Volume 44 Issue 2
Feb.  2024
Turn off MathJax
Article Contents
GU Zhuowei, ZHOU Zhongyu, ZHAO Xincai, LU Yu, ZHANG Xuping, CHENG Cheng, ZHAO Juan, CHEN Guanghua, WU Gang, TAN Fuli, ZHAO Jianheng, SUN Chengwei. Experiment study of cascades explosive implosion magnetic flux generator[J]. Explosion And Shock Waves, 2024, 44(2): 021201. doi: 10.11883/bzycj-2023-0183
Citation: GU Zhuowei, ZHOU Zhongyu, ZHAO Xincai, LU Yu, ZHANG Xuping, CHENG Cheng, ZHAO Juan, CHEN Guanghua, WU Gang, TAN Fuli, ZHAO Jianheng, SUN Chengwei. Experiment study of cascades explosive implosion magnetic flux generator[J]. Explosion And Shock Waves, 2024, 44(2): 021201. doi: 10.11883/bzycj-2023-0183

Experiment study of cascades explosive implosion magnetic flux generator

doi: 10.11883/bzycj-2023-0183
  • Received Date: 2023-05-16
  • Rev Recd Date: 2023-10-25
  • Available Online: 2023-12-28
  • Publish Date: 2024-02-06
  • The explosive implosion magnetic flux generator (EIMFG) could realize ultrahigh magnetic field by using explosive implosion to compress and cumulate inner magnetic flux into a smaller volume near axis. The EIMFG was designed by using magneto-hydrodynamics code of SSS-MHD and simulation shown that around 42% of initial magnetic flux would be finally compressed and cumulated into a volume of 7 mm in diameter near axis. The initial magnetic field system including specific solenoid, power source and large current switch was built up and had the ability of over 20 T of initial magnetic field producing in a cylinder space of 135 mm in diameter. A magnetic optical measurement system was also built up and suitable to dynamic detonation environment. Finally, a 20 kg TNT explosive sale EIMFG setup named CJ-150 was built up and axial maximum magnetic field up to 906 T was recorded using Faraday optical method. The original magneto-optical signal was clear with high quality, and uncertainty of maximum magnetic field data was 5.35%. The magnetic loading by Lorenz force was proved isentropic and uniform around from the measurement results of photonic Doppler velocimeter (PDV) probes which were set inside the sample tube. The CJ-150 setup is proved working stably and suitable to be used in physics experiment. Analysis show that CJ-150 could produce over 1000 T of ultrahigh magnetic field in over 10-1 cm3 volume and realize over 500 GPa of ultrahigh isentropic compression on large size sample.
  • loading
  • [1]
    SAKHAROV A D, LUDAYEV R Z, SMIRNOV E N, et al. Magnitnaya kumulatsia [J]. Dokl. Akad. Nauk SSSR, 1965, 196(1): 65–68.
    [2]
    FOWLER C M, GARN W B, CAIRD R S. Production of very high magnetic fields by implosion [J]. Journal of Applied Physics, 1960, 31(3): 588–594. DOI: 10.1063/1.1735633.
    [3]
    HAWKE R S, DUERRE D E, HUEBEL J G, et al. Electrical properties of Al2O3 under isentropic compression up to 500 GPa (5 Mbar) [J]. Journal of Applied Physics, 1978, 49(6): 3298–3303. DOI: 10.1063/1.325281.
    [4]
    HERLACH F, KNOEPFEL H. Megagauss fields generated in explosive‐driven flux compression devices [J]. Review of Scientific Instruments, 1965, 36(8): 1088–1095. DOI: 10.1063/1.1719809.
    [5]
    PAVLOVSKII A I. Reproducible generation of multimegagauss magnetic fields [C] // Megagauss Physics and Technology. TURCHI P J. New York: Plenum Press 1980: 627–639.
    [6]
    BYKOV A I, DOLOTENKO M I, KOLOKOLCHIKOV N P, et al. VNIIEF achievements on ultra-high magnetic fields generation [J]. Physica B: Condensed Matter, 2001, 294/295: 574–578. DOI: 10.1016/S0921-4526(00)00723-7.
    [7]
    CLARK R G. The dirac experiments–results and challenges [C] // Proceeding of the Ⅷth International Conference on Megagauss Magnetic Field Generation and Related Topics. HANS J. Tallahassee, Florida: Schneider-Muntau, 1998: 12–22.
    [8]
    LINDEMUTH I R, EKDAHL C A, FOWLER C M. US/Russian collaboration in high-energy-density physics using high-explosive pulsed power: ultrahigh current experiments, ultrahigh magnetic field applications, and progress toward controlled thermonuclear fusion [J]. IEEE Transactions on Plasma Science, 1997, 25(6): 1357–1371. DOI: 10.1109/27.650905.
    [9]
    谷卓伟, 罗浩, 张恒第, 等. 炸药柱面内爆磁通量压缩实验技术研究 [J]. 物理学报, 2013, 62(17): 170701. DOI: 10.7498/aps.62.170701.

    GU Z W, LUO H, ZHANG H D, et al. Experimental research on the technique of magnetic flux compression by explosive cylindrical implosion [J]. Acta Physica Sinica, 2013, 62(17): 170701. DOI: 10.7498/aps.62.170701.
    [10]
    ZHOU Z Y, GU Z W, TONG Y J, et al. A compact explosive-driven flux compression generator for reproducibly generating multimegagauss fields [J]. IEEE Transactions on Plasma Science, 2018, 46(10): 3279–3283. DOI: 10.1109/TPS.2018.2794761.
    [11]
    孙承纬, 陆禹, 赵继波, 等. 电磁驱动高能量密度动力学实验的一维磁流体力学多物理场数值模拟平台: SSS-MHD [J]. 爆炸与冲击, 2023, 43(10): 104201. DOI: 10.11883/bzycj-2023-0127.

    SUN C W, LU Y, ZHAO J B, et al. SSS-MHD: a one-dimensional magneto-hydrodynamics multi-physics simulation platform for magnetically-driven high-energy-density dynamics experiments [J]. Explosion and Shock Waves, 2023, 43(10): 104201. DOI: 10.11883/bzycj-2023-0127.
    [12]
    MADER C L. Numerical modeling of explosives and propellants [M]. 3rd ed. Boca Raton: CRC Press, 2008.
    [13]
    孙承纬. 一维冲击波和爆轰波计算程序SSS [J]. 计算物理, 1986, 3(2): 142–154. DOI: 10.19596/j.cnki.1001-246x.1986.02.002.

    SUN C W. One dimensional shock wave and detonation wave calculation program SSS [J]. Chinese Journal of Computational Physics, 1986, 3(2): 142–154. DOI: 10.19596/j.cnki.1001-246x.1986.02.002.
    [14]
    BURGESS T J. Electrical resistivity model of metals: SAND86-1093C [R]. USA: Sandia National Labs, 1986.
    [15]
    李茂生, 陈栋泉. 高温高压下材料的本构模型 [J]. 高压物理学报, 2001, 15(1): 24–31. DOI: 10.11858/gywlxb.2001.01.004.

    LI M S, CHEN D Q. A constitutive model for materials under high-temperature and pressure [J]. Chinese Journal of High Pressure Physics, 2001, 15(1): 24–31. DOI: 10.11858/gywlxb.2001.01.004.
    [16]
    ZHANG J, ZHAO X C, CHEN G H, et al. Dual-channel Faraday rotation measurement for pulsed magnetic field [J]. Review of Scientific Instruments, 2021, 92(10): 105004. DOI: 10.1063/5.0058980.
    [17]
    GENG H Y, WU Q, MARQUÉS M, et al. Thermodynamic anomalies and three distinct liquid-liquid transitions in warm dense liquid hydrogen [J]. Physical Review B, 2019, 100(13): 134109. DOI: 10.1103/PhysRevB.100.134109.
  • 加载中

Catalog

    通讯作者: 陈斌, bchen63@163.com
    • 1. 

      沈阳化工大学材料科学与工程学院 沈阳 110142

    1. 本站搜索
    2. 百度学术搜索
    3. 万方数据库搜索
    4. CNKI搜索

    Figures(24)

    Article Metrics

    Article views (62) PDF downloads(23) Cited by()
    Proportional views
    Related

    /

    DownLoad:  Full-Size Img  PowerPoint
    Return
    Return