稀土金属材料填充方式对预混气体爆炸特性抑制研究

赵齐; 陈先锋; 代华明; 尹姝慧; 王晓彤; 张洪铭; 黄楚原

doi:10.11883/bzycj-2018-0276

稀土金属材料填充方式对预混气体爆炸特性抑制研究

doi: 10.11883/bzycj-2018-0276

武汉理工大学资源与环境工程学院，湖北武汉 430070

基金项目: 国家重点研发计划（2018YFC0808504，2017YFC0804705）；国家自然科学基金（51774221，51804237）；湖北省自然科学基金（2018CFB207）

详细信息

作者简介:
赵　齐(1992－　)，男，硕士研究生，445912007@qq.com

通讯作者:
陈先锋(1975－　)，男，博士，教授，cxf618@whut.edu.cn；

代华明(1987－　)，男，博士，讲师，daihm@whut.edu.cn

中图分类号: O381
计量
- 文章访问数: 5776
- HTML全文浏览量: 1439
- PDF下载量: 35
- 被引次数: 0
出版历程
- 收稿日期: 2018-07-29
- 修回日期: 2018-09-28
- 网络出版日期: 2019-10-25
- 刊出日期: 2019-11-01

Inhibition of explosion characteristic of premixed gases by filling patterns of rare earth metal materials

School of Resources and Environmental Engineering, Wuhan University of Technology, Wuhan 430070, Hubei, China

摘要

摘要: 利用20 L球形爆炸装置，探究了在多孔稀土金属材料两种不同的填充方式（球状和片状）下甲烷-空气预混气体爆炸特性的变化规律，考虑了留空率和填充密度对预混气体爆炸特性的影响，并利用压力传感器记录球体内爆炸压力曲线。研究结果表明：甲烷爆炸压力、最大压力上升速率和爆炸指数均与留空率呈正比例关系，与填充密度呈反比例关系，片状材料下最大压力下降幅度大于球状材料下的；片状材料抑爆性能优于球状材料的，片状材料的双重抑爆作用对爆炸威力的影响更甚；2种不同填充方式下阻火抑爆的主要机理存在差异。
- 稀土金属材料 /
- 填充方式 /
- 抑爆 /
- 留空率 /
- 填充密度
Abstract: Using a 20 L spherical explosive device filled with porous rare earth metal materials, we investigated the explosion characteristics variation of the premixed methane-air mixture in two different filling patterns: spherical and flaky. The influences of blank rate and packed density on the explosion characteristics were considered. And the pressure sensor was used to record the explosion pressure inside the spherical device. It shows that the methane explosion pressure, the maximum pressure rise rate, and the explosion index are all proportional to the blank rate and inversely proportional to the packed density. The drop rate of the maximum explosion pressure of the flaky materials is greater than that of the spherical materials. The explosion suppression performance of the flaky materials is better than that of the spherical materials, and the dual function of the flaky materials has a stronger influence on the explosion power. The main mechanisms of fire and explosion suppression in the two different filling patterns are different.
- rare earth metal materials /
- filling pattern /
- explosion suppression /
- blank rate /
- packed density

HTML全文

图 1 实验材料及填充方式

Figure 1. Experimental materials and filling patterns

下载: 全尺寸图片幻灯片

图 2 20 L球形爆炸装置示意图

Figure 2. Schematic diagram for the 20 L spherical explosive device

下载: 全尺寸图片幻灯片

图 3 填充示意俯视图

Figure 3. Schematic top view of filling

下载: 全尺寸图片幻灯片

图 4 不同留空率下甲烷爆炸压力曲线

Figure 4. Pressure-time curves of methane explosion at different blank rates for two filling patterns

下载: 全尺寸图片幻灯片

图 5 不同填充密度下甲烷爆炸压力随时间的变化曲线

Figure 5. Pressure-time curves of methane explosion at different packed densities

下载: 全尺寸图片幻灯片

图 6 不同留空率下甲烷爆炸特性参数

Figure 6. Parameters for methane explosion characteristics at different blank rates

下载: 全尺寸图片幻灯片

图 7 不同填充密度下甲烷爆炸特性参数

Figure 7. Parameters for methane explosion characteristics at different packed densities

下载: 全尺寸图片幻灯片

图 8 不同填充方式下多孔材料的阻火抑爆机理

Figure 8. Mechanism of fire retardation and explosion suppression by porous materials in different filling patterns

下载: 全尺寸图片幻灯片

参考文献(19)

[1]	刘洋, 高文傲, 李登科, 等. 基于光纤传感技术的易燃易爆气体泄漏监测研究 [J]. 爆破, 2017, 34(4): 22–26. DOI: 10.3963/j.issn.1001-487X.2017.04.005. LIU Yang, GAO Wenao, LI Dengke, et al. Research on leakage monitoring of flammable and explosive gas based on optical fiber sensing technology [J]. Blasting, 2017, 34(4): 22–26. DOI: 10.3963/j.issn.1001-487X.2017.04.005.
[2]	LIU Hongyong, HE Weitao, GUO Ji, et al. Risk propagation mechanism: Qingdao crude oil leaking and explosion case study [J]. Engineering Failure Analysis, 2015, 56: 555–561. DOI: 10.1016/j.engfailanal.2014.10.003.
[3]	CHEN C H, SHEEN Y N, WANG H Y. Case analysis of catastrophic underground pipeline gas explosion in Taiwan [J]. Engineering Failure Analysis, 2016, 65: 39–47. DOI: 10.1016/j.engfailanal.2016.03.013.
[4]	JI Tingchao, QIAN Xinming, YUAN Mengqi, et al. Case study of a natural gas explosion in Beijing, China [J]. Journal of Loss Prevention in the Process Industries, 2017, 49: 401–410. DOI: 10.1016/j.jlp.2017.07.013.
[5]	LI Qingzhao, LIN Baiquan, DAI Huaming, et al. Explosion characteristics of H₂/CH₄/air and CH₄/coal dust/air mixtures [J]. Powder Technology, 2012, 229: 222–228. DOI: 10.1016/j.powtec.2012.06.036.
[6]	WANG Cheng, MA Tianbao, LU Jie. Influence of obstacle disturbance in a duct on explosion characteristics of coal gas [J]. Science China: Physics, Mechanics and Astronomy, 2010, 53(2): 269–278. DOI: 10.1007/s11433-009-0270-3.
[7]	HUO Y, CHOW W K. Flame propagation of premixed liquefied petroleum gas explosion in a tube [J]. Applied Thermal Engineering, 2016, 113: 891–901. DOI: 10.1016/j.applthermaleng.2016.11.040.
[8]	CICCARELLI G, JOHANSEN C T, PARRAVANI M. The role of shock-flame interactions on flame acceleration in an obstacle laden channel [J]. Combustion and Flame, 2010, 157(11): 2125–2136. DOI: 10.1016/j.combustflame.2010.05.003.
[9]	YU Minggao, ZHENG Kai, CHU Tingxiang. Gas explosion flame propagation over various hollow-square obstacles [J]. Journal of Natural Gas Science and Engineering, 2016, 30: 221–227. DOI: 10.1016/j.jngse.2016.02.009.
[10]	DAI Huaming, ZHAO Qi, LIN Baiquan, et al. Premixed combustion of low-concentration coal mine methane with water vapor addition in a two-section porous media burner [J]. Fuel, 2018, 213: 72–82. DOI: 10.1016/j.fuel.2017.09.123.
[11]	喻健良, 蔡涛, 李岳, 等. 丝网结构对爆炸气体淬熄的试验研究 [J]. 燃烧科学与技术, 2008, 14(2): 97–100. DOI: 10.3321/j.issn:1006-8740.2008.02.001. YU Jianliang, CAI Tao, LI Yue, et al. Experiment to quench explosion gas with structure of wire mesh [J]. Journal of Combustion Science and Technology, 2008, 14(2): 97–100. DOI: 10.3321/j.issn:1006-8740.2008.02.001.
[12]	BABKIN V S, KORZHAVIN A A, BUNEV V A. Propagation of premixed gaseous explosion flames in porous media [J]. Combustion and Flame, 1991, 87(2): 182–190. DOI: 10.1016/0010-2180(91)90168-B.
[13]	NIE Baisheng, HE Xueqiu, ZHANG Ruming, et al. The roles of foam ceramics in suppression of gas explosion overpressure and quenching of flame propagation [J]. Journal of Hazardous Materials, 2011, 192(2): 741–747. DOI: 10.1016/j.jhazmat.2011.05.083.
[14]	PANG Lei, WANG Chenxu, HAN Mengxing, et al. A study on the characteristics of the deflagration of hydrogen-air mixture under the effect of a mesh aluminum alloy [J]. Journal of Hazardous Materials, 2015, 299: 174–180. DOI: 10.1016/j.jhazmat.2015.06.027.
[15]	LV Pengfei, PANG Lei, JIN Jianghong, et al. Effects of hydrogen addition on the deflagration characteristics of hydrocarbon fuel/air mixture under a mesh aluminum alloy [J]. International Journal of Hydrogen Energy, 2016, 41(18): 7511–7517. DOI: 10.1016/j.ijhydene.2016.03.084.
[16]	杨杰, 肖述锋. 稀土铝镁合金阻隔防爆材料: 102747257B [P]. 2016-03-02.
[17]	邢志祥, 张贻国, 马国良. 网状铝合金抑爆材料抑爆性能研究 [J]. 中国安全科学学报, 2012, 22(2): 75–80. DOI: 10.16265/j.cnki.issn1003-3033.2012.02.025. XING Zhixiang, ZHANG Yiguo, MA Guoliang. Research on explosion suppression performance of reticulate aluminum alloy explosion suppression material [J]. China Safety Science Journal, 2012, 22(2): 75–80. DOI: 10.16265/j.cnki.issn1003-3033.2012.02.025.
[18]	WANG Cheng, HUANG Fenglei, ADDAI E K, et al. Effect of concentration and obstacles on flame velocity and overpressure of methane-air mixture [J]. Journal of Loss Prevention in the Process Industries, 2016, 43: 302–310. DOI: 10.1016/j.jlp.2016.05.021.
[19]	RALLIS C J, GARFORTH A M. The determination of laminar burning velocity [J]. Progress in Energy and Combustion Science, 1980, 6(4): 303–329. DOI: 10.1016/0360-1285(80)90008-8.