.014. WANG L Q, HAO Z R, WU D Z. Numerical simulation of initial flow field of underwater gas jet [J]. Journal of Engineering Thermophysics, 2009, 30(7): 1132–1135. DOI: 10.3321/j.issn:0253-231X.2009.07.014.
[6]	张焕好, 郭则庆, 王瑞琦, 等. 水下超声速气体射流的初始流动特性研究 [J]. 振动与冲击, 2019, 38(6): 88–93; 131. DOI: 10.13465/j.cnki.jvs.2019.06.013. ZHANG H H, GUO Z Q, WANG R Q, et al. Initial flow characteristics of an underwater supersonic gas jet [J]. Journal of Vibration and Shock, 2019, 38(6): 88–93; 131. DOI: 10.13465/j.cnki.jvs.2019.06.013.
[7]	ZHANG Q B, FAN W, WANG K, et al. Impact of nozzles on a valveless pulse detonation rocket engine without the purge process [J]. Applied Thermal Engineering, 2016, 100: 1161–1168. DOI: 10.1016/j.applthermaleng.2016.02.135.
[8]	陈焕龙, 王柠, 刘华坪, 等. 不同发射深度下喷管燃气射流特性研究 [J]. 水动力学研究与进展: A辑, 2012, 27(6): 659–666. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn1000-4874.2012.06.005. CHEN H L, WANG N, LIU H P, et al. Investigation of nozzle gas jet characteristics with different launch depth underwater [J]. Chinese Journal of Hydrodynamics, 2012, 27(6): 659–666. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn1000-4874.2012.06.005.
[9]	FROLOV S M, AVDEEV K A, AKSENOV V S, et al. Pulsed detonation hydroramjet: simulations and experiments [J]. Shock Waves, 2020, 30(3): 221–234. DOI: 10.1007/s00193-019-00906-2.
[10]	FROLOV S M, AVDEEV K A, AKSENOV V S, et al. Experimental and computational studies of shock wave-to-bubbly water momentum transfer [J]. International Journal of Multiphase Flow, 2017, 92: 20–38. DOI: 10.1016/j.ijmultiphaseflow.2017.01.016.
[11]	LIU W, LI N, WENG C S, et al. Bubble dynamics and pressure field characteristics of underwater detonation gas jet generated by a detonation tube [J]. Physics of Fluids, 2021, 33(2): 023302. DOI: 10.1063/5.0029729.
[12]	LIU W, LI N, HUANG X L, et al. Experimental study of underwater pulse detonation gas jets: bubble velocity field and time-frequency characteristics of pressure field [J]. Physics of Fluids, 2021, 33(8): 083324. DOI: 10.1063/5.0060686.
[13]	侯子伟, 翁春生, 贾芳, 等. 水下爆轰燃气泡形态与激波传播过程研究 [J]. 推进技术, 2021, 42(4): 755–764. DOI: 10.13675/j.cnki.tjjs.200390. HOU Z W, WENG C S, JIA F, et al. Gas bubble shape and shock wave propagation process of underwater detonation [J]. Journal of Propulsion Technology, 2021, 42(4): 755–764. DOI: 10.13675/j.cnki.tjjs.200390.
[14]	HOU Z W, LI N, HUANG X L, et al. Experimental study on pressure evolution of detonation waves penetrating into water [J]. Physics of Fluids, 2022, 34(7): 076110. DOI: 10.1063/5.0100446.
[15]	李旭东, 王春, 姜宗林. 喷管对脉冲爆轰发动机性能的影响 [J]. 力学学报, 2011, 43(1): 1–10. DOI: 10.6052/0459-1879-2011-1-lxxb2009-754. LI X D, WANG C, JIANG Z L. Nozzle effects on performance of pulse detonation engines [J]. Chinese Journal of Theoretical and Applied Mechanics, 2011, 43(1): 1–10. DOI: 10.6052/0459-1879-2011-1-lxxb2009-754.
[16]	YUNGSTER S. Analysis of nozzle and ejector effects on pulse detonation engine performance [C]//Proceedings of the 41st Aerospace Sciences Meeting and Exhibit. Reno, Nevada, USA: AIAA, 2003: 1316. DOI: 10.2514/6.2003-1316.
[17]	范玮, 严传俊, 李强, 等. 脉冲爆震发动机尾喷管的实验 [J]. 航空动力学报, 2007, 22(6): 869–872. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1000-8055.2007.06.004. FAN W, YAN C J, LI Q, et al. Experimental investigation on pulse detonation engine nozzles [J]. Journal of Aerospace Power, 2007, 22(6): 869–872. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1000-8055.2007.06.004.
[18]	汤龙生, 刘宇, 吴智锋, 等. 水下超声速燃气射流气泡的生长及压力波传播特性实验研究 [J]. 推进技术, 2011, 32(3): 417–420. DOI: 10.13675/j.cnki.tjjs.2011.03.002. TANG L S, LIU Y, WU Z F, et al. Experimental study on characteristics of bubble growth and pressure wave propagation by supersonic gas jets under water [J]. Journal of Propulsion Technology, 2011, 32(3): 417–420. DOI: 10.13675/j.cnki.tjjs.2011.03.002.
[19]	LINCK M, GUPTA A, BOURHIS G, et al. Combustion characteristics of pressurized swirling spray flame and unsteady two-phase exhaust jet [C]//Proceedings of the 44th AIAA Aerospace Sciences Meeting and Exhibit. Reno, Nevada, USA: AIAA, 2006: 377. DOI: 10.2514/6.2006-377.
[20]	唐嘉宁, 刘向阳, 李世鹏, 等. 水下固体火箭发动机推力特性研究 [J]. 导弹与航天运载技术, 2012(5): 15–21. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1006-2793.2012.03.008. TANG J N, LIU X Y, LI S P, et al. Study on the thrust characteristics of the underwater solid rocket motor [J]. Missiles and Space Vehicles, 2012(5): 15–21. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1006-2793.2012.03.008.
[21]	TANG J N, WANG N F, SHYY W. Flow structures of gaseous jets injected into water for underwater propulsion [J]. Acta Mechanica Sinica, 2011, 27(4): 461–472. DOI: 10.1007/s10409-011-0474-4.
[22]	王利利, 刘影, 李达钦, 等. 固体火箭发动机水下超音速射流数值研究 [J]. 兵工学报, 2019, 40(6): 1161–1170. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1000-1093.2019.06.006. WANG L L, LIU Y, LI D Q, et al. Numerical study of underwater supersonic gas jets for solid rocket engine [J]. Acta Armamentarii, 2019, 40(6): 1161–1170. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1000-1093.2019.06.006.
[23]	曹嘉怡, 鲁传敬, 李杰, 等. 水下超声速燃气射流动力学特性研究 [J]. 水动力学研究与进展:A辑, 2009, 24(5): 575–582. DOI: 10.16076/j.cnki.cjhd.2009.05.003. CAO J Y, LU C J, LI J, et al. Research on dynamic characteristics of underwater superasonic gas jets [J]. Journal of Hydrodynamics, 2009, 24(5): 575–582. DOI: 10.16076/j.cnki.cjhd.2009.05.003.
[24]	GONG Z X, LU C J, LI J, et al. The gas jet behavior in submerged Laval nozzle flow [J]. Journal of Hydrodynamics, Ser. B, 2017, 29(6): 1035–1043. DOI: 10.1016/S1001-6058(16)60817-X.
[25]	BLOCH G, KUCZATY J, SATTELMAYER T. Application of high-speed digital holographic interferometry for the analysis of temperature distributions and velocity fields in subcooled flow boiling [J]. Experiments in Fluids, 2014, 55(2): 1678. DOI: 10.1007/s00348-014-1678-8.
[26]	GORDON S, MCBRIDE B J. Computer program for calculation of complex chemical equilibrium compositions and applications. Part 1: analysis: NASA 1311 [R]. Washington, USA: National Aeronautics and Space Administration, 1994: 39–40.

Relative Articles

[1]	FANG Houlin, LU Qiang, GUO Quanshi, LI Guoliang, LIU Cunxu, TAO Sihao, ZHANG Dezhi. Experimental research on the free surface effect of shock wave and bubble behavior of small yield underwater explosion[J]. Explosion And Shock Waves, 2024, 44(8): 081444. doi: 10.11883/bzycj-2024-0003
[2]	WEN Yanbo, HU Liangliang, QIN Jian, ZHANG Yanze, WANG Jinxiang, LIU Liangtao, HUANG Ruiyuan. Experimental study and numerical simulation on bubble pulsation and water jet in near-field underwater explosion[J]. Explosion And Shock Waves, 2022, 42(5): 053203. doi: 10.11883/bzycj-2021-0206
[3]	ZHANG Siyuan, LIU Zheng, WANG Zhiqiang, WANG Jinjun, LI Guofeng. Underwater needle-plate electrical bubble pulsation and impact characteristics[J]. Explosion And Shock Waves, 2022, 42(7): 072201. doi: 10.11883/bzycj-2021-0421
[4]	SHENG Zhenxin, LIU Jianhu, ZHANG Xianpi, GAO Tao, CHEN Jiangtao, YANG Jing. On an array-sensor technology for measuring bubble jet load generated by underwater explosion[J]. Explosion And Shock Waves, 2021, 41(3): 031405. doi: 10.11883/bzycj-2020-0346
[5]	SI Jianfeng, ZHONG Dongwang, LI Leibin. Analysis of underwater shock wave attenuation by air bubble curtain based on bubble shape[J]. Explosion And Shock Waves, 2021, 41(7): 073201. doi: 10.11883/bzycj-2020-0136
[6]	CUI Xiongwei, CHEN Yingyu, SU Biao, MA Chunlong. Characteristics of wall pressure generated by bubble jets in an underwater explosion[J]. Explosion And Shock Waves, 2020, 40(11): 111404. doi: 10.11883/bzycj-2020-0106
[7]	HE Ming, ZHANG Aman, LIU Yunlong. Interaction of the underwater explosion bubbles and nearby double-layer structures with circular holes[J]. Explosion And Shock Waves, 2020, 40(11): 111402. doi: 10.11883/bzycj-2020-0110
[8]	WANG Shunli, WU Yun, JIN Di, GUO Shanguang, ZHONG Yepan, YANG Xingkui. Effects of nozzles on performance of rotating detonation at different equivalence ratios[J]. Explosion And Shock Waves, 2020, 40(10): 102102. doi: 10.11883/bzycj-2019-0481
[9]	WANG Zhikai, ZHOU Peng, SUN Bo, YAO Xiongliang, YANG Nana. Influence of bubbles and breaking waves on floating shock platform[J]. Explosion And Shock Waves, 2019, 39(9): 093201. doi: 10.11883/bzycj-2018-0212
[10]	FENG Song, RAO Guoning, PENG Jinhua, WANG Bin. Experimental study of bubble pulsation by underwater explosion of CL-20-based explosives[J]. Explosion And Shock Waves, 2018, 38(4): 855-862. doi: 10.11883/bzycj-2017-0093
[11]	Zhang Gui-fu, Zhu Yu-jian, Li Yuan-chao, Yang Ji-ming. Bubble and jet induced by underwater wire explosion in a narrow tube[J]. Explosion And Shock Waves, 2015, 35(5): 609-616. doi: 10.11883/1001-1455(2015)05-0609-08
[12]	Ma Kun, Chu Zhe, Wang Ke-hui, Li Zhi-kang, Zhou Gang. Experimental research on bubble pulse of small scale charge exploded under simulated deep water[J]. Explosion And Shock Waves, 2015, 35(3): 320-325. doi: 10.11883/1001-1455-(2015)03-0320-06
[13]	Shi Ru-chao, Zhang Ya-jun, Xu Sheng-li. Simulation of expanding process of high pressure cylindrical bubblesin underwater explosion using RGFM and high accuracy schemes[J]. Explosion And Shock Waves, 2014, 34(4): 439-443. doi: 10.11883/1001-1455(2014)04-0439-05
[14]	JIA Hu, SHEN Zhao-wu. Underwatersoundcharacteristicsofmetal-claddetonatingcords[J]. Explosion And Shock Waves, 2011, 31(4): 428-432. doi: 10.11883/1001-1455(2011)04-0428-05
[15]	LI Jian, RONG Ji-li, XIANG Da-lin. Effectsofchargemassandwaterdepthondynamicbehaviorsof anunderwaterexplosionbubble[J]. Explosion And Shock Waves, 2010, 30(4): 342-348. doi: 10.11883/1001-1455(2010)04-0342-07
[16]	ZHAO Sheng-wei, ZHOU Gang, WANG Zhan-jiang, ZHANG Ying, LIANG Zhi-gang. Bubble pulses of small-scale underwater explosion[J]. Explosion And Shock Waves, 2009, 29(2): 213-216. doi: 10.11883/1001-1455(2009)02-0213-04
[17]	ZHANG A-man, YAO Xiong-liang. On dynamics of an underwater explosion bubble near a boundary[J]. Explosion And Shock Waves, 2008, 28(2): 124-130. doi: 10.11883/1001-1455(2008)02-0124-07
[18]	WANG Bin, ZHANG Yuan-ping, WANG Yan-ping. Experimental study on bubble oscillation formed during underwater explosions[J]. Explosion And Shock Waves, 2008, 28(6): 572-576. doi: 10.11883/1001-1455(2008)06-0572-05
[19]	FANG Bin, ZHU Xi, CHEN Xi-di, ZHANG Zhen-hua. Pulsation dynamics of an underwater explosion bubble vertical migrating to a horizontal rigid plane[J]. Explosion And Shock Waves, 2006, 26(4): 345-350. doi: 10.11883/1001-1455(2006)04-0345-06

Supplements(0)

Cited By

Cited by

Periodical cited type(13)

1.	徐赵威，汪维，李奕硕，张仲昊，张丛琨. 接触爆炸下聚脲/钢筋混凝土厚板复合结构的抗爆性能. 爆炸与冲击. 2025(03): 66-78 . 本站查看
2.	柳锦春，王钰颖，孙妮. 聚脲加固配筋砌体墙抗燃气爆炸动态响应的数值模拟分析. 爆炸与冲击. 2024(10): 84-97 . 本站查看
3.	徐睿智，唐柏鉴，陈力. 点火位置和障碍物对泄爆空间丙烷-空气爆炸荷载的影响. 消防科学与技术. 2023(08): 1038-1045 .
4.	柳锦春，王钰颖，孙妮. 喷涂聚脲加固双向砌体墙抗燃气爆炸性能数值分析. 兵工学报. 2023(S1): 138-143 .
5.	陈国鑫. 复合夹芯纤维增强水泥板抗爆性能研究. 安全、健康和环境. 2022(06): 19-23 .
6.	钟冬望，李腾飞，何理，杨志龙，陈江伟. 管廊燃气爆炸载荷特征及作用效应研究. 金属矿山. 2022(07): 19-26 .
7.	许林峰，陈力，李展，岳承军. 聚脲加固砖填充墙抗爆性能的试验和分析方法研究. 爆炸与冲击. 2022(07): 126-137 . 本站查看
8.	周占星，刘科伟，李旭东，黄晓辉，马泗洲. 油罐爆炸作用下隧道衬砌动力响应数值模拟研究. 黄金科学技术. 2022(04): 612-622 .
9.	孙炳鑫，季鲲鹏. 混凝土抗爆加固研究进展综述. 天津化工. 2021(01): 1-2 .
10.	陈力，任辉启，樊源，宗周红，刘思嘉. 强动载作用下起波配筋梁抗力性能的试验研究. 土木工程学报. 2021(10): 1-8+19 .
11.	王莉莉，付世博，陈争辉，孙伟栋，李栋. 竖向开槽砌体墙燃气爆炸动力响应及加固. 煤气与热力. 2021(11): 17-22 .
12.	孙鹏飞，黄舰，吕平，张锐，方志强. 聚脲涂覆建筑结构抗爆性能研究进展. 材料导报. 2020(S2): 1623-1630 .
13.	宋珊珊，刘军，赵伏田. 冲击荷载下砌体墙位移响应影响因素分析. 河南科学. 2020(12): 1968-1973 .