高硬度聚脲涂层抗侵性能与断裂机制研究

张鹏; 赵鹏铎; 王志军; 张磊; 任杰; 徐豫新

doi:10.11883/bzycj-2018-0224

高硬度聚脲涂层抗侵性能与断裂机制研究

doi: 10.11883/bzycj-2018-0224

张鹏^{1, 2},
赵鹏铎^2, ,,
王志军¹,
张磊²,
任杰³,
徐豫新³

1.
中北大学机电工程学院, 山西太原 030051
2.
海军研究院, 北京 100161
3.
北京理工大学爆炸科学与技术国家重点实验室, 北京 100081

基金项目:

国家自然科学基金 11302259

国家自然科学基金 11402027

详细信息

作者简介:
张鹏(1989-), 男, 博士研究生

通讯作者:
赵鹏铎, zhaopengduo@163.com

中图分类号: O385
计量
- 文章访问数: 6821
- HTML全文浏览量: 1973
- PDF下载量: 194
- 被引次数: 0
出版历程
- 收稿日期: 2018-06-21
- 修回日期: 2018-08-29
- 刊出日期: 2019-01-05

Penetration resistance and fracture mechanism of high-hardness polyurea coating

ZHANG Peng^{1, 2},
ZHAO Pengduo^{2
, ,},
WANG Zhijun¹,
ZHANG Lei²,
REN Jie³,
XU Yuxin³

1.
College of Mechatronic Engineering, North University of China, Taiyuan 030051, Shanxi, China
2.
Naval Research Academy, Beijing 100161, China
3.
State Key Laboratory of Explosion Science and Technology, Beijing Institute of Technology, Beijing 100081, China

摘要

摘要: 鉴于高硬度聚脲与常规聚脲弹性体的区别，研究了高硬度聚脲涂覆钢板结构的抗侵性能及涂层断裂机制。通过弹道实验加载3.3 g立方体破片撞击无涂层、迎弹面涂层、背弹面涂层与双面涂层4种涂覆类型靶板，获得靶板的弹道极限，分析了不同涂覆方式下结构的抗侵性能、涂层断裂规律与微观断口形貌。结果表明：破片冲击作用下，迎弹面涂层断裂程度高且吸能性好，能够有效提高结构抗侵性能，而背弹面涂层破坏先于钢板层且吸能性差，对结构抗侵性能无提升作用；涂层断裂呈现一定的速度效应、厚度效应与微观特征，其规律反映了不同位置涂层的吸能差异。
- 高硬度聚脲 /
- 涂覆钢板 /
- 抗侵性能 /
- 立方体破片 /
- 涂层断裂
Abstract: In view of its differences from the conventional polyurea elastomer, we investigated the penetration resistance and fracture mechanism of coatings made from high-hardness polyurea sprayed on steel plates, using the ballistic experiment to obtain the ballistic limit of uncoated and coated steel plates subjected to 3.3 g cubic fragments, in consideration of polyurea coatings on the front side, the back side and on both sides in coated plates. We also analyzed the penetration resistance, fracture patterns and micro-morphologies of the coatings in different coated structures. The results indicate that the front coatings with severe fractures exhibited a high energy absorption capability, thereby improving the penetration resistance of the coated plates whereas, however, the back coatings that had been destroyed before the steel plates exhibited a lower energy absorption capability, which was bad for raising the penetration resistance. Under the fragment impact, polyurea coatings exhibited obvious velocity effects, thickness effects and micro-morphological characteristics, reflecting the differences of energy absorption in each configuration.
- high-hardness polyurea /
- coated steel plate /
- penetration resistance /
- cubic fragment /
- coating fracture

HTML全文

图 1 聚脲涂覆钢板

Figure 1. Polyurea coated steel plate

下载: 全尺寸图片幻灯片

图 2 3.3 g立方体破片

Figure 2. 3.3 g cubic fragments

下载: 全尺寸图片幻灯片

图 3 实验布置示意图

Figure 3. Schematic of experimental setup

下载: 全尺寸图片幻灯片

图 4 破片穿靶前后对比

Figure 4. Comparison of impact fragment

下载: 全尺寸图片幻灯片

图 5 无涂层钢板的典型失效情况

Figure 5. Typical failures of uncoated steel plates

下载: 全尺寸图片幻灯片

图 6 含涂层钢板的典型失效情况

Figure 6. Typical failures of polyurea coated steel plates

下载: 全尺寸图片幻灯片

图 7 涂层断口形貌示意图

Figure 7. Fracture morphology of polyurea coatings

下载: 全尺寸图片幻灯片

图 8 迎弹面涂层典型断口微观形貌

Figure 8. Fracture micro-morphology of front coating

下载: 全尺寸图片幻灯片

图 9 背弹面涂层典型断口微观形貌

Figure 9. Fracture micro-morphology of back coating

下载: 全尺寸图片幻灯片

表 1 聚脲力学性能参数

Table 1. Mechanical property parameters of polyurea

产品型号	密度/(g·cm^-3)	拉伸强度/MPa	撕裂强度/(kN·m^-1)	断裂伸长率/%	邵氏硬度
SPUA-307	1.02	25	81	45	D65~75
SPUA-502^[4]	1.02	15	71	200	A85~89
SPUA-601^[5]	1.02	16	50	450
SPUA1220^[6]	1.02	15	71	200
SPUA-306^[7]	1.02	24	85	400	A85~89
Polyurea^[8]		31		Elastomer	A95
Eraspray ESU630D^[9-10]	1.065			Elastomer	D(63±3)
Polyurea^[11-15]				Elastomer

下载: 导出CSV

表 2 实验工况与结果

Table 2. Configurations and results of different plates

靶板类型	钢板厚度/mm	涂层厚度/mm	面密度/(kg·m^-2)	弹道极限/(m·s^-1)	弹道极限提高率/%	极限比吸收能/(J·m²·kg^-1)	极限比吸收能提高率/%
钢板	3	0	23.52	367.73	0	9.49	0
聚脲/钢板	3	6	29.64	501.99	36.5	14.03	47.8
钢板/聚脲	3	6	29.64	377.16	2.6	7.92	-16.5
聚脲/钢板/聚脲	3	3+3	29.64	462.17	25.7	11.89	25.3

下载: 导出CSV

表 3 3 mm涂层的破坏与断裂规律

Table 3. Failure patterns of 3 mm polyurea coatings

涂层位置	破坏特征	破坏情况			断裂示意图
涂层位置	破坏特征	v_i=252.90 m/s	v_i=349.78 m/s	v_i=442.74 m/s	断裂示意图
迎弹面	典型破坏形貌
	径向裂纹数量	4	4
	断裂直径d/mm	42	47	50
背弹面	典型破坏形貌
	径向裂纹数量	10	11	13
	断裂直径d/mm	16	24	30

下载: 导出CSV

参考文献(17)

[1]	许帅.聚脲弹性体复合结构抗冲击防护性能研究[D].北京: 北京理工大学, 2015. http://cdmd.cnki.com.cn/Article/CDMD-10007-1015030336.htm
[2]	宋彬.聚脲弹性体夹层防爆罐抗爆性能研究[D].南京: 南京理工大学, 2016. http://cdmd.cnki.com.cn/Article/CDMD-10288-1016222541.htm
[3]	蔡桂杰.弹性体涂覆钢筋混凝土板抗爆作用设计方法研究[D].太原: 中北大学, 2015. http://cdmd.cnki.com.cn/Article/CDMD-10110-1015661810.htm
[4]	刘厚钧.聚氨酯弹性体手册[M].2版.北京:化学工业出版社, 2012:1.
[5]	黄微波.喷涂聚脲弹性体技术[M].北京:化学工业出版社, 2005:2-3.
[6]	王宝柱, 刘培礼.关于聚脲热点问题的探讨[J].中国涂料, 2009, 24(10):23-26. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1007-497X.2009.12.001. WANG Baozhu, LIU Peili. Discussion on hot issues of polyurea[J]. China Coatings, 2009, 24(10):23-26. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1007-497X.2009.12.001.
[7]	赵鹏铎, 张鹏, 张磊, 等.聚脲涂覆钢板结构抗爆性能试验研究[J].北京理工大学学报, 2018, 38(2):118-123. DOI: 10.15918/j.tbit1001-0645.2018.02.002. ZHAO Pengduo, ZHANG Peng, ZHANG Lei, et al. Experimental investigation on the performance of polyurea-coated structure under blast loads[J]. Transactions of Beijing Institute of Technology, 2018, 38(2):118-123. DOI: 10.15918/j.tbit1001-0645.2018.02.002.
[8]	FEAGA M K. The effect of projectile strike velocity on the performance of polyurea coated RHA plates under ballistic impact[D]. Bethlehem, Pennsylvania: Lehigh University, 2007.
[9]	MOHOTTI D, NGO T, MENDIS P, et al. Polyurea coated composite aluminium plates subjected to high velocity projectile impact[J]. Materials and Design, 2013, 52:1-16. DOI: 10.1016/j.matdes.2013.05.060.
[10]	MOHOTTI D, NGO T, RAMAN S N, et al. Plastic deformation of polyurea coated composite aluminium plates subjected to low velocity impact[J]. Materials and Design, 2014, 56:696-713. DOI: 10.1016/j.matdes.2013.11.063.
[11]	ROLAND C M, FRAGIADAKIS D, GAMACHE R M, et al. Factors influencing the ballistic impact resistance of elastomer-coated metal substrates[J]. Philosophical Magazine, 2013, 93(5):468-477. DOI: 10.1080/14786435.2012.722235.
[12]	ROLAND C M, FRAGIADAKIS D, GAMACHE R M. Elastomer-steel laminate armor[J]. Composite Structures, 2010, 92(5):1059-1064. DOI: 10.1016/j.compstruct.2009.09.057.
[13]	BOGOSLOVOV R B, ROLAND C M, GAMACHE R M. Impact-induced glass transition in elastomeric coatings[J]. Applied Physics Letters, 2007, 90(22):221910. DOI: 10.1063/1.2745212.
[14]	GAMACHE R M, GILLER C B, MONTELLA G, et al. Elastomer-metal laminate armor[J]. Materials and Design, 2016, 111:362-368. DOI: 10.1016/j.matdes.2016.08.072.
[15]	GILLER C B, GAMACHE R M, WAHL K J, et al. Coating/substrate interaction in elastomer-steel bilayer armor[J]. Journal of Composite Materials, 2016, 50(20):2853-2859. DOI: 10.1177/0021998315613131.
[16]	WINCHESTER J.战机档案: 美军战机7[M].张立功, 译.北京: 中国市场出版社, 2013: 217.
[17]	梅志远, 朱锡.利用MSC/DYTRAN程序仿真分析导弹战斗部立方体破片的侵彻威力[J].海军工程大学学报, 2002, 14(2):39-42. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1009-3486.2002.02.010. MEI Zhiyuan, ZHU Xi. The resistance ability of steel plate for penetration by cubic fragment through MSC/Dytran[J]. Journal of Naval University of Engineering, 2002, 14(2):39-42. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1009-3486.2002.02.010.