Design and impact response analysis of a novel thoracic physical model

LUO Xian; QU Zhixue; GUO Chengwang; YANG Da; CHEN Taiwei; CAI Zhihua

doi:10.11883/bzycj-2025-0216

Article Contents

Article Navigation > Explosion And Shock Waves > 2026 > Accepted Manuscript

LUO Xian, QU Zhixue, GUO Chengwang, YANG Da, CHEN Taiwei, CAI Zhihua. Design and impact response analysis of a novel thoracic physical model[J]. Explosion And Shock Waves. doi: 10.11883/bzycj-2025-0216

Citation:

LUO Xian, QU Zhixue, GUO Chengwang, YANG Da, CHEN Taiwei, CAI Zhihua. Design and impact response analysis of a novel thoracic physical model[J]. Explosion And Shock Waves. doi: 10.11883/bzycj-2025-0216

Citation:

PDF( 14309 KB)

Design and impact response analysis of a novel thoracic physical model

doi: 10.11883/bzycj-2025-0216

LUO Xian^{1, 2
,},
QU Zhixue^{1, 2},
GUO Chengwang^{1, 2},
YANG Da^{1, 2},
CHEN Taiwei^{1, 2},
CAI Zhihua^{1, 2
,
,}

1.
Sanya Institute of Hunan University of Science and Technology, Sanya 572024, Hainan, China
2.
Hunan Provincial Key Laboratory of Health Maintenance for Mechanical Equipment, Hunan University of Science and Technology, Xiangtan 411201, Hunan, China

Received Date: 2025-07-14
Rev Recd Date: 2025-10-26

Available Online: 2025-11-04

Abstract

Abstract

In order to systematically evaluate the impact safety of human chest impacted by non-lethal kinetic projectiles (NLKP), an integrated three-rib thoracic physical model with a configurable structure was developed, which was compatible with both simulation and experimental testing. The projectile representation was first validated through rigid-wall impacts at 29 m/s and 61 m/s on a controllable gas-launch platform. The measured force–time histories agreed well with the NATO Allied Engineering Publication-99 (AEP-99), corridors, confirming the fidelity of the projectile model. Impact experiments on chest were then conducted using the validated projectile model at 56 m/s and 86.5 m/s. The measured chest-wall displacements and the maximum value of the viscous criterion (VC_max, β_vc,max) fell within the validation corridors specified in the AEP-99, demonstrating that the proposed model exhibits dynamic-response consistency and predictive accuracy under medium- and low-velocity impacts at or below 90 m/s. Among them, the maximum relative errors between simulated and experimental displacements at 56 m/s and 86.5 m/s are 16% and 21%, respectively. A projectile hardness scan (soft/medium/hard) showed that VC_max increased from 0.298 m/s to 0.336 m/s at 56 m/s and from 0.765 m/s to 0.856 m/s at 86.5 m/s, indicating a more pronounced risk amplification at higher energies. When the rib spacing varies within the range of 80%−120% of the baseline rib spacing, its effect on the peak displacement and contact force is approximately ±6%, and VC_max fluctuates within 5.7%−6.2%, which is generally within the engineering acceptable range. Compared with the surrogate human thorax for impact model (SHTIM), the proposed model adhered more closely to the corridor mid-line at 56, 86.5 m/s, and yielded VC_max values of 0.308, 0.803 m/s (both within the recommended ranges), whereas the SHTIM slightly underestimated the high-energy case, confirming the model advantage in response fidelity and criterion consistency. A systematic simulation was conducted for impact responses by four typical projectiles (NS, CONDOR, SIR-X, and RB1FS) within the velocity range of 60–90 m/s, elucidating the influence mechanisms of projectile structure and material on thoracic injury risk. Under higher speed impact (100–120 m/s), the soft tissue layer of the model dominates energy absorption and dissipation, while the peak stress in the rib layer increases significantly with velocity and exceeds the yield limit, indicating a high risk of fracture. Thickness sensitivity analysis reveals that the thickness of the soft tissue layer plays the most prominent role in regulating energy absorption and deformation. These findings provide important theoretical and technical support for NLKP impact injury assessment and the optimization of protective equipment.
- thoracic physical model,
- non-lethal kinetic projectile,
- viscous criterion,
- high-velocity impact,
- injury risk assessment

FullText(HTML)

References(25)

References

[1]	张昭晖, 汪送, 陈颖. 非致命动能弹测试靶标发展现状及趋势分析 [J]. 兵器装备工程学报, 2024, 45(12): 109–121. DOI: 10.11809/bqzbgcxb2024.12.015. ZHANG Z H, WANG S, CHEN Y. Analysis on the development status and trend of non-lethal kinetic energy projectile test targets [J]. Journal of Ordnance Equipment Engineering, 2024, 45(12): 109–121. DOI: 10.11809/bqzbgcxb2024.12.015.
[2]	汪送. 防暴动能弹发展现状及趋势分析 [J]. 兵器装备工程学报, 2021, 42(4): 6–11. DOI: 10.11809/bqzbgcxb2021.04.002. WANG S. Analysis of development status and trend of anti-riot kinetic energy projectile [J]. Journal of Ordnance Equipment Engineering, 2021, 42(4): 6–11. DOI: 10.11809/bqzbgcxb2021.04.002.
[3]	BIR C, VIANO D C. Design and injury assessment criteria for blunt ballistic impacts [J]. The Journal of Trauma: Injury, Infection, and Critical Care, 2004, 57(6): 1218–1224. DOI: 10.1097/01.TA.0000114066.77967.DE.
[4]	NATO. NATO - AEP-99 Thorax injury risk assessment of non-lethal projectiles [S]. Brussels: NATO Standardization Office, 2021.
[5]	ROBBE C, PAPY A, NSIAMPA N. Toward a reference non-lethal projectile to validate blunt trauma injury evaluation models [J]. Human Factors and Mechanical Engineering for Defense and Safety, 2019, 3(1): 3. DOI: 10.1007/s41314-019-0026-4.
[6]	KAPELES J A, BIR C A. Human effects assessment of 40-mm nonlethal impact munitions [J]. Human Factors and Mechanical Engineering for Defense and Safety, 2019, 3(1): 2. DOI: 10.1007/s41314-019-0017-5.
[7]	NDOMPETELO N. Numerical assessment of non-lethal projectile thoracic impacts [D]. Liège: Université de Liège, 2016.
[8]	赵法栋, 陈超明, 暴洪涛, 等. 非致命动能弹钝性冲击假人胸部的数值模拟 [J]. 弹道学报, 2022, 34(4): 30–37. DOI: 10.12115/j.issn.1004-499X(2022)04-005. ZHAO F D, CHEN C M, BAO H T, et al. Numerical simulation of non-lethal kinetic projectiles blunt impact on dummy chest [J]. Journal of Ballistics, 2022, 34(4): 30–37. DOI: 10.12115/j.issn.1004-499X(2022)04-005.
[9]	XIONG M M, QIN B, WANG S, et al. Experimental impacts of less lethal rubber spheres on a skin-fat-muscle model [J]. Journal of Forensic and Legal Medicine, 2019, 67: 7–14. DOI: 10.1016/j.jflm.2019.07.009.
[10]	曾鑫, 周克栋, 赫雷, 等. 非侵彻条件下猪体和明胶靶内压力衰减试验研究 [J]. 振动与冲击, 2014, 33(8): 96–99,114. DOI: 10.13465/j.cnki.jvs.2014.08.017. ZENG X, ZHOU K D, HE L, et al. Test for pressure attenuation in targets of Landrace and gelatin under non-penetration condition [J]. Journal of Vibration and Shock, 2014, 33(8): 96–99,114. DOI: 10.13465/j.cnki.jvs.2014.08.017.
[11]	PAPY A, ROBBE C, NSIAMPA N, et al. Definition of a standardized skin penetration surrogate for blunt impacts [C]//IRCOBI Conference. Dublin, 2012. (查阅网上资料, 未找到本条文献出版社信息, 请确认).
[12]	王智, 常利军, 黄星源, 等. 爆炸冲击波与破片联合作用下防弹衣复合结构防护效果的数值模拟 [J]. 爆炸与冲击, 2023, 43(6): 063202. DOI: 10.11883/bzycj-2022-0515. WANG Z, CHANG L J, HUANG X Y, et al. Simulation on the defending effect of composite structure of body armor under the combined action of blast wave and fragments [J]. Explosion and Shock Waves, 2023, 43(6): 063202. DOI: 10.11883/bzycj-2022-0515.
[13]	刘迪, 陈菁, 张安强, 等. 爆炸冲击波作用下聚脲材料对肺冲击伤防护作用的数值模拟研究 [J]. 爆炸与冲击, 2024, 44(12): 121423. DOI: 10.11883/bzycj-2024-0205. LIU D, CHEN J, ZHANG A Q, et al. Numerical simulation study on the protective effects of polyurea materials against lung blast injuries under blast wave loading [J]. Explosion and Shock Waves, 2024, 44(12): 121423. DOI: 10.11883/bzycj-2024-0205.
[14]	张佃元, 于晨, 郝文勇, 等. 爆炸冲击载荷下猪肺部的损伤特性 [J]. 爆炸与冲击, 2024, 44(12): 121433. DOI: 10.11883/bzycj-2024-0262. ZHANG D Y, YU C, HAO W Y, et al. Injury properties of porcine lung under blast load [J]. Explosion and Shock Waves, 2024, 44(12): 121433. DOI: 10.11883/bzycj-2024-0262.
[15]	BODO M, BRACQ A, DELILLE R, et al. Thorax injury criteria assessment through non-lethal impact using an enhanced biomechanical model [J]. Journal of Mechanics in Medicine and Biology, 2017, 17(7): 1740027. DOI: 10.1142/S0219519417400279.
[16]	LAAN D V, VU T D N, THIELS C A, et al. Chest wall thickness and decompression failure: a systematic review and meta-analysis comparing anatomic locations in needle thoracostomy [J]. Injury, 2016, 47(4): 797–804. DOI: 10.1016/j.injury.2015.11.045.
[17]	SMERECZYŃSKI A, KOŁACZYK K, BERNATOWICZ E. Chest wall–underappreciated structure in sonography. Part I: Examination methodology and ultrasound anatomy [J]. Journal of Ultrasonography, 2017, 17(70): 197–205. DOI: 10.15557/jou.2017.0029.
[18]	OUKARA A, NSIAMPA N, ROBBE C, et al. Assessment of non-lethal projectile head impacts [J]. Human Factors and Mechanical Engineering for Defense and Safety, 2017, 1(1): 3. DOI: 10.1007/s41314-016-0001-2.
[19]	JOODAKI H, PANZER M B. Skin mechanical properties and modeling: A review [J]. Proceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers, Part H: Journal of Engineering in Medicine, 2018, 232(4): 323–343. DOI: 10.1177/0954411918759801.
[20]	TIAN J, FU C H, LI W H, et al. Biomimetic tri-layered artificial skin comprising silica gel-collagen membrane-collagen porous scaffold for enhanced full-thickness wound healing [J]. International Journal of Biological Macromolecules, 2024, 266: 131233. DOI: 10.1016/j.ijbiomac.2024.131233.
[21]	ALKHOULI N, MANSFIELD J, GREEN E, et al. The mechanical properties of human adipose tissues and their relationships to the structure and composition of the extracellular matrix [J]. American Journal of Physiology-Endocrinology and Metabolism, 2013, 305(12): E1427–E1435. DOI: 10.1152/ajpendo.00111.2013.
[22]	CZERNER M, FASCE L A, MARTUCCI J F, et al. Deformation and fracture behavior of physical gelatin gel systems [J]. Food Hydrocolloids, 2016, 60: 299–307. DOI: 10.1016/j.foodhyd.2016.04.007.
[23]	王家涛, 姜维胜, 靳萌萌, 等. 返回再入过载下座椅倾角对航天员胸腹部损伤的影响 [J/OL]. 北京航空航天大学学报, 2025: 1–12(2025-04-24)[2025-05-30]. https://doi.org/10.13700/j.bh.1001-5965.2024.0892. WANG J T, JIANG W S, JIN M M, et al. Effect of seatback inclination on thoracoabdominal injuries of taikonauts under reentry return loads [J/OL]. Journal of Beijing University of Aeronautics and Astronautics, 2025: 1–12(2025-04-24)[2025-05-30]. https://doi.org/10.13700/j.bh.1001-5965.2024.0892.
[24]	ROBBE C, PAPY A, NSIAMPA N, et al. NATO standardized method for assessing the thoracic impact of kinetic energy non-lethal weapons [J]. Human Factors and Mechanical Engineering for Defense and Safety, 2023, 7(1): 7. DOI: 10.1007/s41314-023-00060-9.
[25]	Marvi-Mashhadi M, Lopes C S, LLorca J. High fidelity simulation of the mechanical behavior of closed-cell polyurethane foams [J]. Journal of the Mechanics and Physics of Solids, 2020, 135: 103814. DOI: 10.1016/j.jmps.2019.103814.