A control method for attenuation history of shock wave generated by blast simulation shock tube based on high pressure gas driving technic

CHENG Shuai; TONG Nianxue; LIU Wenxiang; YIN Wenjun; LI Qinchao; ZHANG Dezhi

doi:10.11883/bzycj-2023-0094

Volume 44 Issue 5

May 2024

Turn off MathJax

Article Contents

Abstract

References

Article Navigation > Explosion And Shock Waves > 2024 > 44(5): 052201

CHENG Shuai, TONG Nianxue, LIU Wenxiang, YIN Wenjun, LI Qinchao, ZHANG Dezhi. A control method for attenuation history of shock wave generated by blast simulation shock tube based on high pressure gas driving technic[J]. Explosion And Shock Waves, 2024, 44(5): 052201. doi: 10.11883/bzycj-2023-0094

Citation:

CHENG Shuai, TONG Nianxue, LIU Wenxiang, YIN Wenjun, LI Qinchao, ZHANG Dezhi. A control method for attenuation history of shock wave generated by blast simulation shock tube based on high pressure gas driving technic[J]. Explosion And Shock Waves, 2024, 44(5): 052201. doi: 10.11883/bzycj-2023-0094

Citation:

CHENG Shuai, TONG Nianxue, LIU Wenxiang, YIN Wenjun, LI Qinchao, ZHANG Dezhi. A control method for attenuation history of shock wave generated by blast simulation shock tube based on high pressure gas driving technic[J]. Explosion And Shock Waves, 2024, 44(5): 052201. doi: 10.11883/bzycj-2023-0094

PDF( 1663 KB)

A control method for attenuation history of shock wave generated by blast simulation shock tube based on high pressure gas driving technic

doi: 10.11883/bzycj-2023-0094

National Key Laboratory of Intense Pulsed Radiation Simulation and Effect, Northwest Institute of Nuclear Technology, Xi’an 710024, Shaanxi, China

Received Date: 2023-03-14
Rev Recd Date: 2023-11-24

Available Online: 2024-03-11

Publish Date: 2024-05-08

Abstract

Abstract

A high-pressure-gas-driving blast wave simulation shock tube, commonly composed of driving section, throat section and expansion section, is an ideal platform for explosion damage effect research of long positive shock pressure duration time in the laboratory, as the ability of generating simulated shock wave with similar characteristics to real explosion wave. One of the core problems in the design of blast simulation shock tubes, is the control method of the simulated wave attenuation process by modifying the variable section structure and the driving section shape of the shock tube. In this article, a numerical calculation model of one-dimensional flow in the shock tube is established based on the explosion simulation shock tube in the laboratory, a similarity evaluation method of simulated shock wave and standard explosion wave in a shock tube based on determination coefficient is proposed referring to the statistical theory. Then, based on the flow characteristics of the variable section shock tube, the influence of the shape of the driving section on the shock wave attenuation history is studied. The results show that, it is feasible to acquire simulated wave with approximate exponential attenuation history of real blast wave, by using variable cross-section driving tube, of which the section diameter decreases with the growth of distance to the throat, optimizing the variable cross-section structure due to the determination coefficient, and controlling the motion property of expansion and compression wave in the shock tube.
- shock tube,
- blast wave simulation,
- shock wave overpressure,
- decay process control,
- similarity evaluation method

FullText(HTML)

References(19)

References

[1]	任辉启, 王世合, 周松柏, 等. 大型爆炸波模拟装置研制及其应用 [C]//第十六届全国激波与激波管学术会议论文集. 河南,洛阳: 中国力学学会激波与激波管专业委员会, 2014.
[2]	NIAN W M, SUBRAMANIAM K V L, ANDREOPOULOS Y. Experimental investigation on blast response of cellular concrete [J]. International Journal of Impact Engineering, 2016, 96: 105–115. DOI: 10.1016/j.ijimpeng.2016.05.021.
[3]	RENEER D V, HISEL R D, HOFFMAN J M, et al. A multi-mode shock tube for investigation of blast-induced traumatic brain injury [J]. Journal of Neurotrauma, 2011, 28(1): 95–104. DOI: 10.1089/neu.2010.1513.
[4]	RESLER E L, LIN S C, KANTROWITZ A. The production of high temperature gases in shock tubes [J]. Journal of Applied Physics, 1952, 23(12): 1390–1399. DOI: 10.1063/1.1702080.
[5]	CHESTER W. The quasi-cylindrical shock tube [J]. The London, Edinburgh, and Dublin Philosophical Magazine and Journal of Science, 1954, 45(371): 1293–1301. DOI: 10.1080/1478641208561138.
[6]	CHISNELL R F. The motion of a shock wave in a channel, with applications to cylindrical and spherical shock waves [J]. Journal of Fluid Mechanics, 1957, 2(3): 286–298. DOI: 10.1017/S0022112057000130.
[7]	WHITHAM G B. On the propagation of shock waves through regions of non-uniform area or flow [J]. Journal of Fluid Mechanics, 1958, 4(4): 337–360. DOI: 10.1017/S0022112058000495.
[8]	CHESTER W. The propagation of shock waves along ducts of varying cross section [J]. Advances in Applied Mechanics, 1960, 6: 119–152. DOI: 10.1016/S0065-2156(08)70111-X.
[9]	COULTER G A, BULMASH G, KINGERY C. Feasibility study of shock wave modification in the BRL 2.44 m blast simulator: AD-A139631 [R]. U.S. Army Ballistic Research Laboratory, 1984.
[10]	HISLEY D M. Computational studies of wave-shaping in a blast simulator by perforated plates in the driver: AD-A188200 [R]. Aberdeen, UK: Ballistic Research Laboratory, 1987.
[11]	MARK A. Computational design of large-scale blast simulators [C]//19th Aerospace Sciences Meeting. St. Louis: AIAA, 1981.
[12]	OPALKA K O. Large blast and thermal simulator advanced concept driver design by computational fluid dynamics: AD-A-211364 [R]. Aberdeen, UK: Ballistics Research Laboratory, 1989.
[13]	JOSEY T, SAWYER T W. High fidelity simulation of free-field blast loading: the importance of dynamic pressure: DRDC-RDDC-2018-P003 [R]. Canada: Defense Research and Development, 2016.
[14]	GION E J. A multidriver shock tube model of a large blast simulator: AD-A208324 [R]. U.S. Army Ballistic Research Laboratory, 1989.
[15]	SCHRAML S J. Performance predictions for the large blast/thermal simulator based on experimental and computational results: AD-A-235728 [R]. Aberdeen, UK: Ballistics Research Laboratory, 1991.
[16]	张德良. 计算流体力学教程 [M]. 北京: 高等教育出版社, 2010: 151. ZHANG D L. A course in computational fluid dynamics [M]. Beijing: Higher Education Press, 2010: 151.
[17]	OPALKA K O, MARK A. The BRL-Q1D Code: a tool for the numerical simulation of flows in shock tubes with variable cross-sectional areas: AD-A174254 [R]. U.S. Army Ballistic Research Laboratory, 1986.
[18]	SCHRAML S J, PEARSON R J. Computer programs for LB/TS test design: technical description, usage instructions and source code listings: AD-A-299247 [R]. Aberdeen, UK: Ballistics Research Laboratory, 1995.
[19]	刘剑平, 陆元鸿, 曹宵临. 概率论与数理统计方法 [M]. 2版. 上海: 华东理工出版社, 2004: 186–195.

Relative Articles

[1]	ZHANG Xuping, DONG Jinlei, LYU Chao, LUO Binqiang, WANG Guiji, TAN Fuli, ZHAO Jianheng. Mechanical response of NiTi alloys with different initial phase transition temperatures at high strain rates[J]. Explosion And Shock Waves, 2024, 44(5): 053102. doi: 10.11883/bzycj-2023-0257
[2]	CHEN Junhong, YIN Biao, XU Weifang, ZHANG Fangju, XIE Ruoze. The coupled thermal-plastic behavior of TC11 titanium alloy[J]. Explosion And Shock Waves, 2024, 44(5): 053101. doi: 10.11883/bzycj-2023-0228
[3]	YUAN Kangbo, YAO Xiaohu, WANG Ruifeng, MO Yonghui. A review on rate-temperature coupling response and dynamic constitutive relation of metallic materials[J]. Explosion And Shock Waves, 2022, 42(9): 091401. doi: 10.11883/bzycj-2021-0416
[4]	WANG Jianjun, YUAN Kangbo, ZHANG Xiaoqiong, WANG Ruifeng, GAO Meng, GUO Weiguo. Proposition and research progress of the third-type strain aging[J]. Explosion And Shock Waves, 2021, 41(5): 051101. doi: 10.11883/bzycj-2020-0422
[5]	MA Yan, YUAN Fuping, WU Xiaolei. Dynamic shear behaviors and microstructural deformation mechanisms in FeNiAlC dual-phase high strength alloy[J]. Explosion And Shock Waves, 2021, 41(1): 011404. doi: 10.11883/bzycj-2020-0224
[6]	DU Bing, GUO Yazhou, LI Yulong. A novel technique for determining the dynamic Bauschinger effect by electromagnetic Hopkinson bar[J]. Explosion And Shock Waves, 2020, 40(8): 081101. doi: 10.11883/bzycj-2020-0050
[7]	SHU Qi, DONG Xinlong, YU Xinlu. A dynamic tensile method for M-shaped specimen loaded by Hopkinson pressure bar[J]. Explosion And Shock Waves, 2020, 40(8): 084101. doi: 10.11883/bzycj-2019-0433
[8]	LI Xiaolong, LI Penghui, GUO Weiguo, YUAN Kangbo. Shear characteristics and failure mechanism of laser metal deposition GH4169 at different strain rates[J]. Explosion And Shock Waves, 2020, 40(8): 083101. doi: 10.11883/bzycj-2019-0254
[9]	PAN Hao, WANG Shengtao, WU Zihui, HU Xiaomian. On strength of aluminum under high pressure and high strain rate based on crystal plasticity theory[J]. Explosion And Shock Waves, 2019, 39(2): 023102. doi: 10.11883/bzycj-2018-0084
[10]	LIU Yu, XU Zejian, TANG Zhongbin, ZHANG Weiqi, HUANG Fenglei. A high-strain-rate shear testing method based on the DIHPB technique[J]. Explosion And Shock Waves, 2019, 39(10): 104101. doi: 10.11883/bzycj-2018-0301
[11]	LI Penghui, GUO Weiguo, LIU Kaiye, WANG Jianjun, TAN Xueming. Validity analysis of materials' dynamic tensile SHTB experimental technique at ultrahigh temperature[J]. Explosion And Shock Waves, 2018, 38(2): 426-436. doi: 10.11883/bzycj-2016-0259
[12]	LI Chenghua, JIANG Zhaoxiu, WANG Beiqiao, ZHANG Zhen, WANG Yonggang. Nonlinear mechanical response of PZT95/5 ferroelectric ceramics under high strain rate loading[J]. Explosion And Shock Waves, 2018, 38(4): 707-715. doi: 10.11883/bzycj-2016-0329
[13]	Li Shunping, Feng Shunshan, Xue Zaiqing, Tu Jian. Mechanical properties of PTFE at high strain rate[J]. Explosion And Shock Waves, 2017, 37(6): 1046-1050. doi: 10.11883/1001-1455(2017)06-1046-05
[14]	Zhang Long-hui, Zhang Xiao-qing, Yao Xiao-hu, Zang Shu-guang. Constitutive model of transparent aviation polyurethane at high strain rates[J]. Explosion And Shock Waves, 2015, 35(1): 51-56. doi: 10.11883/1001-1455(2015)01-0051-06
[15]	TangTie-gang, LiuCang-li. Ontheconstitutivemodelforoxygen-freehigh-conductivitycopper underhighstrain-ratetension[J]. Explosion And Shock Waves, 2013, 33(6): 581-586. doi: 10.11883/1001-1455(2013)06-0581-06
[16]	SUO Tao, DAI Lei, SHI Chun-sen, LI Yu-long, YANG Jian-bo. MechanicalbehaviorsofC/SiCcompositessubjectedtouniaxialcompression athightemperaturesandhighstrainrates[J]. Explosion And Shock Waves, 2012, 32(3): 297-302. doi: 10.11883/1001-1455(2012)03-0297-06
[17]	TANG Tie-gang, LI Qing-zhong, CHEN Yong-tao, GU Yan, LIU Cang-li. An improved technique for dynamic tension of metal ring by explosive loading[J]. Explosion And Shock Waves, 2009, 29(5): 546-549. doi: 10.11883/1001-1455(2009)05-0546-04
[18]	WANG Li-li, DONG Xin-long, SUN Zi-jian. Dynamic constitutive behavior of materials at high strain rate taking account of damage evolution[J]. Explosion And Shock Waves, 2006, 26(3): 193-198. doi: 10.11883/1001-1455(2006)03-0193-06
[19]	LI Xiao-jie, XIE Xing-hua, LI Rui-yong. Detonation synthesis for nano-metallic oxide powders[J]. Explosion And Shock Waves, 2005, 25(3): 271-275. doi: 10.11883/1001-1455(2005)03-0271-05
[20]	LI Yu-long, SUO Tao, GUO Wei-guo, HU Rui, LI Jin-shan, FU Heng-zhi. Determination of dynamic behavior of materials at elevated temperatures and high strain rates using Hopkinson bar[J]. Explosion And Shock Waves, 2005, 25(6): 487-492. doi: 10.11883/1001-1455(2005)06-0487-06

Supplements(0)

Cited By

Cited by

Periodical cited type(5)

1.	杨东，姜紫薇，郑志军. 高温高应变率下钛合金Ti6Al4V的动态力学行为及本构关系. 高压物理学报. 2024(01): 77-87 .
2.	秦彩芳，许泽建，窦旺，杜雨田，黄风雷. 金属材料在复杂应力状态下的塑性流动特性及本构模型. 爆炸与冲击. 2022(09): 79-89 . 本站查看
3.	陈永胜，张凤丽，王仕强，吕志阳，王金江. 闸板防喷器-窜动钻杆动态剪切机理研究. 石油机械. 2022(09): 19-27+35 .
4.	胡博，郭亚洲，魏秋明，索涛，李玉龙. 绝热剪切变形中温升现象的研究进展. 高压物理学报. 2021(04): 100-127 .
5.	刘宇，许泽建，汤忠斌，张炜琪，黄风雷. 基于DIHPB技术的高应变率剪切测试方法. 爆炸与冲击. 2019(10): 102-110 . 本站查看