• ISSN 1001-1455  CN 51-1148/O3
  • EI、Scopus、CA、JST、EBSCO、DOAJ收录
  • 力学类中文核心期刊
  • 中国科技核心期刊、CSCD统计源期刊

低动能易碎弹的致伤威力评估

梅宗书 鲁昌兵 覃亮 柴明明 陈鹏 陈言坤

梅宗书, 鲁昌兵, 覃亮, 柴明明, 陈鹏, 陈言坤. 低动能易碎弹的致伤威力评估[J]. 爆炸与冲击. doi: 10.11883/bzycj-2025-0419
引用本文: 梅宗书, 鲁昌兵, 覃亮, 柴明明, 陈鹏, 陈言坤. 低动能易碎弹的致伤威力评估[J]. 爆炸与冲击. doi: 10.11883/bzycj-2025-0419
MEI Zongshu, LU Changbing, QIN Liang, CHAI Mingming, CHEN Peng, CHEN Yankun. Experimental study on evaluating the damage power of low kinetic energy fragile bullets[J]. Explosion And Shock Waves. doi: 10.11883/bzycj-2025-0419
Citation: MEI Zongshu, LU Changbing, QIN Liang, CHAI Mingming, CHEN Peng, CHEN Yankun. Experimental study on evaluating the damage power of low kinetic energy fragile bullets[J]. Explosion And Shock Waves. doi: 10.11883/bzycj-2025-0419

低动能易碎弹的致伤威力评估

doi: 10.11883/bzycj-2025-0419
详细信息
    作者简介:

    梅宗书(1991- ),男,博士,工程师,meizongshu@163.com

    通讯作者:

    陈 鹏(1990- ),男,硕士,高级工程师,xjy5555@qq.com

    陈言坤(1985- ),男,博士,高级工程师,cyk19860110@163.com

  • 中图分类号: O389; TJ012.37

Experimental study on evaluating the damage power of low kinetic energy fragile bullets

  • 摘要: 针对当前以橡皮弹为代表的传统防暴动能弹在应用过程中致伤致死概率较高问题,为提高防暴动能弹的使用安全性,基于现有非致命武器发射载具,设计一款兼具壳体可靠破碎和粉体分散释能特点的新型低动能易碎弹。通过对假人靶标和明胶靶标的射击试验,得到易碎弹钝击下2种靶标冲击动力响应。假人靶标试验中,该易碎弹破碎可靠,动能缓释效果明显。计算得到的假人不同部位损伤评估指标均在安全阈值内,与橡皮弹钝击试验结果的对比显示,该易碎弹在保证致痛性能的同时安全性明显高于橡皮弹。明胶靶标射击试验中,相同质量及着靶速度下,易碎弹和橡胶弹在明胶内部传感器产生的压强峰值相差约一个量级。试验结果表明,新型低动能易碎弹通过弹丸壳体破碎和弹丸内部填充粉体飞散,可有效衰减弹丸冲击压力峰值,大幅降低动能弹致伤威力,可为提高防暴动能弹药使用安全性提供技术支撑。
  • 图  1  QBS 09式霰弹枪

    Figure  1.  QBS-09 military shotgun

    图  2  18.4 mm低动能易碎弹

    Figure  2.  18.4 mm frangible low-energy cartridge

    图  3  弹丸结构示意图

    Figure  3.  Schematic diagram of projectile structure

    图  4  CHN50-A男性假人靶标传感器安装位置

    Figure  4.  Sensors installation positions in CHN50-A male dummy target

    图  5  易碎动能弹钝击假人试验示意图

    Figure  5.  Schematic of fragile kinetic energy projectile blunt strike dummy test

    图  6  假人胸部钝击过程

    Figure  6.  Blunt impact process of dummy chest

    图  7  头部三向加速度时程曲线

    Figure  7.  Head triaxial acceleration time history curve

    图  8  胸部动态响应时程曲线

    Figure  8.  Time history curves of chest dynamic response

    图  9  明胶靶标制备过程及试验布设

    Figure  9.  Preparation process and test layout of gelatin target

    图  10  明胶靶传感器预埋

    Figure  10.  Sensor embedding in gelatin target

    图  11  明胶靶标钝击试验

    Figure  11.  Gelatin target blunt impact test

    图  12  带猪皮明胶靶标钝击过程

    Figure  12.  Blunt impact process of porcine skin-covered ballistic gelatin target

    表  1  低动能易碎弹的结构参数

    Table  1.   Structural parameters of low-kinetic-energy frangible projectiles

    直径/mm质量/g长度/mm密度/(g·cm−3)粉体装填量/g粉体粒径/μm
    18.48.3401.155.66~5.829.8
    下载: 导出CSV

    表  2  CHN50-A男性假人内部传感器参数

    Table  2.   Internal sensor parameters of CHN50-A male dummy

    测试参数 安装位置 传感器数量×通道数 测量范围
    头部加速度 头部质心 3×1 (241~314)g
    胸部加速度 胸部质心 3×1 (241~314)g
    胸部位移 胸部 1×1 50~68 mm
    大腿力 大腿骨下端 2×1 4.4~5.4 kN
    下载: 导出CSV

    表  3  假人靶标头部受力

    Table  3.   Impact forceson the head of dummy target

    弹丸名称 弹丸质量/g 着靶速度/
    (m·s−1)
    刚性壁最大
    冲击力/N
    头部最大
    作用力/N
    18.4 mm橡皮弹8.5473.846108.8423.24
    8.5774.316145.3438.20
    8.5774.156087.8435.13
    18.4 mm易碎动能弹8.3175.90/111.54
    下载: 导出CSV

    表  4  钝击试验压强对比

    Table  4.   Pressure comparison in blunt impact test

    靶标 弹药
    类型
    质量/g 速度/
    (m·s−1)
    动能/J 压强/MPa
    CH1 CH2 CH3 CH4 CH5
    带皮肤
    明胶靶
    易碎弹 8.9 73.7 24.097 0.035 0.065 0.025 0.04 0.033
    橡皮弹 9.0 99.3 44.408 0.599 0.156 0.09 0.334 0.412
    下载: 导出CSV
  • [1] 战仁军, 汪送, 马永忠. 非致命武器装备[M]. 北京: 国防工业出版社, 2017.

    ZHAN R J, WANG S, MA Y Z. Non-lethal Weapons [M]. Beijing: National Defense Industry Press, 2017.
    [2] OLSON K A, HASELDEN L E, ZAUNBRECHER R D, et al. Penetrating injuries from “less lethal” beanbag munitions [J]. The New England Journal of Medicine, 2020, 383(11): 1081–1083. DOI: 10.1056/NEJMc2025923.
    [3] ANDREI A, ROBBE C, PAPY A, et al. Literature review of case reports regarding NLW thoracic impacts [J]. Human Factors and Mechanical Engineering for Defense and Safety, 2023, 7(1): 4. DOI: 10.1007/s41314-023-00062-7.
    [4] SCHALET G, DAVIS B, GOMEZ M, et al. Acute cardiac tamponade secondary to nonpenetrating injury from gunshot with beanbag round: a case report and literature review [J]. Trauma Case Reports, 2022, 42: 100733. DOI: 10.1016/j.tcr.2022.100733.
    [5] HAAR R J, IACOPINO V, RANADIVE N, et al. Health impacts of chemical irritants used for crowd control: a systematic review of the injuries and deaths caused by tear gas and pepper spray [J]. BMC Public Health, 2017, 17(1): 831. DOI: 10.1186/s12889-017-4814-6.
    [6] SCHENCK C S, LOKESHWAR S D, RIEDEL M D, et al. Penetrating deep pelvic injury due to “less-lethal” beanbag munitions: a case report and policy implications [J]. Trauma Surgery & Acute Care Open, 2021, 6(1): e000754. DOI: 10.1136/tsaco-2021-000754.
    [7] PEARL R C, TORBATI S, GEIDERMAN J M. Kinetic projectile injuries treated during civil protests in Los Angeles: a case series [J]. Clinical Practice and Cases in Emergency Medicine, 2021, 5(4): 385–389. DOI: 10.5811/cpcem.2021.7.52885.
    [8] SELIM M S, EL-SAFTY S A, SHENASHEN M A, et al. Advances in polymer/inorganic nanocomposite fabrics for lightweight and high-strength armor and ballistic-proof materials [J]. Chemical Engineering Journal, 2024, 493: 152422. DOI: 10.1016/j.cej.2024.152422.
    [9] 荣吉利, 葛迅, 李健, 等. 不同弹头形式的易碎弹冲击航空有机玻璃的数值分析 [J]. 振动与冲击, 2015, 34(1): 200–205. DOI: 10.13465/j.cnki.jvs.2015.01.035.

    RONG J L, GE X, LI J, et al. Numerical analysis on fragile projectile with different warheads impacting against aviation organic glass [J]. Journal of Vibration and Shock, 2015, 34(1): 200–205. DOI: 10.13465/j.cnki.jvs.2015.01.035.
    [10] 覃彬, 王建民, 熊漫漫, 等. 非致命动能弹对目标作用的钝击水波效应与致伤机制研究 [J]. 北京理工大学学报, 2017, 37(s2): 132–136.

    QIN B, WANG J M, XIONG M M, et al. Research on water wave effect and injury mechanics for kinetic less-lethal bullet impacting target [J]. Transactions of Beijing Institute of Technology, 2017, 37(s2): 132–136.
    [11] 罗棕木, 李克, 陈浩, 等. 爆炸冲击波作用下假人头部加速度响应测试与损伤分析 [J]. 爆炸与冲击, 2024, 44(12): 121435. DOI: 10.11883/bzycj-2024-0242.

    LUO Z M, LI K, CHEN H, et al. Acceleration response test and damage analysis of dummy head under explosion shock wave [J]. Explosion and Shock Waves, 2024, 44(12): 121435. DOI: 10.11883/bzycj-2024-0242.
    [12] 汪送, 战仁军, 段雄义. 橡皮弹胸部钝击损伤的有限元法评估 [J]. 系统仿真学报, 2020, 32(9): 1762–1770. DOI: 10.16182/j.issn1004731x.joss.19-0119.

    WANG S, ZHAN R J, DUAN X Y. Finite element method evaluation on chest blunt injury by rubber projectile [J]. Journal of System Simulation, 2020, 32(9): 1762–1770. DOI: 10.16182/j.issn1004731x.joss.19-0119.
    [13] VIANO D C. Biomechanics of head injury-toward a theory linking head dynamic motion, brain tissue deformation and neural trauma[R]. SAE Technical Paper, 1988.
    [14] VERSACE J. A review of the severity index[C]//Proceedings of 15th Stapp Car Crash Conference. San Diego: Society of Automotive Engineers, 1971: 771−796. DOI: 10.4271/710881.
    [15] 于小牧, 汪送. 非致命动能弹头部冲击响应分析 [J]. 兵器装备工程学报, 2022, 43(4): 67–73. DOI: 10.11809/bqzbgcxb2022.04.012.

    YU X M, WANG S. Head impact response analysis of non-lethal kinetic energy projectiles [J]. Journal of Ordnance Equipment Engineering, 2022, 43(4): 67–73. DOI: 10.11809/bqzbgcxb2022.04.012.
    [16] HAN D, PARK M, CHOI J, et al. Assessment of pain onset and maximum bearable pain thresholds in physical contact situations [J]. PLOS ONE, 2022, 17(5): e0268057. DOI: 10.3390/s22082996.
  • 加载中
图(12) / 表(4)
计量
  • 文章访问数:  166
  • HTML全文浏览量:  14
  • PDF下载量:  68
  • 被引次数: 0
出版历程
  • 收稿日期:  2025-12-26
  • 修回日期:  2026-04-17
  • 网络出版日期:  2026-06-15

目录

    /

    返回文章
    返回