摘要:
掌握火灾环境高压储氢气瓶爆炸能量产生、转化及耗散机制对于气瓶爆炸事故后果分析至关重要。本研究以充装氢气和氮气的6.8L-30MPa III型高压气瓶燃爆引发试验为基础,开展气瓶极限承压判据、燃爆动力学行为及威力评估研究。结果表明:火灾可显著削弱气瓶承压性能,气瓶临界爆破压力由常温时的125.1MPa降至火灾时的46.8MPa,承压性能降幅约62.6%。储氢气瓶爆炸呈现典型的物理-化学复合特征,产生直径~9m的火球,冲击波峰值压力在距离爆源2m处达882.47kPa,正压持续时间为168.11ms;相同位置处氮气瓶爆炸冲击波峰值为59.42kPa,正压持续2.17ms,爆炸威力远小于氢气瓶。本研究探讨了开敞环境下氢气瓶与氮气瓶爆炸能量转化路径,建立了开敞环境下储氢气瓶爆炸威力评估方法,研究结果对完善高压储氢气瓶爆炸事故风险评估具有参考价值。
Abstract:
It’s significant to understand the generation, transformation, and dissipation mechanism of energy of high pressure tanks in fire scenarios for the consequence assessment of explosion accidents. This study revealed the differences properties between high-pressure hydrogen storage tanks and nitrogen tanks under fire environments through comparative experiments. Fire tests were conducted using 6.8L - 30MPa type III tanks. The results show that fire can significantly weaken the pressure-bearing performance of the tanks, with the critical bursting pressure decreasing from 125.1 MPa at room temperature to 46.8 MPa in fire conditions (a reduction of 62.6%). The explosion of hydrogen tanks exhibited typical physical-chemical composite characteristics, forming a fireball with a diameter of 9 m. The peak shockwave pressure at a distance of 2 m reached 882.47 kPa, and the positive pressure duration was 168.11 ms. In contrast, nitrogen tanks only undergo physical explosions, with a peak shockwave pressure of 59.42 kPa and a positive pressure duration of only 2.17 ms. This study analyzed the energy conversion pathways during explosions of high-compressed gas tanks (H2 and N2) in open environments. A blast power assessment method for hydrogen storage cylinder explosions in unconfined spaces was developed. First, the physical explosion energy was calculated by determining the basic data such as the critical burst pressure, nominal volume and initial filling pressure of the high pressure tanks and comparing the applicability of five mechanical energy calculation models. Secondly, the mass of hydrogen was determined using the actual gas equation, and the total chemical explosion energy was derived by integrating the heat of combustion value of hydrogen. Finally, considering the contribution of mechanical and chemical energy to the shock wave intensity, the total explosion energy was converted into shock wave energy by the open space energy correction factor, followed by quantitative analysis and error verification with measured data. The research findings could provide crucial support for enhancing risk assessment of explosion accidents involving high-pressure hydrogen storage devices.