Calculation of shock wave transmission and reflection pressures at water-soil interface

YAN Fuhuai; YUE Songlin; QIU Yanyu; WANG Mingyang; HE Yong

doi:10.11883/bzycj-2023-0440

Article Contents

Article Navigation > Explosion And Shock Waves > 2024 > Accepted Manuscript

YAN Fuhuai, YUE Songlin, QIU Yanyu, WANG Mingyang, HE Yong. Calculation of shock wave transmission and reflection pressures at water-soil interface[J]. Explosion And Shock Waves. doi: 10.11883/bzycj-2023-0440

Citation:

YAN Fuhuai, YUE Songlin, QIU Yanyu, WANG Mingyang, HE Yong. Calculation of shock wave transmission and reflection pressures at water-soil interface[J]. Explosion And Shock Waves. doi: 10.11883/bzycj-2023-0440

Citation:

PDF( 2644 KB)

Calculation of shock wave transmission and reflection pressures at water-soil interface

doi: 10.11883/bzycj-2023-0440

1.
State Key Laboratory of Disaster Prevention and Mitigation of Explosion and Impact, Army Engineering University of PLA, Nanjing 210007, Jiangsu, China
2.
School of Mechanical Engineering, Nanjing University of Science and Technology, Nanjing 210094, Jiangsu, China

Received Date: 2023-12-24
Rev Recd Date: 2023-03-19

Available Online: 2024-03-26

Abstract

Abstract

There is a lack of reliable calculation theory for the transmission and reflection pressures of shock waves at the water-soil interface. Using the mass conservation equation, momentum conservation equation, and the equations of state of water and soil, the Hugoniot relationship and p-u curve of the propagation of shock waves in water and soil medium are derived, and then the transmission and reflection pressures of the shock wave at the water-soil interface can be analyzed theoretically. Two-dimensional numerical models of the free field in water and water-soil layered medium field are established, in which the water and soil parameters are consistent with those in the three-phase medium saturated soil model used in the theoretical derivation. The calculation results show that the theoretical and numerical solutions of the water-soil interface transmission and reflection pressures are highly consistent. When using 80 g TNT explosives and exploding at 0.1–0.9 m from the water-soil interface (proportional burst distance of 0.232–2.089 m/kg^1/3), the error of the theoretical and numerical solutions for transmission and reflection pressures is less than 7%, and the coefficient of the reflection pressure is in the range of 1.6–1.8 according to the analytical solution of the reflection pressure and the ratio of the incident pressure in the water. When exploding at 0.5 m from the water-soil interface and the gas content of the saturated soil varies in the range of 0–10%, the transmission and reflection pressures are 63.8–70.0 MPa, and the reflection pressure coefficients are in the range of 1.55–1.70 at this time. The calculation method for the shock wave transmission and reflection pressure at the water-soil interface has a clear physical meaning and high precision and can provide a theoretical basis for the soil damage assessment of engineering structures in submerged soil caused by underwater explosions.
- water-soil interface,
- shock wave propagation,
- theoretical calculation

FullText(HTML)

References(27)

References

[1]	钱七虎, 王明洋. 三相介质饱和土自由场中爆炸波的传播规律 [J]. 爆炸与冲击, 1994, 14(2): 97–104. QIAN Q H, WANG M Y. Propagation of explosive wave in the free-field of three-phase saturated soil [J]. Explosion and Shock Waves, 1994, 14(2): 97–104.
[2]	钱七虎, 王明洋, 赵跃堂. 三相饱和水土中爆炸波在障碍物上的反射荷载(Ⅰ) [J]. 爆炸与冲击, 1994, 14(3): 225–230. QIAN Q H, WANG M Y, ZHAO Y T. Reflecting loading from the obstacle for explosive wave in three-phase saturated soil (Ⅰ) [J]. Explosion and Shock Waves, 1994, 14(3): 225–230.
[3]	穆朝民, 任辉启, 李永池, 等. 爆炸波在高饱和度饱和土中传播规律的研究 [J]. 岩土力学, 2010, 31(3): 875–880. DOI: 10.16285/j.rsm.2010.03.051. MU C M, REN H Q, LI Y C, et al. Propagation laws of blast wave in saturated soils with high saturation degree [J]. Rock and Soil Mechanics, 2010, 31(3): 875–880. DOI: 10.16285/j.rsm.2010.03.051.
[4]	穆朝民, 齐娟, 辛凯. 高饱和度饱和土中结构对爆炸波反射规律的实验研究 [J]. 振动与冲击, 2010, 29(5): 224–227, 252–253. DOI: 10.13465/j.cnki.jvs.2010.05.045. MU C M, QI J, XIN K. The Free-field experimental study on blast wave propagation in saturated sand with high degree of saturation [J]. Journal of Projectiles, Rockets, Missiles and Guidance, 2010, 30(5): 87–86. DOI: 10.13465/j.cnki.jvs.2010.05.045.
[5]	穆朝民, 齐娟, 辛凯. 高饱和度饱和砂中爆炸波传播规律的自由场实验研究 [J]. 弹箭与制导学报, 2010, 30(5): 87–86,96. DOI: 10.15892/j.cnki.djzdxb.2010.05.001. MU C M, QI J, XIN K. The Free-field experimental study on blast wave propagation in saturated sand with high degree of saturation [J]. Journal of Projectiles, Rockets, Missiles and Guidance, 2010, 30(5): 87–86,96. DOI: 10.15892/j.cnki.djzdxb.2010.05.001.
[6]	穆朝民, 齐娟, 辛凯. 高饱和度饱和土中爆炸波的传播特性 [J]. 土木建筑与环境工程, 2010, 32(1): 18–23. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1674-4764.2010.01.004. MU C M, QI J, XIN K. Characteristics of blast wave propagation in saturated soil with high degree of saturation [J]. Journal of Civil, Architectural & Environmental Engineering, 2010, 32(1): 18–23. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1674-4764.2010.01.004.
[7]	COLE R H. Underwater explosions [M]. New Jersey: Princeton University Press, 1948.
[8]	王爱兴. 水下爆炸冲击波近区传播规律及防护方法研究 [D]. 武汉: 长江科学院, 2010: 13–33.
[9]	KEDRINSKII V K. Negative pressure profile in cavitation zone at underwater explosion near free surface [J]. Acta Astronaut, 1976, 3(7): 623–632.
[10]	赵凯. 分层防护层对爆炸波的衰减和弥散作用研究 [D]. 合肥: 中国科学技术大学, 2008: 19–35.
[11]	张涛, 庄铁栓, 伍俊, 等. 冲击波在不同物态介质界面传播的理论分析 [J]. 防护工程, 2023, 45(5): 28–35. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1674-1854.2023.05.005. ZHANG T, ZHUANG T S, WU J, et al. Theoretical analysis of shock wave propagation at different medium interfaces [J]. Protective Engineering, 2023, 45(5): 28–35. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1674-1854.2023.05.005.
[12]	WANG G H, ZHUANG S R, YU M, et al. Investigation of the shock wave propagation characteristics and cavitation effects of underwater explosion near boundaries [J]. Applied Ocean Research, 2014, 46: 40–53. DOI: 10.1016/j.apor.2014.02.003.
[13]	顾文彬, 叶序双, 张朋祥, 等. 浅层水中爆炸水底影响的试验研究 [J]. 解放军理工大学学报(自然科学版), 2001, 2(2): 55–58. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1009-3443.2001.02.013. GU W B, YE X S, ZHANG P X, et al. Experimental studies of bottom influence in shallow-layer water explosion [J]. Journal of PLA University of Science and Technology, 2001, 2(2): 55–58. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1009-3443.2001.02.013.
[14]	顾文彬, 阳天海, 叶序双, 等. 单个装药浅层水中沉底爆炸的数值模拟 [J]. 解放军理工大学学报(自然科学版), 2000, 1(3): 51–55. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1009-3443.2000.03.011. GU W B, YANG T H, YE X S, et al. Numerical simulation of single charge explosion on seabed in shallow water [J]. Journal of PLA University of Science and Technology, 2000, 1(3): 51–55. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1009-3443.2000.03.011.
[15]	顾文彬, 叶序双, 刘文华, 等. 界面对浅层水中爆炸冲击波峰值压力影响的研究 [J]. 解放军理工大学学报(自然科学版), 2001, 2(5): 61–63. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1009-3443.2001.05.015. GU W B, YE X S, LIU W H, et al. Peak pressure investigation of exploding wave influenced by interfaces in shallow -layer water [J]. Journal of PLA University of Science and Technology, 2001, 2(5): 61–63. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1009-3443.2001.05.015.
[16]	顾文彬, 马海洋, 唐勇, 等. 水底对浅水中装药爆炸效果的影响 [J]. 爆破, 2003, 20(4): 88–92. DOI: 10.3963/j.issn.1001-487X.2003.04.029. GU W B, MA H Y, TANG Y, et al. Influence of water bottom on the explosion effect of shallow-layer water charging [J]. Blasting, 2003, 20(4): 88–92. DOI: 10.3963/j.issn.1001-487X.2003.04.029.
[17]	顾文彬, 孙百连, 阳天海, 等. 浅层水中沉底爆炸冲击波相互作用数值模拟 [J]. 解放军理工大学学报(自然科学版), 2003, 4(6): 64–68. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1009-3443.2003.06.015. GU W B, SUN B L, YANG T H, et al. Numerical simulation of explosive shockwave interaction in shallow-layer water [J]. Journal of PLA University of Science and Technology, 2003, 4(6): 64–68. DOI: 10. 3969/j.issn.1009-3443.2003.06.015. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1009-3443.2003.06.015.
[18]	杨莉, 汪玉, 杜志鹏, 等. 沉底装药水下爆炸冲击波传播规律 [J]. 兵工学报, 2013, 34(1): 100–104. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1000-1093.2013.01.018. YANG L, WANG Y, DU Z P, et al. Research on shock wave propagation of underwater explosion of bottom charge [J]. Acta Armamentarii, 2013, 34(1): 100–104. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1000-1093.2013.01.018.
[19]	WARDLAW A B, LUTON J A. Fluid-structure interaction mechanisms for close-in explosions [J]. Shock and Vibration, 2015, 7(1): 265–275. DOI: 10.1155/2000/141934.
[20]	严泽臣, 岳松林, 邱艳宇, 等. 水下爆炸冲击波反射压力计算方法的改进 [J/OL]. 兵工学报, (2023-06-01)[2023-12-24]. DOI: 10.12382/bgxb.2022.1037. YAN Z C, YUE S L, QIU Y Y, et al. Improvement on the calculation method of shock wave reflected pressure in underwater explosion [J/OL]. Acta Armamentarii, (2023-06-01)[2023-12-24]. DOI: 10.12382/bgxb.2022.1037.
[21]	辛春亮等. TrueGrid和LS-DYNA动力学数值计算详解 [M]. 北京: 机械工业出版社, 2019: 251–260.
[22]	LS-DYNA keyword user's manual [Z]. LSTC, 2017.
[23]	文祝, 邱艳宇, 紫民, 等. 钙质砂的准一维应变压缩试验研究 [J]. 爆炸与冲击, 2019, 39(3): 033101. DOI: 10. 11883/bzycj-2018-0015. DOI: 10.11883/bzycj-2018-0015. WEN Z, QIU Y Y, ZI M, et al. Experimental study on quasi-one-dimensional strain compression of calcareous sand [J]. Explosion and Shock Waves, 2019, 39(3): 033101. DOI: 10. 11883/bzycj-2018-0015. DOI: 10.11883/bzycj-2018-0015.
[24]	ZAMYSHLYAEV B V, YAKOVLEV Y S. Dynamic loads in underwater explosion: AD 757183 [R]. Washington DC: Naval Intelligence Support Center, 1973.
[25]	张勇, 肖正明, 段浩, 等. 水下中远场爆炸冲击波作用下航行体表面动态响应分析 [J/OL]. 兵工学报, (2023-07-11)[2023-12-24]. DOI: 10.12382/bgxb.2023.0306. ZHANG Y, XIAO Z M, DUAN H, et al. Dynamic response analysis of vehicle surface under the action of underwater medium and far field explosion shock wave [J/OL]. Acta Armamentarii, (2023-07-11)[2023-12-24]. DOI: 10.12382/bgxb.2023.0306.
[26]	张轶凡, 刘亮涛, 王金相, 等. 水下爆炸冲击波和气泡载荷对典型圆柱壳结构的毁伤特性 [J]. 兵工学报, 2023, 44(2): 345–359. DOI: 10.12382/bgxb.2021.0598. ZHANG Y F, LIU L T, WANG J X, et al. Damage Characteristics of underwater explosion shock wave and bubble load on typical cylindrical shell structure [J]. Acta Armamentarii, 2023, 44(2): 345–359. DOI: 10.12382/bgxb.2021.0598.
[27]	李晓杰, 张程娇, 王小红, 等. 水的状态方程对水下爆炸影响的研究 [J]. 工程力学, 2014, 31(8): 46–52. DOI: 10.6052/j.issn.1000-4750.2013.03.0180. LI X J, ZHANG C J, WANG X H, et al. Numerical study on the effect of equations of state of water on underwater explosions [J]. Engineering Mechanics, 2014, 31(8): 46–52. DOI: 10.6052/j.issn.1000-4750.2013.03.0180.