高速颗粒流冲击下负泊松比力学超材料夹芯梁的动态响应及缓冲吸能机理

胡朝磊; 孙海亮; 王志鹏; 包兆鹏; 崔天宁; 秦庆华

doi:10.11883/bzycj-2022-0045

高速颗粒流冲击下负泊松比力学超材料夹芯梁的动态响应及缓冲吸能机理

doi: 10.11883/bzycj-2022-0045

胡朝磊^{1, 2,},
孙海亮³,
王志鹏^{1, 2},
包兆鹏^{1, 2},
崔天宁^{1, 2},
秦庆华^{1, 2, ,}

1.
西安交通大学机械结构强度与振动国家重点实验室，陕西西安 710049
2.
西安交通大学航天航空学院极端环境与防护技术联合研究中心，陕西西安 710049
3.
北京宇航系统工程研究所，北京 100076

基金项目: 国家自然科学基金（11972281）；航空科学基金（201941070001）；爆炸科学与技术国家重点实验室（北京理工大学）开放课题（KFJJ22-07M）

详细信息

作者简介:
胡朝磊（1995－　），男，硕士研究生，hcl2047537371@stu.xjtu.edu.cn

通讯作者:
秦庆华（1976－　），男，博士，教授，博士生导师，qhqin@mail.xjtu.edu.cn

中图分类号: O347.3
计量
- 文章访问数: 895
- HTML全文浏览量: 177
- PDF下载量: 162
- 被引次数: 0
出版历程
- 收稿日期: 2022-02-09
- 修回日期: 2022-06-30
- 网络出版日期: 2022-07-11
- 刊出日期: 2022-12-08

Dynamic response and mechanism of mitigation and energy absorption of sandwich beams with a mechanical metamaterial core of negative Poisson’s ratio subjected to high-velocity impact of granular slug

HU Chaolei^{1, 2
,},
SUN Hailiang³,
WANG Zhipeng^{1, 2},
BAO Zhaopeng^{1, 2},
CUI Tianning^{1, 2},
QIN Qinghua^{1, 2
, ,}

1.
State Key Laboratory for Strength and Vibration of Mechanical Structures, Xi’an Jiaotong University, Xi’an 710049, Shaanxi, China
2.
Joint Research Center for Extreme Environment and Protection Technology, School of Aerospace, Xi’an Jiaotong University, Xi’an 710049, Shaanxi, China
3.
Beijing Institute of Astronautical Systems Engineering, Beijing 100076, China

摘要

摘要: 建立了颗粒流子弹发射有限元模型，利用离散元和有限元的联合模拟方法，研究了高速颗粒流冲击负泊松比内凹蜂窝夹芯梁的动态响应及缓冲吸能机理。分析了加载冲量、冲击角、芯材强度以及颗粒流子弹与面板间的摩擦力等因素对夹芯梁动态响应的影响。研究结果表明：夹芯梁在正向颗粒流子弹冲击载荷作用下表现为局部凹陷和整体弯曲的耦合变形模式，面内设计芯材因胞壁弯曲呈现局部内凹的变形模式，面外设计芯材因胞壁屈曲呈现局部褶皱的变形模式。在等面密度的条件下，采用面外设计的硬芯夹芯梁面板的跨中最大挠度比采用面内设计的软芯夹芯梁小，但初始冲击力峰值和冲击力整体水平较高，冲击力响应时间较短。夹芯梁前后面板的跨中最大挠度与冲击载荷近似呈对数线性递增关系。与正向冲击相比，斜冲击下夹芯梁的变形模式具有非对称性，局部凹陷程度减小；在颗粒流子弹不同冲击角度作用下，夹芯梁前后面板的跨中最大挠度、初始冲击力峰值以及传递到夹芯梁的动能和动量占比随冲击角度的增大而减小，而颗粒流子弹与夹芯梁面板间的摩擦因数对夹芯梁的动态响应无显著影响。
- 夹芯结构 /
- 力学超材料 /
- 负泊松比 /
- 高速颗粒流 /
- 离散元-有限元耦合方法 /
- 动态响应 /
- 缓冲吸能
Abstract: In this paper, a finite element model of the granular slug launcher was constructed. Using the discrete element-finite element coupling method, the dynamic response and mechanism of mitigation and energy absorption of sandwich beams with reentrant honeycomb core of negative Poisson’s ratio subject to high velocity granular slugs were investigated. Effects of the load impulse, impact angle, core strengths and friction between the granular slug and face sheets on dynamic response of sandwich beams were analyzed. The results demonstrated that the active deformation mode of sandwich beam subject to the normal impact of the granular slug is combined local denting and overall bending. The deformation mode of the sandwich in-plane core is local denting mode due to the bending of cell walls, whilst the sandwich out-plane core is local folding mode due to buckling of the cell walls. Compared to the same areal density of the sandwich beam with the in-plane design of the soft core, the deflections of the sandwich beam with the out-of-plane design of the hard core are smaller but both its initial peak and level of impact force are higher and its response time is shorter. The mid-span maximum deflections of front and rear face sheets of the sandwich beam increase with the impact loading approximately log-linearly. Compared to the normal impact, the deformation mode of the sandwich beam subject to the oblique impact is asymmetrical and the local denting area reduced. The mid-span maximum deflections of the front and rear face sheets, the initial peak of impact force and the proportions of kinetic energy and momentum transferred to the sandwich beams subject to velocity granular slug with different impact angles decrease with the increase of the impact angles, while the friction between the granular slug and the face sheets has little effect on dynamic response of sandwich beams.
- sandwich structure /
- mechanical metamaterial /
- negative Poisson’s ratio /
- high-velocity granular slug /
- discrete element-finite element coupling method /
- dynamic response /
- mitigation and energy absorption

HTML全文

图 1 数值模型

Figure 1. Numerical model

下载: 全尺寸图片幻灯片

图 2 内凹蜂窝几何尺寸

Figure 2. Size of reentrant honeycomb

下载: 全尺寸图片幻灯片

图 3 芯材设计

Figure 3. Design of core

下载: 全尺寸图片幻灯片

图 4 软颗粒接触模型

Figure 4. Soft-particle contact model

下载: 全尺寸图片幻灯片

图 5 颗粒流子弹压缩曲线

Figure 5. Nominal stress-strain curves of granular slug

下载: 全尺寸图片幻灯片

图 6 标记点恒定速度

Figure 6. Steady velocity of marker points

下载: 全尺寸图片幻灯片

图 7 颗粒流子弹长度变化曲线

Figure 7. Length change curves of granular slug

下载: 全尺寸图片幻灯片

图 8 梁跨中挠度时程曲线

Figure 8. Mid-span deflections of beams versus time

下载: 全尺寸图片幻灯片

图 9 颗粒流子弹正向冲击下夹芯梁的变形（v_p=150 m/s）

Figure 9. Deformation of sandwich beam under normal impact of granular slug (v_p=150 m/s)

下载: 全尺寸图片幻灯片

图 10 冲击力时程曲线

Figure 10. Impact force versus time

下载: 全尺寸图片幻灯片

图 11 正向冲击时面板变形模式

Figure 11. Deformation modes of face sheets under normal impact

下载: 全尺寸图片幻灯片

图 12 芯材节点速度矢量图

Figure 12. Node velocity vectors diagram of core

下载: 全尺寸图片幻灯片

图 13 颗粒流子弹流动形态

Figure 13. Flow mode of granular slug

下载: 全尺寸图片幻灯片

图 14 颗粒流子弹速度时程曲线（v_p =150 m/s）

Figure 14. Velocity of granular slug versus time (v_p =150 m/s)

下载: 全尺寸图片幻灯片

图 15 夹芯梁前后面板跨中最大挠度与不同冲量间的关系

Figure 15. Maximum mid-span deflections of face sheets versus impulse

下载: 全尺寸图片幻灯片

图 16 冲击角为45 °时夹芯梁的变形（v_p=150 m/s）

Figure 16. Deformation of sandwich beam (v_p=150 m/s, $ \theta = $45°)

下载: 全尺寸图片幻灯片

图 17 冲击力时程曲线

Figure 17. Impact force versus time

下载: 全尺寸图片幻灯片

图 18 斜45°冲击面板变形模式

Figure 18. Deformation modes of face sheets ($ \theta = $45°)

下载: 全尺寸图片幻灯片

图 19 颗粒流子弹流动形态

Figure 19. Flow mode of granular slug

下载: 全尺寸图片幻灯片

图 20 面板跨中最大挠度与冲击角的关系

Figure 20. Maximum mid-span deflections of face sheets versus impact angle

下载: 全尺寸图片幻灯片

图 21 不同冲击角度下的冲击力时程曲线

Figure 21. Impact force versus time at different impact angles

下载: 全尺寸图片幻灯片

图 22 颗粒流子弹动能时程曲线

Figure 22. Kinetic energy of granular slug versus time

下载: 全尺寸图片幻灯片

图 23 颗粒流子弹剩余动能占比与冲击角的关系

Figure 23. Relationship between residual kinetic energy proportion and impact angle

下载: 全尺寸图片幻灯片

图 24 夹芯梁能量时程曲线

Figure 24. Total energy of sandwich beam versus time

下载: 全尺寸图片幻灯片

图 25 夹芯梁吸收能量占比与冲击角的关系

Figure 25. Relationship between absorbed energy proportion and impact angle

下载: 全尺寸图片幻灯片

图 26 颗粒流子弹动量时程曲线

Figure 26. Momentum of granular slug versus time

下载: 全尺寸图片幻灯片

图 27 颗粒流子弹剩余动量、偏转动量占比与冲击角度的关系

Figure 27. Relationships of proportion of residual momentum and proportion of deflection momentum with impact angle

下载: 全尺寸图片幻灯片

图 28 夹芯梁动量时程曲线

Figure 28. Momentum of sandwich beam versus time

下载: 全尺寸图片幻灯片

图 29 夹芯梁动量占比与冲击角的关系

Figure 29. Relationship between proportion of momentum and impact angle

下载: 全尺寸图片幻灯片

图 30 摩擦因数与面板跨中最大扰度的关系

Figure 30. Maximum mid-span deflections of face sheets versus friction coefficients

下载: 全尺寸图片幻灯片

图 31 芯材面外布置的夹芯梁的变形（v_p=150 m/s）

Figure 31. Deformation of sandwich beam with out-of-plane honeycomb core (v_p=150 m/s)

下载: 全尺寸图片幻灯片

图 32 冲击力时程曲线

Figure 32. Impact force versus time

下载: 全尺寸图片幻灯片

图 33 芯材剖面图

Figure 33. Sectional view of core

下载: 全尺寸图片幻灯片

图 34 芯材面内和面外布置夹芯梁的跨中挠度时程曲线

Figure 34. Mid-span deflections of sandwich beams with in-plane and out-of-plane honeycomb cores versus time

下载: 全尺寸图片幻灯片

图 35 芯材面内和面外布置夹芯梁的冲击力时程曲线

Figure 35. Impact forces of sandwich beams with in-plane and out-of-plane honeycomb cores versus time

下载: 全尺寸图片幻灯片

表 1 颗粒流子弹不同加载冲量

Table 1. Different impulses of granular slug

v_p/(m·s⁻¹) v₀/(m·s⁻¹) I₀/(kN·s·m⁻²)

120 133.03 23.70
130 143.09 25.50
140 153.03 27.27
150 162.93 29.03

下载: 导出CSV

参考文献(23)

[1]	PINGLE S M, FLECK N A, WADLEY H N G, et al. Discrete element calculations of the impact of a sand column against rigid structures [J]. International Journal of Impact Engineering, 2012, 45: 74–89. DOI: 10.1016/j.ijimpeng.2011.10.005.
[2]	BØRVIK T, OLOVSSON L, HANSSEN A G, et al. A discrete particle approach to simulate the combined effect of blast and sand impact loading of steel plates [J]. Journal of the Mechanics and Physics of Solids, 2011, 59(5): 940–958. DOI: 10.1016/j.jmps.2011.03.004.
[3]	赵振宇, 任建伟, 金峰, 等. V形防护结构研究综述 [J]. 应用力学学报, 2020, 37(6): 2527–2534. DOI: 10.11776/cjam.37.06.B154. ZHAO Z Y, REN J W, JIN F, et al. Investigation process on V-shape protective structures [J]. Chinese Journal of Applied Mechanics, 2020, 37(6): 2527–2534. DOI: 10.11776/cjam.37.06.B154.
[4]	GOEL A, WADLEY H N G, DESHPANDE V S. Impact of granular slugs on rigid targets: effect of grain shape and fracture [J]. European Journal of Mechanics:A/Solids, 2018, 71: 64–76. DOI: 10.1016/j.euromechsol.2018.02.015.
[5]	LIU T, FLECK N A, WADLEY H N G, et al. The impact of sand slugs against beams and plates: coupled discrete particle/finite element simulations [J]. Journal of the Mechanics and Physics of Solids, 2013, 61(8): 1798–1821. DOI: 10.1016/j.jmps.2013.03.008.
[6]	DHARMASENA K P, WADLEY H N G, LIU T, et al. The dynamic response of edge clamped plates loaded by spherically expanding sand shells [J]. International Journal of Impact Engineering, 2013, 62: 182–195. DOI: 10.1016/j.ijimpeng.2013.06.012.
[7]	KYNER A, DHARMASENA K, WILLIAMS K, et al. Response of square honeycomb core sandwich panels to granular matter impact [J]. International Journal of Impact Engineering, 2018, 117: 13–31. DOI: 10.1016/j.ijimpeng.2018.02.009.
[8]	UTH T, DESHPANDE V S. Response of clamped sandwich beams subjected to high-velocity impact by sand slugs [J]. International Journal of Impact Engineering, 2014, 69: 165–181. DOI: 10.1016/j.ijimpeng.2014.02.012.
[9]	PARK S, UTH T, FLECK N A, et al. Sand column impact onto a Kolsky pressure bar [J]. International Journal of Impact Engineering, 2013, 62: 229–242. DOI: 10.1016/j.ijimpeng.2013.07.003.
[10]	UTH T, WADLEY H N G, DESHPANDE V S. The effect of inclination and stand-off on the dynamic response of beams impacted by slugs of a granular material [J]. International Journal of Solids and Structures, 2015, 56/57: 154–174. DOI: 10.1016/j.ijsolstr.2014.11.019.
[11]	GOEL A, UTH T, LIU T, et al. Coupled discrete/continuum simulations of the impact of granular slugs with clamped beams: stand-off effects [J]. Mechanics of Materials, 2018, 116: 90–103. DOI: 10.1016/j.mechmat.2017.03.001.
[12]	FLECK N A, DESHPANDE V S. The resistance of clamped sandwich beams to shock loading [J]. Journal of Applied Mechanics, 2004, 71(3): 386–401. DOI: 10.1115/1.1629109.
[13]	XUE Z Y, HUTCHINSON J W. A comparative study of impulse-resistant metal sandwich plates [J]. International Journal of Impact Engineering, 2004, 30(10): 1283–1305. DOI: 10.1016/j.ijimpeng.2003.08.007.
[14]	WADLEY H, DHARMASENA K, CHEN Y, et al. Compressive response of multilayered pyramidal lattices during underwater shock loading [J]. International Journal of Impact Engineering, 2008, 35(9): 1102–1114. DOI: 10.1016/j.ijimpeng.2007.06.009.
[15]	WEI Z, DESHPANDE V S, EVANS A G, et al. The resistance of metallic plates to localized impulse [J]. Journal of the Mechanics and Physics of Solids, 2008, 56(5): 2074–2091. DOI: 10.1016/j.jmps.2007.10.010.
[16]	朱源, 张建勋, 秦庆华. 金属正交波纹夹芯结构的动态压缩响应 [J]. 爆炸与冲击, 2020, 40(1): 013101. DOI: 10.11883/bzycj-2019-0038. ZHU Y, ZHANG J X, QIN Q H. Dynamic compressive response of metal orthogonal corrugated sandwich structure [J]. Explosion and Shock Waves, 2020, 40(1): 013101. DOI: 10.11883/bzycj-2019-0038.
[17]	任鑫, 张相玉, 谢亿民. 负泊松比材料和结构的研究进展 [J]. 力学学报, 2019, 51(3): 656–687. DOI: 10.6052/0459-1879-18-381. REN X, ZHANG X Y, XIE Y M. Research progress in auxetic materials and structures [J]. Chinese Journal of Theoretical and Applied Mechanics, 2019, 51(3): 656–687. DOI: 10.6052/0459-1879-18-381.
[18]	YANG L, CORMIER D, WEST H, et al. Non-stochastic Ti-6Al-4V foam structures with negative Poisson’s ratio [J]. Materials Science and Engineering:A, 2012, 558: 579–585. DOI: 10.1016/j.msea.2012.08.053.
[19]	XIAO D B, CHEN X Q, LI Y, et al. The structure response of sandwich beams with metallic auxetic honeycomb cores under localized impulsive loading-experiments and finite element analysis [J]. Materials & Design, 2019, 176: 107840. DOI: 10.1016/j.matdes.2019.107840.
[20]	吴文旺, 肖登宝, 孟嘉旭, 等. 负泊松比结构力学设计、抗冲击性能及在车辆工程应用与展望 [J]. 力学学报, 2021, 53(3): 611–638. DOI: 10.6052/0459-1879-20-333. WU W W, XIAO D B, MENG J X, et al. Mechanical design, impact energy absorption and applications of auxetic structures in automobile lightweight engineering [J]. Chinese Journal of Theoretical and Applied Mechanics, 2021, 53(3): 611–638. DOI: 10.6052/0459-1879-20-333.
[21]	HOU X H, DENG Z C, ZHANG K. Dynamic crushing strength analysis of auxetic honeycombs [J]. Acta Mechanica Solida Sinica, 2016, 29(5): 490–501. DOI: 10.1016/s0894-9166(16)30267-1.
[22]	IMBALZANO G, LINFORTH S, NGO T, et al. Blast resistance of auxetic and honeycomb sandwich panels: comparisons and parametric designs [J]. Composite Structures, 2018, 183: 242–261. DOI: 10.1016/j.compstruct.2017.03.018.
[23]	LUO F, ZHANG S L, YANG D Q. Anti-explosion performance of composite blast wall with an auxetic re-entrant honeycomb core for offshore platforms [J]. Journal of Marine Science and Engineering, 2020, 8(3): 182. DOI: 10.3390/jmse8030182.