Research on the correlation between the medium-weight shock test load and the design shock load for ship equipment

MA Gang; HE Bin; LIU Jianhu; PEI Du; YAN Bo; XIE Teng

doi:10.11883/bzycj-2025-0227

Article Contents

Article Navigation > Explosion And Shock Waves > 2026 > Accepted Manuscript

MA Gang, HE Bin, LIU Jianhu, PEI Du, YAN Bo, XIE Teng. Research on the correlation between the medium-weight shock test load and the design shock load for ship equipment[J]. Explosion And Shock Waves. doi: 10.11883/bzycj-2025-0227

Citation:

MA Gang, HE Bin, LIU Jianhu, PEI Du, YAN Bo, XIE Teng. Research on the correlation between the medium-weight shock test load and the design shock load for ship equipment[J]. Explosion And Shock Waves. doi: 10.11883/bzycj-2025-0227

Citation:

PDF( 2602 KB)

Research on the correlation between the medium-weight shock test load and the design shock load for ship equipment

doi: 10.11883/bzycj-2025-0227

MA Gang^{1, 2, 3
,},
HE Bin^{1, 2, 3},
LIU Jianhu^{2, 3},
PEI Du^{1, 2, 3},
YAN Bo^{1, 2, 3},
XIE Teng^{1, 2, 3}

1.
China Ship Scientific Research Center, Wuxi 214082, Jiangsu, China
2.
Taihu Laboratory of Deepsea Technological Science, Wuxi 214082, Jiangsu, China
3.
National Key Laboratory of Ship Structural Safety, Wuxi 214082, Jiangsu, China

Received Date: 2025-07-21
Rev Recd Date: 2025-12-22

Available Online: 2026-01-05

Abstract

Abstract

At present, there is a lack of research on the correlation between the shock design load specified in GJB1060.1-1991 and the shock test load corresponding to the test conditions specified in GJB150.18-1986 in China. Without a clear understanding of the severities of shock design loads and shock test loads, it is impossible to accurately guide the anti-shock design for the evaluation and testing of ship equipment. Taking the medium-weight shock test specified in GJB150.18-1986 standard as a case, a multi-degree-of-freedom mass stiffness damping dynamic model is established. Considering the single-degree-of-freedom rigid installation equipment installed on the hull (the equipment itself is assumed to be rigid), the shock test load calculation under the standard conditions can be carried out. It can be found that there are upper and lower limits for the shock spectrum velocity of the test load anvil where the lower limit is about 1.75 m/s and the upper limit is about 2.40 m/s. A calculation formula of the shock test spectrum velocity is fitted. Based on the DDAM (dynamic design analysis method) method and the shock design spectrum value specified in GJB1060.1-1991, the shock design spectrum velocity calculated is compared with the shock test load, and the influences of equipment installation frequency, equipment mass and pendulum height on the shock design load and shock test load are analyzed. Based on the comparison results, it is found that the shock design load is more severe than the shock test load. However, when the channel steel span is relatively large (greater than 90 cm) and the equipment installation frequency is relatively high (greater than 80 Hz), the shock test load may be more severe. In addition, the quantitative ratio between the velocity of the shock design spectrum and that of the shock test spectrum is provided. The research results prove the correlation between the shock design load and the shock test load, which can provide reference for the shock resistance design and shock test of the equipment and the revision of relevant standards.
- shipboard equipment,
- anti-shock,
- shock test,
- medium-weight impact machine,
- mass stiffness damping,
- design shock load

FullText(HTML)

References(9)

References

[1]	国防科学技术工业委员会. GJB150.18-1986 试验十, 舰船设备的冲击试验 [S]. 1986: 186–205.
[2]	王俊峰, 张志谊. 基于LS-DYNA的冲击试验机碰撞分析 [J]. 噪声与振动控制, 2007, 27(6): 10–12. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1006-1355.2007.06.004. WANG J F, ZHANG Z Y. Impact analysis of impact test machine based on LS-DYNA [J]. Noise and Vibration Control, 2007, 27(6): 10–12. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1006-1355.2007.06.004.
[3]	王旭. 中量级强冲击试验机摆锤结构优化设计与冲击数值仿真 [D]. 武汉: 华中科技大学, 2014. WANG X. Optimization of pendulum and numerical simulation of impact for a high-impact shock testing machine with medium [D]. Wuhan: Huazhong University of Science & Technology, 2014.
[4]	冯松, 何郧, 文延, 等. 船舶设备强碰撞中型冲击机冲击特性 [J]. 科学技术与工程, 2017, 17(26): 221–226. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1671-1815.2017.26.036. FENG S, HE Y, WEN Y, et al. Dynamic characteristics of shipborne equipment medium weight shock testing machine [J]. Science Technology and Engineering, 2017, 17(26): 221–226. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1671-1815.2017.26.036.
[5]	王涛. 中量级强冲击试验机运动过程力学特性研究 [D]. 武汉: 华中农业大学, 2014. WANG T. Study on mechanical movement characteristics of middle weight high impact tester [D]. Wuhan: Huazhong Agricultural University, 2014.
[6]	ALEXANDER J E. Damped 2DOF model of MIL-S-901D medium-weight shock machine test [J]. Sound & Vibration, 2016, 50(11): 7–13.
[7]	CLEMENTS E W. Shipboard shock and navy devices for its simulation: SF35-422-110-15046 [R]. Stennis Space Center: Naval Research Laboratory, 1972.
[8]	CLAUDE P, BRUNO A. MIL-S-901 shock testing machines simulation for the selection and prequalification of elastic mountings [C]//Proceedings of the 87th Shock and Vibration Symposium. 2017.
[9]	马刚, 何斌, 刘建湖, 等. 舰船设备中量级冲击试验动力学模型研究 [J]. 中国造船, 2024, 65(5): 222–232. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1000-4882.2024.05.019. MA G, HE B, LIU J H, et al. Research on the dynamics model of medium-weight impact testing for ship equipment [J]. Shipbuilding of China, 2024, 65(5): 222–232. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1000-4882.2024.05.019.