Study on dynamic deformation modulus of rock under confining pressure unloading and dynamic loading
-
摘要: 利用SHPB岩石动静组合加载实验系统，研究在不同轴压水平下围压以1 MPa/s速率卸载至预加值50%时矽卡岩受频繁冲击作用的动态变形模量变化规律。实验结果表明：高轴压促使岩石内部微裂纹萌发与扩展，降低了岩石抵抗外部冲击的能力。围压的侧向约束阻碍岩石内部裂纹的横向扩展，但在围压卸载时会加剧岩石内部的损伤，这是由于高轴压下，围压卸载导致岩石内部应力重新分布。轴压与围压卸载共同影响着冲击作用下的岩石动态变形模量，通过岩样在冲击荷载下的能量耗散分析岩石动态变形模量的变化规律，有助于了解深部岩体开挖的破坏机制。Abstract: Dynamic experiments on skarn were conducted with a modified one-dimensional coupled static and dynamic loads based on SHPB device. The variations of dynamic deformation modulus of skarn under different axial pressures and frequent dynamic disturbance are studied when confining pressure was unloaded at the 1 MPa/s rate to 50% of initial value. The results show that high axial pressure promotes the formation and propagation of microcracks in rocks and reduces the resisting ability under external shocks. The lateral restraint of confining pressure hinders the transverse propagation of cracks inside the rock, but it will aggravate the damage when confining pressure is unloaded. This is because, under high axial pressure, unloading of confining pressure results in redistribution of stress inside rock. The axial pressure and confining unloading pressure affect the dynamic deformation modulus of rock under impact. Base on the variation analysis of dynamic deformation modulus by the energy dissipation of rock under impact, some significant understanding of deep rock excavation failure mechanism are drawn.
-
图 1 基于SHPB装置的动静组合加载系统
Figure 1. Coupled static and dynamic loading system based on SHPB device
图 2 围压卸载过程中频繁冲击荷载下矽卡岩的动态应力应变曲线(图中数字表示冲击次序)
Figure 2. Dynamic stress-strain curves of skarn with frequent impact and confining pressure unloading (numbers in figure denotes impact order)
图 3 动态变形模量计算示意图
Figure 3. Schematic diagram of dynamic deformation modulus calculation
图 4 矽卡岩首次受冲击荷载的动态变形模量与轴压的关系
Figure 4. Relationship between dynamic deformation modulusof skarn and axial compression for the first impact
图 5 矽卡岩冲击破坏时的动态变形模量与轴压的关系
Figure 5. Relationship between dynamic deformation modulus of skarn and axial compression in impact failure
图 6 矽卡岩能耗与冲击次数的关系
Figure 6. Relationship between energy dissipation of skarn and impact times
图 7 矽卡岩动态变形模量与围压的关系
Figure 7. Relationship between dynamic deformation modulus of skarn and confining compression
图 8 矽卡岩能耗与冲击次数的关系
Figure 8. Relationship between energy dissipation of skarn and impact times
图 9 不同轴压下动态变形模量与冲击次数的关系
Figure 9. Relationship between dynamic deformation modulus and impact number under different axial compression
表 1 矽卡岩三轴压缩实验结果
Table 1. Results of three axial compression experiment of skarn
围压/MPa 弹性模量/GPa 三轴抗压强度/MPa 峰值应变/10-3 黏结力/MPa 内摩擦角/(°) 15 26.81 217.93 10.27 6.86 57 20 32.69 237.87 12.29 25 21.81 245.06 14.37 30 22.03 284.34 15.38 
下载: 导出CSV
表 2 实验方案
Table 2. Testing projects
岩样编号 预加轴压/MPa 预加围压/MPa 冲击时围压/MPa 围压卸载速率/(MPa·s-1) 冲击气压/MPa XK1-1 52.5 15 7.5 1 0.6 XK1-2 20 10.0 XK1-3 25 12.5 XK1-4 30 15.0 XK2-1 62.5 15 7.5 1 0.6 XK2-2 20 10.0 XK2-3 25 12.5 XK2-4 30 15.0 XK3-1 72.5 15 7.5 1 0.6 XK3-2 20 10.0 XK3-3 25 12.5 XK3-4 30 15.0 XK4-1 82.5 15 7.5 1 0.6 XK4-2 20 10.0 XK4-3 25 12.5 XK4-4 30 15.0
下载: 导出CSV
-
[1] 古德生, 李夕兵.现代金属矿床开采科学技术[M].北京:冶金工业出版社, 2006:454-455. [2] HE M C. Rock mechanics and hazard control in deep mining engineering in China[C]//Proceedings of the 4th Asian Rock Mechanics Symposium. Singapore: World Scientific Publishing Co. Ltd, 2006: 29-46. [3] ABOUV M G, AITALIEV S M, ERMEKOV T M, et al. Studies of the effect of dynamic processes during explosive break-out upon the toof of mining excavations[J]. Journal of Mining Science, 1988, 24(6):581-590. doi: 10.1007/BF02498618 [4] DIEDERICHS M S, KAISER P K, EBERHARDT E. Damage initiation and propagation in hard rock during tunneling and the influence of near-face stress rotation[J]. International Journal of Rock Mechanics and Mining Sciences, 2004, 41(5):785-812. doi: 10.1016/j.ijrmms.2004.02.003 [5] 何满潮, 苗金丽, 李德建, 等.深部花岗岩试样岩爆过程实验研究[J].岩石力学与工程学报, 2007, 26(5):865-876. doi: 10.3321/j.issn:1000-6915.2007.05.001HE Manchao, MIAO Jinli, LI Dejian, et al. Experimental study on rockburst processes of granite specimen at great depth[J]. Chinese Journal of Rock Mechanics and Engineering, 2007, 26(5):865-876. doi: 10.3321/j.issn:1000-6915.2007.05.001 [6] 代革联, 李新虎.岩石加卸荷破坏细观机理CT实时分析[J].工程地质学报, 2004, 12(1):104-108. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1004-9665.2004.01.019DAI Gelian, LI Xinhu. CT real time testing of meso-failure mechanisms of rock under loading and unloading conditons[J]. Journal of Engineering Geology, 2004, 12(1):104-108. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1004-9665.2004.01.019 [7] 任建喜, 葛修润, 蒲毅彬, 等.岩石卸荷损伤演化机理CT实时分析初探[J].岩石力学与工程学报, 2000, 19(6):697-701. doi: 10.3321/j.issn:1000-6915.2000.06.003REN Jianxi, GE Xiurun, PU Yibin, et al. Primary study of real-time CT testing of unloading damage evolution law of rock[J]. Chinese Journal of Rock Mechanics and Engineering, 2000, 19(6):697-701. doi: 10.3321/j.issn:1000-6915.2000.06.003 [8] 殷志强, 李夕兵, 金解放, 等.围压卸载速度对岩石动力强度与破碎特性的影响[J].岩土工程学报, 2011, 33(8):1296-1301. http://www.wanfangdata.com.cn/details/detail.do?_type=perio&id=QK201101732609YIN Zhiqiang, LI Xibing, JIN Jiefang, et al. The confining pressure unloading speed effect on rock dynamic strength and fragmentation characteristics of rock and soil engineering[J]. Chinese Journal of Geotechnical Engineering, 2011, 33(8):1296-1301. http://www.wanfangdata.com.cn/details/detail.do?_type=perio&id=QK201101732609 [9] 陈卫忠, 吕森鹏, 郭小红, 等.基于能量原理的卸围压试验与岩爆判据研究[J].岩石力学与工程学报, 2009, 28(8):1530-1540. doi: 10.3321/j.issn:1000-6915.2009.08.003CHEN Weizhong, LYU Senpeng, GUO Xiaohong, et al. Research on unloading confining pressure tests and rockburst criterion based on energy theory[J]. Chinese Journal of Rock Mechanics and Engineering, 2009, 28(8):1530-1540. doi: 10.3321/j.issn:1000-6915.2009.08.003 [10] 张黎明, 王在泉, 贺俊征.岩石卸荷破坏与岩爆效应[J].西安建筑科技大学学报, 2007, 39(1):110-114. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1006-7930.2007.01.021ZHANG Liming, WANG Zaiquan, HE Junzheng. Analysis of failure characteristics of rock under unloading conditions and their effects on rock burst[J]. Journal of Xi'an University of Architecture, 2007, 39(1):110-114. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1006-7930.2007.01.021 [11] 陈景涛, 冯夏庭.高地应力条件下岩石的真三轴实验研[J].岩石力学与工程学报, 2006, 25(8):1537-1543. doi: 10.3321/j.issn:1000-6915.2006.08.004CHEN Jingtao, FENG Xiating. True triaxial experimental study on rock with high geostress[J]. Chinese Journal of Rock Mechanics and Engineering, 2006, 25(8):1537-1543. doi: 10.3321/j.issn:1000-6915.2006.08.004 [12] 王智德, 夏元友, 周雄, 等.顺层岩质边坡爆破的振动控制及损伤特性[J].爆炸与冲击, 2017, 37(1):27-36. http://www.bzycj.cn/CN/abstract/abstract9682.shtmlWANG Zhide, XIA Yuanyou, ZHOU Xiong, et al. Blasting vibration control and damage characteristics of bedding rock slopes[J]. Explosion and Shock Waves, 2017, 37(1):27-36. http://www.bzycj.cn/CN/abstract/abstract9682.shtml [13] 金解放, 李夕兵, 钟海兵.三维静载与循环冲击组合作用下砂岩动态力学特性研究[J].岩石力学与工程学报, 2013, 32(7):1358-1372. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1000-6915.2013.07.010JIN Jiefang, LI Xibing, ZHONG Haibing. Study on dynamic mechanical properties of sandstone under 3D static load and cyclic impact[J]. Chinese Journal of Rock Mechanics and Engineering, 2013, 32(7):1358-1372. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1000-6915.2013.07.010 [14] 金解放, 李夕兵, 殷志强, 等.轴压和围压对循环冲击下砂岩能量耗散的影响[J].岩土力学, 2013, 34(11):3096-3102. http://d.old.wanfangdata.com.cn/Periodical/ytlx201311011JIN Jiefang, LI Xibing, YIN Zhiqiang, et al. Effect of axial compression and confining pressure on energy dissipation of sandstone under cyclic impact[J]. Rock and Soil Mechanics, 2013, 34(11):3096-3102. http://d.old.wanfangdata.com.cn/Periodical/ytlx201311011 [15] 唐礼忠, 陈源, 王春, 等.高静应力卸载过程中频繁动力扰动作用下岩石的动力学特性[J].中国有色金属学报, 2016, 26(8):1728-1736. http://d.old.wanfangdata.com.cn/Periodical/zgysjsxb201608016TANG Lizhong, CHEN Yuan, WANG Chun, et al. The dynamic characteristics of the rock under frequent impact in the high static press unloading[J]. Transactions of Nonferrous Metals Society of China, 2016, 26(8):1728-1736. http://d.old.wanfangdata.com.cn/Periodical/zgysjsxb201608016 [16] 李夕兵, 宫凤强, ZHAO J, 等.一维动静组合加载下岩石冲击破坏试验研究[J].岩石力学与工程学报, 2010, 29(2):251-260. http://d.old.wanfangdata.com.cn/Periodical/yslxygcxb201002005LI Xibing, GONG Fengqiang, ZHAO J, et al. Test study of impact failure of rock subjected to one-dimensional coupled static and dynamic loads[J]. Chinese Journal of Rock Mechanics and Engineering, 2010, 29(2):251-260. http://d.old.wanfangdata.com.cn/Periodical/yslxygcxb201002005 [17] LI X B, ZHOU Z L, LOK T S, et al. Innovative testing technique of rock subjected to coupled static and dynamic loads[J]. International Journal of Rock Mechanics and Mining Sciences, 2008, 45(5):739-748. doi: 10.1016/j.ijrmms.2007.08.013 [18] LI X B, LOK T S, ZHAO J, et al. Oscillation elimination in the Hopkinson bar apparatus and resultant complete dynamic stress-strain curves for rocks[J]. International Journal of Rock Mechanics and Mining Sciences, 2000, 37(7):1055-1060. doi: 10.1016/S1365-1609(00)00037-X [19] 李夕兵.岩石动力学基础与应用[M].北京:科学出版社, 2014:19-20. [20] FEMA. Federal Guidelines for Dam Safety: Earthquake Analyses and Design of Dams[S]. 2005. [21] 唐礼忠, 王春, 程露萍, 等.一维静载及循环冲击共同作用下矽卡岩力学特性试验研究[J].中南大学学报(自然科学版), 2015, 10:3898-3906. doi: 10.11817/j.issn.1672-7207.2015.10.045TANG Lizhong, WANG Chun, CHENG Luping, et al. Experimental study on mechanical properties of skarn under one-dimensional static load and cyclic impact[J]. Journal of Central South University (Science and Technology), 2015, 10:3898-3906. doi: 10.11817/j.issn.1672-7207.2015.10.045 [22] 李夕兵, 古德生.岩石冲击动力学[M].长沙:中南工业大学出版社, 1994:269-275. [23] COOK M A, COOK V D, CLAY R B, et al. Behavior of rock during blasting[J]. Transactions of Society of Mining Engineers, 1966, 23(5):383-392. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Rock_mass_plasticity -
点击查看大图
计量
- 文章访问数: 4740
- HTML全文浏览量: 1304
- PDF下载量: 38
- 被引次数: 0